Positive node-ratio in curative-intent treatment for gastric cancer is a strong independent prognostic factor for 5-year overall survival.

INTRODUCTION: This study addressed whether the positive node-ratio (N-ratio) for patients who underwent curative-intent treatment was an independent prognostic factor of overall survival (OS) for gastric adenocarcinoma (GA). METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy for GA with at least 15 harvested nodes were evaluated for 5-year OS. The best threshold was determined using the area under an receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Univariate and multivariate models were assessed looking for independent prognostic factors for OS. RESULTS: From 1994 to 2015, 398 consecutive patients were evaluated. The N-ratio ≥11% had an accuracy of 0.764, the sensitivity of 71.1%, the specificity of 81.7%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 91.7%, and odds ratio (OR) of 11. After multivariate analysis for OS, age ≥70 years (HR 1.44), need for total gastrectomy (HR 1.45), need for extended resection (HR 1.7), and N-ratio ≥11% (HR 3.7) were unfavorable prognostic factors. D2 lymphadenectomy (HR 0.53) was a protective factor. The median OS according to N-ratio was 14 months for N-ratio >11 vs 58 months for N-ratio <11%. CONCLUSION: The N-ratio ≥11% was an independent negative prognostic factor for patients who underwent treatment for GA with curative intent. The N-ratio ≥11% presented high specificity, high PPV and high OR for risk of death for 5 years after surgery.

Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptors in gastric cancer: a survival analysis by Weibull model incorporating long-term survivors.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus about the prognostic role of HER2 expression and that of other members of the EGFR family in gastric cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the EGFR family in gastric cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study included 201 patients with gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma stages 0-IV (AJCC 6th edition) who underwent primary tumor resection. Tissues from primary tumors were analyzed by tissue microarray technology and immunohistochemistry. Correlations between receptor expression and clinicopathological characteristics were performed according to the chi-square test. Survival analysis was calculated according to the Weibull model with a mixture model incorporating long-term survivors. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed by a regression model incorporating long-term survivors with the Weibull distribution. RESULTS: Membrane expression of HER1, HER2, and HER4 were 9, 17, and 15 %, respectively. No membrane expression of HER3 was observed. Cytoplasmic expression of HER1, HER3, and HER4 were 45, 62, and 24 %, respectively. HER2 and HER3 expression were correlated (p < 0.001) and associated with intestinal-type histology (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) and advanced age (p = 0.011 and p = 0.008, respectively). According to a regression model adjusted for age, surgical radicality, surgical modality, Laurén histology, adjuvant therapy, TNM stage, and receptor expressions, only TNM stage showed prognostic influence. CONCLUSIONS: According to analysis by a parametric model, the EGFR family did not have prognostic influence in the gastric cancer population studied. The data presented showed a correlation between HER2 and HER3 expression, which might suggest a potential role for HER2-HER3 heterodimerization inhibitors.

Effect of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy on overall survival of gastric cancer patients submitted to D2 lymphadenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment in Western countries for gastric cancer patients submitted to curative resection. However, the role of adjuvant CRT in gastric cancer treated with D2 lymphadenectomy has not been well defined. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in patients with stage II to IV gastric adenocarcinoma with no distant metastases, who underwent curative resection with D2 lymphadenectomy between January 2002 and December 2007. The present study compared the 3-year overall survival of two treatments (adjuvant CRT according to the INT 0116 trial versus resection alone). Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with a log-rank test. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed by the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients were included, 104 patients (56 %) received adjuvant CRT and 81 received resection alone. The 3-year overall survival was 64.4 % in the CRT group and 61.7 % in the resection-alone group (p: 0.415). However, according to the Cox proportional hazards model, adjuvant CRT was a prognostic factor for 3-year overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.82, p: 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, adjuvant CRT was associated with a lower risk of death over a 3-year period in gastric cancer patients treated with D2 lymphadenectomy.

Profile of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma mutations in Brazilian patients.

Esophageal cancer is an aggressive tumor that has a high rate of incidence and mortality worldwide. It is the 10th most frequent type in Brazil, being squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) the predominant subtype. There is currently an incessant search to identify the frequently altered genes associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma biology that could be druggable. This study aimed to analyze the somatic mutation profile of a large panel of cancer-related genes in Brazilian ESCC. In a series of 46 ESCC diagnoses at Barretos Cancer Hospital, DNA isolated from paired fresh-frozen and blood tissue, a panel of 150 cancer-related genes was analyzed by next-generation sequencing. The genes with the highest frequency of mutations were TP53 (39/46, 84.8%), followed by NOTCH1 (7/46, 15.2%), NFE2L2 (5/46, 10.8%), RB1 (3/46, 6.5%), PTEN (3/46, 6.5%), CDKN2A (3/46, 6.5%), PTCH1 (2/46, 4.3%) and PIK3CA (2/46, 4.3%). There was no significant association between molecular and patients' clinicopathological features. Applying an evolutionary action score of p53 (EAp53), we observed that 14 (35.9%) TP53 mutations were classified as high-risk, yet no association with overall survival was observed. Concluding, this the largest mutation profile of Brazilian ESCC patients, which helps in the elucidation of the major cancer-related genes in this population.

BRAZILIAN GASTRIC CANCER ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES (PART 2): UPDATE ON TREATMENT.

BACKGROUND: : The II Brazilian Consensus on Gastric Cancer of the Brazilian Gastric Cancer Association BGCA (Part 1) was recently published. On this occasion, countless specialists working in the treatment of this disease expressed their opinion in the face of the statements presented. AIM: : To present the BGCA Guidelines (Part 2) regarding indications for surgical treatment, operative techniques, extension of resection and multimodal treatment. METHODS: To formulate these guidelines, the authors carried out an extensive and current review regarding each declaration present in the II Consensus, using the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library and SciELO databases initially with the following descriptors: gastric cancer, gastrectomy, lymphadenectomy, multimodal treatment. In addition, each statement was classified according to the level of evidence and degree of recommendation. RESULTS: : Of the 43 statements present in this study, 11 (25,6%) were classified with level of evidence A, 20 (46,5%) B and 12 (27,9%) C. Regarding the degree of recommendation, 18 (41,9%) statements obtained grade of recommendation 1, 14 (32,6%) 2a, 10 (23,3%) 2b e one (2,3%) 3. CONCLUSION: : The guidelines complement of the guidelines presented here allows surgeons and oncologists who work to combat gastric cancer to offer the best possible treatment, according to the local conditions available.

Caution is needed in interpreting the results of comparative studies regarding oncological operations by minimally invasive versus laparotomic access.

We aim to alert the difference between groups while comparing studies of abdominal oncological operations performed either by minimally invasive or laparotomic approaches and potential conflicts of interest in presenting or interpreting the results. Considering the large volume of scientific articles that are published, there is a need to consider the quality of the scientific production that leads to clinical decision making. In this regards, it is important to take into account the choice of the surgical access route. Randomized, controlled clinical trials are the standard for comparing the effectiveness between these interventions. Although some studies indicate advantages in minimally invasive access, caution is needed when interpreting these findings. There is no detailed observation in each of the comparative study about the real limitations and potential indications for minimally invasive procedures, such as the indications for selected and less advanced cases, in less complex cavities, as well as its elective characteristic. Several abdominal oncological operations via laparotomy would not be plausible to be completely performed through a minimally invasive access. These cases should be carefully selected and excluded from the comparative group. The comparison should be carried out, in a balanced way, with a group that could also have undergone a minimally invasive access, avoiding bias in selecting those cases of minor complexity, placed in the minimally invasive group. It is not a question of criticizing the minimally invasive technologies, but of respecting the surgeon's clinical decision regarding the most convenient method, revalidating the well-performed traditional laparotomy route, which has been unfairly criticized or downplayed by many people.

BRAZILIAN GASTRIC CANCER ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES (PART 1): AN UPDATE ON DIAGNOSIS, STAGING, ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT AND FOLLOW-UP.

BACKGROUND: The II Brazilian Consensus on Gastric Cancer by the Brazilian Gastric Cancer Association (ABCG) was recently published. On this occasion, several experts in gastric cancer expressed their opinion before the statements presented. AIM: To present the ABCG Guidelines (part 1) regarding the diagnosis, staging, endoscopic treatment and follow-up of gastric cancer patients. METHODS: To forge these Guidelines, the authors carried out an extensive and current review regarding each statement present in the II Consensus, using the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library and SciELO databases with the following descriptors: gastric cancer, staging, endoscopic treatment and follow-up. In addition, each statement was classified according to the level of evidence and degree of recommendation. RESULTS: Of the 24 statements, two (8.3%) were classified with level of evidence A, 11 (45.8%) with B and 11 (45.8%) with C. As for the degree of recommendation, six (25%) statements obtained grade of recommendation 1, nine (37.5%) recommendation 2a, six (25%) 2b and three (12.5%) grade 3. CONCLUSION: The guidelines presented here are intended to assist professionals working in the fight against gastric cancer with relevant and current information, granting them to be applied in the daily medical practice.

D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer as an independent prognostic factor of 10-year overall survival.

BACKGROUND: The extension of lymphadenectomy for GA remains on debate even after Eastern and Western clinical trials. The main concern is if morbidity of extended lymphadenectomy could be justified based on benefits in oncologic outcomes. This study addressed the extension of lymphadenectomy as a prognostic factor of overall survival (OS) for gastric adenocarcinoma (GA). METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy for GA were retrospectively evaluated. Univariate and multivariate models assessed determinants of OS. RESULTS: From 1994 to 2015, 656 consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy were evaluated. Briefly, 455 (69.4%) were male, 397 (60.5%) underwent total gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y reconstruction was done in 483 (73.6%), and R0 resection was achieved in 632 patients (96.3%). According to multivariate analysis, the risk of death was increased with older age (≥70-y), high-grade tumors, lesions ≥ 5 cm, positive nodes ≥ 3, and extra-gastric resections. Otherwise, D2 lymphadenectomy improved median OS (37 versus 16 months), 3-y (51.1 versus 32.2%), 5-y (43.2 versus 26), and 10-y OS (30.6 versus 9.4%), with HR of 0.48 (95% CI 0.34-0.67, p < 0.001). The general median OS was 31 months and 3-, 5-, and 10-y were 47.6, 40, and 27%, respectively. The median follow-up for all patients was 26 months, and for survivors was 65 months. CONCLUSION: This study showed D2 lymphadenectomy for GA as an independent prognostic factor for OS, even after 5-y and until 10-y. Our study suggests that D2 should be offered as the curative-intent treatment for all patients with GA that fit to undergo surgery.

Robotic left lateral sectionectomy as stepwise approach for cirrhotic liver.

Laparoscopy is considered the gold standard approach to perform left lateral sectionectomy (LLS). Furthermore, laparoscopy for cirrhotic patients can reduce intraoperative bleeding and postoperative morbidity when compared to open surgery. Although robotic surgery is feasible for both minor and major liver resections, it remains a work in progress and only few series reported this approach for cirrhotic patients. We reported two cases of 62-year-old men, both with hepatitis C virus and alcoholic cirrhosis, but with compensated liver functions (MELD 9-10 and Child-Pugh A5-A6). The patients were diagnosed with a single lesion in the left lobe. Robotic LLS was performed using intraoperative ultrasound to confirm findings of pre-operative image, and linear staplers were used to control left lobe inflow and outflow. The specimens were removed through Pfannenstiel incision in both patients. Both procedures followed the same standardization. The total operative time was 250 and 151 min with estimated blood loss of 100 and 70 ml, respectively, for cases 1 and 2. The procedures were made without Pringle maneuver and postoperative course was uneventful with hospital discharge at third and fourth postoperative day, respectively. The pathology examination confirmed a 2.5- and 4.5-cm hepatocellular carcinoma, respectively; both presented negative margins and cirrhosis. Robotic LLS seems to be as feasible as conventional laparoscopic approach as a stepwise procedure in a robotic learning curve for liver resection. Its benefits can also be offered to selected cirrhotic patients.

Brazilian gastric cancer association guidelines (part 2): update on treatment / Diretrizes da associação brasileira de câncer gástrico (parte 2): atualização sobre o tratamento

ABSTRACT Background : The II Brazilian Consensus on Gastric Cancer of the Brazilian Gastric Cancer Association BGCA (Part 1) was recently published. On this occasion, countless specialists working in the treatment of this disease expressed their opinion in the face of the statements presented. Aim : To present the BGCA Guidelines (Part 2) regarding indications for surgical treatment, operative techniques, extension of resection and multimodal treatment. Methods: To formulate these guidelines, the authors carried out an extensive and current review regarding each declaration present in the II Consensus, using the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library and SciELO databases initially with the following descriptors: gastric cancer, gastrectomy, lymphadenectomy, multimodal treatment. In addition, each statement was classified according to the level of evidence and degree of recommendation. Results : Of the 43 statements present in this study, 11 (25,6%) were classified with level of evidence A, 20 (46,5%) B and 12 (27,9%) C. Regarding the degree of recommendation, 18 (41,9%) statements obtained grade of recommendation 1, 14 (32,6%) 2a, 10 (23,3%) 2b e one (2,3%) 3. Conclusion : The guidelines complement of the guidelines presented here allows surgeons and oncologists who work to combat gastric cancer to offer the best possible treatment, according to the local conditions available.

RESUMO Racional: O II Consenso Brasileiro de Câncer Gástrico da Associação Brasileira de Câncer Gástrico ABCG (Parte 1) foi recentemente publicado. Nesta ocasião inúmeros especialistas que atuam no tratamento desta doença expressaram suas opiniões diante declarações apresentadas. Objetivo: Apresentar as Diretrizes da ABCG (Parte 2) quanto às indicações de tratamento cirúrgico, técnicas operatórias, extensão de ressecção e terapia combinada. Métodos: Para formulação destas diretrizes os autores realizaram extensa e atual revisão referente a cada declaração presente no II Consenso, utilizando as bases Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library e SciELO, inicialmente com os seguintes descritores: câncer gástrico, gastrectomia, linfadenectomia, terapia combinada. Ainda, cada declaração foi classificada de acordo com o nível de evidência e grau de recomendação. Resultados: Das 43 declarações presentes neste estudo, 11 (25,6%) foram classificadas com nível de evidência A, 20 (46,5%) B e 12 (27,9%) C. Quanto ao grau de recomendação, 18 (41,9%) declarações obtiveram grau de recomendação 1, 14 (32,6%) 2a, 10 (23,3%) 2b e um (2,3%) 3. Conclusão: O complemento das diretrizes aqui presentes possibilita que cirurgiões e oncologistas que atuam no combate ao câncer gástrico possam oferecer o melhor tratamento possível, de acordo com as condições locais disponíveis.

Caution is needed in interpreting the results of comparative studies regarding oncological operations by minimally invasive versus laparotomic access / É necessário cautela na interpretação dos resultados de estudos comparativos de cirurgias oncológicas por acessos minimamente invasivos vs laparotômicos

ABSTRACT We aim to alert the difference between groups while comparing studies of abdominal oncological operations performed either by minimally invasive or laparotomic approaches and potential conflicts of interest in presenting or interpreting the results. Considering the large volume of scientific articles that are published, there is a need to consider the quality of the scientific production that leads to clinical decision making. In this regards, it is important to take into account the choice of the surgical access route. Randomized, controlled clinical trials are the standard for comparing the effectiveness between these interventions. Although some studies indicate advantages in minimally invasive access, caution is needed when interpreting these findings. There is no detailed observation in each of the comparative study about the real limitations and potential indications for minimally invasive procedures, such as the indications for selected and less advanced cases, in less complex cavities, as well as its elective characteristic. Several abdominal oncological operations via laparotomy would not be plausible to be completely performed through a minimally invasive access. These cases should be carefully selected and excluded from the comparative group. The comparison should be carried out, in a balanced way, with a group that could also have undergone a minimally invasive access, avoiding bias in selecting those cases of minor complexity, placed in the minimally invasive group. It is not a question of criticizing the minimally invasive technologies, but of respecting the surgeon's clinical decision regarding the most convenient method, revalidating the well-performed traditional laparotomy route, which has been unfairly criticized or downplayed by many people.

RESUMO Objetivamos alertar a desigualdade entre grupos de pacientes, em estudos comparativos de cirurgias oncológicas abdominais por acessos minimamente invasivos ou laparotômicos, e os possíveis conflitos de interesse na demonstração ou interpretação dos resultados. Diante do grande volume de artigos científicos produzidos, há necessidade de se considerar a qualidade da produção científica de estudos para a tomada da decisão clínica quanto à eleição da via de acesso cirúrgico. Ensaios clínicos randomizados e controlados são o padrão para comparar a eficácia entre estas intervenções em situações diversas. Apesar de alguns estudos indicarem vantagens no acesso minimamente invasivo, é preciso cautela na interpretação desses achados. Não se percebe detalhada discussão que alerte, em cada estudo comparativo, sobre os reais limites e indicações possíveis de cirurgias minimamente invasivas, como indicações para casos selecionados, menos avançados, mais eletivos, e em cavidades menos complexas. Diversas cirurgias oncológicas abdominais via laparotômica não seriam plausíveis de serem, completamente, realizadas por acesso minimamente invasivo. Estas deveriam ser, criteriosamente, selecionadas e excluídas do grupo comparativo. A comparação deve ser, equilibradamente, realizada com grupo que, muito provavelmente, também poderia ter sido submetido ao acesso minimamente invasivo a contento, evitando viés de seleção da concentração de casos de complexidade menor no grupo da cirurgia minimamente invasiva. Não se trata, aqui, de desmerecer as tecnologias minimamente invasivas, mas de respeito à decisão clínica do cirurgião pelo método mais conveniente, revalidando a via laparotômica tradicional bem procedida, a qual tem sido, injustamente, criticada ou inferiorizada por muitos em nosso meio.

Ii brazilian consensus on gastric cancer by the brazilian gastric cancer association / Ii consenso brasileiro de câncer gástrico realizado pela associação brasileira de câncer gástrico

ABSTRACT Background: Since the publication of the first Brazilian Consensus on Gastric Cancer (GC) in 2012 carried out by the Brazilian Gastric Cancer Association, new concepts on diagnosis, staging, treatment and follow-up have been incorporated. Aim: This new consensus is to promote an update to professionals working in the fight against GC and to provide guidelines for the management of patients with this condition. Methods: Fifty-nine experts answered 67 statements regarding the diagnosis, staging, treatment and prognosis of GC with five possible alternatives: 1) fully agree; 2) partially agree; 3) undecided; 4) disagree and 5) strongly disagree A consensus was adopted when at least 80% of the sum of the answers "fully agree" and "partially agree" was reached. This article presents only the responses of the participating experts. Comments on each statement, as well as a literature review, will be presented in future publications. Results: Of the 67 statements, there was consensus in 50 (74%). In 10 declarations, there was 100% agreement. Conclusion: The gastric cancer treatment has evolved considerably in recent years. This consensus gathers consolidated principles in the last decades, new knowledge acquired recently, as well as promising perspectives on the management of this disease.

RESUMO Racional: Desde a publicação do primeiro Consenso Brasileiro sobre Câncer Gástrico em 2012 realizado pela Associação Brasileira de Câncer Gástrico (ABCG), novos conceitos sobre o diagnóstico, estadiamento, tratamento e seguimento foram incorporados. Objetivo: Promover uma atualização aos profissionais que atuam no combate ao câncer gástrico (CG) e fornecer diretrizes quanto ao manejo dos pacientes portadores desta afecção. Métodos: Cinquenta e nove especialistas responderam 67 declarações sobre o diagnóstico, estadiamento, tratamento e prognóstico do CG com cinco alternativas possíveis: 1) concordo plenamente; 2) concordo parcialmente; 3) indeciso; 4) discordo e 5) discordo fortemente. Foi considerado consenso a concordância de pelo menos 80% da soma das respostas "concordo plenamente" e "concordo parcialmente". Este artigo apresenta apenas as respostas dos especialistas participantes. Os comentários sobre cada declaração, assim como uma revisão da literatura serão apresentados em publicações futuras. Resultados: Das 67 declarações, houve consenso em 50 (74%). Em 10 declarações, houve concordância de 100%. Conclusão: O tratamento do câncer gástrico evoluiu consideravelmente nos últimos anos. Este consenso reúne princípios consolidados nas últimas décadas, novos conhecimentos adquiridos recentemente, assim como perspectivas promissoras sobre o manejo desta doença.

HER2 in gastric cancer: comparative analysis of three different antibodies using whole-tissue sections and tissue microarrays.

AIM: To compare the performance of three commercially available anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibodies in whole-tissue sections and tissue microarrays (TMAs) of a series of gastric tumors. METHODS: We present a comparative analysis of three anti-HER2 antibodies (HercepTest, 4B5 and SP3) using TMA and whole-tissue sections prepared from the same paraffin blocks of 199 gastric adenocarcinomas operated upon between January 2004 and December 2008 at a Brazilian cancer hospital. The data on the patients' age, sex, the anatomical location of the tumor and the Lauren's histological classification were collected from clinical and pathological records. The immunohistochemical (IHC) results were examined by two pathologists and the cases were classified as positive (3+), equivocal (2+) and negative (0 or 1+), according to the criteria of the IHC scoring system of gastric cancer. TMAs and whole-tissue sections were evaluated separately and independently. All cases yielding discordant IHC results and/or scored as 2+ were subjected to dual-color in situ hybridization in order to determine the final HER2 status. Besides determining the sensitivity and predictive value for HER2-positive status, we measured the accuracy of each antibody by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The agreement between the results obtained using the TMAs and those obtained using the whole-tissue sections was assessed by means of Kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER2 expression was observed with all antibodies. HER2-positive expression (3+) in the whole-tissue sections was observed in 23 cases (11.6%) using the 4B5 antibody, in 18 cases (9.1%) using the SP3 antibody and in 10 cases (5.1%) using the HercepTest antibody. In the TMAs, 11 positive cases (5.6%) were identified using SP3 antibody, 9 (4.6%) using the 4B5 antibody and 6 (3%) using the HercepTest antibody. The sensitivity using whole-tissue sections and TMA, respectively, was 95.2% and 42.9% with 4B5, 90.5% and 66.7% with SP3 and 47.6% and 42.9% with HercepTest. The accuracy, calculated from the area under the ROC curve, using whole-tissue sections and TMA, respectively, was 0.91 and 0.79 by 4B5, 0.86 and 0.80 by SP3 and 0.73 and 0.71 by HercepTest. The concordance of the results obtained using whole-tissue sections and TMA was 97.4% (Kappa 0.75) using HercepTest, 85.6% (Kappa 0.56) using SP3 and 84.1% (Kappa 0.38) using 4B5. CONCLUSION: The use of the 4B5 antibody on whole-tissue sections was the most accurate IHC method for evaluating HER2 expression in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Brazilian consensus in gastric cancer: guidelines for gastric cancer in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: In Brazil, gastric cancer is the fourth most common malignancy among men and sixth among women. The cause is multivariate and the risks are well known. It has prognosis and treatment defined by the location and staging of the tumor and number of lymph nodes resected and involved. AIM: The Brazilian Consensus on Gastric Cancer promoted by ABCG was designed with the intention to issue guidelines that can guide medical professionals to care for patients with this disease. METHODS: Were summarized and answered 43 questions reflecting consensus or not on diagnosis and treatment that may be used as guidance for its multidisciplinary approach. The method involved three steps. Initially, 56 digestive surgeons and related medical specialties met to formulate the questions that were sent to participants for answers on scientific evidence and personal experience. Summaries were presented, discussed and voted in plenary in two other meetings. They covered 53 questions involving: diagnosis and staging (six questions); surgical treatment (35 questions); chemotherapy and radiotherapy (seven questions) and anatomopathology, immunohistochemistry and perspective (five questions). It was considered consensus agreement on more than 70% of the votes in each item. RESULTS: All the answers were presented and voted upon, and in 42 there was consensus. CONCLUSION: It could be developed consensus on most issues that come with the care of patients with gastric cancer and they can be transformed in guidelines.

Carcinoma da papila de Vater: análise de 19 casos / Papilla of Vater carcinoma: analysis of 19 cases

Os autores analisam 19 casos de neoplasia maligna da papila de Vater registrados no Hospital A. C. Camargo, Säo Paulo, no período de 1953 a 1985. Esta neoplasia representou 0,29% dos tumores do aparelho digestivo registrados nesse período. Os sinais e sintomas mais importantes foram icterícia (94%) e hepatomegalia (75%). O tamanho médio dos tumores foi de 2,4cm. Dezesseis pacientes foram submetidos à cirurgia de Whipple, dois à derivaçäo biliar interna e um à papilotomia endoscópica e radioterapia. A mortalidade pós-operatória para os pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de Whipple foi de 25% e a sobrevida a cinco anos foi de 25%

Câncer gástrico em adultos jovens / Gastric cancer in young adults

Estudos realizados em outros países relatam que menos de 5 por cento dos casos de câncer gástrico ocorrem em pessoas com menos de 40 anos, faixa etária em que não é comum suspeitar-se desse diagnóstico. O propósito deste estudo foi avaliar os aspectos clínicos e a sobrevida de câncer gástrico em menores de 40 anos. Um estudo retrospectivo no período de 1970 a 1996 foi realizado no Hospital S. Judas Tadeu, Barretos, SP, utilizando os prontuários de 37 (4,9 por cento) pacientes na faixa etária acima. Estadiamento utilizado: TNM (UICC/ União Internacional Contra o Câncer); programa de computação Stata para fazer a análise multivariada, segundo o modelo de Cox, e a análise de sobrevida segundo o método Kaplan-Meier. Dos 37 pacientes, 81,1 por cento tinham idade de 30 a 39 anos e 18,9 por cento de 20 a 29 anos, e 54,3por cento eram do sexo masculino. O sintomas mais comuns foram nessa ordem: dor epigástrica, vômitos, emagrecimento, plenitude pós prandial e astenia. Estadiamento: EC I: 3 pacientes; EC II: 3 pacientes; EC III: 11 pacientes; EC IV: 18 pacientes e em 2 pacientes o estádio não pode ser determinado. A sobrevida média foi de 561 dias, variando de 3 a 3736 dias. Foi encontrada uma diferença significativa (p menor do que 0,005) na comparação da sobrevida entre os pacientes com estádios I e II e os com estádios III e IV. Todos os pacientes com diagnóstico inicial I e II estão vivos e os demais foram ao óbito, em média 9 meses após o diagnóstico.

Análise de resultados do tratamento cirúrgico do câncer gástrico / An analysis of results of surgical treatment of gastric cancer

Os autores, analisam a sobrevida de 452 pacientes portadores de adenocarcinoma gástrico matriculados no Departamento de Cirurgia Abdominal do Hospital A.C. Camargo e operados com finalidade radical. Os resultados säo apresentados de acordo com o estádio clínico e o número de linfonodos contaminados, verificando-se que os resultados declinam do EC I para o EC III e também com o número de linfonodos contaminados. Fazem também estudo comparativo dos resultados de tratamento em dois períodos: 1953 e 1970-1980, demonstrando melhora nos índices de sobrevida no segundo período

Ruptura de baço: apresentaçäo de um caso de paciente com linfoma / Spleen rupture: case report of a patient with lynfoma

Relatam-se aspectos diagnósticos e terapêuticos de um caso de ruptura de baço em um paciente com linfoma, onde a dificuldade esteve em saber se a ruptura pós-trauma deveu-se a um órgäo infiltrado por linfoma ou näo, mostrando a importância da laparoscopia como método de estadiamento e indicadora do tratamento efetuado