Common Mistakes in the Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in Turkey. A Retrospective Descriptive Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a widespread metabolic bone disease representing a global public health problem currently affecting more than two hundred million people worldwide. The World Health Organization states that dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the best densitometric technique for assessing bone mineral density (BMD). DXA provides an accurate diagnosis of osteoporosis, a good estimation of fracture risk, and is a useful tool for monitoring patients undergoing treatment. Common mistakes in BMD testing can be divided into four principal categories: 1) indication errors, 2) lack of quality control and calibration, 3) analysis and interpretation errors, and 4) inappropriate acquisition techniques. The aim of this retrospective multicenter descriptive study is to identify the common errors in the application of the DXA technique in Turkey. METHODS: All DXA scans performed during the observation period were included in the study if the measurements of both, the lumbar spine and proximal femur were recorded. Forearm measurement, total body measurements, and measurements performed on children were excluded. Each examination was surveyed by 30 consultants from 20 different centers each informed and trained in the principles of and the standards for DXA scanning before the study. RESULTS: A total of 3,212 DXA scan results from 20 different centers in 15 different Turkish cities were collected. The percentage of the discovered erroneous measurements varied from 10.5% to 65.5% in the lumbar spine and from 21.3% to 74.2% in the proximal femur. The overall error rate was found to be 31.8% (n = 1021) for the lumbar spine and 49.0% (n = 1576) for the proximal femur. CONCLUSION: In Turkey, DXA measurements of BMD have been in use for over 20 years, and examination processes continue to improve. There is no educational standard for operator training, and a lack of knowledge can lead to significant errors in the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation.

Clinical Characteristics and Etiology of Terminal Ileum Ulcers: A Retrospective Study.

Terminal ileal ulcers can have various etiologies, including Crohn's disease (CD), infections, and medication-related causes. This study aims to investigate the incidence of terminal ileal ulcers detected during colonoscopies, explore their underlying causes, and analyze their clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological characteristics. Additionally, the study aims to identify predictive factors that indicate the need for follow-up. Medical records of all patients who underwent colonoscopies, between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with terminal ileal ulcers, with or without ileocecal valve involvement, were included in the study. Demographic information, medication usage, symptoms, colonoscopy findings, and histopathological data of these patients were analyzed. A total of 398 patients were included in the study. Histopathological examination revealed that 243 patients (61%) had active ileitis, and 69 patients (17.4%) had chronic active ileitis. The final diagnoses for ulcers were: nonspecific ulcers in 212 patients (53.3%), CD in 66 patients (16.6%), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcers in 58 patients (14.6%). In the multivariate analysis, the parameters predicting CD included the presence of 10 or more ulcers (odds ratio (OR) = 7.305), deep ulcers (OR = 7.431), and edematous surrounding tissue (OR = 5.174), all of which were statistically significant (P < .001). Upon final evaluation, only 66 patients (16.6%) were diagnosed with CD, while 212 patients (53.3%) had nonspecific ulcers. The majority of patients with healed ulcers exhibited pathological findings consistent with active ileitis. Therefore, it can be concluded that not all terminal ileal ulcers are indicative of CD. In those cases with active ileitis, repetitive colonoscopies should be reconsidered.

Bilateral upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis following central cord syndrome.

UNLABELLED: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication following spinal cord injury (SCI). Although DVT of the upper extremity is much less common than DVT of the lower extremities, the risk of pulmonary embolism following upper-extremity DVT should not be disregarded. METHOD: Case report. FINDINGS: A bilateral upper-extremity DVT developed in a 51-year-old woman with SCI (central cord syndrome) being followed in our rehabilitation clinic. Medical treatment resulted in improvement in the clinical status of the patient as well as the regression in the thrombus. CONCLUSION: In patients with SCI, DVT should be kept in mind in the presence of pain and edema in the upper extremities, and prophylactic DVT treatment should be considered.