Bilateral contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the hand: diagnostic image quality of accelerated MRI using echo sharing with interleaved stochastic trajectories (TWIST).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the image quality of time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA (tr-MRA) employing echo-sharing with stochastic trajectories for the bilateral examination of the hands. METHODS: In this institutional review-board approved study, Tr-MRA was compared with multiphasic contrast-enhanced MRA (mp-MRA) featuring sub-systolic venous compression in 20 healthy volunteers at 3.0 T using the following settings: TR/TE: 2.8/1.2 ms, flip angle: 25°, acceleration factor: 4, effective voxel size: 0.9 × 0.8 × 0.9 cm, acquisition time 4.9 s per 3D volume. RESULTS: With tr-MRA the arterial first-pass contrast agent transit is clearly seen. On average the contrast agent arrived 34 s post-injection and reached the proper digital arteries after 44 s. The mean arterio-venous window was 13 s. Bilateral contrast enhancement was asynchronous in 56-62%. On a semiquantitative scale (0 = non-sufficient to 4 = excellent) tr-MRA (mp-MRA) yielded an average ranking of 2.8-3.6 (3.1-3.8) in the greater and intermediate sized segments and 1.3-2.0 (1.6-2.3) in the proper digital arteries. CONCLUSION: Compared with established multiphasic ce-MRA, time-resolved MRA allows a four times faster acquisition. It reflects the natural haemodynamics of the hand arteries with no need for sub-systolic venous compression and may be beneficial in the detection of hand circulation disorders. Image quality is comparable to mp-MRA. In both techniques depiction of the proper digital arteries is limited.

Thoracic aorta: prospective electrocardiographically triggered CT angiography with dual-source CT--feasibility, image quality, and dose reduction.

PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate the feasibility, image quality, and radiation dose for prospective electrocardiographically (ECG) triggered sequential dual-source computed tomographic (CT) angiography of the thoracic aorta in comparison to retrospective ECG-gated helical dual-source CT angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was obtained. One hundred thirty-nine patients referred for ECG-assisted dual-source CT angiography of the thoracic aorta were prospectively enrolled. Inclusion criteria were stable sinus rhythm and heart rate of 80 beats per minute or less. Tube voltage was adjusted to body mass index (< 25.0 kg/m(2), 100 kV, n = 58; > or = 25.0 kg/m(2), 120 kV, n = 81). In both cohorts, patients were randomly assigned to prospective or retrospective ECG-assisted data acquisition. In both groups, tube current (250 mAs per rotation) was centered at 70% of the R-R cycle. The presence of motion or stair-step artifacts of the thoracic aorta was independently assessed by two readers. Effective radiation dose was calculated from the dose-length product. RESULTS: Subjective scoring of motion and stair-step artifacts was equivalent for both techniques. Scan length was not significantly different (23.8 cm +/- 2.4 [standard deviation] vs 23.7 cm +/- 2.5 for prospective and retrospective ECG-triggered CT angiography, respectively; P = .54). Scanning time was significantly longer for prospective ECG-triggered CT angiography (18.8 seconds +/- 3.4 vs 16.4 seconds +/- 3.3, P < .001). Mean estimated effective dose was significantly lower for prospective data acquisition (100 kV, 1.9 mSv +/- 0.5 vs 4.1 mSv +/- 0.7, P < .001; 120 kV, 5.3 mSv +/- 1.1 vs 9.5 mSv +/- 3.0, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Prospective ECG-gated sequential dual-source CT angiography of the thoracic aorta is feasible, despite the slightly longer acquisition time. Thus, motion-free imaging of the thoracic aorta is possible at significantly lower radiation exposure than retrospective ECG-gated helical dual-source CT angiography in certain patients with a regular heart rate.

Contrast enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of relevant stenoses in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: diagnostic value of a two-step examination protocol in comparison to conventional DSA.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Contrast-enhanced MRA (ce-MRA) has been claimed by many authors as a replacement of conventional angiography evaluating peripheral arterial occlusive disease. However, reliable detection of relevant stenoses (>70%) has to be provided for planning vascular interventions. Only few data in the literature focuses on this crucial problem. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this topic using a two-step body-coil-based MRA protocol. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Forty three patients presenting with 82 stenoses >/=50% and 61 stenoses >70% on conventional catheter angiogram received fast Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced high resolution 3D MR angiography at 1.5 T covering the pelvic and peripheral vascular tree in two examination steps using the body-coil. The data were evaluated double-blinded by three readers distinguishing moderate (50-70%) from severe stenoses (>70%). RESULTS: Overall sensitivity/specificity/accuracy was 84/60/70% evaluating 143 segments. Specificity was rather poor in the iliac (58%) and crural (50%) region and moderate in the femoral and popliteal level (73%). The negative predictive value ranged between 78 and 91%. The grade of stenosis tend to be overestimated rather than underestimated in all levels with positive predictive values between 55 and 78%. DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: Body-coil-based contrast-enhanced MRA has limited potential in distinguishing moderate from severe stenoses in peripheral occlusive disease. Overestimations are more common than underestimations. Both occur mainly in small-sized crural arteries but also in larger iliac arteries where vessel course in partition direction may cause inadequacy between voxel size and lumen diameter in severe stenosis.

Reducing the radiation dose for low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses using iterative reconstruction: feasibility and image quality.

PURPOSE: To evaluate image quality of dose-reduced CT of the paranasal-sinus using an iterative reconstruction technique. METHODS: In this study 80 patients (mean age: 46.9±18 years) underwent CT of the paranasalsinus (Siemens Definition, Forchheim, Germany), with either standard settings (A: 120 kV, 60 mAs) reconstructed with conventional filtered back projection (FBP) or with tube current-time product lowering of 20%, 40% and 60% (B: 48 mAs, C: 36 mAs and D: 24 mAs) using iterative reconstruction (n=20 each). Subjective image quality was independently assessed by four blinded observers using a semiquantitative five-point grading scale (1=poor, 5=excellent). Effective dose was calculated from the dose-length product. Mann-Whitney-U-test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Mean effective dose was 0.28±0.03 mSv(A), 0.23±0.02 mSv(B), 0.17±0.02 mSv(C) and 0.11±0.01 mSv(D) resulting in a maximum dose reduction of 60% with iterative reconstruction technique as compared to the standard low-dose CT. Best image quality was observed at 48 mAs (mean 4.8; p<0.05), whereas standard low-dose CT (A) and maximum dose reduced scans (D) showed no significant difference in subjective image quality (mean 4.37 (A) and 4.31 (B); p=0.72). Interobserver agreement was excellent (κ values 0.79-0.93). CONCLUSION: As compared to filtered back projection, the iterative reconstruction technique allows for significant dose reduction of up to 60% for paranasal-sinus CT without impairing the diagnostic image quality.

Bilateral ce-MR angiography of the hands at 3.0 T and 1.5 T: intraindividual comparison of quantitative and qualitative image parameters in healthy volunteers.

The purpose of this study was to determine the benefit of bilateral contrast-enhanced MR angiography (ce-MRA) of the hands at 3.0 Tesla (T) compared with an established 1.5-T technique in healthy volunteers. Intraindividual bilateral ce-MRA of the hands was performed at 1.5 T and 3.0 T in 14 healthy volunteers using a timed ultra-fast GRE sequence featuring parallel acquisition. The evaluation comprised measurement of the vessel signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), rating of the image quality and the assessment of artefacts and venous contamination. At 3.0 T, SNR improved up to 95% and CNR up to 129%. The image quality of the larger inflow arteries, the palm arches and common digital arteries was good or sufficient at either magnetic field strengths. However, 3.0-T MRA was clearly superior in the depiction of the digital arteries. Ce-MRA of the hand clearly profits from the use of 3.0 T. Compared with 1.5 T, a substantial increase of CNR is found resulting in a significantly better delineation of the small digital arteries. Saturation affects more the SNR of the perivascular tissue than the contrast-enhanced blood, and thus leads to a marked increase of CNR at 3.0.