Correction: Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and low-dose dexamethasone in lenalidomide-refractory and proteasome inhibitor-exposed myeloma.

Following the publication of this article, the authors noted that the pomalidomide dose for the additional SC cohort in Fig. 1 was incorrectly listed. The correct dose for pomalidomide in the additional SC cohort should be the maximum tolerated dose of 4 mg/day, not 2 mg/day as listed in the original Fig. 1. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused.

Early relapse after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation remains a poor prognostic factor in multiple myeloma but outcomes have improved over time.

Duration of initial disease response remains a strong prognostic factor in multiple myeloma (MM) particularly for upfront autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT) recipients. We hypothesized that new drug classes and combinations employed prior to AHCT as well as after post-AHCT relapse may have changed the natural history of MM in this population. We analyzed the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database to track overall survival (OS) of MM patients receiving single AHCT within 12 months after diagnosis (N=3256) and relapsing early post-AHCT (<24 months), and to identify factors predicting for early vs late relapses (24-48 months post-AHCT). Over three periods (2001-2004, 2005-2008, 2009-2013), patient characteristics were balanced except for lower proportion of Stage III, higher likelihood of one induction therapy with novel triplets and higher rates of planned post-AHCT maintenance over time. The proportion of patients relapsing early was stable over time at 35-38%. Factors reducing risk of early relapse included lower stage, chemosensitivity, transplant after 2008 and post-AHCT maintenance. Shorter post-relapse OS was associated with early relapse, IgA MM, Karnofsky <90, stage III, >1 line of induction and lack of maintenance. Post-AHCT early relapse remains a poor prognostic factor, even though outcomes have improved over time.

International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma.

New uniform response criteria are required to adequately assess clinical outcomes in myeloma. The European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant/International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry criteria have been expanded, clarified and updated to provide a new comprehensive evaluation system. Categories for stringent complete response and very good partial response are added. The serum free light-chain assay is included to allow evaluation of patients with oligo-secretory disease. Inconsistencies in prior criteria are clarified making confirmation of response and disease progression easier to perform. Emphasis is placed upon time to event and duration of response as critical end points. The requirements necessary to use overall survival duration as the ultimate end point are discussed. It is anticipated that the International Response Criteria for multiple myeloma will be widely used in future clinical trials of myeloma.

Pomalidomide, bortezomib and low-dose dexamethasone in lenalidomide-refractory and proteasome inhibitor-exposed myeloma.

This phase 1 dose-escalation study evaluated pomalidomide, bortezomib (subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV)) and low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) in lenalidomide-refractory and proteasome inhibitor-exposed relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In 21-day cycles, patients received pomalidomide (1-4 mg days 1-14), bortezomib (1-1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8 and 11 for cycles 1-8; days 1 and 8 for cycle ⩾9) and LoDEX. Primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Thirty-four patients enrolled: 12 during escalation, 10 in the MTD IV bortezomib cohort and 12 in the MTD SC bortezomib cohort. Patients received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy; 97% bortezomib exposed. With no dose-limiting toxicities, MTD was defined as the maximum planned dose: pomalidomide 4 mg, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 and LoDEX. All patients discontinued treatment by data cutoff (2 April 2015). The most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (44%) and thrombocytopenia (26%), which occurred more frequently with IV than SC bortezomib. No grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy or deep vein thrombosis was reported. Overall response rate was 65%. Median duration of response was 7.4 months. Pomalidomide, bortezomib and LoDEX was well tolerated and effective in lenalidomide-refractory and bortezomib-exposed patients with RRMM.

Cure of multiple myeloma -- more hype, less reality.

Randomized studies have firmly established the role of autologous transplant as initial therapy in multiple myeloma (MM). Indeed, MM has emerged as the commonest indication for autologous SCT in North America. The conceptual basis for high-dose therapy is the goal of complete remission (CR) through steep reduction in tumor burden affected by single and tandem transplants. Careful analysis of the data challenges the notion of CR as a surrogate to success. Intrinsically aggressive MM, defined by known unfavorable biologic risk factors, overrides the benefit of CR. In contrast, subgroups of patients with favorable biological risk factors may achieve prolonged survival, often without ever achieving CR. Unfortunately, even with tandem transplants, there is no plateau in survival curves. To this end, sequential autologous followed by nonmyeloablative allotransplants are a novel attempt at 'curing' myeloma, but the results thus far have failed to show a definite plateau in survival. Given the improvements in supportive care and concomitant reduction in transplant-related mortality, conventional myeloablative allogeneic transplants need to be re-examined as an option in high-risk aggressive myeloma. At the same time, novel antimyeloma therapies, newer risk stratification and staging tools are transforming the treatment algorithm. We examine the changing role of transplantation in myeloma in the context of novel drug therapy, biologic risk stratification and improving supportive care while arguing that the current 'one size fits all' transplant approaches are far from a cure.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: is there a future?

Despite remarkable progress in survival with the availability of novel agents, an overwhelming majority of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) relapse and the curability of MM remains limited. Genetically defined high-risk MM represents a subgroup with an aggressive disease course despite novel agents. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a potentially curative option in MM that has several advantages including a tumor-free graft, and the potential for sustained immune-mediated disease control. However, historically high treatment-related mortality (TRM) and conflicting reports from prospective studies in the United States and European Union have limited the utilization of this modality. Meanwhile, newer preparative regimens, planned maintenance strategies and improvements in supportive care have led to a decline in TRM and better survival in recent years. The allo-SCT platform also provides additional options of immunotherapy at relapse including donor lymphocyte infusions, immunomodulatory drug maintenance and withdrawal of immune suppression. In this article, we provide an in-depth review of literature for allo-SCT and other immunotherapy options, as well as the authors' approach to using allo-SCT in MM.

Outcome with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone followed by early autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma on the ECOG-ACRIN E4A03 randomized clinical trial: long-term follow-up.

In Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-ACRIN E4A03, on completion of four cycles of therapy, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients had the option of proceeding to autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (ASCT) or continuing on their assigned therapy lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Ld) or lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone (LD). This landmark analysis compared the outcome of 431 patients surviving their first four cycles of therapy pursuing early ASCT to those continuing on their assigned therapy. Survival distributions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank test. Ninety patients (21%) opted for early ASCT. The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year survival probability estimates were higher for early ASCT versus no early ASCT at 99, 93, 91, 85 and 80% versus 94, 84, 75, 65 and 57%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) in the early versus no early ASCT group was not reached (NR) versus 5.78 years. In patients <65 years of age, median OS in the early versus no early ASCT groups was NR in both, hazard ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval: (0.50, 0.25). In patients ⩾65 years of age, median OS in the early versus no early ASCT was NR versus 5.11 years. ASCT dropped out of statistical significance (P=0.080). Patients opting for ASCT after induction Ld/LD had a higher survival probability and improvement in OS regardless of dexamethasone dose density.

High-dose melphalan with autotransplantation for refractory multiple myeloma: results of a Southwest Oncology Group phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate high-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with refractory multiple myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multiple myeloma patients with alkylating agent or vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone-refractory disease were eligible for the phase II multi-institutional Southwest Oncology Group trial S8993. Patients up to age 70 years were enrolled between April 15, 1991, and May 1, 1996. Patients without prior stem-cell collection were primed with high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CTX; 6 g/m(2)) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. After stem-cell procurement, patients received melphalan 200 mg/m(2) with autologous transplantation. Upon recovery from melphalan, patients were to receive interferon alfa-2b until relapse. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled onto S8993; five were ineligible and one received no therapy. Of the 66 assessable patients, 56 patients underwent the transplant procedure; 54 were assessable for response and 56 for toxicity. The response to HD-CTX (n = 37) included three complete remissions (CRs; 8%) and five partial remissions (PR; 14%); response to melphalan (n = 54) included 16 CRs (30%) and 19 PRs (35%), for an overall CR and >/= PR (n = 66; intent-to-treat) of 27% and 58%, respectively. Toxicities included six treatment-related deaths: two during HD-CTX and four during transplantation. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) durations on an intent-to-treat basis from transplant registration was 11 months and 19 months (95% confidence interval, 14 to 29 months), respectively. The 3-year actuarial PFS and OS rates were 25% and 31%, respectively. CONCLUSION: High-dose therapy with melphalan 200 mg/m(2) is feasible with high response rates (58% overall) and an OS of 19 months in patients with refractory multiple myeloma.

Comparable engraftment kinetics following peripheral-blood stem-cell infusion mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without cyclophosphamide in multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE: To compare, in the setting of tandem autotransplantations for multiple myeloma (MM), two established methods of peripheral-blood stem-cell (PBSC) procurement with chemotherapy or hematopoietic growth factor alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1994 and July 1995, 44 patients with MM were randomized to PBSC mobilization with either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 16 microg/kg (group 1; n = 22) or high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDCTX) 6 g/m2 plus G-CSF 5 microg/kg (group 2; n = 22). All 44 patients received melphalan 200 mg/m2 with their first autograft and 32 patients proceeded to a second transplantation. RESULTS: Group 2 required a significantly longer time interval for completion of PBSC collection than group 1 (median, 22 v 8 days; P = .0001), greater frequency of hospitalization (100% v 32%; P = .0001), and increased transfusion of platelets (86% v 18%; P = .0001) and packed RBCs (86% v 55%; P = .02). Likewise, the incidence of fever and pneumonia/sepsis were higher in group 2 (P = .02 and P = .04, respectively). Surprisingly, despite greater CD34 cell quantities infused in group 2, median recovery times of granulocytes (both > 500/microL and 2,500/microL) and platelets (both > 50,000/microL and > 100,000/microL) were similar (all P > .7). Posttransplant toxicities were also similar. CONCLUSION: Compared with HDCTX plus G-CSF, high-dose G-CSF alone is associated with lower morbidity, shorter duration of PBSC mobilization, and comparable hematopoietic recovery after transplantation, which should result in significant cost reduction. Considering the relatively limited antitumor activity of HDCTX (10% with > or = 50% tumor cytoreduction), PBSC mobilization with HDCTX should be limited to selected patients with persistent MM despite induction chemotherapy.

The implication of follicular lymphoma patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation from donors carrying t(14;18)-positive cells.

We performed real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) in peripheral blood (PB) and/or bone marrow (BM) samples collected pre- and post transplant from 23 recipient-donor pairs receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) for follicular lymphoma (FL). Of 23 donors, 11 had a PB and/or BM sample positive for t(14;18) (BCL2/IGH fusion) at low levels (

Outcome of unrelated transplants in patients with multiple myeloma.

The outcome of patients with multiple myeloma treated with standard therapy is disappointing, with a historical median survival of 3 years. Although high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant has improved treatment outcomes, cure is unlikely. Allogeneic transplant provides a tumor-free graft and a graft-versus-myeloma effect. However, only a minority of patients has a compatible sibling donor. Unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplant is another option. We analyzed the outcome of patients who received an unrelated bone marrow transplant facilitated by the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP). Between 1989 and 2000, 71 patients received a myeloablative unrelated transplant for multiple myeloma; 70 patients consented for this analysis. The median recipient age was 44 years. A total of 31% of patients had received a prior autologous transplant. In all, 91% of patients engrafted. The 3-year cumulative incidence estimate of relapse was 34+/-10%. The incidence of Grade II-IV GVHD was 47%. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for overall survival at 5 years was 9+/-7%. The 100-day treatment-related mortality was 42%. In multivariate analysis, only a male donor was a significant predictor for survival. Better strategies are needed to treat patients with multiple myeloma, perhaps by using less-toxic, nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens.

Safety of autotransplants with high-dose melphalan in renal failure: a pharmacokinetic and toxicity study.

Melphalan (MEL) is probably the most effective chemotherapeutic agent in multiple myeloma (MM) with a clear dose-response effect. It can be escalated without excessive toxicity to 200 mg/m2, a myeloablative dose requiring hematopoietic stem cell support. Patients with marked renal insufficiency, not an infrequent finding in MM, have either received reduced doses or have been excluded from therapy with high-dose MEL. A prospective study was performed to evaluate the relationship between MEL pharmacokinetics and renal function in 20 patients with MM. Six patients had severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance, <40 ml/min), including five on chronic hemodialysis. Three patients with severe renal impairment first received a low test dose of MEL (16 mg/m2) for pharmacokinetic studies. All patients received 200 mg/m2 MEL divided into two equal doses of 100 mg/m2 i.v. on 2 consecutive days, followed by the administration of peripheral blood stem cells. MEL pharmacokinetics, performed after the first dose of 100 mg/m2, was not adversely affected by impaired renal function. The median half-life (t1/2), area under the concentration curve, and clearance of MEL were 1.1 h, 5.5 mg h/liter, and 27.5 liter/h, respectively, in patients with a creatinine clearance of <40 ml/min compared to 1.9, 7.9, and 23.6 for the others. Renal insufficiency also had no apparent negative impact on the quality of peripheral blood stem cell collections and did not adversely affect posttransplant engraftment, transfusion requirements, incidence of severe mucositis, or overall survival. However, it was associated with longer durations of fever (P = 0. 0005) and hospitalization (P = 0.004). No transplant-related deaths were observed. Plasma t1/2 and area under the concentration curve differed by a factor of 10 and MEL clearance by a factor of 5 between patients with the lowest and highest values. These large variations in MEL elimination could not be explained by patient or disease characteristics. We conclude that renal failure does not require dose reduction of MEL in autologous transplant. Due to marked interindividual variation in MEL elimination, pharmacokinetically guided dosing as well as cellular pharmacology studies may be helpful in achieving a more uniform antitumor effect.

Diffuse large-cell lymphoma in an adult with Schönlein-Henoch purpura.

Schönlein-Henoch purpura is an IgA-mediated immune complex vasculitis of unknown cause which is characterized by nonthrombocytopenic purpura, arthralgias, abdominal pain, angioedema, and glomerulonephritis. It most commonly occurs in children and usually follows a benign course. Associated malignancies are rarely reported. A number of treatment regimens have been used, including corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. This is a case report of lymphoma in an adult with Schönlein-Henoch purpura in the absence of renal involvement.

Contribution of chemotherapy mobilization to disease control in multiple myeloma treated with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation.

In patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT), peripheral blood progenitor cells may be collected following mobilization with growth factor alone (GF) or cytotoxic chemotherapy plus GF (CC+GF). It is uncertain whether the method of mobilization affects post-transplant outcomes. We compared these mobilization strategies in a retrospective analysis of 968 patients with MM from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database who received an auto-HCT in the US and Canada between 2007 and 2012. The kinetics of neutrophil engraftment (⩾0.5 × 10(9)/L) was similar between groups (13 vs 13 days, P=0.69) while platelet engraftment (⩾20 × 10(9)/L) was slightly faster with CC+GF (19 vs 18 days, P=0.006). Adjusted 3-year PFS was 43% (95% confidence interval (CI) 38-48) in GF and 40% (95% CI 35-45) in CC+GF, P=0.33. Adjusted 3-year OS was 82% (95% CI 78-86) vs 80% (95% CI 75-84), P=0.43 and adjusted 5-year OS was 62% (95% CI 54-68) vs 60% (95% CI 52-67), P=0.76, for GF and CC+GF, respectively. We conclude that MM patients undergoing auto-HCT have similar outcomes irrespective of the method of mobilization and found no evidence that the addition of chemotherapy to mobilization contributes to disease control.

Adoptive immunotherapy for leukemia: donor lymphocytes transduced with the herpes simplex thymidine kinase gene for remission induction. HGTRI 0103.

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of allogenic donor lymphocyte infusions in patients who have relapsed hematologic malignancies after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Donor lymphocyte transfusions have resulted in the cure of some patients with relapsed leukemia or lymphoproliferative disorder after allogeneic BMT, but has been complicated by the development of graft versus host disease (GvHD). We hypothesize that a retroviral vector containing the Herpes simplex thymidine kinase (HStk) gene will allow for retention of the anti-leukemia response of transfused donor lymphocytes while allowing for the adverse effects of GVHD to be mitigated. Patients with relapsed hematologic malignancies after allogeneic BMT will be infused with ex vivo gene modified donor lymphocytes. The Herpes Simplex thymidine kinase (HStk) gene will be transduced into the cells ex vivo using LTKOSN. 1 vector supernate. Insertion of the HStk gene into lymphocytes confers a sensitivity to the anti-herpes drug ganciclovir (GCV). This selective destruction of donor lymphocytes in situ will be used to abrogate the effect of graft versus host disease, if it develops.

Phase I study for poor-prognosis lymphoma: augmentation of the "BEAM" regimen with escalating dose melphalan using amifostine cytoprotection and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation--a preliminary report.

We and others have previously shown that the use of amifostine (Ethyol; MedImmune Inc, Gaithersburg, MD) can ameliorate certain regimen-related toxicities of high-dose melphalan (HD-MEL) in the autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant setting. Our recent experience indicated that the maximum tolerated dose of HD-MEL plus autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant could be increased from approximately 200 mg/m2 to at least 280 mg/m2 with amifostine. Although a dose-limiting toxicity was not clearly identified, atrial fibrillation was noted in several patients. Phase II trials using this regimen have been reported in lymphoma and myeloma. Nonetheless, it is unlikely that single agent therapy, regardless of dose, will be highly curative in advanced hematologic malignancy. Thus, we used amifostine to permit dose escalation of HD-MEL within the BEAM (BCNU/etoposide/arabinosylcytosine/HD-MEL) combination chemotherapy regimen before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant in selected patients with lymphoma. Patient entry at the starting dose (ie, HD-MEL 140 mg/m2) has been completed without the development of severe regimen-related toxicities. This trial is ongoing.

Salvage therapy for multiple myeloma: the University of Arkansas experience.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize a spectrum of salvage regimens for multiple myeloma (MM) developed during the past decade. DESIGN: We reviewed the experience at the University of Arkansas in the management of patients with MM who failed to achieve remission ("primary unresponsive") or had a relapse despite myelosuppressive doses of chemotherapy ("resistant relapse"). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Results with use of the various chemotherapeutic protocols are presented, and multivariate regression analysis was applied to determine the independent contributions of certain factors toward event-free and overall survival. RESULTS: The VAD regimen (vincristine sulfate, Adriamycin [doxorubicin hydrochloride], and dexamethasone) yielded responses in 29% of previously unresponsive and 46% of relapsed cases of MM, in comparison with 25% and 21%, respectively, with use of dexamethasone only. Responses occurred more frequently when tumor cell RNA content was high, tumor burden was low, and duration of drug resistance was less than 1 year. The duration of survival in patients who received high doses of melphalan was decreased in those with increased serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase. EDAP (etoposide, dexamethasone, ara-C, and cisplatin) produced 75% or more tumor cytoreduction in 8 of 20 patients. Overall in patients with an increasing number of adverse factors, response rates and survival decreased progressively with less intensive therapy but were unaffected when more intensive therapy was used. In the multivariate analysis, the most important features for extended survival were a low beta 2-microglobulin level before transplantation and application of two bone marrow transplants within 6 months. CONCLUSION: Variables relative to the patient's overall medical condition, prior treatment, characteristics of MM at diagnosis, and response history should be carefully assessed to determine a plan for salvage therapy that will maximize the opportunity for sustained remission and survival.

Engraftment syndrome after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant supported by granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF).

The engraftment syndrome (ES) is a phenomenon observed in some patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT). ES is characterized by fever, rash, capillary leak, and pulmonary infiltrates occurring at the onset of engraftment. Prior studies have suggested that the administration of hematopoietic growth factors post-transplant results in the increased frequency of ES. However, the relative contribution of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) vs granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to the development of ES remains unknown. A total of 152 consecutive patients who were treated with high-dose chemotherapy and AHSCT supported by either G-CSF or GM-CSF were analyzed retrospectively. In all, 20 patients developed ES, an incidence of 13%. ES was seen more frequently in patients who received GM-CSF (GM-CSF 24% vs G-CSF 4%, p=0.0001). The highest incidence of ES was observed in breast cancer patients (42% of breast cancer patients; 70% of all ES cases). Comparison of the incidence of ES by the priming regimen used comprising either of the growth factors revealed no significant association (p=0.8224). This study demonstrates that the incidence of ES is higher using GM-CSF, particularly in patients with breast cancer. It suggests that it might be advantageous to administer only G-CSF in breast cancer patients undergoing AHSCT to reduce ES-related morbidity.

Controversy in multiple myeloma transplants: tandem autotransplants and mini-allografts.

Autologous stem cell transplantation appears to enhance outcome in multiple myeloma patients. To improve upon these results, various groups have utilized tandem autografts, as well as used reduced-conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation. These two approaches, discussed herein, have been promising. Inherent patient selection, however, appears to play a role and much of the data have not yet been subjected to peer-review scrutiny. At present, these strategies remain investigational and cannot be considered the standard-of-care for multiple myeloma patients.

Melphalan-associated pulmonary toxicity following high-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Melphalan can rarely cause interstitial pneumonitis and fibrosis. Although it has been reported previously in patients after conventional doses, we report four cases developing diffuse interstitial pneumonitis (DIP) after high-dose melphalan-based therapy. In a 3-year period, four of 57 (7%) consecutive patients undergoing high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m2; MEL 200) were identified with DIP. Two patients who were heavily pre-treated with alkylators developed progressive respiratory failure despite high-dose steroids and eventually died. The other two patients previously treated with vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone (VAD) improved dramatically on high-dose steroids with complete resolution of their pneumonitis. Melphalan should be added to the growing list of alkylators causing pulmonary toxicity.