Decreased efficacy of twice-weekly intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone on vulvovaginal atrophy.

OBJECTIVE: While daily intravaginal administration of 0.50% (6.5 mg) dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA, prasterone) for 12 weeks has shown clinically and statistically significant effects on moderate to severe (MS) dyspareunia as the most bothersome symptom (MBS), the present study analyzes the effect of a reduced dosing regimen on MBS vaginal dryness. METHOD: Daily intravaginal 0.50% prasterone for 2 weeks followed by twice weekly for 10 weeks versus placebo. RESULTS: Maximal beneficial changes in vaginal parabasal and superficial cells and pH were observed at 2 weeks as observed for intravaginal 10 µg estradiol (E2). This was followed by a decrease or lack of efficacy improvement after switching to twice-weekly dosing. The decrease in percentage of parabasal cells, increase in percentage of superficial cells and decrease in vaginal pH were all highly significant (p < 0.0001 to 0.0002 over placebo) at 12 weeks. In parallel, the statistical significance over placebo (p value) on MBS vaginal dryness at 6 weeks was 0.09 followed by an increase to 0.198 at 12 weeks. For MBS dyspareunia, the p value of 0.008 at 6 weeks was followed by a p value of 0.077 at 12 weeks, thus illustrating a decrease of efficacy at the lower dosing regimen. The improvements of vaginal secretions, color, epithelial integrity and epithelial surface thickness were observed at a p value < 0.01 or 0.05 over placebo at 2 weeks, with a similar or loss of statistical difference compared to placebo at later time intervals. No significant adverse event was observed. Vaginal discharge related to the melting of Witepsol was reported in 1.8% of subjects. CONCLUSION: The present data show that daily dosing with 0.50% DHEA for 2 weeks followed by twice-weekly dosing is a suboptimal treatment of the symptoms/signs of vulvovaginal atrophy resulting from a substantial loss of the efficacy achieved at daily dosing.

Evaluation of contraceptive efficacy and cycle control of a transdermal contraceptive patch vs an oral contraceptive: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Oral contraceptive (OC) pills are effective, but poor compliance increases rates of pregnancy during treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare the contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, compliance, and safety of a transdermal contraceptive patch and an OC. DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial conducted October 1997 to June 1999. SETTING: Forty-five clinics in the United States and Canada. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1417 healthy adult women of child-bearing potential. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to receive a transdermal contraceptive patch (n = 812) vs an OC (n = 605) for 6 or 13 cycles. Patch treatment consisted of application of 3 consecutive 7-day patches followed by 1 patch-free week. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall and method-failure Pearl Indexes (number of pregnancies/100 person-years of use) and life-table estimates of the probability of pregnancy were calculated. Cycle control, compliance, patch adhesion, and adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS: Overall and method-failure Pearl Indexes were numerically lower with the patch (1.24 and 0.99, respectively) vs the OC (2.18 and 1.25, respectively); this difference was not statistically significant (P =.57 and.80, respectively). The incidence of breakthrough bleeding and/or spotting was significantly higher only in the first 2 cycles in the patch group, but the incidence of breakthrough bleeding alone was comparable between treatments in all cycles. The mean proportion of participants' cycles with perfect compliance was 88.2% (811 total participants, 5141 total cycles) with the patch and 77.7% (605 total participants, 4134 total cycles) with the OC (P <.001). Only 1.8% (300/16 673) of patches completely detached. Both treatments were similarly well tolerated; however, application site reactions, breast discomfort, and dysmenorrhea were significantly more common in the patch group. CONCLUSION: The contraceptive patch is comparable to a combination OC in contraceptive efficacy and cycle control. Compliance was better with the weekly contraceptive patch than with the OC.