Normal saline solution versus other viscous solutions for submucosal injection during endoscopic mucosal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EMR is being increasingly practiced for the removal of large colorectal polyps. A variety of solutions such as normal saline solution (NS) and other viscous and hypertonic solutions (VS) have been used as submucosal injections for EMR. A systematic review and meta-analysis is presented comparing the efficacy and adverse events of EMR performed using NS versus VS. METHODS: Two independent reviewers conducted a search of all databases for human, randomized controlled trials that compared NS with VS for EMR of colorectal polyps. Data on complete en bloc resection, presence of residual lesions, and adverse events were extracted using a standardized protocol. Pooled odds ratio (OR) estimates along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed effect or random effects models. RESULTS: Five prospective, randomized controlled trials (504 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The mean polyp sizes were 20.84 mm with NS and 21.44 mm with VS. On pooled analysis, a significant increase in en bloc resection (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.11-3.29; P = .02; I2 = 0%) and decrease in residual lesions (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.91; P = .02; I2 = 0%) were noted in VS compared with NS. There was no significant difference in the rate of overall adverse events between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of VS during EMR leads to higher rates of en bloc resection and lower rates of residual lesions compared with NS, without any significant difference in adverse events. Endoscopists could consider using VS for EMR of large colorectal polyps and NS for smaller polyps because there is no significant difference in the outcomes with lesions <2 cm.

Protective Factors of the Gastric and Duodenal Mucosa: An Overview.

The structural and functional integrity of the gastric and duodenal mucosa represents equilibrium between aggressive factors and protective mechanisms. Mucus-buffers-phospholipid layer as pre-epithelial barrier, enhanced by prostaglandins and epidermal growth factor, remains a vanguard of mucosal protection. It maintains a neutral pH at the surface epithelial luminal interface, facing luminal pH dropping to 1.0, i.e., hydrogen ion concentration gradient equal 1,000,000. The surface epithelial cells, elaborating mucins, buffers, phospholipids, prostaglandins, trefoil peptides, peptide growth factor and their receptors, heat shock proteins, cathelicidins, and ß-defensins form the second line of defense. Endothelium exerts mucosal protection through production of potent vasodilators like nitric oxide and prostacyclins and through release of angiogenic growth factors, securing adequate blood flow and representing the third and an ultimate line of mucosal protection. This microcirculation is instrumental for supply of oxygen, nitric oxide, hydrogen sulfide and removal of ad hoc generated toxic substances as well as for continuous mucosal cell renewal from progenitor cells, secured by growth factors accompanied by survivin preventing early apoptosis.

Salivary bicarbonate as a major factor in the prevention of upper esophageal mucosal injury in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: It has been previously demonstrated that the exposure of the lower esophageal mucosa to acid and pepsin results in significant increase in salivary protective factors secretion, mediated by the esophago-salivary reflex. The impact of the upper esophageal mucosal exposure to acid and pepsin on salivary secretory response remains unknown. AIMS: To investigate the rate of salivary protective factors secretion during the upper esophageal mucosal exposure to acid and pepsin and to compare with the corresponding results recorded during the lower esophageal mucosal exposure, in the same group of asymptomatic volunteers. METHODS: The study was conducted in 10 asymptomatic volunteers. Salivary samples were collected during the esophageal mucosal exposure to saline, followed by acid/pepsin and the final saline, using the esophageal perfusion catheter. Salivary bicarbonate and non-bicarbonate buffers were analyzed using TitraLab. Salivary mucin and protein were quantified through PAS and Lowry methodologies, respectively, whereas PE2 using radioimmunoassay. Statistical analysis was performed using Σ-Stat software. RESULTS: The rate of salivary bicarbonate secretion was significantly higher (3.1-fold) during the upper versus the lower esophageal mucosal exposure to acid and pepsin (87.5 ± 14.4 vs. 28.0 ± 7.70 µEq/min, p < 0.05). The volumes of saliva, pH, salivary protein, mucin and PE2 were similar in both esophageal perfusions. CONCLUSIONS: Threefold stronger secretion of salivary bicarbonate could be a major factor protecting the upper esophageal mucosa. This phenomenon may represent an ultimate defense mechanism potentially preventing further complications within the upper esophageal mucosa; however, it needs to be confirmed in patients of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Impact of introduction of endoscopic ultrasound on volume, success, and complexity of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a tertiary referral center.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is commonly used to examine pancreaticobiliary disorders. We hypothesize that the introduction of EUS service may change the pattern and the complexity of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs) performed. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of introducing EUS on the volume, success, and complexity of ERCP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective data review of ERCP procedures done "before" and "after" the introduction of EUS (before EUS and after EUS). Patients' demographics, ERCP indications, types of sedation, therapeutic interventions, outcomes, complications, and complexity of ERCP were collected. The categorical and continuous variables were compared using Fisher's exact test and the unpaired t-test, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to compare ERCP outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 945 ERCPs performed over a 3-year period between January 2010 and January 2013 (411 and 534 in the "before EUS" and "after EUS" time periods, respectively) were included in this study. There was a 30% relative increase in the volume of ERCPs after the introduction of EUS. ERCP success rate was higher after the introduction of EUS, even after adjusting the complexity grade [odds ratio (OR) = 4.54, P = 0.001]. Significant increase in the complexity of ERCP was observed after the introduction of EUS service. The OR of performing grade 4 ERCP was 4.44 (P = 0.0005) after the introduction of EUS. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a new EUS service in our tertiary referral university medical center is associated with an increase in the volume, success, and complexity of ERCP procedures. EUS expertise may be valuable for better ERCP outcomes.

Desmoid type fibromatosis: A case report with an unusual etiology.

Desmoid type fibromatosis (DTF) is a rare, locally invasive, non-metastasizing soft tissue tumor. We report an interesting case of DTF involving the pancreatic head of a 54-year-old woman. She presented with intermittent dysphagia and significant weight loss within a 3-mo period. Laboratory findings showed mild elevation of transaminases, significant elevation of alkaline phosphatase and direct hyperbilirubinemia, indicating obstructive jaundice. Computerized tomography of the abdomen revealed a mass in the head of the pancreas, dilated common bile duct, and dilated pancreatic duct. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound showed a large hypoechoic mass in the head of the pancreas causing extrahepatic biliary obstruction and pancreatic ductal dilation. The patient underwent a successful partial pancreatico-duodenectomy and cholecystectomy. She received no additional therapy after surgery, and liver function tests were normalized within nine days after surgery. Currently, surgical resection is the recommended first line treatment. The patient will be followed for any recurrence.

Role of saliva in esophageal defense: implications in patients with nonerosive reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: It has been previously demonstrated that patients with reflux esophagitis exhibit a significant impairment in the secretion of salivary protective components versus controls. However, the secretion of salivary protective factors in patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is not explored. The authors therefore studied the secretion of salivary volume, pH, bicarbonate, nonbicarbonate glycoconjugate, protein, epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-α) and prostaglandin E2 in patients with NERD and compared with the corresponding values in controls (CTRL). METHODS: Salivary secretion was collected during basal condition, mastication and intraesophageal mechanical (tubing, balloon) and chemical (initial saline, acid, acid/pepsin, final saline) stimulations, respectively, mimicking the natural gastroesophageal reflux. RESULTS: Salivary volume, protein and TGF-α outputs in patients with NERD were significantly higher than CTRL during intraesophageal mechanical (P < 0.05) and chemical stimulations (P < 0.05). Salivary bicarbonate was significantly higher in NERD than CTRL group during intraesophageal stimulation with both acid/pepsin (P < 0.05) and saline (P < 0.01). Salivary glycoconjugate secretion was significantly higher in the NERD group than the CTRL group during chewing (P < 0.05), mechanical (P < 0.05) and chemical stimulation (P < 0.01). Salivary EGF secretion was higher in patients with NERD during mechanical stimulation (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NERD demonstrated a significantly stronger salivary secretory response in terms of volume, bicarbonate, glycoconjugate, protein, EGF and TGF-α than asymptomatic controls. This enhanced salivary esophagoprotection is potentially mediating resistance to the development of endoscopic mucosal changes by gastroesophageal reflux.

Implementing panel management for hypertension in a low-income, urban, primary care setting.

OBJECTIVE: Panel management is a system of care that targets groups of patients with similar needs to improve their quality of care. The purpose of this pilot was to determine whether panel management could improve blood pressure control in patients with previously uncontrolled hypertension and to explore how panel management can be integrated in an urban, low-income, primary care setting. METHODS: The practice coach model was used to assist a clinical site in forming a quality improvement team to implement panel management. The team created a patient registry to track hypertensive patients over time and to recall patients with uncontrolled hypertension for planned care visits during which evidence-based interventions for hypertension were delivered. Percent of patients gaining control of blood pressure and change in blood pressure were measured between 6 and 9 months after enrollment. Qualitative interviews of clinic staff were completed to explore strengths and weaknesses of program implementation. RESULTS: Forty patients with uncontrolled hypertension were enrolled in the pilot, and 27.5% gained blood pressure control by 9 months after enrollment (P < .001). The average systolic blood pressure decreased by 16 mm Hg from 156.5 to 140.5 mm Hg (P < .001), and the average diastolic blood pressure decreased by 3.8 mm Hg from 85 to 81.2 mm Hg (P = .03). Staff interviews were generally positive; however, several areas for improvement were identified. CONCLUSION: Panel management for hypertension can be effective and can be implemented in a low-income, urban, primary care clinic setting given appropriate staffing allocation.

A distinct salivary secretory response mediated by the esophago-salivary reflex in patients with Barrett's esophagus: its potential pathogenetic implications.

PURPOSE: A significantly compromised epidermal growth factor (EGF) secretion by basal parotid saliva may contribute to the development of Barrett's esophagus (BE). The rate of secretion of EGF as well as a wide spectrum of protective factors in total basal and stimulated saliva in BE patients remains to be explored. We therefore studied the rate of secretion of salivary buffers, glycoconjugate, protein, EGF, transforming growth factor α (TGFα) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), evoked by esophago-salivary reflex, in patients with BE and controls (CTRL). MATERIAL/METHODS: Salivary secretion was collected during basal condition, mastication, and intraesophageal mechanical and chemical stimulations respectively, mimicking the natural gastroesophageal reflux scenario. RESULTS: Salivary pH in BE was significantly lower than in controls during mechanical (p<0.001) and chemical stimulations (p<0.001). Bicarbonate and protein outputs in BE were significantly lower during mechanical (p<0.05) and chemical stimulations (p<0.01). The non-bicarbonate and glycoconjugate outputs in BE were lower during chemical stimulation (p<0.05) and during mechanical (p<0.05) and chemical stimulations (p<0.05) respectively. The rate of salivary EGF output in BE was significantly lower during mechanical stimulation (p<0.05). We observed a higher TGFα output during mastication (p<0.05) and PGE2 secretion during basal and masticatory condition (p<0.05) in BE. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BE demonstrated significantly compromised salivary pH and rate of secretion of bicarbonate, non-bicarbonate, glycoconjugate, protein and EGF. This impairment could potentially predispose to the development of accelerated esophageal mucosal injury. Potential restoration of this impairment by masticatory stimulation of salivary secretion using sugarless chewing gum justifies further clinical exploration.