[Guideline "Legal evaluation after closed brain injury in adulthood"]. / Leitlinie "Begutachtung nach gedecktem Schädel-Hirntrauma im Erwachsenenalter".

In 2005 and 2013, the "Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurowissenschaftliche Begutachtung" (German Society for Neuroscientific Evaluation) together with other societies developed and consented guidelines fort the legal evaluation of patients with closed head injuries and published them trough the National Working Group of Scientific Medical Societies and in this journal. Five years later, a revision was necessary, this was developed on the higher S2 k level of consent through a Delphi conference.

Outcome of neurological early rehabilitation patients carrying multi-drug resistant bacteria: results from a German multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: Colonization or infection with multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria is considered detrimental to the outcome of neurological and neurosurgical early rehabilitation patients. METHODS: In a German multi-center study, 754 neurological early rehabilitation patients were enrolled and and reviewed in respect to MDR status, length of stay (LOS) and the following outcome variables: Barthel Index (BI), Early Rehabilitation Index (ERI), Glasgow Outcome Score Extended (GOSE), Coma Remission Scale (CRS), Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC). RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 68.0 ± 14.8 years. Upon admission, the following prevalence for MDRs was observed: MRSA (methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus) 7.0% (53/754), ESBL- (extended spectrum beta-lactamase) producing bacteria strains 12.6% (95/754), VRE (vancomycin resistant enterococci) 2.8% (21/754). Patients colonized or infected with MDR bacteria (MDR+) were significantly more frequently diagnosed with a critical illness polyneuropathy - CIP - than non-colonized (MDR-) patients: 29.0% vs. 14.8%. In addition, they were more frequently mechanically ventilated (MDR+: 55/138, 39.9%; MDR- 137/616, 22.2%). MDR+ patients were referred to rehabilitation earlier, had a longer LOS in early rehabilitation, lower BI on admission and at discharge, lower ERI on admission and lower CRS at discharge than MDR- patients. There was a highly significant correlation of the BI upon admission with the BI at discharge (rs = 0.492, p < 0.001). GOSE at discharge differed significantly between both groups (χ 2-test, p < 0.01). Perhaps of greatest importance, mortality among MDR+ was higher in comparison to MDR- (18.1% vs. 7.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of neurological early rehabilitation patients colonized or infected with MDR bacteria including MRSA or ESBL producing strains is significantly poorer than by non-colonized patients. There is some evidence that the poor outcome could be related to the higher morbidity and lower functional status upon admission.

[Prolonged weaning during early neurological and neurosurgical rehabilitation : S2k guideline published by the Weaning Committee of the German Neurorehabilitation Society (DGNR)]. / Prolongiertes Weaning in der neurologisch-neurochirurgischen Frührehabilitation : S2k-Leitlinie herausgegeben von der Weaning-Kommission der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurorehabilitation e. V. (DGNR).

Prolonged weaning of patients with neurological or neurosurgery disorders is associated with specific characteristics, which are taken into account by the German Society for Neurorehabilitation (DGNR) in its own guideline. The current S2k guideline of the German Society for Pneumology and Respiratory Medicine is referred to explicitly with regard to definitions (e.g., weaning and weaning failure), weaning categories, pathophysiology of weaning failure, and general weaning strategies. In early neurological and neurosurgery rehabilitation, patients with central of respiratory regulation disturbances (e.g., cerebral stem lesions), swallowing disturbances (neurogenic dysphagia), neuromuscular problems (e.g., critical illness polyneuropathy, Guillain-Barre syndrome, paraplegia, Myasthenia gravis) and/or cognitive disturbances (e.g., disturbed consciousness and vigilance disorders, severe communication disorders), whose care during the weaning of ventilation requires, in addition to intensive medical competence, neurological or neurosurgical and neurorehabilitation expertise. In Germany, this competence is present in centers of early neurological and neurosurgery rehabilitation, as a hospital treatment. The guideline is based on a systematic search of guideline databases and MEDLINE. Consensus was established by means of a nominal group process and Delphi procedure moderated by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF). In the present guideline of the DGNR, the special structural and substantive characteristics of early neurological and neurosurgery rehabilitation and existing studies on weaning in early rehabilitation facilities are examined.Addressees of the guideline are neurologists, neurosurgeons, anesthesiologists, palliative physicians, speech therapists, intensive care staff, ergotherapists, physiotherapists, and neuropsychologists. In addition, this guideline is intended to provide information to specialists for physical medicine and rehabilitation (PMR), pneumologists, internists, respiratory therapists, the German Medical Service of Health Insurance Funds (MDK) and the German Association of Health Insurance Funds (MDS). The main goal of this guideline is to convey the current knowledge on the subject of "Prolonged weaning in early neurological and neurosurgery rehabilitation".

[Course of rehabilitation in early neurological/neurosurgical rehabilitation. Results of a 2014 multi-center evaluation in Germany]. / Rehabilitationsverlauf von Patienten in der neurologisch-neurochirurgischen Frührehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, neurological-neurosurgical early rehabilitation is well established in the treatment of severe neurological diseases. To develop quality standards, knowledge of the current rehabilitation course is required. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the course of rehabilitation from patients in an early neurological/neurosurgical rehabilitation program in 16 centers from 10 German states. The odds for a good or poor outcome were investigated using a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: Seven hundred and fifty-four patients were included in the study. The average age of the patients was 68 ± 15 years. Of the patients studied, 26 % were on mechanical ventilation commencing their neurological rehabilitation. The average duration of stay was 56 ± 51 days. Weaning rate from mechanical ventilation was 65 % and the rate of weaning from tracheal cannula was 54 %. Mean improvement in the Barthel Index of 17 points, significant reduction of dysphagia (from 62 to 30 %) and depended walking (from 99 to 82 %), and the achievement of phase C (the next stage of rehabilitation) in 38 % can still be counted as signs of successful rehabilitation. During their course of stay, near 10 % of the patients died. Of these, 67 % received solely palliative care. In the multivariate logistic models, the absence of the factor "necessity for mechanical ventilation on admission" (odds ratio 0.61; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.42 … 0.89) increased the chance for good outcome and the presence of this factor the risk of dying with an odds ratio of 8.07 (95 % CI: 4.54-14.34). DISCUSSION: In spite of the severity of neurological deficits, significant functional progress has been made. These results could be interpret as positive proof of the efficacy of neurological/neurosurgical early rehabilitation programs.

[The Value of Neuropsychological Legal Evaluations]. / Der Stellenwert neuropsychologischer Zusatzgutachten.

In the context of neurological assessment, neuropsychological deficits, in particular of attention and memory functions, usually require additional neuropsychological evaluation. Clinical neuropsychology also has at its disposal an inventory of validated and standardized tests for assessing symptom validity. Procedure, test selection, quality criteria and limitations of neuropsychological expert medical evaluations are presented. Independent expert evaluations should be conducted by a qualified clinical neuropsychologist.

[Catalogues of therapeutic nursing activities in neurological early rehabilitation]. / Leistungskataloge der aktivierend-therapeutischen Pflege in der neurologischen Frührehabilitation.

Under the German DRG-system, hospital-based rehabilitation of still critically ill patients becomes increasingly important. The code for early neurological rehabilitation in the DRG-system's (Diagnosis Related Groups) list of operations and procedures requires an average daily therapeutic intensity of 300 min, part of which is being contributed by therapeutic nursing. As therapeutic aspects are integrated in other nursing activities, it is difficult to separate its time consumption. This problem is pragmatically resolved by catalogues of therapeutic nursing activities which assign plausible amounts of therapeutic minutes to each activity. The 4 catalogues that are used most often are described and compared. Nursing science has not focused yet on therapeutic nursing.

[The German guideline "legal evaluation after closed head injury"]. / Die leitlinie "begutachtung nach gedecktem schädel-hirntrauma".

In 2005, the "Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurowissenschaftliche Begutachtung" (German Society for Neuroscientific Legal Evaluation) together with other Societies published a guideline for the legal evaluation of patients with closed head injuries. Meanwhile, not only scientific progress in imaging techniques but also in other fields such as neuropsychology has necessitated a revision, which is presented here. In the mean time, the handling of guidelines has been systematised in Germany so that a registration with the Cooperation of German Medical Learned Societies is applied for and publication in the German Guideline Registry is expected.

[Prioritization: the clinical perspective]. / Priorisierung: Klinische Perspektive.

It is being discussed how prioritization affects access to rehabilitation and rehabilitation practice. Multiprofessional in-patient rehabilitation is being challenged to produce proofs of its efficiency in comparison to out-patient oligo- and monoprofessional interventions. In clinical practice, prioritization among different interventions is determined by ICF orientation and available or affordable staffing resources.

[Elzach concept and intervention catalogue of nursing therapy in postacute neurological rehabilitation within the German DRG System]. / Elzacher Konzept und Leistungskatalog der therapeutischen Pflege in der neurologischen Frührehabilitation (Phase B).

The German DRG system defines specialized treatments through a set of minimal requirements, the documentation of which and its assessment by external specialists of the medical service of the statutory health insurance causing frictions between rehabilitation hospitals and the medical service. It is especially problematic to make a clear distinction between nursing care and treatment. To reduce frictions and interface problems, a catalogue of acts of therapy performed by nurses was agreed for neurological early rehabilitation in Baden-Württemberg. This Elzach concept and catalogue describe therapeutic nursing in neurological rehabilitation and increase transparency and accountability both for providers and cost carriers.

[Medicolegal evaluation of traumatic brain injury]. / Begutachtung von Schädel-Hirn-Traumen.

The present state of medicolegal evaluation of persons with traumatic brain injury is discussed in this contribution. Both the ICD and German jurisdiction see a strict separation between structural and only functional brain damage that can be reliably evaluated through neurological, neuropsychological and neuroradiological means. However, there is evidence mainly from MRI investigations that there can be structural changes that presently cannot be detected in the single case, e.g. anisotropy. Furthermore, the neurological and neuropsychological differentiation of directly traumatic and psychogenic disorders can be difficult and requires expertise.

[Comment on the S3 Guidelines Dementia by the DGPPN and the DGN from the neurological point of view]. / Stellungnahme zur S3-Leitlinie Demenzen der DGPPN und der DGN aus neurologischer Sicht.

The German Society for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Nervous Diseases (DGPPN) and the German Society for Neurology (DGN) have appointed an expert panel to develop guidelines for the diagnosis of and therapy for dementias and to reach a consensus on these guidelines with other relevant societies. These guidelines have now been broadly consented. They assess the present evidence according to transparent standards and give a number of recommendations that are outlined in the present communication. The guidelines lack recommendations for the organisation of medical and social services and for adequate settings of care. These are key elements of national practice guidelines, the development of which is of key importance in view of the socioeconomic consequences of dementias. The financing of national practice guidelines cannot be the responsibility of scientific societies.

WHODAS II with people after stroke and their relatives.

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to measure the internal consistency, inter-rater-reliability and validity of the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II) for its application to stroke patients and their closest others. METHOD: Patients were assessed 6 months and 1 year after stroke with the self- and proxy-rating versions of the WHODAS II. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) as well as patients' statements about 'Recovery' and 'Independence' were used as measurements for validity. Patients' statements concerning individual restrictions and limitations were compared with the WHODAS II items. RESULTS: Internal consistency can be regarded as good to excellent, inter-rater-reliability as satisfactory to good. Item reliability ranged from insufficient to good, the percentage of agreements was below 80%. WHODAS II scale scores of patients with an mRS score of 0 as well as of recovered and independent patients differed significantly from others. Correlation coefficients between WHODAS II Scales and validation measures ranged from fair to high. Correspondence between stroke related problems and WHODAS II items was good. CONCLUSION: The WHODAS II is a valid, generally reliable and useful instrument for the assessment of stroke patients over the first year after stroke.

[Informant report of cognitive changes in the elderly. A first evaluation of the German version of the IQCODE]. / Fremdbeurteilung kognitiver Veränderungen im Alter. Erste Vergleichswerte für den deutschen IQCODE.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive deficits occurring with dementia are frequently not reported by the affected subject. Therefore, informant reports from close relatives are especially important for the early diagnosis of dementia. Internationally, the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) has been evaluated with positive results and is a widely used informant-rated instrument for the diagnosis of cognitive decline. For the German speaking countries, norms and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the instrument are lacking. METHODS: Norms for the German long version of the IQCODE were established with 46 healthy elderly married couples. These were compared with respect to their concurrent and discriminative validity with groups of patients suffering from mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n=25), Alzheimer's or mixed dementia (AD, n=59) and frontotemporal lobe degeneration (FTLD, n=15). RESULTS: The German version of the IQCODE exhibited good psychometric properties and was able to best discriminate between cognitively intact and demented subjects with AD. Receiver-operating characteristic analyses indicated a cut-off score of 3.38 which corresponds well with the value given in international literature. Patients with MCI and with FTLD were also reliably distinguished from cognitively intact subjects. However, the instrument did not distinguish AD from FTLD with any significant degree of confidence. DISCUSSION: The German version of the IQCODE reliably discriminates cognitively intact persons from those suffering from MCI or cortical dementia, but not between different types of cortical dementia, such as AD and FTLD. The IQCODE is an efficient informant-rated screening instrument for the early diagnosis of cognitive decline and dementia.