RESUMO
After a rich history in medicine, randomized control trials (RCTs), both simple and complex, are in increasing use in other areas, such as web-based A/B testing and planning and design of decisions. A main objective of RCTs is to be able to measure parameters, and contrasts in particular, while guarding against biases from hidden confounders. After careful definitions of classical entities such as contrasts, an algebraic method based on circuits is introduced which gives a wide choice of randomization schemes.
RESUMO
The paper covers the design and analysis of experiments to discriminate between two Gaussian process models with different covariance kernels, such as those widely used in computer experiments, kriging, sensor location and machine learning. Two frameworks are considered. First, we study sequential constructions, where successive design (observation) points are selected, either as additional points to an existing design or from the beginning of observation. The selection relies on the maximisation of the difference between the symmetric Kullback Leibler divergences for the two models, which depends on the observations, or on the mean squared error of both models, which does not. Then, we consider static criteria, such as the familiar log-likelihood ratios and the Fréchet distance between the covariance functions of the two models. Other distance-based criteria, simpler to compute than previous ones, are also introduced, for which, considering the framework of approximate design, a necessary condition for the optimality of a design measure is provided. The paper includes a study of the mathematical links between different criteria and numerical illustrations are provided.
RESUMO
This paper introduces a new way to define a genome rearrangement distance, using the concept of mean first passage time from probability theory. Crucially, this distance provides a genuine metric on genome space. We develop the theory and introduce a link to a graph-based zeta function. The approach is very general and can be applied to a wide variety of group-theoretic models of genome evolution.
Assuntos
Evolução Molecular , Rearranjo Gênico , Modelos Genéticos , Filogenia , Bactérias/genética , Inversão Cromossômica , Genoma , Genoma Bacteriano , Funções Verossimilhança , Cadeias de Markov , Conceitos Matemáticos , Teoria da Probabilidade , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Classical dimensional analysis in its original form starts by expressing the units for derived quantities, such as force, in terms of power products of basic units [Formula: see text] etc. This suggests the use of toric ideal theory from algebraic geometry. Within this the Graver basis provides a unique primitive basis in a well-defined sense, which typically has more terms than the standard Buckingham approach. Some textbook examples are revisited and the full set of primitive invariants found. First, a worked example based on convection is introduced to recall the Buckingham method, but using computer algebra to obtain an integer [Formula: see text] matrix from the initial integer [Formula: see text] matrix holding the exponents for the derived quantities. The [Formula: see text] matrix defines the dimensionless variables. But, rather than this integer linear algebra approach it is shown how, by staying with the power product representation, the full set of invariants (dimensionless groups) is obtained directly from the toric ideal defined by [Formula: see text]. One candidate for the set of invariants is a simple basis of the toric ideal. This, although larger than the rank of [Formula: see text], is typically not unique. However, the alternative Graver basis is unique and defines a maximal set of invariants, which are primitive in a simple sense. In addition to the running example four examples are taken from: a windmill, convection, electrodynamics and the hydrogen atom. The method reveals some named invariants. A selection of computer algebra packages is used to show the considerable ease with which both a simple basis and a Graver basis can be found.
Assuntos
Matemática , Fenômenos Físicos , Condutividade Elétrica , Hidrogênio/químicaRESUMO
In many scientific problems the purpose of comparing two linear regression models is to demonstrate that they have only negligible differences and so can be regarded as being practically equivalent. The frequently used statistical approach of testing the homogeneity null hypothesis of the two models by using a partial F test is not appropriate for this purpose. In this paper, a simultaneous confidence band is proposed which provides an upper bound on the largest possible difference between the two models, in units of the standard error of the observations, over a given region of the covariates. This is demonstrated to be a more practical method for assessing the equivalence of the two regression models.