Mobile Compression Reduces Bleeding-related Readmissions and Wound Complications After THA and TKA.

BACKGROUND: The use of chemoprophylaxis to prevent thromboembolic disease after primary THA and TKA can be associated with postoperative bleeding complications. Mechanical prophylaxis has been studied as an alternative to chemoprophylaxis with greater safety in patients undergoing THA, but no data have been published comparing the safety of chemoprophylaxis versus mechanical methods for patients undergoing TKA. The risk of readmission resulting from bleeding and venous thromboembolism (VTE) has also not been determined for patients undergoing THA or TKA when treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) alone compared with mechanical prophylaxis plus aspirin (ASA). QUESTION/PURPOSES: We sought to answer four questions: For the THA and TKA cohorts, respectively, (1) was the incidence of readmission resulting from VTE and bleeding complications higher with LMWH than mobile compression plus ASA; and (2) was the incidence of wound bleeding complications higher with LMWH than mechanical compression plus ASA? For the TKA cohort specifically, (3) was the frequency of systemic bleeding events and complications related to chemical prophylaxis higher with LMWH compared with mechanical compression plus ASA? (4) Was there a difference in symptomatic VTEs between LMWH and mechanical compression plus ASA? METHODS: Between November 2008 and April 2011, 632 patients underwent primary THA and TKA. Seventy-two patients (11%) were identified before surgery as being at high risk for VTE (31 patients) or bleeding (41 patients) and were excluded from the study. Five hundred sixty patients (89%) were considered to be at standard risk for VTE and bleeding and comprise the study cohort. Between November 2008 and November 2009, 252 patients (76 THAs, 176 TKAs) underwent THA and TKA and were treated with LMWH (5 mg dalteparin given subcutaneously daily for 14 days) and in-hospital nonmobile mechanical compression. Between November 2009 and April 2011, a total of 308 patients undergoing THA and TKA (108 THAs, 200 TKAs) were treated using a mobile compression device plus oral aspirin once daily for 2 weeks after surgery. All complications and readmissions that occurred within 6 weeks of surgery were noted. There were no differences between the VTE treatment groups with regard to age, sex, or body mass index. RESULTS: For the THA cohort, there was no difference in the frequency of readmission for a bleeding complication (wound or systemic) between the two groups (2.6% for LMWH versus 0.9% for mobile compression; p = 0.57; odds ratio [OR], 2.9). Patients undergoing TKA treated with LMWH had higher readmission rates within 6 weeks of surgery because of a bleeding complication, a wound infection, or the development of a VTE (6.8% for LMWH versus 1.5% for mobile compression; p = 0.015; OR, 4.8). For the THA cohort, there was higher wound bleeding complication frequency with LMWH (9.2% for LMWH versus 0.9% for mechanical compression; p = 0.009; OR, 10.9). Patients undergoing TKA treated with LMWH had a higher frequency of wound bleeding complications or infection (3.9% for LMWH versus 0.5% for mobile compression; p = 0.028; OR, 8.2). Patients undergoing TKA treated with LMWH had higher rates of systemic bleeding or a complication secondary to LMWH administration (2.8% for LMWH versus 0% for mobile compression; p = 0.022; OR, 12.8). No difference was noted in the rate of symptomatic VTEs between either group (for THA: 2.6% for the LMWH group versus 1.9% for the mechanical compression group; p = 1; for TKA: 1.1% versus 0%, respectively; p = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, we advocate for routine use of mobile mechanical compression devices in the prevention of VTEs and complications associated with more potent chemical anticoagulants. However, more focused randomized clinical trials are needed to validate these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

How do I get out of this jam? Early postoperative problems of primary total hip arthroplasty.

Acute postoperative problems associated with total hip arthroplasty typically require prompt attention. Because the circumstances surrounding these problems provide limited time for consultation or literature review, effective management depends on the surgeon being aware of treatment options and favored treatment methods and executing the best treatments. Surgeons should be aware of management strategies for the most common and difficult early postoperative complications after primary total hip arthroplasty, including wound problems, periprosthetic femur fractures, nerve dysfunction, and venous thromboembolism. State-of-the-art knowledge will help the treating surgeon successfully manage complications.

A retrospective comparative provider workload analysis for femoral nerve and adductor canal catheters following knee arthroplasty.

Adductor canal catheters preserve quadriceps strength better than femoral nerve catheters and may facilitate postoperative ambulation following total knee arthroplasty. However, the effect of this newer technique on provider workload, if any, is unknown. We conducted a retrospective provider workload analysis comparing these two catheter techniques; all other aspects of the clinical pathway remained the same. The primary outcome was number of interventions recorded per patient postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included infusion duration, ambulation distance, opioid consumption, and hospital length of stay. Adductor canal patients required a median (10-90th percentiles) of 0.0 (0.0-2.6) interventions compared to 1.0 (0.3-3.0) interventions for femoral patients (p < 0.001); 18/23 adductor canal patients (78 %) compared to 2/22 femoral patients (9 %) required no interventions (p < 0.001). Adductor canal catheter infusions lasted 2.0 (1.4-2.0) days compared to 1.5 (1.0-2.7) days in the femoral group (p = 0.016). Adductor canal patients ambulated further [mean (SD)] than femoral patients on postoperative day 1 [24.5 (21.7) vs. 11.9 (14.6) meters, respectively; p = 0.030] and day 2 [44.9 (26.3) vs. 22.0 (22.2) meters, respectively; p = 0.003]. Postoperative opioid consumption and length of stay were similar between groups. We conclude that adductor canal catheters offer both patient and provider benefits when compared to femoral nerve catheters.

A randomized comparison of proximal and distal ultrasound-guided adductor canal catheter insertion sites for knee arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVES: Proximal and distal (mid-thigh) ultrasound-guided continuous adductor canal block techniques have been described but not yet compared, and infusion benefits or side effects may be determined by catheter location. We hypothesized that proximal placement will result in faster onset of saphenous nerve anesthesia, without additional motor block, compared to a distal technique. METHODS: Preoperatively, patients receiving an ultrasound-guided nonstimulating adductor canal catheter for knee arthroplasty were randomly assigned to either proximal or distal insertion. A local anesthetic bolus was administered via the catheter after successful placement. The primary outcome was the time to achieve complete sensory anesthesia in the saphenous nerve distribution. Secondary outcomes included procedural time, procedure-related pain and complications, postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and motor weakness. RESULTS: Proximal insertion (n = 23) took a median (10th-90th percentiles) of 12.0 (3.0-21.0) minutes versus 6.0 (3.0-21.0) minutes for distal insertion (n = 21; P= .106) to anesthetize the medial calf. Only 10 of 25 (40%) and 10 of 24 (42%) patients in the proximal and distal groups, respectively, developed anesthesia at both the medial calf and top of the patella (P= .978). Bolus-induced motor weakness occurred in 19 of 25 (76%) and 16 of 24 (67%) patients in the proximal and distal groups (P = .529). Ten of 24 patients (42%) in the distal group required intravenous morphine postoperatively, compared to 2 of 24 (8%) in the proximal group (P = .008), but there were no differences in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous adductor canal blocks can be performed reliably at both proximal and distal locations. The proximal approach may offer minor analgesic and logistic advantages without an increase in motor block.

Continuous adductor canal blocks are superior to continuous femoral nerve blocks in promoting early ambulation after TKA.

BACKGROUND: Femoral continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNBs) provide effective analgesia after TKA but have been associated with quadriceps weakness and delayed ambulation. A promising alternative is adductor canal CPNB that delivers a primarily sensory blockade; however, the differential effects of these two techniques on functional outcomes after TKA are not well established. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether, after TKA, patients with adductor canal CPNB versus patients with femoral CPNB demonstrated (1) greater total ambulation distance on Postoperative Day (POD) 1 and 2 and (2) decreased daily opioid consumption, pain scores, and hospital length of stay. METHODS: Between October 2011 and October 2012, 180 patients underwent primary TKA at our practice site, of whom 93% (n = 168) had CPNBs. In this sequential series, the first 102 patients had femoral CPNBs, and the next 66 had adductor canal CPNBs. The change resulted from a modification to our clinical pathway, which involved only a change to the block. An evaluator not involved in the patients' care reviewed their medical records to record the parameters noted above. RESULTS: Ambulation distances were higher in the adductor canal group than in the femoral group on POD 1 (median [10(th)-90(th) percentiles]: 37 m [0-90 m] versus 6 m [0-51 m]; p < 0.001) and POD 2 (60 m [0-120 m] versus 21 m [0-78 m]; p = 0.003). Adjusted linear regression confirmed the association between adductor canal catheter use and ambulation distance on POD 1 (B = 23; 95% CI = 14-33; p < 0.001) and POD 2 (B = 19; 95% CI = 5-33; p = 0.008). Pain scores, daily opioid consumption, and hospital length of stay were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adductor canal CPNB may promote greater early postoperative ambulation compared to femoral CPNB after TKA without a reduction in analgesia. Future randomized studies are needed to validate our major findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A randomized comparison of long-and short-axis imaging for in-plane ultrasound-guided femoral perineural catheter insertion.

OBJECTIVES: Continuous femoral nerve blocks provide effective analgesia after knee arthroplasty, and infusion effects depend on reliable catheter location. Ultrasound-guided perineural catheter insertion using a short-axis in-plane technique has been validated, but the optimal catheter location relative to target nerve and placement orientation remain unknown. We hypothesized that a long-axis in-plane technique for femoral perineural catheter insertion results in faster onset of sensory anesthesia compared to a short-axis in-plane technique. METHODS: Preoperatively, patients receiving an ultrasound-guided nonstimulating femoral perineural catheter for knee surgery were randomly assigned to either the long-axis in-plane or short-axis in-plane technique. A local anesthetic was administered via the catheter after successful insertion. The primary outcome was the time to achieve complete sensory anesthesia. Secondary outcomes included the procedural time, the onset time of the motor block, pain and muscle weakness reported on postoperative day 1, and procedure-related complications. RESULTS: The short-axis group (n = 23) took a median (10th-90th percentiles) of 9.0 (6.0-20.4) minutes compared to 6.0 (3.0-14.4) minutes for the long-axis group (n = 23; P = .044) to achieve complete sensory anesthesia. Short-axis procedures took 5.0 (4.0-7.8) minutes to perform compared to 9.0 (7.0-14.8) minutes for long-axis procedures (P < .001). In the short-axis group, 19 of 23 (83%) achieved a complete motor block within the testing period compared to 18 of 23 (78%) in the long-axis group (P = .813); short-axis procedures took 12.0 (6.0-15.0) minutes versus 15.0 (5.1-27.9) minutes for long-axis procedures (P = .048). There were no statistically significant differences in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Long-axis in-plane femoral perineural catheters result in a slightly faster onset of sensory anesthesia, but placement takes longer to perform without other clinical advantages.

MI TKA: a risk factor for early revision surgery.

Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty (MI TKA) was developed with the potential to decrease surgical trauma, pain, and recovery time. While this procedure has increased in popularity, some surgeons have questioned its safety and long-term efficacy. In this study 58 consecutive revision total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) (57 patients) performed at one academic medical center from 2006 to 2008 are reviewed. Prospectively collected clinical and radiographic data included: incision length, gender, age, time to revision surgery, and primary diagnosis at time of revision. Of these, 34 knees involving infection and rerevision were excluded. Of the remaining 24 knees, 11 knees that met inclusion criteria had undergone MI TKA. There were no differences between the groups with regard to age, diagnosis, body mass index, and gender. Average time to revision was shorter for the MI TKA patients (29 vs. 65 months, p < 0.032, odds ratio 14.7). Reasons for revision were aseptic loosening (55%), pain/stiffness (27%), malrotation (9%), and instability (9%) in the MI TKA group and aseptic loosening (53%), instability (15%), pain/stiffness (8%), malrotation (8%), combined malrotation and instability (8%), and polyethylene wear/osteolysis (8%) in the traditional TKA group. These data suggest that MI TKA may be a risk factor for early revision.

Acetabular component positioning using the transverse acetabular ligament: can you find it and does it help?

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported that the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) can be used to orient the acetabular component during total hip arthroplasty and that it can be identified in nearly all patients. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We attempted to determine how often the TAL could be identified during primary THA and its accuracy as a guide for acetabular component positioning. METHODS: In a prospective series of 63 patients (64 hips) undergoing primary THA, two surgeons attempted to identify the TAL and, if it was found, to use it for acetabular component orientation. Patients in whom the TAL was identified served as the study group and the ligament was used for cup orientation in those patients; the remaining patients in whom the ligament could not be identified served as a control group and had free-hand cup positioning. Anteversion was determined by radiographic measurement from true lateral views. RESULTS: The TAL was identified in only 30 hips (47%) and was more likely to be found in patients who did not have inferior acetabular osteophytes. Acetabular position was not improved using this ligament for reference. CONCLUSIONS: The TAL could not be routinely identified at surgery and when used for cup orientation it was no more accurate for cup positioning than free-hand technique.

Long-term comparison of mobile-bearing vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Few published reports have been published regarding a comparison of the long-term outcomes between mobile- (MB) and fixed-bearing component designs for knee arthroplasty. The minimum 10-year clinical and radiologic follow-up of an unselected consecutive series of 89 patients (107 knees) who were randomized to have one of these different designs for primary arthroplasty was done. Twenty-six patients (30 knees) who had a fixed-bearing design and 24 patients (33 knees) who had an MB prosthesis were available for follow-up. Two MB knees were revised for aseptic loosening of a tibial component in one and femoral component fracture in the other. In patients who did not have revision surgery, there were no differences between the groups with respect to mean Knee Society scores, knee flexion, or pain scores.

Cannabinoid and Opioid Use Among Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients: A 6-Year, Single-Institution Study.

Evidence is limited regarding cannabinoid use among total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients, despite increased availability and popularity for treating chronic pain. The authors hypothesized that preoperative cannabinoid use increased and opioid use decreased during a 6-year interval in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients, and also asked whether complications were associated with use of these substances. This retrospective, single-institution study reviewed electronic medical records and the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) database for TJA cases from 2012 through 2017. Primary outcomes were the prevalence and trends of active cannabinoid and opioid use, as determined by routine preoperative urine toxicology screening. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to investigate a secondary outcome, whether there was an association between cannabinoid or opioid use and postoperative complications. A total of 1778 operations (1161 TKAs and 617 THAs) performed on 1519 patients were reviewed. The overall prevalence of pre-operative cannabinoid and opioid use was 11% and 23%, respectively. Comparing 2012 with 2017, cannabinoid use increased from 9% to 15% (P=.049), and opioid use decreased from 24% to 17% (P=.040). Cannabinoid users were more likely to be taking opioids than nonusers (P=.002). Controlling for age, sex, surgery type, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score, cannabinoid use was not associated with 90-day readmission, infection, reoperation, or other VASQIP-captured complications. Laboratory testing indicated a much higher prevalence of cannabinoid use among TJA patients than previously reported. During a 6-year period, cannabinoid use increased more than 60%, and opioid use decreased approximately 30%. These findings indicate that cannabinoid use did not appear to be associated with perioperative complications. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(1):e101-e106.].

Minimal incision surgery as a risk factor for early failure of total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Minimal incision total hip arthroplasty (MI THA) techniques were developed to decrease postoperative pain and recovery time. Although these techniques have increased in popularity, the long-term survivorship of these procedures is unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore investigated whether the time to revision in our referral practice was shorter for patients who underwent primary MI THA compared to primary traditional THA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 46 revision THAs performed during a 3-year period. We excluded revisions performed for infection and rerevisions. Patients with incisions less than or equal to 10 cm were defined as having had MI THA. Fifteen of the 46 patients (33%) had undergone primary MI THA. At the time of primary index THA, the mean ages of the MI and non-MI patients were 65 years and 55 years, respectively. RESULTS: The mean time to revision was 1.4 years for the MI patients compared with 14.7 years for the non-MI patients. Twelve of the 15 patients having MI THA required revision within 2 years of primary THA compared to 4 of the 31 patients without MI surgery (OR = 26.5, 95% CI 4.4-160.0). There were no differences between the groups with regard to age, gender, or body mass index. The most common reasons for revision in the MI THA group were intraoperative fracture and failure of femoral component osseointegration. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest MI THA may be a risk factor for early revision surgery and the long-term survival therefore may be lower than that for non-MI surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Hylamer vs conventional polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty: a long-term case-control study of wear rates and osteolysis.

The long-term results of Hylamer implants have not been reported previously. Clinical and radiographic results of a consecutive series of 43 patients (45 hips) who had primary total hip arthroplasty using Hylamer liners were compared with those of 37 patients (43 hips) who had conventional liners after 10-year follow-up. The linear wear rates for Hylamer and conventional polyethylene acetabular liners were 0.21 and 0.20 mm/y, respectively. The number of pelvic osteolytic lesions and their size detected on plain radiographs were significantly greater for Hylamer liners. Seven Hylamer hips were revised or are pending revision for osteolysis (16%) compared with 1 control hip. Close radiographic surveillance of patients who have Hylamer liners and evidence of osteolysis found on plain radiographs is warranted.

Candida infection in total knee arthroplasty with successful reimplantation.

Fungal infections associated with prosthetic joints are uncommon. The first case report describes a woman with insidious onset of a candidal infection of a revision total knee arthroplasty. After multiple joint debridements and prolonged antibacterial and antifungal therapy, she had a successful reimplantation of a knee prosthesis. The second case report concerns a man who had a primary cemented total knee arthroplasty that became infected with Candida albicans. He underwent resection arthroplasty with eventual replant without recurrence at 20 years. Although resection arthroplasty should be maintained as the gold standard in the surgical treatment of this problem, the first case shows a successful short-term outcome ofreimplantation of a patient with fungal infection of long-stemmed, revision total knee replacement. It also shows a treatment failure with fluconazole that was cured by voriconazole and caspofungin, two more recently developed antifungal agents.

A survey of Hip Society surgeons concerning the direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty.

AIMS: To establish whether there was a consensus among the members of the Hip Society (HS) on the role of direct anterior approach (DAA) contemporary primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: An online survey was sent to all 112 active and senior members of the HS, to which 71 members responded. The survey was constructed to determine whether they believed that evidence-based medicine proves, in modern clinical practice, that the DAA has significant benefits compared to risks when contrasted with other approaches. In addition, they were asked if they currently used the DAA. RESULTS: While only 16.9% (12/71) of respondents had been trained in a generic anterior approach during residency, 49.3% (35/71) had used the DAA in their clinical practice in the past or were using it at the present time. Unexpectedly, 42.9% (15/35) of respondents who had used the DAA in the past had abandoned it by the time of this survey. Only 22.5% (16/71) of all respondents believed that evidence-based medicine proves that the DAA has significant benefits compared to risks in contrast to other approaches. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive literature review found only three prospective randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing the DAA with another approach with greater than one-year follow-up. Two showed minor benefits within the early postoperative period only, and one of those showed poorer mid-term results. Most of the published comparison studies with short follow-up show longer surgical times and greater blood loss for the DAA, and many three-month comparison studies show higher complication rates for the DAA using a proprietary traction table. The complications included problems with wound healing, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury, femoral component loosening, and femoral fractures. Because of the lack of evidence from RCTs showing superiority of the DAA over other approaches and reports of higher complications, the opinion of a large majority (77.5%; 55/71) of HS surgeons was that the DAA lacks sufficient evidence to warrant its use. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7 Supple B):57-61.

Primary total hip arthroplasty using an anterior approach and a fracture table: short-term results from a community hospital.

There are no data regarding the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive hip arthroplasty technique performed by community practice orthopedists. The early clinical and radiographic results of primary total hip arthroplasty using a minimally invasive anterior approach to the hip performed on a fracture table were studied. Two hundred thirty-one consecutive patients (247 hips) of 5 community practice surgeons were studied. The average surgical time (164 minutes) and estimated blood loss (858 mL) were more than double, and the major complication rate (9%) was 6 times that reported by an innovator of the procedure. However, no postoperative dislocations occurred. Adequate training is critical to reduce the risk of complications during the learning experience of minimally invasive hip arthroplasty procedures by community practice surgeons.

A comparison of the results of total hip and knee arthroplasty performed on a teaching service or a private practice service.

BACKGROUND: Active participation of residents and fellows in the performance of total hip and total knee arthroplasties may affect the outcomes of these procedures. We evaluated the early clinical results and complications associated with primary total hip and knee arthroplasties at a hospital that had both university teaching and private practice orthopaedic services. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on a consecutive series of 347 patients who had undergone 230 total hip and 171 total knee procedures performed by one attending surgeon. One hundred and sixty-nine patients underwent an arthroplasty during which a resident or fellow on a teaching service assisted the attending surgeon; during these procedures, the resident or fellow performed part of the arthroplasty under the direct supervision of the attending surgeon. Subsequently, 178 patients underwent an arthroplasty performed by the same surgeon without resident or fellow participation. RESULTS: Significantly longer operative times were recorded for both total hip arthroplasty (average, seventy-three compared with sixty-one minutes; p < 0.0001) and total knee arthroplasty (average, eighty compared with seventy-three minutes; p = 0.0028) when the procedures were performed with the participation of residents or fellows. For total hip arthroplasty the complication rates were 8% for the teaching service and 10% for the private practice service, and for total knee arthroplasty they were 3% for each service. With the numbers studied, there were no differences in any clinical outcomes between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Teaching and active participation from residents and fellows during total hip and total knee arthroplasty did not have a detrimental effect on the early clinical results, except for a longer surgical time.

In the absence of evidence--why bother? A literature review of minimally invasive total hip replacement surgery.

Two new total hip replacement (THR) procedures have been termed minimally invasive. It is claimed that these smaller incision techniques reduce soft-tissue trauma, decrease postoperative pain and blood loss, speed recovery, and reduce the length of the hospital stay compared with hip replacement using the standard incision technique. These new procedures use either one small 6- to 10-cm incision through a posterior, lateral, or anterior approach or two very small (a 2.5 cm posterior incision for placement of the femoral component and a 5-cm anterior incision for placement of the acetabular component) incisions to accomplish the same THR procedure that requires a standard length incision of 15 to 20 cm. Controversy exists on whether these small incision THRs are actually minimally invasive. It is debated whether a small skin incision that requires the application of high forces on the soft tissues for exposure of the joint but less muscle dissection will produce less overall trauma to the patient than a larger incision with wider muscle dissection but with lower retraction forces. If small incision THR techniques are less traumatic overall, then they should produce less pain, lower transfusion requirements, a shorter hospital stay, and a faster recovery for patients. The other important issues regarding small incision procedures are whether the decreased visualization provided by these techniques is adequate to prevent a higher complication rate from damage to the surrounding neurovascular structures and outcomes that are equivalent to those found for THR using the standard technique. A review of the literature to date provides no convincing evidence of any significant advantages of small incision THR compared with standard incision THR other than a shorter surgical scar. Comparison studies that prove both significant advantages and low complication rates for small incision THR are needed before these procedures can be recommended for general use.

History of Nocturia May Guide Urinary Catheterization for Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Urinary tract infection is a common complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and can be related to urethral catheterization. This study attempted to determine whether nocturia could be used as an indicator of risk for postoperative urinary retention to limit the need for prophylactic catheterization in men undergoing TKA. A retrospective study was performed in a consecutive series of men undergoing TKA at a single Veterans Affairs medical center. Patients reporting 0 episodes or 1 episode of nocturia per night were not catheterized prophylactically, and patients reporting 2 or more episodes of nocturia each night were catheterized preoperatively. Of 100 consecutive patients, 51 reported no more than 1 episode of nocturia and did not undergo preoperative catheterization. Of these patients, 10 required 1 postoperative straight catheterization for urinary retention. In the 49 patients who were catheterized prophylactically, all catheters were removed on postoperative day 1. Only 1 of these patients required reinsertion of a catheter. No patient in either group was discharged with a catheter or had a urinary tract infection. Previously, the authors' standard protocol was to use a prophylactic urinary catheter for all men after TKA. In this 100-patient cohort, with this new protocol, 41 patients were not catheterized at all and 10 patients had only 1 straight catheterization. In this study, the frequency of nocturia in men undergoing TKA was an effective screening tool that safely reduced the need for an indwelling catheter in 51% of patients. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(4):e749-e752.].

An ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca catheter technique does not impair ambulatory ability within a clinical pathway for total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Both neuraxial and peripheral regional analgesic techniques offer postoperative analgesia for total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. While no single technique is preferred, quadriceps muscle weakness from peripheral nerve blocks may impede rehabilitation. We designed this study to compare postoperative ambulation outcome in THA patients who were treated with a new ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca catheter (FIC) technique or intrathecal morphine (ITM). METHODS: We reviewed the electronic health records of a sequential series of primary unilateral THA patients who were part of a standardized clinical pathway; apart from differences in regional analgesic technique, all other aspects of the pathway were the same. Our primary outcome was total ambulation distance (meters) combined for postoperative days 1 and 2. Secondary outcomes included daily opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalents) and analgesic-related side effects. We examined the association between the primary outcome and analgesic technique by performing crude and adjusted ordinary least-squares linear regression. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically-significant. RESULTS: The study analyzed the records of 179 patients (fascia iliaca, n = 106; intrathecal, n = 73). The primary outcome (total ambulation distance) did not differ between the groups (P = 0.08). Body mass index (BMI) was the only factor (ß = -1.7 [95% CI -0.5 to -2.9], P < 0.01) associated with ambulation distance. Opioid consumption did not differ, while increased pruritus was seen in the intrathecal group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: BMI affects postoperative ambulation outcome after hip arthroplasty, whereas the type of regional analgesic technique used does not. An ultrasound-guided FIC technique offers similar analgesia with fewer side effects when compared with ITM.