Cancerous inhibitor of PP2A is targeted by natural compound celastrol for degradation in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Celastrol binds CIP2A and enhances CIP2A-CHIP interaction, leading to ubiquitination/degradation of CIP2A and inhibition of lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Celastrol potentiates cisplatin's efficacy by suppressing the CIP2A-Akt pathway, and therefore CIP2A inhibitors may represent novel therapeutics for cancer.

Association between the concentration of imatinib in bone marrow mononuclear cells, mutation status of ABCB1 and therapeutic response in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia.

Low concentrations of imatinib (IM) in bone marrow cells have been linked with poor prognosis in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), which may be caused by the emergence of ATP-binding cassette transporter B1 (ABCB1) mutations. The aim of present study was to investigate how clinical outcomes vary among patients with different single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of ABCB1. A total of 48 adult patients with CML and higher than median ABCB1 mRNA levels were selected for testing of ABCB1 SNPs. In 28 of the 48 patients, the IM concentration and expression levels of human organic cation transporter 1 (hOCT1) and ABCB1 in bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMCs) were also tested. Correlations between treatment outcomes and IM concentration or the SNP status of ABCB1 were analyzed. Patients were classified by therapeutic response as major molecular response (MMR) (n=11), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) (n=19) and non-CCyR (n=18) groups. It was found that the concentration of IM in BMMCs of the CCyR group was significant higher than that of the resistant groups (P=0.013). In addition, the IM concentration was positively correlated with the expression of hOCT1 mRNA (R=0.456, P=0.033), but negatively correlated with the expression of ABCB1 mRNA (R=-0.491, P=0.015). Furthermore, the mRNA expression level of ABCB1 was not associated with therapeutic response, but SNPs of the ABCB1 gene were associated with the response to IM. In conclusion, the concentration of IM in BMMCs may be regulated by the ABCB1 gene, and SNPs of the ABCB1 gene predict the therapeutic response to IM in patients with CML.

Imatinib and bortezomib induce the expression and distribution of anaphase-promoting complex adaptor protein Cdh1 in blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia.

Anaphase promoting complex cofactor Cdh1 plays a critical role in tumor suppression and genomic stability in cancer. However, its role in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) remains unclear. We treated both wild-type and imatinib-resistant K562 cells with imatinib or nilotinib and bortezomib, respectively. The siRNAs of Cdh1 and Skp2 were designed and transiently transfected with HiPerFect transfection reagent into CML cells. Expression of Cdh1-Skp2-p27 pathway proteins were detected by Western blotting. Cell cycle, cell apoptosis and cellular morphology were detected by flow cytometry and Wright staining. Our study revealed that Cdh1 was expressed at lower levels in imatinib-resistant CML blast crisis (BC) patients than imatinib-sensitive ones. Moreover, imatinib and bortezomib induced cell cycle quiescence or arrest, upregulation and nuclear relocation of Cdh1 in CML cells. Furthermore, nilotinib and bortezomib resulted in upregulation of Cdh1 in imatinib-resistant CML cells. Conversely, Cdh1 silencing resulted in stabilization of Skp2 and Cdc20, subsequently promoting G1-S transition and formation of multinucleated cells. Our study shows that TKIs and bortezomib can regulate the cell cycle and cell apoptosis via regulation of the expression and redistribution of Cdh1 in CML-BC, which sheds light on the orchestration of crosstalk between TKIs and bortezomib in imatinib-resistant CML-BC. Additionally, Cdh1 tends to play an important role in maintenance of genomic stability, the detailed mechanisms deserve further study.

Synergistic effect of panobinostat and bortezomib on chemoresistant acute myelogenous leukemia cells via AKT and NF-κB pathways.

In this study, we investigated the synergistic effects of panobinostat and bortezomib on adriamycin-resistant HL60/ADR cells and refractory acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) primary cells. Combination of both agents had synergistic cytotoxicity on these cells, and increased the sensitivity of HL60/ADR cells to adriamycin. Panobinostat plus bortezomib was shown to modulate multiple apoptotic and drug metabolic related molecules, including activation of caspases, down-regulation of XIAP, Bcl-2 and MRP1. These effects were likely to be mediated via inhibition of AKT and NF-κB pathways. These findings provide evidence for clinic protocols using panobinostat and borezomib to overcome drug resistance in refractory AML patients.

[Reversal effect of LBH589 alone or in combination with bortezomib on drug-resistance in myeloid leukemia and its mechanism].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate reversal effect of histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589 alone or in combination with proteasome inhibitor bortezomib on drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and its mechanism. METHODS: Ex vivo cultures of HL-60/ADM cells and fresh refractory AML cells were treated with LBH589, bortezomib or their combination at varying concentrations. Proliferation capacity, apoptosis rate and reversal of drug resistance were evaluated by MTT assay, dual staining of Hoechst 33342 and Annexin VFITC/PI by flow cytometry, and adriamycin uptake rate with proliferation inhibition, respectively. The change of signal pathway at protein level was analyzed by Western blot. RESULTS: Synergistic cytotoxicity was observed in the combination treatment with LBH589 and bortezomib against HL-60/ADM cells, as well as the fresh AML cells, the most powerful synergy being observed at 21 nmol/L LBH589 plus 12 nmol/L bortezomib, with CI values of 0.531 and 0.498, respectively by Calcusyn software analysis. Moreover, the accumulation of adriamycin in HL-60/ADM cells was increased more in combination treatment [(64.81 +/- 3.69)%] than in either LBH589 [(28.96 +/- 2.52)%] or bortezomib [(37.29 +/- 3.71)%] alone (P < 0.05), and so did the uptake rate of adriamycin being (64.81 +/- 3.69)%, (28.96 +/- 2.52)% and (37.29 +/- 3.71)% respectively (P < 0.05). The combination treatment induced multiple apoptotic molecules co-action and intracellular drug accumulation contributed to the synergistic cytotoxicity, including caspase activation, PARP cleavage, XIAP downregulation, p53-dependent suppression of Bcl-2 and MRP1 expression via the inhibition of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) signaling pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Combination treatment of drug resistant AML cells with LBH589 and bortezomib produces a synergistic effect of in creating sensitivity to chemotherapy. The mechanism may be mainly resulted from inhibition of PI3K/ Akt/NF-kappaB signaling pathway.

Synergy between proteasome inhibitors and imatinib mesylate in chronic myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Resistance developed by leukemic cells, unsatisfactory efficacy on patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) at accelerated and blastic phases, and potential cardiotoxity, have been limitations for imatinib mesylate (IM) in treating CML. Whether low dose IM in combination with agents of distinct but related mechanisms could be one of the strategies to overcome these concerns warrants careful investigation. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We tested the therapeutic efficacies as well as adverse effects of low dose IM in combination with proteasome inhibitor, Bortezomib (BOR) or proteasome inhibitor I (PSI), in two CML murine models, and investigated possible mechanisms of action on CML cells. Our results demonstrated that low dose IM in combination with BOR exerted satisfactory efficacy in prolongation of life span and inhibition of tumor growth in mice, and did not cause cardiotoxicity or body weight loss. Consistently, BOR and PSI enhanced IM-induced inhibition of long-term clonogenic activity and short-term cell growth of CML stem/progenitor cells, and potentiated IM-caused inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis of BCR-ABL+ cells. IM/BOR and IM/PSI inhibited Bcl-2, increased cytoplasmic cytochrome C, and activated caspases. While exerting suppressive effects on BCR-ABL, E2F1, and beta-catenin, IM/BOR and IM/PSI inhibited proteasomal degradation of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), leading to a re-activation of this important negative regulator of BCR-ABL. In addition, both combination therapties inhibited Bruton's tyrosine kinase via suppression of NFkappaB. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that combined use of tyrosine kinase inhibitor and proteasome inhibitor might be helpful for optimizing CML treatment.