Central nervous system relapse in patients with untreated HER2-positive esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Although HER2-positive breast cancers demonstrate a propensity for central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, it is unknown whether other HER2-positive tumors, including adenocarcinomas of the esophagus/gastroesophageal junction (EAC), share this characteristic. Insight into this association may inform the development of HER2-targeted therapies that penetrate the blood-brain barrier. We examined HER2 overexpression and gene amplification in 708 patients with EAC who underwent curative-intent surgery during a time period (1980-1997) when no patient received HER2-targeted therapy. We identified patients whose site of first cancer recurrence was CNS and those who had a CNS relapse at any time. After a median follow-up of 61.2 months, 3.4% (24/708) of patients developed CNS relapse (all involved the brain). Patients with HER2-positive (vs -negative) primary tumors showed a higher 5-year cumulative incidence of CNS relapse as first recurrence (5.8% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.0058) and at any time (8.3% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.0062). In a multivariable model that included covariates previously associated with HER2 or with CNS relapse in breast cancer, HER2 positivity was the only variable that was statistically significantly associated with shorter time to CNS relapse as first recurrence (p = 0.0026) or at any time (hazard ratio 4.3 [95% confidence interval 1.8 to 10.3]; p = 0.001). These are the first data in a non-breast cancer to demonstrate an association between HER2 positivity and higher CNS relapse risk after surgery, and suggest that HER2-positive EACs have a predilection for CNS metastases.

HER-2/neu gene amplification in relation to expression of HER2 and HER3 proteins in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a therapeutic target in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), with gene amplification used as a selection criterion for treatment, although to the authors' knowledge the concordance between amplification and HER2 protein expression remains undefined in EAC. Furthermore, the association between HER2 and its interacting partner, human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3), is unknown yet appears to be of potential therapeutic relevance. METHODS: Patients with untreated EACs (N = 673) were analyzed for HER2 amplification and polysomy 17 by fluorescence in situ hybridization in parallel with immunohistochemistry (IHC) (IHC scores of 0-1+, 2+, and 3+). Amplification was defined as HER2/CEP17 ≥ 2. HER3 expression by IHC was analyzed in randomly selected cases (n = 224). IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization results were compared using least squares linear regression. RESULTS: Overall, 17% of the EACs (116 of 673 EACs) were HER2-amplified with an amplification frequency that was highest among IHC3+ cases (89%) and declined among IHC2+ cases (13%) and IHC0 to IHC1+ cases (4%). Among HER2-amplified cases, the level of amplification increased linearly with HER2 membranous expression (HER2/CEP17 ratio: 7.9 in IHC3+ and 5.5 in IHC2+ vs 2.8 in IHC0 to IHC1+ [P < .0001]), with 14% of amplified tumors demonstrating absent/faint expression (IHC0 to IHC1+). Polysomy 17 was not found to be associated with HER2 expression. Cytoplasmic HER3 expression was detected in 87% of tumors (195 of 224 tumors) and was found to be significantly associated with better differentiation (P < .0001). Stepwise increases in HER3 expression were associated with higher HER2 expression levels (P = .0019). CONCLUSIONS: Levels of HER2 protein expression and amplification were found to be linearly associated and highly concordant. Among amplified tumors with absent/faint expression, the level of amplification was low. Frequent expression of HER3 suggests its relevance as a therapeutic target, and its significant association with HER2 supports ongoing efforts to inhibit HER2/HER3 in patients with EAC.

Molecular cytogenetic analysis for TFE3 rearrangement in Xp11.2 renal cell carcinoma and alveolar soft part sarcoma: validation and clinical experience with 75 cases.

Renal cell carcinoma with TFE3 rearrangement at Xp11.2 is a distinct subtype manifesting an indolent clinical course in children, with recent reports suggesting a more aggressive entity in adults. This subtype is morphologically heterogeneous and can be misclassified as clear cell or papillary renal cell carcinoma. TFE3 is also rearranged in alveolar soft part sarcoma. To aid in diagnosis, a break-apart strategy fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probe set specific for TFE3 rearrangement and a reflex dual-color, single-fusion strategy probe set involving the most common TFE3 partner gene, ASPSCR1, were validated on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues from nine alveolar soft part sarcoma, two suspected Xp11.2 renal cell carcinoma, and nine tumors in the differential diagnosis. The impact of tissue cut artifact was reduced through inclusion of a chromosome X centromere control probe. Analysis of the UOK-109 renal carcinoma cell line confirmed the break-apart TFE3 probe set can distinguish the subtle TFE3/NONO fusion-associated inversion of chromosome X. Subsequent extensive clinical experience was gained through analysis of 75 cases with an indication of Xp11.2 renal cell carcinoma (n=54), alveolar soft part sarcoma (n=13), perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (n=2), chordoma (n=1), or unspecified (n=5). We observed balanced and unbalanced chromosome X;17 translocations in both Xp11.2 renal cell carcinoma and alveolar soft part sarcoma, supporting a preference but not a necessity for the translocation to be balanced in the carcinoma and unbalanced in the sarcoma. We further demonstrate the unbalanced separation is atypical, with TFE3/ASPSCR1 fusion and loss of the derivative X chromosome but also an unanticipated normal X chromosome gain in both males and females. Other diverse sex chromosome copy number combinations were observed. Our TFE3 FISH assay is a useful adjunct to morphologic analysis of such challenging cases and will be applicable to assess the growing spectrum of TFE3-rearranged tumors.

Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment of HER2 in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (NCCTG N9831, BCIRG 006, and BCIRG 005).

A comprehensive, blinded, pathology evaluation of HER2 testing in HER2-positive/negative breast cancers was performed among three central laboratories. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses were performed on 389 tumor blocks from three large adjuvant trials: N9831, BCIRG-006, and BCIRG-005. In 123 cases, multiple blocks were examined. HER2 status was defined according to FDA-approved guidelines and was independently re-assessed at each site. Discordant cases were adjudicated at an on-site, face-to-face meeting. Results across three independent pathologists were concordant by IHC in 351/381 (92 %) and FISH in 343/373 (92 %) blocks. Upon adjudication, consensus was reached on 16/30 and 18/30 of discordant IHC and FISH cases, respectively, resulting in overall concordance rates of 96 and 97 %. Among 155 HER2-negative blocks, HER2 status was confirmed in 153 (99 %). In the subset of 102 HER2-positive patients from N9831/BCIRG-006, primary blocks from discordant cases were selected, especially those with discordant test between local and central laboratories. HER2 status was confirmed in 73 (72 %) of these cases. Among 118 and 113 cases with IHC and FISH results and >1 block evaluable, block-to-block variability/heterogeneity in HER2 results was seen in 10 and 5 %, respectively. IHC-/FISH- was confirmed for 57/59 (97 %) primary blocks from N9831 (locally positive, but centrally negative); however, 5/22 (23 %) secondary blocks showed HER2 positivity. Among 53 N9831 patients with HER2-normal disease adjudicated as IHC-/FISH-(although locally positive), there was a non-statistically significant improvement in disease-free survival with concurrent trastuzumab compared to chemotherapy alone (adjusted hazard ratio 0.34; 95 % CI, 0.11-1.05; p = 0.06). There were similar agreements for IHC and FISH among pathologists (92 % each). Agreement was improved at adjudication (96 %). HER2 tumor heterogeneity appears to partially explain discordant results in cases initially tested as positive and subsequently called negative.

Section E9 of the American College of Medical Genetics technical standards and guidelines: fluorescence in situ hybridization.

This updated Section E9 has been incorporated into and supersedes the previous Section E9 in Section E: Clinical Cytogenetics of the 2008 Edition (Revised 02/2007) American College of Medical Genetics Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories. This section deals specifically with the standards and guidelines applicable to fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis.

Clinical diagnostic testing for the cytogenetic and molecular causes of male infertility: the Mayo Clinic experience.

PURPOSE: Approximately 8% of couples attempting to conceive are infertile and male infertility accounts for approximately 50% of infertility among couples. Up to 25% of males with non-obstructive infertility have chromosomal abnormalities and/or microdeletions of the long arm of the Y-chromosome. These are detected by conventional chromosome and Y-microdeletion analysis. In this study, we reviewed the results of testing performed in the Mayo Clinic Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics Laboratories and compared our findings with previously published reports. METHODS: This study includes 2,242 chromosome studies from males ≥18 years of age referred for infertility between 1989 and 2000 and 2,749 Y-deletion molecular studies performed between 2002 and 2009. RESULTS: 14.3% of infertile males tested by karyotyping had abnormalities identified. These include: (258) 47,XXY and variants consistent with Klinefelter syndrome, (3) combined 47,XXY and balanced autosomal rearrangements, (9) 47,XYY, (9) Y-deletions, (7) 46,XX males, (32) balanced rearrangements, and (1) unbalanced rearrangement. 3.6% of males tested for Y-microdeletion analysis had abnormalities identified, 90% of which included a deletion of the AZFc region. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need of males suffering from non-obstructive infertility to have laboratory genetic testing performed. An abnormal finding can have significant consequences to assisted reproductive techniques and fertility treatment, and provide a firm diagnosis to couples with longstanding infertility.

Identification of Adenosquamous Carcinoma as a Rare Aggressive HER2-negative Subgroup of Esophageal/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to evaluate the prognostic impact of pathologically confirmed esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) and its association with HER2 status and clinicopathologic characteristics. METHODS: Among 796 patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who underwent curative resection, surgical pathology reports were reviewed, and suspected ASC was confirmed utilizing p63 and CK5/6 immunostaining. HER2 status was determined using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cox models were used to assess the impact of ASC on disease-specific survival and overall survival. RESULTS: Overall, 2.0% (16/796) of patients had esophageal ASC, mostly demonstrating a close intermingling of squamous and adenocarcinoma cells within the same tumor. The percentage of squamous versus adenocarcinoma cells in the primary was generally recapitulated in nodal metastases, and intrapatient internodal heterogeneity was uncommon. Patients with esophageal ASC were statistically significantly more likely to be female (vs. male), have normal (vs. excess) body mass index, and harbor HER2-negative (vs. positive) tumors, as compared with patients with adenocarcinoma only. No ASC tumor was HER2-positive as compared with 16% of adenocarcinoma only tumors (P=0.018). Compared with patients with adenocarcinoma only, those with ASC demonstrated profoundly worse disease-specific survival (5-year event-free rate, 34% vs. 6%; multivariate hazard ratio, 2.87 [95% confidence interval, 1.59-4.76]; P=0.0010) and overall survival (P=0.0027) that was independent of known prognostic factors and HER2 status. CONCLUSION: ASC identifies a rare aggressive HER2-negative subgroup of esophageal/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Peripheral blood cytogenetic studies in hematological neoplasms: predictors of obtaining metaphases for analysis.

Peripheral blood (PB) is sometimes used in place of bone marrow (BM) for cytogenetic studies during the evaluation of hematologic malignancies. A total of 242 PB cytogenetic studies from adult patients were performed: clinical diagnosis was a myeloid neoplasm in 169 patients (70%), lymphoid or plasma cell neoplasm in 50 (21%), and a benign/reactive cytopenia or leukocytosis in 23 (9%). PB cytogenetic studies resulted in at least two analyzable metaphases in 142 of the 242 study cases (59%); in univariate analysis, this was predicted by the specific clinical diagnosis (P < 0.0001), presence and degree of circulating myeloid progenitor cells or blasts of any lineage (P < 0.0001), higher leukocyte count (P < 0.001), lower platelet count (P = 0.003), lower hemoglobin level (P = 0.002), and presence of palpable splenomegaly (P = 0.002). In multivariable analysis, only the presence of circulating myeloid progenitor cells or blasts sustained significance and this was consistent with the high yield rates seen in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) (80%), post-PV/ET PMF (85%), acute myeloid leukemia (76%), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (80%) in contrast with the low rates seen in ET (0%) and PV (2%). In 104 cases, BM cytogenetic studies were performed within 1 month of the PB cytogenetic studies; an abnormal BM cytogenetic finding was another independent predictor of a successful PB study (P = 0.002). PB cytogenetic studies are most appropriate in diseases of adults characterized by presence of circulating myeloid progenitors or blasts; the yield otherwise is too small to be cost-effective.

Comprehensive validation of array comparative genomic hybridization platforms: how much is enough?

Clinical testing using various array comparative genomic hybridization platforms is being incorporated rapidly into cytogenetic testing algorithms. Comprehensive validation of these complex assays presents unique challenges and very few studies reporting the validation of commercially available array platforms have been published. Sixty-seven patients with previously defined subtelomere abnormalities, representing deletions and/or duplications of all 41 clinically relevant sites, were tested in a blinded study using the Spectral Genomics Constitutional Chip 3.0. Overall, 72 of 74 (97%) subtelomeric abnormalities were concordant with previous cytogenetic studies. However, two false-negative results were documented, and issues with mismapped and suboptimal clone performance were identified that may result in failure to detect 6q and 20q subtelomeric abnormalities. The results of this study indicate that comprehensive validation is necessary before implementation of array comparative genomic hybridization platforms into a clinical setting. Specific suggestions for validation are discussed in the context of the recently proposed American College of Medical Genetics guidelines for microarray analysis for constitutional cytogenetic abnormalities.

Independent Prognostic Significance of Monosomy 17 and Impact of Karyotype Complexity in Monosomal Karyotype/Complex Karyotype Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results from Four ECOG-ACRIN Prospective Therapeutic Trials.

The presence of a monosomal karyotype (MK+) and/or a complex karyotype (CK+) identifies subcategories of AML with poor prognosis. The prognostic significance of the most common monosomies (monosomy 5, monosomy 7, and monosomy 17) within MK+/CK+AML is not well defined. We analyzed data from 1,592 AML patients age 17-93 years enrolled on ECOG-ACRIN therapeutic trials. The majority of MK+ patients (182/195; 93%) were MK+/CK+ with 87% (158/182) having ≥5 clonal abnormalities (CK≥5). MK+ patients with karyotype complexity ≤4 had a median overall survival (OS) of 0.4y compared to 1.0y for MK- with complexity ≤4 (p<0.001), whereas no OS difference was seen in MK+vs. MK- patients with CK≥5 (p=0.82). Monosomy 5 (93%; 50/54) typically occurred within a highly complex karyotype and had no impact on OS (0.4y; p=0.95). Monosomy 7 demonstrated no impact on OS in patients with CK≥5 (p=0.39) or CK≤4 (p=0.44). Monosomy 17 appeared in 43% (68/158) of CK≥5 patients and demonstrated statistically significant worse OS (0.4y) compared to CK≥5 patients without monosomy 17 (0.5y; p=0.012). Our data suggest that the prognostic impact of MK+is limited to those with less complex karyotypes and that monosomy 17 may independently predict for worse survival in patients with AML.

Operator experience and sample quality in genetic amniocentesis.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to relate the frequency of maternal cell contamination in amniotic fluid samples that were submitted to a single laboratory for cytogenetic analysis to the experience and training of the physician who performed the amniocentesis. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed the database of a single cytogenetics laboratory to compare the number of amniocenteses that were performed annually per physician to the rate of maternal cell contamination in genetic amniocentesis samples. Only samples that resulted in a 46 XY male karyotype were studied so that maternal cell contamination could be identified as having occurred when the karyotype revealed > or = 1 cell with 2 X chromosomes. Samples were categorized as being submitted by a physician who submitted > or = 50 or more samples annually versus < 50 samples to this laboratory. The frequency of maternal cell contamination was compared with annual operator volume with 2 x 2 tables and analyzed by chi-squared testing. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2004, the laboratory received 6332 mid-trimester amniotic fluid samples that generated a male karyotype result. Fourteen of 2081 samples (0.67%) that were submitted by physicians who submitted < 50 samples grew > or = 1 46 XX cells, compared with 8 of 4251 samples (0.19%; chi-squared, 9.47; degrees of freedom, 1; P = .0021). CONCLUSION: Maternal cell contamination occurs more frequently in genetic amniocentesis samples that are obtained by physicians who perform < 50 genetic amniocenteses annually.

Bone Marrow Conventional Karyotyping and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization: Defining an Effective Utilization Strategy for Evaluation of Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

OBJECTIVES: The current standard of practice for evaluation of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) includes peripheral blood and bone marrow morphology review and conventional karyotyping. Karyotype provides a global view of the chromosome complement while fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) targets specific abnormalities. The aim of this study was to determine if an MDS-FISH panel would add value beyond karyotype in MDS workup. METHODS: We studied 505 patients who were evaluated for a possible MDS and had concurrent bone marrow examination, karyotyping, and MDS-FISH performed. RESULTS: In total, 462 cases had adequate karyotyping (≥20 metaphases) and showed excellent concordance (96%, 445/462) between karyotyping and MDS-FISH. Additional FISH abnormalities had no impact on diagnosis and minimal impact on the cytogenetic prognostic scoring in the myeloid neoplasm cases (2%, 4/206). The concordance rate dropped to 82% (32/39) in the group with insufficient karyotyping (<20 metaphases), and additional FISH findings in this subgroup had no impact on the diagnosis but altered the cytogenetic prognostic scoring in 10% (2/20) of myeloid neoplasm cases. CONCLUSIONS: In the evaluation of a possible MDS, FISH rarely provides additional value when karyotype is adequate. We propose a value-based, cost-effective algorithmic approach for conventional karyotyping and FISH testing in routine MDS workup.

Change in Pattern of HER2 Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Results in Breast Cancers Submitted for FISH Testing: Experience of a Reference Laboratory Using US Food and Drug Administration Criteria and American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Guidelines.

Purpose In 1998, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing guidelines to determine eligibility for HER2-directed therapy (HDT) in breast cancer. ASCO and the College of American Pathologists published immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) HER2 testing guidelines in 2007 (AC2007) and updated these guidelines in 2013 (AC2013). We compared the HER2 FISH amplification frequency using these three guidelines. Methods Patient samples that were sent to the Mayo Clinic cytogenetics laboratory for FISH testing (n = 2,851; from November 2013 to October 2014) were analyzed. Frequency of HER2 FISH amplification was examined and impact of AC2013 assessed. Results IHC results were available for 1,922 patient samples (67.4%), 137 of which were from Mayo Clinic. Distribution was 2.4% IHC 0, 7.9% IHC 1+, 84.8% IHC 2+, and 2.5% IHC 3+. Among IHC 2+ patients, HER2 FISH positivity was 11.8% (FDA), 9.4% (AC2007), and 24.1% (AC2013). Overall, 11.8% (n = 339) were positive with a FISH ratio ≥ 2.0, 1.3% (n = 35) with a FISH ratio ≥ 2.0 despite a HER2 signal < 4.0, and 3.0% (n = 86) with HER2 signal ≥ 6.0 despite FISH ratio < 2.0. Among 405 patients (14.2%) who were initially considered FISH-equivocal (ratio < 2.0 with HER2 signal ≥ 4.0, but < 6.0; AC2013), use of an alternative chromosome 17 probe reassigned 212 (7.4% overall) patients to FISH-positive and 36 (1.3% overall) patients to FISH-negative, whereas 157 (5.5% overall) patients remained equivocal. Final HER2 positivity with AC2013 (23.6%) was increased (P < .001) compared with FDA (13.1%) and AC2007 (11%) guidelines. Conclusion In a reference laboratory cohort that was highly enriched for IHC 2+ patient samples, AC2013 guidelines led to a larger number of FISH-equivocal patients. Approximately one half of these FISH-equivocal patients (7.4% overall) became HER2-positive upon alternative FISH probe testing. However, these patients would not have participated in the pivotal HDT trials. Clinical utility data on HDT benefit in these patients and other special subsets are needed.

Conventional karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization: an effective utilization strategy in diagnostic adult acute myeloid leukemia.

OBJECTIVES: Cytogenetics defines disease entities and predicts prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Conventional karyotyping provides a comprehensive view of the genome, while fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detects targeted abnormalities. The aim of this study was to compare the utility of karyotyping and FISH in adult AML. METHODS: We studied 250 adult AML cases with concurrent karyotyping and FISH testing. Karyotyping was considered adequate when 20 or more metaphases were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 220 cases had adequate karyotyping and were classified as normal karyotype/normal FISH (n = 92), normal karyotype/abnormal FISH (n = 4), abnormal karyotype/normal FISH (n = 8), and abnormal karyotype/abnormal FISH (n = 116). The overall karyotype/FISH concordance rate was 97.7% with five discordant cases identified, four from the normal karyotype/abnormal FISH group and one from the abnormal karyotype/abnormal FISH group. No karyotype/FISH discordance was seen in the abnormal karyotype/normal FISH group for the FISH probes evaluated. FISH lent prognostic information in one (0.5%) of 220 cases with normal karyotype/abnormal FISH: CBFB-MYH11 fusion, indicating favorable prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: In adult AML, FISH rarely provides additional information when karyotyping is adequate. We therefore propose an evidence-based, cost-effective algorithmic approach for routine conventional karyotype and FISH testing in adult AML workup.

Development of an NPM1/MLF1 D-FISH probe set for the detection of t(3;5)(q25;q35) identified in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

The t(3;5)(q25;q35) NPM1/MLF1 fusion has an incidence of approximately 0.5% in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and has an intermediate prognosis at diagnosis. We have developed a dual-color, dual-fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization (D-FISH) assay to detect fusion of the MLF1 and NPM1 genes. A blinded investigation was performed using 25 normal bone marrow specimens and 26 bone marrow samples from patients with one or more metaphases with a t(3;5)(q21-q25;q31-q35) or a der(5)t(3;5)(q21-q25;q31-q35) previously identified by chromosome analysis. Once unblinded, the results indicate our D-FISH method identified NPM1/MLF1 fusion in 15 of the 26 fully evaluated patient samples. Excluding three samples with a single abnormal t(3;5) metaphase, 15 of 17 (88%) patient samples with a balanced t(3;5) demonstrated NPM1/MLF1 fusion, and 0 of 6 patient samples with a der(5)t(3;5) demonstrated NPM1/MLF1 fusion, suggesting only the balanced form of this 3;5 translocation as observed by karyotype is associated with NPM1/MLF1 fusion. Overall, the FISH results demonstrated five different outcomes (NPM1/MLF1 fusion, MLF1 disruption, MLF1 duplication, NPM1 deletion, and normal), indicating significant molecular heterogeneity when the 3;5 translocation is identified. The development of this sensitive D-FISH strategy for the detection of NPM1/MLF1 fusion adds to the AML FISH testing repertoire and is effective in the detection of this translocation at diagnosis as well as monitoring residual disease in AML patients.

Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and dual-ISH (DISH) in the determination of HER2 status in breast cancer.

The determination of HER2 amplification is critical to selecting appropriate patients for HER2 targeted therapy in breast cancer. Dual in situ hybridization (DISH), an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry, is now available. To compare the FISH and DISH methods, we tested 251 samples enriched for common or difficult-to-assess HER2 anomalies. Seven samples failed DISH testing. There was a 64% (156/244) concordance between FISH and DISH by anomaly (κ = 0.58, 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.65; P < .0001) and an 83% (203/244) concordance by amplification status (κ = 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.69; P < .0001). DISH resulted in lower estimates of HER2/ centromere 17 ratios than FISH, and many cases that were equivocal with FISH were normal with DISH. DISH did not detect any case with coamplification of HER2 and centromere 17. Using a cohort of difficult specimens, we observed less than 95% concordance between FISH and DISH. DISH may underestimate the HER2/chromosome 17 ratio, or FISH may overestimate this ratio.

Adverse prognostic impact of intratumor heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: There is increasing recognition of the existence of intratumoral heterogeneity of the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2), which affects interpretation of HER2 positivity in clinical practice and may have implications for patient prognosis and treatment. We determined the frequency and prognostic impact of heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification and polysomy 17 in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: HER2 amplification (by fluorescence in situ hybridization) was examined in surgical EAC specimens (n = 675). HER2 heterogeneity was defined according to consensus guidelines as gene amplification (HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 2.0) in more than 5% but less than 50% of cancer cells. No patient received neoadjuvant or HER2-targeted therapy. Cox models were used to assess disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Overall, 117 EACs (17%) demonstrated HER2 amplification, of which 20 (17%) showed HER2 heterogeneity. All HER2-heterogeneous tumors were amplified. Among HER2-amplified tumors, heterogeneous tumors had significantly higher frequency of poor histologic grade and polysomy 17. In multivariable models that included number of metastatic lymph nodes, grade, tumor stage, and polysomy 17, only HER2 heterogeneity and node number were prognostic among HER2-amplified tumors, with heterogeneity showing worse DSS (hazard ratio, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.09 to 3.79; P = .025) and OS (P = .026). Among HER2-nonamplified EACs, polysomy 17 was independently associated with worse DSS (P = .012) and OS (P = .023). CONCLUSION: Among HER2-amplified EACs, 17% show HER2 heterogeneity, which independently predicts for worse cancer-specific death. Among HER2-nonamplified EACs, polysomy 17 is independently associated with worse survival. These novel findings demonstrate aggressive subgroups in HER2-amplified and -nonamplified EACs that have important implications for HER2 analysis and determination of benefit from HER2-targeted therapy.

TFE3 rearrangements in adult renal cell carcinoma: clinical and pathologic features with outcome in a large series of consecutively treated patients.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with chromosomal rearrangement of transcription factor for immunoglobulin heavy-chain enhancer 3 (TFE3) at Xp11.2 is a distinct subtype that was initially described in children and has been reported to display an indolent course. Recent reports have identified RCC with TFE3 rearrangements in adults and have suggested a more aggressive course in this population. However, only a few studies have examined these tumors in a large series of consecutively treated adults. We screened 632 RCCs from patients consecutively treated by surgery at a single institution by fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect TFE3 rearrangements. We identified 6 RCCs with TFE3 rearrangement. Patient ages ranged from 25 to 78 years and included 4 women and 2 men. Tumors showed significant histologic variability. Comparison of the clinical and pathologic features between RCCs with TFE3 rearrangements and RCCs without TFE3 rearrangements showed no significant differences. Follow-up period for patients with TFE3-rearranged RCC ranged from 0.8 to 16.5 years, with 4 of 6 dying from the disease. Cancer-specific survival for patients with TFE3-rearranged RCC was significantly worse than for patients with TFE3-rearrangement-negative papillary-type RCC (P<0.001) but not different from that for TFE3-rearrangement-negative clear cell-type RCC. In conclusion, we present an assessment of TFE3 rearrangement status in a large series of adults consecutively treated by surgery for RCC. Our findings confirm that RCCs with TFE3 rearrangement account for only approximately 1% of adult RCCs. The results also suggest that adult RCC with TFE3 rearrangement may be a clinically aggressive tumor.