Durvalumab for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer and grade 1 radiation pneumonitis following concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Introduction/Background Durvalumab demonstrated a good efficacy and safety in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in the PACIFIC trial. Although a history of radiation pneumonitis (RP) has been reported to increase the risk of pneumonitis associated with programmed death-1 inhibitors, the safety and efficacy of durvalumab in patients with baseline Grade 1 RP have not been assessed. Therefore, we carried out a multicenter prospective cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of durvalumab in these patients. Patients and Methods This was a multicenter prospective cohort study of 35 patients with Grade 1 RP after CCRT and before durvalumab initiation. This study was a first prespecified analysis for the first 20 patients with the primary objective of assessing the short-term safety; it was assessed 3 months after durvalumab initiation. Results Twenty patients were enrolled in this study between March 1, 2019, and September 3, 2019. Three patients (15%) experienced drug-related Grade ≥3 adverse events, while three patients (15%) had Grade ≥2 pneumonitis/RP within 3 months after durvalumab initiation. Three months after durvalumab initiation, all the patients were alive and four patients (20%) experienced disease progression. Conclusion Durvalumab can be a feasible treatment option for patients with stage III NSCLC with baseline Grade 1 RP following CCRT.(Trial registration number: UMIN000036061. The registration period was between March 2019 and December 2019.).

Irinotecan and Gemcitabine as Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma following Platinum plus Pemetrexed Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-pemetrexed combination chemotherapy is the current standard primary treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). It was first approved for untreated and unresectable MPM in the 2003 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. However, to date, standard treatments for patients with MPM who previously underwent chemotherapy, as recommended by the NCCN Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma guidelines, have been inadequate. To explore treatment options for such patients, we performed this retrospective study of patients who received irinotecan plus gemcitabine as second-line therapy for MPM. METHODS: We investigated 62 patients diagnosed with unresectable MPM between January 2008 and October 2017 who experienced recurrence following cisplatin treatment (or carboplatin) plus pemetrexed or pemetrexed monotherapy as first-line treatment, and who underwent irinotecan plus gemcitabine combination therapy as second-line treatment. Irinotecan (60 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (800 mg/m2) were administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, including a 1-week washout period. Our endpoints were efficacy, survival period, and toxicity. RESULTS: patients' median age was 65 years (range 50-79), and the histological MPM types were epithelioid (n = 48), sarcomatoid (n = 6), biphasic (n = 6), and desmoplastic (n = 2). One patient experienced a partial response, 40 had stable disease, and 21 had progressive disease. The disease control rate was 66.1% and the response rate 2.1%. Additionally, the median progression-free and overall survival time were 5.7 and 11.3 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were neutropenia (32.2%), loss of appetite (16.1%), nausea/diarrhea (11.3%), and thrombocytopenia/phlebitis (9.7%). Grade 3 adverse events included neutropenia (12.9%) and thrombocytopenia/phlebitis (2.1%); however, all adverse events were managed with symptomatic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that second-line irinotecan plus gemcitabine combination therapy did not produce marked tumor shrinkage, it achieved a relatively high disease control rate of >65% with an acceptable toxicity profile. Hence, the combination of irinotecan plus gemcitabine may be considered for MPM treatment, with consideration of combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors as a potential next step.

The utility of 68F-FDG PET/CT for evaluation of tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and prognosis prediction in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare three fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) (EORTC criteria and PERCIST) and computed tomography (CT) (RECIST1.1) for response evaluation and prognosis prediction in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty NSCLC patients underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT scans at baseline and after 4 to 8 cycles of nivolumab or pembrolizumab. Therapeutic response was evaluated according to EORTC criteria, PERCIST, and RECIST1.1,then concordance among those was assessed using Cohen's κ coefficient. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was examined using log-rank and Cox methods. RESULTS: The number of complete metabolic response (CMR)/partial metabolic response (PMR)/stable metabolic disease (SMD)/progressive metabolic disease (PMD) were 8/10/4/18 for EORTC criteria and 9/9/4/18 for PERCIST. Using RECIST1.1, those of CR/PR/SD/PD were 4/10/12/14. Although there was high concordance between PERCIST and EORTC (92.5% of patients; κ=0.924), that between PERCIST and RECIST1.1 was substantial (65.0%; κ=0.560) and that between EORTC and RECIST1.1 (65.0%; κ=0.574). After a median 23.2 months (range 7.2 to 51.8 months), 32 patients had documented progression and 24 patients died from NSCLC. According to both PET and CT, patients with no progression (CMR/PMR/SMD or CR/PR/SD) showed significantly longer PFS and OS than PMD or PD patients (EORTC: P<0.0001 and P<0.0001, respectively, PERCIST: P<0.0001 and P=0.0001, respectively, RECIST1.1: P<0.0001 and P<0.0001, respectively). In a univariate analysis total MTV (P=0.042) on pre-ICI treatment 18F-FDGPET/CT scans was significantly associated with progression. Highest SUVmax (P<0.0001), total MTV (P=0.0062), total TLG (P<0.0001), highest SULpeak (P<0.0001), and total TLGL (P<0.0001) on post-ICI treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were also were significantly associated with progression. Moreover, the change rate of highest SUVmax (P<0.0001), total metabolic tumor volume (MTV) (P<0.0001), total lesion glycolysis(TLG) (P<0.0001), highest SULpeak (P<0.0001), total TLGL (P<0.0001), size (P=0.0012), EORTC (P<0.0001), PERCIST (P<0.0001), and RECIST 1.1 (P<0.0001) on two PET/CT scans were significantly associated with progression. A multivariate analysis confirmed the change rate of total MTV (P=0.034), and total TLGL (P=0.0027), EORTC (P=0.018), PERCIST (P=0.045), and RECIST1.1 (P=0.0037) as independent negative PFS predictors. CONCLUSION: Both 18F-FDG PET (EORTC criteria and PERCIST) and CT (RECIST1.1) after 4 to 8ICI monotherapy cycles are accurate for evaluation of tumor response and predicting prognosis in NSCLC patients.

Tumor-associated macrophage-derived inflammatory cytokine enhances malignant potential of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an asbestos-related aggressive malignant neoplasm. Due to the difficulty of achieving curative surgical resection in most patients with MPM, a combination chemotherapy of cisplatin and pemetrexed has been the only approved regimen proven to improve the prognosis of MPM. However, the median overall survival time is at most 12 mo even with this regimen. There has been therefore a pressing need to develop a novel chemotherapeutic strategy to bring about a better outcome for MPM. We found that expression of interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R) was upregulated in MPM cells compared with normal mesothelial cells. We also investigated the biological significance of the interaction between pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1ß and the IL-1R in MPM cells. Stimulation by IL-1ß promoted MPM cells to form spheroids along with upregulating a cancer stem cell marker CD26. We also identified tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) as the major source of IL-1ß in the MPM microenvironment. Both high mobility group box 1 derived from MPM cells and the asbestos-activated inflammasome in TAMs induced the production of IL-1ß, which resulted in enhancement of the malignant potential of MPM. We further performed immunohistochemical analysis using clinical MPM samples obtained from patients who were treated with the combination of platinum plus pemetrexed, and found that the overexpression of IL-1R tended to correlate with poor overall survival. In conclusion, the interaction between MPM cells and TAMs through a IL-1ß/IL-1R signal could be a promising candidate as the target for novel treatment of MPM (Hyogo College of Medicine clinical trial registration number: 2973).

Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with locally advanced, unresectable, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have disease progression despite definitive chemoradiotherapy (chemotherapy plus concurrent radiation therapy). This phase 3 study compared the anti-programmed death ligand 1 antibody durvalumab as consolidation therapy with placebo in patients with stage III NSCLC who did not have disease progression after two or more cycles of platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive durvalumab (at a dose of 10 mg per kilogram of body weight intravenously) or placebo every 2 weeks for up to 12 months. The study drug was administered 1 to 42 days after the patients had received chemoradiotherapy. The coprimary end points were progression-free survival (as assessed by means of blinded independent central review) and overall survival (unplanned for the interim analysis). Secondary end points included 12-month and 18-month progression-free survival rates, the objective response rate, the duration of response, the time to death or distant metastasis, and safety. RESULTS: Of 713 patients who underwent randomization, 709 received consolidation therapy (473 received durvalumab and 236 received placebo). The median progression-free survival from randomization was 16.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.0 to 18.1) with durvalumab versus 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 7.8) with placebo (stratified hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.65; P<0.001); the 12-month progression-free survival rate was 55.9% versus 35.3%, and the 18-month progression-free survival rate was 44.2% versus 27.0%. The response rate was higher with durvalumab than with placebo (28.4% vs. 16.0%; P<0.001), and the median duration of response was longer (72.8% vs. 46.8% of the patients had an ongoing response at 18 months). The median time to death or distant metastasis was longer with durvalumab than with placebo (23.2 months vs. 14.6 months; P<0.001). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 29.9% of the patients who received durvalumab and 26.1% of those who received placebo; the most common adverse event of grade 3 or 4 was pneumonia (4.4% and 3.8%, respectively). A total of 15.4% of patients in the durvalumab group and 9.8% of those in the placebo group discontinued the study drug because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Progression-free survival was significantly longer with durvalumab than with placebo. The secondary end points also favored durvalumab, and safety was similar between the groups. (Funded by AstraZeneca; PACIFIC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02125461 .).

Adenosine Deaminase in Pleural Effusion and Its Relationship with Clinical Parameters in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Pleural effusion adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels are elevated in various diseases. We investigated whether pleural effusion ADA levels differ among patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), lung cancer (LC), and benign diseases, including tuberculous pleurisy. We examined 329 patients from February 2002 to July 2013. There were 131 MPM cases with ADA levels of 32.29 IU/L; 117 LC cases with ADA levels of 21.12 IU/L; 54 benign disease cases with ADA levels of 20.98 IU/L. A significant difference existed in pleural effusion ADA levels between MPM and benign disease patients. Pleural effusion ADA levels were significantly higher in MPM patients.

Initial evaluation of nivolumab in patients with post-operative recurrence of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Limited options exist for treating post-recurrence patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of nivolumab in patients with post-operative recurrence of MPM in a real-world setting. METHODS: This study included 35 patients with post-operative recurrence of MPM. Treatment consisted of 240-mg intravenous nivolumab administration every 2 weeks until progressive disease (PD) or serious adverse events (AEs). Additional post-treatment data were evaluated, including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), post-treatment survival and AEs. Tumor response was assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The feasibility analysis including AEs was performed with the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. RESULTS: Of the 35 patients who received nivolumab, median follow-up was 6 months. The median treatment duration was 3 months (range: 1-14 months), and median of 8 cycles (range: 2-32 cycles) was administered. Best overall responses were follows: 1 patient had complete response, 6 had partial response, 18 had stable disease and 8 had PD. The ORR was 20.0%, and the DCR was 77.1%. The median overall survival and PFS were 13.1 and 4.4 months, respectively. There were grade-3 AEs in four patients (11.4%). No grade-4 or -5 AEs were observed. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab treatment in patients with post-operative recurrence of MPM seems safe and clinical efficacy.

Patient-reported outcomes with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (PACIFIC): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: In the ongoing, phase 3 PACIFIC trial, durvalumab improved the primary endpoints of progression-free survival and overall survival compared with that for placebo, with similar safety, in patients with unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. In this analysis, we aimed to evaluate one of the secondary endpoints, patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: PACIFIC is an ongoing, international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years, had a WHO performance status of 0 or 1, with histologically or cytologically documented stage III, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer, for which they had received at least two cycles of platinum-based chemoradiotherapy, with no disease progression after this treatment. We randomly assigned patients (2:1) using an interactive voice response system and a blocked design (block size=3) stratified by age, sex, and smoking history to receive 10 mg/kg intravenous durvalumab or matching placebo 1-42 days after concurrent chemoradiotherapy, then every 2 weeks up to 12 months. The primary endpoints of progression-free survival and overall survival have been reported previously. PROs were a prespecified secondary outcome. We assessed PRO symptoms, functioning, and global health status or quality of life in the intention-to-treat population with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) version 3 and its lung cancer module, the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ-LC13) at the time of random allocation to groups, at weeks 4 and 8, every 8 weeks until week 48, and then every 12 weeks until progression. Changes from baseline to 12 month in key symptoms were analysed with mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) and time-to-event analyses. A 10-point or greater change from baseline (deterioration or improvement) was deemed clinically relevant. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02125461, and EudraCT, 2014-000336-42. FINDINGS: Between May 9, 2014, and April 22, 2016, 476 patients were assigned to receive durvalumab, and 237 patients were assigned to receive placebo. As of March 22, 2018, the median follow-up was 25·2 months (IQR 14·1-29·5). More than 79% of patients given durvalumab and more than 82% of patients given placebo completed questionnaires up to week 48. Between baseline and 12 months, the prespecified longitudinal PROs of interest, cough (MMRM-adjusted mean change 1·8 [95% CI 0·06 to 3·54] in the durvalumab group vs 0·7 [-1·91 to 3·30] in the placebo group), dyspnoea (3·1 [1·75 to 4·36] vs 1·4 [-0·51 to 3·34]), chest pain (-3·1 [-4·57 to -1·60] vs -3·5 [-5·68 to -1·29]), fatigue (-3·0 [-4·53 to -1·50] vs -5·2 [-7·45 to -2·98]), appetite loss (-5·8 [-7·28 to -4·36] vs -7·0 [-9·17 to -4·87]), physical functioning (0·1 [-1·10 to 1·28] vs 2·0 [0·22 to 3·73]), and global health status or quality of life (2·6 [1·21 to 3·94] vs 1·8 [-0·25 to 3·81]) remained stable with both treatments, with no clinically relevant changes from baseline. The between-group differences in changes from baseline to 12 months in cough (difference in adjusted mean changes 1·1, 95% CI -1·89 to 4·11), dyspnoea (1·6, -0·58 to 3·87), chest pain (0·4, -2·13 to 2·93), fatigue (2·2, -0·38 to 4·78), appetite loss (1·2, -1·27 to 3·67), physical functioning (-1·9, -3·91 to 0·15), or global health status or quality of life (0·8, -1·55 to 3·14) were not clinically relevant. Generally, there were no clinically important between-group differences in time to deterioration of prespecified key PRO endpoints. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that a clinical benefit with durvalumab can be attained without compromising PROs. This result is of note because the previous standard of care was observation alone, with no presumed detriment to PROs. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

EphA2 inhibition suppresses proliferation of small-cell lung cancer cells through inducing cell cycle arrest.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by one of neuroendocrine tumors, and is a clinically aggressive cancer due to its rapid growth, early dissemination, and rapid acquisition of multidrug resistance to chemotherapy. Moreover, the standard chemotherapeutic regimen in SCLC has not changed for three decades despite of the dramatic therapeutic improvement in non-SCLC. The development of a novel therapeutic strategy for SCLC has become a pressing issue. We found that expression of Eph receptor A2 (EphA2) is upregulated in three of 13 SCLC cell lines and five of 76 SCLC tumor samples. Genetic inhibition using siRNA of EphA2 significantly suppressed the cellular proliferation via induction of cell cycle arrest in SBC-5 cells. Furthermore, small molecule inhibitors of EphA2 (ALW-II-41-27 and dasatinib) also exclusively inhibited proliferation of EphA2-positive SCLC cells by the same mechanism. Collectively, EphA2 could be a promising candidate as a therapeutic target for SCLC.

[Comparison of a safety evaluation between paclitaxel injection NK and Taxol®].

Paclitaxel injection NK(NK)is a generic product containing the same amount of ingredients as a Taxol®Injection. We examined the safety of NK in clinical practice compared to the original drug. Our results suggested that for the cancer patient, most safety profiles between NK and the original drug are similar. However, patients who received Taxol®Injection had significantly more grade 2 neuropathy compared to those who received NK(p<0. 01).

Outcomes of Chemoimmunotherapy Among Patients With Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer According to Potential Clinical Trial Eligibility.

Importance: Chemoimmunotherapy is the standard first-line therapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, whether findings from pivotal trials can be extrapolated to the clinical practice setting remains unclear. Objective: To compare treatment outcome gaps following first-line chemoimmunotherapy for patients with ES-SCLC between those who met and did not meet the eligibility criteria used in previous clinical trials. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective cohort study was conducted from September 1, 2019, to September 30, 2020, at 32 hospitals in Japan, with at least 12 months of follow-up. Participants included consecutive patients with ES-SCLC who received carboplatin and etoposide with atezolizumab as first-line therapy. Exposures: Patients who met eligibility criteria for pivotal phase 3 clinical trials were considered trial-eligible. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 6-month progression-free survival. The secondary outcomes were differences in progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety according to whether key clinical trial eligibility criteria were met. Results: A total of 207 patients were analyzed (median age, 72 years; range, 46-87 years; 170 [82%] were male). Sixty-four patients (31%) were older adults (age ≥75 years), and most (184 [89%]) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. There were 132 (64%) trial-eligible patients. The 6-month progression-free survival rate for all patients was 38.8% (95% CI, 32.4%-45.7%). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months in trial-eligible patients and 4.7 months in trial-ineligible patients (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.97; P = .03). The proportion of patients who achieved disease control was 93% (118 of 127) in trial-eligible patients and 77% (55 of 71) in trial-ineligible patients (P = .002). The median overall survival was 15.8 months in trial-eligible patients and 13.1 months in trial-ineligible patients (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.51-1.07; P = .10). The rate of severe adverse events was numerically higher among trial-ineligible patients than among trial-eligible patients (39% vs 27%; P = .07). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the overall treatment outcome was comparable to that reported in pivotal clinical trials. However, treatment outcomes after chemoimmunotherapy might differ between trial-eligible and trial-ineligible patients. These findings suggest that trial-eligibility criteria may be useful in clinical practice, and further studies using data from clinical practice settings are required to inform regulatory approval and clinical decision-making.

Non-invasive assessment of arterial stiffness using oscillometric blood pressure measurement.

BACKGROUND: Arterial stiffness is a major contributor to cardiovascular diseases. Because current methods of measuring arterial stiffness are technically demanding, the purpose of this study was to develop a simple method of evaluating arterial stiffness using oscillometric blood pressure measurement. METHODS: Blood pressure was conventionally measured in the left upper arm of 173 individuals using an inflatable cuff. Using the time series of occlusive cuff pressure and the amplitudes of pulse oscillations, we calculated local slopes of the curve between the decreasing cuff pressure and corresponding arterial volume. Whole pressure-volume curve was derived from numerical integration of the local slopes. The curve was fitted using an equation and we identified a numerical coefficient of the equation as an index of arterial stiffness (Arterial Pressure-volume Index, API). We also measured brachial-ankle (baPWV) PWV and carotid-femoral (cfPWV) PWV using a vascular testing device and compared the values with API. Furthermore, we assessed carotid arterial compliance using ultrasound images to compare with API. RESULTS: The slope of the calculated pressure-volume curve was steeper for compliant (low baPWV or cfPWV) than stiff (high baPWV or cfPWV) arteries. API was related to baPWV (r = -0.53, P < 0.05), cfPWV (r = -0.49, P < 0.05), and carotid arterial compliance (r = 0.32, P < 0.05). A stepwise multiple regression analysis demonstrated that baPWV and carotid arterial compliance were the independent determinants of API, and that API was the independent determinant of baPWV and carotid arterial compliance. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that our method can simply and simultaneously evaluate arterial stiffness and blood pressure based on oscillometric measurements of blood pressure.

A randomized phase II study of docetaxel or pemetrexed with or without the continuation of gefitinib after disease progression in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations (JMTO LC12-01).

BACKGROUND: Gefitinib (G) is a recommended molecular-targeted agent for elderly patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Docetaxel (Doc) and pemetrexed (Pem) have similar efficacies, and either is often used as the sole agent during treatment. The efficacy of continuing G after progressive disease (PD) develops has been reported. It remains unclear whether the continuation of G in combination with a single cytotoxic agent beyond PD is beneficial for elderly patients. Here, we conducted a randomized phase II study to assess the efficacy and safety of cytotoxic chemotherapy with G for elderly patients with progressive EGFR-mutant NSCLC. METHODS: Elderly patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with PD previously treated with G were enrolled. Patients received Pem 500 mg/m or Doc 60 mg/m every 21 days and were randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy with 250 mg G (G+ Doc/Pem arm) or without G (Doc/Pem arm) until further disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: This trial was terminated early owing to slow accrual. A group of 22 patients underwent analysis. The primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), was significantly longer in the G + Doc/Pem arm (median: 1.6 months vs. 5.6 months, hazard ratio = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.16-0.99, p = 0.0391). Adverse events ≥ grade 3 were more frequent in the G + Doc/Pem arm (45.5% vs. 90.9%, p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on G and Pem or Doc beyond PD showed a longer PFS than those on single-agent chemotherapy; however, it was associated with increased toxicity.

Prospective multicenter cohort study of durvalumab for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer and grade 1 radiation pneumonitis.

OBJECTIVE: Durvalumab was safe and effective in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in a phase 3 trial (PACIFIC trial). Although a history of radiation pneumonitis (RP) has been reported to increase the risk of exacerbation of pneumonitis associated with programmed death-1 axis inhibitors, the detailed clinical results of durvalumab treatment in patients with baseline grade 1 RP were not reported in the PACIFIC trial. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of durvalumab therapy in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective cohort study involving 35 patients. Patients were eligible if they met the following criteria: inoperable stage III NSCLC, administration of durvalumab within 42 days after CCRT using platinum-based chemotherapy, no disease progression after CCRT, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and presence of grade 1 RP at baseline. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of durvalumab with a minimum 1-year follow-up period for all patients. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled in our study from February 2019 to December 2019. The median progression-free survival was 11.4 months (95 % confidence interval, 7.1 months-not reached), and the median overall survival was not reached. Eleven (31 %) patients had grade ≥2 pneumonitis/RP, 10 (28 %) developed grade 2 pneumonitis/RP, and 1 (3 %) developed grade 5 pneumonitis/RP. Five (14 %) patients experienced treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events. CONCLUSION: Durvalumab might be safe and effective in patients with stage III NSCLC with baseline grade 1 RP following chemoradiotherapy.

Drug-Related Pneumonitis Induced by Osimertinib as First-Line Treatment for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Setting.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib has demonstrated impressive efficacy as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive (m+) lung cancer. Drug-related pneumonitis (DRP) is a potentially lethal complication of osimertinib treatment, but reliable real-world data currently are lacking. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the prevalence of osimertinib-induced DRP in first-line settings? What are the characteristics, clinical impact, and risk factors of osimertinib-induced DRP? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients who received osimertinib as a first-line treatment for advanced EGFR m+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between August 2018 and December 2019. All chest CT scans and clinical information during osimertinib exposure were collected until June 2020. The primary end point was DRP incidence identified through central review. RESULTS: A total of 452 patients from 18 institutions were evaluated. Eighty patients (18%) had a diagnosis of DRP (all grades), and 21 patients (4.6%) had a diagnosis of grade 3 or more DRP. Among the patients with DRP, 46% were identified as having transient asymptomatic pulmonary opacity (TAPO). Regarding the CT scan patterns, organizing pneumonia, simple pulmonary eosinophilia, hypersensitivity pneumonia, diffuse alveolar damage, and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia were found in 30, 21, 18, 9, and two patients (38%, 26%, 23%, 11%, and 3%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, smoking history was identified as an independent risk factor for DRP (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.01-2.89; P = .046). In the 3-month landmark analysis, DRP was associated with poor treatment efficacy; however, the presence of TAPO did not affect treatment efficacy negatively. INTERPRETATION: For osimertinib treatment in first-line settings, the frequency of DRP was considerably elevated to 18 %, and half of these patients exhibited TAPO features.

Early discontinuation of induction therapy in chemoimmunotherapy as an effective alternative to the standard regimen in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate whether induction chemotherapy with less than four courses is as effective as induction chemotherapy with more than four courses in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 249 patients with NSCLC who received chemoimmunotherapy at 12 centers in Japan between January and December 2019. The patient group that completed less than four courses owing to adverse events (AEs), and received subsequent maintenance therapy was compared to the group that received at least four courses of induction chemotherapy followed by maintenance therapy. RESULTS: On univariate and multivariate analyses, the patient group that transitioned to maintenance therapy after completing less than four courses of induction chemotherapy had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than those who completed at least four courses (hazard ratio [HR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.38-3.37, p < 0.001 and HR 2.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.40-3.84, p = 0.001, respectively). There was no obvious difference in PFS between the group in which induction chemotherapy ended in two or three courses leading to partial or complete response, and the group that continued at least four courses of induction chemotherapy (log-rank test p = 0.53). CONCLUSION: Treatment efficacy may be maintained if induction chemotherapy is completed in less than four courses owing to development of AEs, and is administered for more than two courses with partial or complete response; efficacy is maintained even on transitioning to maintenance therapy.

Prognostic Nutritional Index and Lung Immune Prognostic Index as Prognostic Predictors for Combination Therapies of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Cytotoxic Anticancer Chemotherapy for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and cytotoxic chemotherapies (chemoimmunotherapy) is associated with significantly better survival outcomes than cytotoxic chemotherapies alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there are no prognostic markers for chemoimmunotherapy. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) are prognostic biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy or cytotoxic chemotherapies. Thus, we aimed to examine whether these factors could also be prognostic markers for chemoimmunotherapy. We retrospectively examined 237 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with chemoimmunotherapy. In the total group, the median overall survival (OS) was not reached, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.6 months. Multivariate analysis of OS and PFS revealed significant differences based on PNI and LIPI. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) was also significantly associated with OS and PFS. PNI and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of <50% and poor LIPI (regardless of PD-L1 TPS) were associated with poor prognosis. PNI and LIPI predicted survival outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with chemoimmunotherapy, especially in patients with PD-L1 TPS <50%. For patients in this poor category, chemoimmunotherapy may result in a worse prognosis than expected.

Histologic transformation of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the incidence and clinical course of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung cancer with histologic transformation (HT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated lung cancer who received EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) between 2012 and 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence of HT. The secondary outcome was treatment efficacy in patients with HT. RESULTS: In total, 6356 patients were enrolled. In 2624 patients, the histological type was proven by rebiopsy after acquiring resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Among them, 74 patients had HT (incidence rate: 2.8% [95% confidence interval: 2.3%-3.5%]). The median progression-free survival after EGFR-TKIs and first-line therapy after confirming HT was 10.4 and 4.4 months, respectively, which was not significantly different between patients with transformation to high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma and those with transformation to another subtype of non-small cell lung cancer. Overall survival after confirming HT was 12.2 months. Twenty-seven patients received immune checkpoint inhibitors: 6 and 21 received immune checkpoint inhibitors before and after confirming HT, respectively. No patients achieved 1-year progression-free survival. The median progression-free survival after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy after confirming HT was 1.6 months. CONCLUSION: HT occurred in approximately 3% of EGFR-mutated patients who developed resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Cytotoxic agents are likely to be effective in patients with HT. However, the therapeutic effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors was limited in these patients. Given the rarity of HT and absence of prospective trials, our findings are important to inform the treatment of these patients.

Clinical impact of amrubicin monotherapy in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

Background: Topoisomerase is an essential enzyme for deoxyribonucleic acid replication, and its inhibitors suppress tumor progression. Amrubicin, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, is mainly used in the second-line treatment of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, the impact of different types of topoisomerase inhibitors for first-line chemotherapy on the efficacy of amrubicin remains unclear. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of second-line amrubicin in patients with relapsed SCLC who were previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, including topoisomerase I and II inhibitors. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed patients with ES-SCLC who experienced recurrence and were treated with amrubicin at 22 institutions in Japan between April 2015 and November 2020. The progression-free survival of amrubicin monotherapy was investigated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 320 patients were enrolled in this study, with 59 (18%) receiving platinum plus topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan and 261 (82%) receiving platinum plus topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide as first-line treatment. The progression-free survival of amrubicin was significantly longer in the irinotecan group than in the etoposide group (3.2 vs. 2.5 months; P=0.034). Conclusions: These results showed that different types of topoisomerase inhibitors could affect the efficacy of amrubicin monotherapy in the second-line treatment of patients with relapsed ES-SCLC.