Global miRNA profiling reveals key molecules that contribute to different chronic lymphocytic leukemia incidences in Asian and Western populations.

It has been known for decades that the incidence of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is significantly lower in Asia than in Western countries, but the reason responsible for this difference still remains a major knowledge gap. Using GeneChip® miRNA array to analyze the global microRNA expression in B lymphocytes from Asian and Western CLL patients and healthy individuals, we have identified microRNA with CLL-promoting or suppressive functions that are differentially expressed in Asian and Western individuals. In particular, miR-4485 is upregulated in CLL patients of both ethnic groups, and its expression is significantly lower in Asian healthy individuals. Genetic silencing of miR-4485 in CLL cells suppresses leukemia cell growth, whereas ectopic expression of miR-4485 promotes cell proliferation. Mechanistically, miR-4485 exerts its CLL-promoting activity by inhibiting the expression of TGR5 and activating the ERK1/2 pathway. In contrast, miR-138, miR-181a, miR- 181c, miR-181d, and miR-363 with tumor-suppressive function are highly expressed in Asian healthy individuals. Our study suggests that differential expression of several important microRNA with pro- or anti-CLL functions in Asian and Western B lymphocytes likely contributes to the difference in CLL incidence between the two ethnic groups, and that miR-4485 and its downstream molecule TGR5 could be potential therapeutic targets.

A composite single-nucleotide polymorphism prediction signature for extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma.

Current prognostic scoring systems based on clinicopathologic variables are inadequate in predicting the survival and treatment response of extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) patients undergoing nonanthracyline-based treatment. We aimed to construct a classifier based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for improving predictive accuracy and guiding clinical decision making. Data from 722 patients with ENKTL from international centers were analyzed. A 7-SNP-based classifier was constructed using LASSO Cox regression in the training cohort (n = 336) and further validated in the internal testing cohort (n = 144) and in 2 external validation cohorts (n = 142 and n = 100). The 7-SNP-based classifier showed good prognostic predictive efficacy in the training cohort and the 3 validation cohorts. Patients with high- and low-risk scores calculated by the classifier exhibited significantly different progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (all P < .001). The 7-SNP-based classifier was further proved to be an independent prognostic factor by multivariate analysis, and its predictive accuracy was significantly better than clinicopathological risk variables. Application of the 7-SNP-based classifier was not affected by sample types. Notably, chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy significantly improved PFS and OS vs radiotherapy alone in high-risk Ann Arbor stage I patients, whereas there was no statistical difference between the 2 therapeutic modalities among low-risk patients. A nomogram was constructed comprising the classifier and clinicopathological variables; it showed remarkably better predictive accuracy than either variable alone. The 7-SNP-based classifier is a complement to existing risk-stratification systems in ENKTL, which could have significant implications for clinical decision making for patients with ENKTL.

Aponermin or placebo in combination with thalidomide and dexamethasone in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CPT-MM301): a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Aponermin, a circularly permuted tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, is a potential death receptor 4/5-targeted antitumour candidate. Previous phase 1/2 studies have demonstrated the efficacy of aponermin in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). To confirm the superiority of aponermin plus thalidomide and dexamethasone (aponermin group) over placebo plus thalidomide and dexamethasone (placebo group) in RRMM, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled phase 3 trial was performed. METHODS: Four hundred seventeen patients with RRMM who had previously received at least two regimens were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive aponermin, thalidomide, and dexamethasone or placebo, thalidomide, and dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: A total of 415 patients received at least one dose of trial treatment (276 vs. 139). The median PFS was 5.5 months in the aponermin group and 3.1 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-0.78; P < 0.001). The median OS was 22.4 months for the aponermin group and 16.4 months for the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.89; P = 0.003). Significantly higher rates of ORR (30.4% vs. 13.7%, P < 0.001) and very good partial response or better (14.1% vs. 2.2%, P < 0.0001) were achieved in the aponermin group than in the placebo group. Treatment with aponermin caused hepatotoxicity in some patients, as indicated by the elevated alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, or lactate dehydrogenase levels (52.2% vs. 24.5%, 51.1% vs. 19.4% and 44.9% vs. 21.6%, respectively), mostly grade 1/2, transient and reversible. The main grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia, pneumonia and hyperglycemia. The incidence of serious adverse events was similar between the two groups (40.6% vs. 37.4%). There was no evidence that aponermin leads to hematological toxicity, nephrotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, or secondary tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Aponermin plus thalidomide and dexamethasone significantly improved PFS, OS and ORR with manageable side effects in RRMM patients who had received at least two prior therapies. These results support the use of aponermin, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as a treatment option for RRMM patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn as ChiCTR-IPR-15006024, 17/11/2014.

Orelabrutinib in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma patients: Multi-center, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study.

Orelabrutinib is a novel, small molecule, selective irreversible Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety in patients with refractory or relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). This is single-arm, multi-center, open-label, phase 2 study in 80 eligible Chinese patients, who were treated with monotherapy of orelabrutinib at 150 mg once daily. Overall response rate evaluated by an independent review committee was the primary endpoint, and secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Independent review committee assessed overall response rate was 92.5% (74/80); complete response 21.3% (17/80), partial response 60.0% (48/80), partial response with lymphocytosis 11.3% (9/80). At a 32.3-month median follow-up, the median progression-free survival had not been achieved, while the 30-month progression-free survival rate and overall survival rates were 70.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.5-79.6) and 81.3% (95% CI, 70.8-88.2), respectively. Orelabrutinib also revealed substantial response in patients with high prognostic risks: overall response rates of patients carrying positive TP53 mutational status or del(17p), del(11q), as well as unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region gene were 100%, 94.7%, and 93.9%, respectively. Most adverse events were in low grade, with 86.8% of AEs being Grade 1 or 2. Nearly 67% of patients were still receiving orelabrutinib after almost a 3-year follow-up. In conclusion, Orelabrutinib demonstrated compelling efficacy as well as safety profiles, with a noteworthy number of patients obtaining complete response in refractory or relapsed CLL/SLL.

Malignant clonal evolution drives multiple myeloma cellular ecological diversity and microenvironment reprogramming.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease with different patterns of clonal evolution and a complex tumor microenvironment, representing a challenge for clinicians and pathologists to understand and dissect the contribution and impact of polyclonality on tumor progression. METHODS: In this study, we established a global cell ecological landscape of the bone marrow (BM) from MM patients, combining single-cell RNA sequencing and single-molecule long-read genome sequencing data. RESULTS: The malignant mutation event was localized to the tumor cell clusters with shared mutation of ANK1 and IFITM2 in all malignant subpopulations of all MM patients. Therefore, these two variants occur in the early stage of malignant clonal origin to mediate the malignant transformation of proplasmacytes or plasmacytes to MM cells. Tumor cell stemness index score and pseudo-sequential clonal evolution analysis can be used to divide the evolution model of MM into two clonal origins: types I and IX. Notably, clonal evolution and the tumor microenvironment showed an interactive relationship, in which the evolution process is not only selected by but also reacts to the microenvironment; thus, vesicle secretion enriches immune cells with malignant-labeled mRNA for depletion. Interestingly, microenvironmental modification exhibited significant heterogeneity among patients. CONCLUSIONS: This characterization of the malignant clonal evolution pattern of MM at the single-cell level provides a theoretical basis and scientific evidence for a personalized precision therapy strategy and further development of a potential new adjuvant strategy combining epigenetic agent and immune checkpoint blockade.

Combination of PD-1 inhibitor with GVD (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, liposomal doxorubicin) versus GVD regimen as second-line therapy for relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

Patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) who do not achieve complete remission (CR) after second-line chemotherapy have poor clinical outcomes. Besides, conventional salvage chemotherapy regimens have an unsatisfactory CR rate. The present retrospective study reports the efficacy and toxicity of the GVD (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, liposomal doxorubicin) regimen with or without programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor for patients with cHL who failed first-line treatment. A total of 103 patients with cHL (GVD+PD-1 group, n = 27; GVD group, n = 76) with response assessment based on positron emission tomography were included. The GVD+PD-1 group tended to have a higher CR rate than GVD group (85·2% vs. 65·8%, P = 0·057) and had a better event-free survival (EFS) (P = 0·034). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with low-risk second-line International Prognostic Score might benefit from the addition of PD-1 inhibitor (GVD+PD-1 vs. GVD, 100·0% vs. 64·7%, P = 0·028) and had better EFS than GVD alone (P = 0·016). Further analysis demonstrated that PD-1 consolidation therapy might provide an EFS benefit (P = 0·007). The toxicity of the GVD+PD-1 regimen was comparable to the GVD regimen, except for higher rates of hypothyroidism and autoimmune pneumonitis, which were manageable. In conclusion, combining a PD-1 inhibitor with a GVD regimen could be a potentially effective second-line therapy for patients with cHL.

Selinexor plus low-dose dexamethasone in Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor (MARCH): a phase II, single-arm study.

BACKGROUND: Selinexor 80 mg combined with low-dose dexamethasone (Sd) demonstrated significant clinical benefit in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who had disease refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI), an immunomodulator (IMiD), and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody based on a global phase II STORM study. The present study, MARCH, addresses China regulatory needs to further validate the data from STORM in Chinese patients with RRMM. METHODS: The MARCH study was conducted at 17 sites in China, where eligible Chinese RRMM patients who had disease refractory to PI and IMiD were enrolled. Selinexor 80 mg combined with dexamethasone 20 mg was administered orally on day 1 and day 3 of each week in 4-week cycles. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) per an independent review committee, with the null hypothesis of ≤15%. Patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment were included in the safety population. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile was characterized by parameter and ethnicity sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients with RRMM were enrolled in the study, with a median age of 60 years. Of the 82 patients, 55 patients (67.1%) had high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, defined as one or more of del 17p13, t(4;14), t(14;16), or 1q amplification identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); 18 patients (22.0%) had abnormal renal function. Enrolled patients were heavily pre-treated with a median prior regimen number of 5. All 82 patients (100%) were refractory to both PI and IMiD, including 20 patients (24.4%) categorized as triple-class refractory population (refractory to PI, IMiD, and daratumumab). Ten patients (12.2%) had undergone CAR-T therapy. ORR was 29.3% (95% CI 19.7, 40.4) with a median DOR of 4.7 months. The median PFS and OS were 3.7 and 13.2 months, respectively. ORR was 25.0% (95% CI 8.7, 49.1) in the triple-class refractory population. Efficacy was consistent across various subgroups. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) included anemia (57.3%), thrombocytopenia (51.2%), lymphopenia (42.7%), neutropenia (40.2%), hyponatremia (29.3%), and lung infection (26.8%). Serious AEs were reported in 54.9% of patients. No significant drug accumulation was shown following multiple administrations. No human PK ethnicity difference was identified between Chinese and western patients. CONCLUSIONS: With an encouraging ORR, the MARCH study has demonstrated that selinexor combined with low-dose dexamethasone (Sd) delivers meaningful clinical benefit to Chinese patients with RRMM, including triple-class refractory patients. AEs were expected and manageable with supportive care and dose modification. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03944057 (May 09, 2019); Chinadrugtrials.org.cn , CTR20190858 (June 05, 2019).

Efficacy and safety comparison between R-CHOP and modified NHL-BFM-90 regimens in children and adolescents with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of R-CHOP and modified non-Hodgkin lymphoma Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster-90 (NHL-BFM-90) regimens in children and adolescents with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are lacking. Thus, we retrospectively analyzed 85 DLBCL patients aged ≤18 years from 2000 to 2020; 74 patients received the modified NHL-BFM-90 regimen, and 11 received the R-CHOP regimen. The 5-year OS and event-free survival (EFS) rates between the modified NHL-BFM-90 and R-CHOP regimens were 91.0% vs. 90.9% (P = 0.466) and 89.8% vs. 68.6% (P = 0.055), respectively. In the stratified analysis, the survival outcome of pediatric patients treated with the modified NHL-BFM-90 regimen was not significantly different from that of adolescent patients. The OS and EFS rates of patients with early-stage disease were both 100%. Patients in the advanced-stage group who were treated with the modified NHL-BFM-90 regimen had superior EFS rates (P < 0.05). The frequency of severe adverse events from the two regimens was similar. There were no treatment-related deaths. We concluded that the modified NHL-BFM-90 regimen has better efficacy than R-CHOP in DLBCL patients with advanced-stage disease. However, the R-CHOP regimen might be an option for early-stage DLBCL. Further prospective studies are needed to guide clinical decisions about treatment.

A nomogram prognostic index for risk-stratification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era: a multi-institutional cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to establish a predictive prognostic risk-stratification model for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the rituximab era. METHODS: The data of 1406 primary DLBCL patients from the Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center were analysed to establish a nomogram prognostic index (NPI) model for predicting overall survival (OS) based on pre-treatment indicators. An independent cohort of 954 DLBCL patients from three other hospitals was used for external validation. RESULTS: Age, performance status, stage, lactate dehydrogenase, number of extranodal sites, BCL2, CD5 expression, B symptoms and absolute lymphocyte and monocyte count were the main factors of the NPI model and could stratify the patients into four distinct categories based on their predicted OS. The calibration curve demonstrated satisfactory agreement between the predicted and actual 5-year OS of the patients. The concordance index of the NPI model (0.794) was higher than the IPI (0.759) and NCCN-IPI (0.750), and similar results were obtained upon external validation. For CD5 + DLBCL patients, systemic treatment with high-dose methotrexate was associated with superior OS compared to R-CHOP-based immunochemotherapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: We established and validated an accurate prediction model, which performed better than IPI and NCCN-IPI for prognostic stratification of DLBCL patients.

Sequential P-GEMOX and radiotherapy for early-stage extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: A multicenter study.

Extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal-type (ENKTL) is a distinct subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and most of the patients presented localized disease. Combined modality therapy (CMT), namely chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy, has been recommended for patients with early-stage ENKTL. However, the optimal CMT has not been fully clarified. This study reports the efficacy and toxicity of sequential P-GEMOX (pegaspargase, gemcitabine and oxaliplatin) and radiotherapy in a large Chinese cohort comprising of 202 patients diagnosed with early-stage ENKTL from six medical centers. The observed best overall response rate was 96.0% and 168 (83.2%) patients achieved complete remission. With a median follow-up of 44.1 months, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 74.6% and 85.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis suggested that extensive primary tumor (PFS, hazard ratio [HR] 3.660, 95% CI 1.820-7.359, p < 0.001; OS, HR 3.825, 95% CI 1.442-10.148, p = 0.007) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 2 (PFS, 3.042, 95% CI 1.468-6.306, p = 0.003; OS, HR 3.983, 95% CI 1.678-9.457, p = 0.02) were independent prognostic factors for survival outcomes. Among the established prognostic models for ENKTL, the nomogram-revised risk index model had optimal prognostic risk stratification ability (PFS, p < 0.001; OS, p < 0.001) and relatively balanced population distribution. The adverse events of this CMT were well-tolerated and manageable. In conclusion, sequential P-GEMOX and radiotherapy showed favorable efficacy with acceptable toxicity, and could be an effective treatment option for early-stage ENKTL patients.

Comparison of chemotherapy with or without asparaginase for extranodal nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma in children and adolescents.

PURPOSE: As extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) occurs rarely in children and adolescents, standardized therapy is yet to be determined. This study aimed to describe the clinical features and determine the optimal chemotherapy regimen for childhood ENKTL. METHODS: The treatment outcomes of radiotherapy combined with asparaginase-based (P-GEMOX or P-GMED) or asparaginase-absent chemotherapy regimens (CHOP, EPOCH, or NHL-BFM-90/95) in patients aged ≤18 years with newly diagnosed ENKTL from December 2006 to December 2018 were compared. RESULTS: Among the 34 patients included in the study, 21 had stage I/II disease. The overall response rates of chemotherapy with or without asparaginase were 85.0% and 78.6%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 54 months, the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rates of patients with stage I/II and III/IV disease were 66.2 ± 11.3% and 26.0 ± 12.8%, respectively (P = .027). In stage III/IV patients treated with asparaginase-based or asparaginase-absent regimens, the 5-year EFS rates were 40.0 ± 17.4% and 0%, respectively (P = .236). The 5-year EFS rates of stage III/IV patients who received or did not receive hematopoietic stem cell transplant were 66.7 ± 27.2% and 11.1 ± 10.5%, respectively (P = .054). In addition, chemotherapy-associated side effects were significantly less in patients treated with asparaginase-based regimens as compared to asparaginase-absent regimens in this cohort. CONCLUSION: P-GEMOX and P-GMED regimens are effective and safe for treating childhood ENKTL.

Ixazomib-based frontline therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in real-life practice showed comparable efficacy and safety profile with those reported in clinical trial: a multi-center study.

The induction therapy containing ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, has shown favorable efficacy and safety in clinical trials, but its experience in real-life remains limited. In routine practice, few patients received ixazomib-based induction therapy due to reasons including (1) patients' preference on oral regimens, (2) concerns on adverse events (AEs) of other intravenous/subcutaneous regimens, (3) requirements for less center visits, and (4) fears of COVID-19 and other infectious disease exposures. With the aim of assessing the real-life effectiveness and safety of ixazomib-based induction therapy, we performed this multi-center, observational study on 85 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients from 14 medical centers. Ixazomib-based regimens included ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) in 44.7% of patients, ixazomib-dexamethasone (Id) in 29.4%, and Id plus another agent (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, or daratumumab) in 25.9%. Different ixazomib-based therapies were applied due to (1) financial burdens or limitations on local health insurance coverage, (2) concerns on treatment tolerance, and (3) drug accessibility issue. Ten patients received ixazomib maintenance. The median age was 67 years; 43.5% had ISS stage III disease; 48.2% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score ≥ 2; and 17.6% with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. Overall response rate for all 85 patients was 95.3%, including 65.9% very good partial response or better and 29.5% complete responses. The median time to response was 30 days. The response rate was similar across different ixazomib-based regimens. Median progression-free survival was not reached. Severe AEs (≥ grade 3) were reported in 29.4% of patients. No grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy (PN) occurred. Patients received a median of 6 (range 1-20) cycles of ixazomib treatment; 56.6% remained on treatment at data cutoff; 15.3% discontinued treatment due to intolerable AEs. These results support that the ixazomib-based frontline therapy was highly effective with acceptable toxicity in routine practice and the ixazomib oral regimens could be good alternative options for NDMM patients.

High level of soluble interleukin-2 receptor in serum predicts treatment resistance and poor progression-free survival in multiple myeloma.

The IL-2/IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) system plays a central role in maintaining normal T cell immunity, and its disturbance is associated with several hematologic disorders. Studies have found in several types of lymphoma that abnormal amounts of soluble IL-2R (sIL-2R) may result in imbalance of the IL-2/IL-2R system and hence of the T cell immunoregulation. Whether the level of sIL-2R in blood could predict treatment outcomes or not needs to be investigated in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. The level of sIL-2R in serum was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 81 patients with newly diagnosed MM. Twenty-six patients (32.1%) were treated with bortezomib-based regimens and 55patients (67.9%) received old drugs-based regimens. The mean concentration of sIL-2R for myeloma patients was 8.51 ng/ml, significantly higher than that of healthy controls (0.56 ng/ml, p < 0.0001). The best cutoff value for sIL-2R in predicting high risk for disease progression is 6.049 ng/ml with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.665 (p = 0.013). Thirty-six patients (44.4%) were classified as higher sIL-2R level group (> 6.049 ng/ml), and 45 patients (55.6%) as lower group (≤ 6.049 ng/ml). The overall response rate (ORR) was 60.0% in lower sIL-2R level group, and 41.7% in higher level group (p = 0.156). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 12 months (range, 2.0-65 months) and 20 months (range, 2.0-118 months), respectively. In a multivariate survival analysis, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, treatment response, and sIL-2R level, it was found that all these three parameters were significantly independent prognostic factors for PFS (p = 0.032, 0.016, and 0.043, respectively), but none factors maintained their value in predicting OS. Subgroup analysis revealed that high level of sIL-2R is correlated with significantly inferior PFS in patients treated with bortezomib-based regimens (p = 0.004). Serum sIL-2R level is an independent prognostic factor for PFS, indicating novel drugs targeting the imbalance of IL-2/IL-2R system may be a promising strategy in MM.

High level of interleukin-10 in serum predicts poor prognosis in multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-10 (IL-10) is a inhibiting inflammatory cytokine that plays an important role in immune suppressive microenvironment in multiple myeloma (MM). Whether the level of serum IL-10 could predict treatment response and survival outcomes or not needs to be investigated in MM patients. METHODS: The level of IL-10 in serum was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 188 patients with newly diagnosed MM. RESULTS: The best cutoff value for IL-10 in predicting survival is 169.69 pg ml(-1) with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.747 (P<0.001). In all, 92 patients (48.9%) were classified as high-IL-10 group (>169.96 pg ml(-1)) and 96 patients (51.1%) as low-IL-10 group (⩽169.96 pg ml(-1)). The overall response rate (ORR) was 79.2% in low-IL-10 group, significantly higher than that in high-IL-10 group (53.3%, P<0.001). Patients in low-IL-10 group had significantly better survival compared with those in high-IL-10 group (3-year PFS rate: 69.3% vs 13.3%, P<0.001; 3-year OS rate: 93.6% vs 51.9%, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that serum IL-10 level >169.96 pg ml(-1) at diagnosis and certain cytogenetic abnormalities were two adverse factors for PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that serum IL-10 at diagnosis is a novel, powerful predictor of prognosis for MM.

Randomized phase III trial of amrubicin/cisplatin versus etoposide/cisplatin as first-line treatment for extensive small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) is characterized by rapid progression and relapse, despite high initial response rates to chemotherapy. The primary objective of this trial was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of amrubicin and cisplatin (AP) combination therapy compared with the standard first-line regimen of etoposide and cisplatin (EP) for previously untreated ED-SCLC in a Chinese population. When non-inferiority was verified, the objective was switched from non-inferiority to superiority. METHODS: From June 2008 to July 2010, 300 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to AP and EP groups. AP-treated patients received cisplatin (60 mg/m(2), day 1) and amrubicin (40 mg/m(2), days 1-3) once every 21 days. EP-treated patients received cisplatin (80 mg/m(2), day 1) and etoposide (100 mg/m(2), days 1-3) once every 21 days. Treatment was continued for four to six cycles, except in cases of progressive disease or toxicity, and patient refusal. RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) for AP vs. EP treatment was 11.8 vs. 10.3 months (p = 0.08), respectively, demonstrating non-inferiority of AP to EP (AP group: 95% confidence interval for hazard ratio 0.63-1.03 months). Median progression-free survival and overall response rates for AP vs. EP groups were 6.8 vs. 5.7 months (p = 0.35) and 69.8% vs. 57.3%, respectively. Drug-related adverse events in both groups were similar, with neutropenia being the most frequent (AP 54.4%; EP 44.0%). Leukopenia, pyrexia, and fatigue were more prevalent in the AP group, but all were clinically reversible and manageable. CONCLUSIONS: AP therapy demonstrated non-inferiority to EP therapy, prolonging OS for 1.5 months, but this difference was not statistically significant; thus we propose AP as a promising treatment option for ED-SCLC in China. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered on 10 April 2008 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00660504).

Lymphopenia during routine follow-up may predict relapse in patients with extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma.

Recently, absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) at diagnosis, as a surrogate marker of host immunity, has been reported to be a prognostic factor for clinical outcomes in extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma (ENKTL). In this retrospective study, we set out to investigate whether ALC at the time of confirmed relapse or at last follow-up is a marker for relapse after chemoradiotherapy in 84 patients with stage I/II ENKTL. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) analysis showed that ALC at follow-up was a significant marker for relapse (AUC = 0.883, P < 0.001). Using 1.215 × 10(9)/L as the optimal cutoff value of ALC, 44 patients (52.4%) were in lower ALC group and 40 patients (47.6%) were in higher ALC group. The sensitivity and specificity for ALC at the time of confirmed relapse or at last follow-up was 94.1 and 76.0%, respectively. The relative risk of relapse with an ALC < 1.215 × 10(9)/L was 14.5. The positive predictive value with an ALC < 1.215 × 10(9)/L was 72.7%, and the negative predictive value with an ALC ≥ 1.215 × 10(9)/L was 95.0%. The 4-year cumulative incidence rate for an ALC < 1.215 × 10(9)/L was 73.2% compared with 3.2% for an ALC ≥ 1.215 × 10(9)/L (P < 0.001). In a multivariate regression analysis, ALC at the time of confirmed relapse or last follow-up remained to be a significant factor for relapse (P < 0.001). In conclusion, lymphopenia observed during routine follow-up can predict relapse in patients with ENKTL, which needs further validation in prospective trials.

CD56-negative extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma should be regarded as a distinct subtype with poor prognosis.

Previous results about the clinical and prognostic significance concerning CD56 expression status in extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma (ENKTL) are controversial due to a small sample size and the heterogeneity nature of this disease. The complete data of 288 patients with early-stage upper aerodigestive tract ENKTL were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred eighty-three patients (63.5 %) had stage I disease, and the primary tumor site of 204 patients (70.8 %) was in the nasal cavity. Sixty patients (20.8 %) were categorized to CD56-negative ENKTL group. The complete remission rate in CD56-positive ENKTL group was 80.6 %, significantly higher than that in CD56-negative ENKTL group (60.8 %, P = 0.005). At a median follow-up time of 69 months, the 5-year and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate were 52 and 41 %, respectively, and the 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS) rate were 69 % and 68 %, respectively. Patients with primary tumor site located in the nasal cavity or CD56-positive expression had significantly superior PFS and OS (P < 0.05). In multivariate Cox regression model that included age, Ann Arbor stage, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, primary tumor site, chemotherapy regimens, and CD56 expression status, all these six factors remained to be independent prognostic factors for PFS, and the first five factors were independent prognostic factors for OS, while CD56 expression status had a trend to be independently correlated with OS (P = 0.084). In a subgroup analysis according to primary tumor site location, CD56 expression status significantly correlated with survival outcomes in patients with primary nasal cavity involvement (P < 0.05). In conclusion, in this large cohort of patients with early-stage ENKTL, we found that CD56-negative ENKTL had significantly inferior survival outcomes, indicating CD56-negative ENKTL should be regarded as a distinct phenotype, and optimal treatment strategies need to be evaluated further for this entity.

Radical surgery may be not an optimal treatment approach for pulmonary MALT lymphoma.

Primary pulmonary MALT lymphoma is a rare disease, and no standard treatments have been defined yet. In this study, 38 consecutive patients from single center were reviewed. Among 25 patients with localized disease, radical surgery were performed in 12 patients, and the other 13 patients had chemotherapy combined with (7 patients) or without (6 patients) radiotherapy. No significant difference in overall survival (OS) was found between patients who received surgery or not; however, patients treated with chemotherapy had superior progression-free survival (PFS) than those treated with upfront surgery (P = 0.032). Among the 12 patients who received radical surgery, 7 were given adjuvant chemotherapy and 1 patient had consolidation radiotherapy. No significant differences in PFS and OS exist between those who received adjuvant treatment or not (P > 0.05). For patients who received chemotherapy, PFS and OS were significantly better for those treated with cyclophosphamide-based therapy than fludarabine-based therapy. At a median follow-up time of 61.1 months, 5- and 10-year PFS rate was 70.0 and 43.0 %, respectively, and 5- and 10-year OS rate was both 81.0 %. In conclusion, we confirmed the indolent behavior and favorable outcome of this disease. In order to preserve lung function and reduce the risks associated with surgery, radiotherapy or rituximab in combination with alkylating drug-based chemotherapy should be considered as first-line option for pulmonary MALT lymphoma.

CD38 expression predicts poor prognosis and might be a potential therapy target in extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type.

No standard chemotherapy regimens have been defined yet for extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma (ENKTL), and the prognosis of patients with advanced or relapsed disease is very poor. Daratumumab, an investigated anti-cancer drug targeting CD38, has been of great interest in the treatment of CD38-expressing malignancies, especially multiple myeloma. In this study, we reviewed the clinical data of 94 patients with ENKTL, investigated the expression of CD38, and analyzed the prognostic value of CD38 expression. Forty-seven patients had weak expression of CD38, and the other 47 patients had strong expression. The complete response (CR) rate was significantly higher in patients who were treated with asparaginase-based therapy (83.8 vs. 59.6 %, p = 0.025). There was a trend towards higher CR rate in CD38 weak expression group (78.7 vs. 59.6 %, p = 0.074). At a median follow-up time of 42 months, the 2-year and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 53.0 and 39.0 %, respectively, and the 2-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 68.0 and 58.0 %, respectively. In multivariate survival analysis including CD38 expression status, International Prognostic Index (IPI) score, local tumor invasion, and chemotherapy regimens, it was found that strong expression of CD38 and non-asparaginase-based chemoregimens were independent adverse prognostic factors for PFS (p = 0.009 and 0.027, respectively), while local tumor invasion and higher IPI score were independent adverse prognostic factors for OS (p = 0.002 and 0.035, respectively). In subgroup analysis, strong expression of CD38 significantly correlated with inferior survival outcomes in patients without local tumor invasion (p = 0.011) or with stage I-II disease (p = 0.008). In conclusion, we firstly found that the majority of ENKTL cases were CD38 positive, with half had strong expression of CD38, which significantly correlated with poor outcomes, indicating the potential role of CD38 as a therapy target for ENKTL.

Peripheral blood lymphocyte to monocyte ratio identifies high-risk adult patients with sporadic Burkitt lymphoma.

Adult sporadic Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is a rare subtype of lymphoma. In this retrospective study, we investigated the prognostic value of pretreatment lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) in a cohort of 62 patients. Using LMR <2.6 as the optimal cutoff point, 24 patients (38.7 %) had LMR <2.6. The complete response rates in high-LMR group and low-LMR group were 90.9 and 65.0 %, respectively (P = 0.019). At a median follow-up time of 41 months, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rates were 76 and 80 %, respectively. In a multivariate Cox regression model, it was found that the presence of bone marrow infiltration and low LMR were independently adverse prognostic factors for both PFS and OS. In the whole group, the addition of rituximab to treatment did not benefit patients significantly in PFS and OS. In subgroup analysis, in patients with high LMR, addition of rituximab can significantly improve survival outcomes (P = 0.046). In conclusion, we firstly found that low LMR (<2.60) was an independently adverse prognostic factor in adult patients with sporadic BL. Intensive chemotherapy could cure the majority of patients in our study, and the pretreatment LMR might predict the value of rituximab in this age population.