Environmental impact of a blood test reduction intervention in adult intensive care units: A before and after quality improvement project.

BACKGROUND: Pathology testing is a very common investigation in the intensive care unit (ICU). Many tests are ordered on a routine basis rather than for a specific clinical indication, resulting in potential patient harm and unnecessary financial and environmental costs. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether a multifaceted intervention based on the principles of education, audit, and feedback can result in a decrease in unnecessary pathology tests without a commensurate increase in adverse patient outcomes and to measure this decrease in terms of the associated reduction in environmental and financial costs. METHODS: A before and after quality improvement project was conducted between 2017 and 2019 across four ICUs in three 12-month phases, divided according to baseline, intervention implementation, and follow-up. Local clinician champions from each site partnered with the project coordinating centre to develop and implement a range of interventions based on the principles of education, audit, and feedback. Data were collected for the number of pathology tests performed and the clinical characteristics of patients admitted to a participating ICU across the three phases. RESULTS: A total of 196 323 arterial blood gases and 460 258 other tests across eight categories were performed on the 22 210 patients admitted to participating ICUs during the project. A decrease in testing was observed across all but one category, with the greatest reduction seen in arterial blood gases (31.2% reduction in tests per bed-day). Across all categories, this equated to a mean reduction of 1.8 tCO2e (tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent), a potential estimated total saving of Australian dollar $918 497.50. No increase in adverse clinical outcomes was observed. CONCLUSION: A multifaceted intervention based on the principles of education, audit, and feedback can produce a significant decrease in the number of unnecessary pathology tests performed. This reduction translates to substantial environmental and financial savings without any associated increase in adverse patient outcomes.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy associated with a lymphoproliferative disorder treated with pembrolizumab.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a demyelinating disease affecting the central nervous system as a result of reactivation of the John Cunningham (JC) polyomavirus and occurs almost exclusively in immunosuppressed individuals. The disease course of PML is variable but usually progressive and often fatal. Treatment is predominantly focused on immune restoration, although this is difficult to do outside of human immunodeficiency virus-associated PML. A recent case series demonstrated a potential role for programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab, to contain and/or clear JC virus. Herein, we discuss the first reported Australian case of a 61-year-old female with PML secondary to chemoimmunotherapy demonstrating complete clearance of JC virus as well as clinical and radiological stabilisation following pembrolizumab treatment.

Everyone’s a winner if we test less: the CODA action plan.

In this era of 'Choosing Wisely,' we present a four-step action plan to reduce unnecessary pathology testing and the associated patient harm (blood loss through repeated phlebotomy), economic cost and environmental impact. The authors are experts from the CODA group; a medical education and health-promotion charity that aims to build on the Choosing Wisely initiative to provide meaningful and sustainable actions to reduce the carbon footprint of healthcare, globally. Pathology testing is expensive and carbon-intensive, with as many as half of all tests being not clinically indicated. Reducing unnecessary testing is the only effective way to decrease the carbon footprint and other associated costs, as opportunities to reuse and recycle pathology specimens are limited. The four key steps for action are (i) auditing local practice; (ii) defining unnecessary testing including developing a clinical guideline for rational ordering; (iii) educating stakeholders; and (iv) measuring the impact of the intervention through re-audit. This proven method is designed to be used in any healthcare setting around the world; having a small group of passionate 'champions' is thought to be as important as strong clinical governance and more important than access to sophisticated equipment. Electronic medical record systems and other technological solutions offer new ways to help establish a sustainability mindset and reduce unnecessary testing. The Codachange.org/coda-earth/ website provides a dynamic crowdsourcing platform through which we can collectively learn to meet the diverse needs of our international medical community. Self-reported outcomes are gamified through collaborative feedback, amplification via social media and the ability to earn rewards, be uploaded to the CODA website, or added to the template as a success story. By combining our existing local networks with the emerging international CODA community, we can initiate meaningful change now and enter the era of environmental stewardship.

Reducing inappropriate arterial blood gas testing in a level III intensive care unit: a before-and-after observational study.

Background: Arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis is the most frequently performed test in intensive care units (ICUs), often without a specific clinical indication. This is costly and contributes to iatrogenic anaemia. Objectives: To reduce the number of ABG tests performed and the proportion that are inappropriate. Design, setting and participants: The indications for ABG analysis were surveyed at a 58-bed level III ICU during fortnightly periods before and after a multifaceted educational intervention which included the introduction of a clinical guideline. The number of ABG tests performed during the period July-December 2017 was compared with that for the period July-December 2018. Tests were predefined as inappropriate if performed at regular time intervals, at change of shift, concurrently with other blood tests or after a treatment was ceased on a stable patient or after ventilatory support or oxygen delivery was decreased in an otherwise stable patient. The study was enrolled on the Quality Improvement Projects Register and ethics approval was waived by the local ethics committee. Results: There was a 31.3% bed-day adjusted decrease in number of ABG tests performed (33 005 v 22 408; P < 0.001), representing an annual saving of A$770 000 and 100 litres of blood. The proportion of inappropriate ABG tests decreased by 47.3% (54.2% v 28.6%; P < 0.001) and the number of inappropriate ABG tests per bed-day decreased by 71% (2.8 v 0.8; P < 0.001). Patient outcomes before and after the intervention did not differ (standardised mortality ratio, 0.65 v 0.63; P = 0.22). Conclusion: Staff education and implementation of a clinical guideline resulted in substantial decreases in the number of ABG tests performed and the proportion of inappropriate ABG tests.