Global survey of stigma among physicians and patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with fatty liver disease may experience stigma from the disease or comorbidities. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to understand stigma among patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and healthcare providers. METHODS: Members of the Global NASH Council created two surveys about experiences/attitudes toward NAFLD and related diagnostic terms: a 68-item patient and a 41-item provider survey. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 1,976 patients with NAFLD across 23 countries (51% Middle East/North Africa [MENA], 19% Europe, 17% USA, 8% Southeast Asia, 5% South Asia) and 825 healthcare providers (67% gastroenterologists/hepatologists) across 25 countries (39% MENA, 28% Southeast Asia, 22% USA, 6% South Asia, 3% Europe). Of all patients, 48% ever disclosed having NAFLD/NASH to family/friends; the most commonly used term was "fatty liver" (88% at least sometimes); "metabolic disease" or "MAFLD" were rarely used (never by >84%). Regarding various perceptions of diagnostic terms by patients, there were no substantial differences between "NAFLD", "fatty liver disease (FLD)", "NASH", or "MAFLD". The most popular response was being neither comfortable nor uncomfortable with either term (56%-71%), with slightly greater discomfort with "FLD" among the US and South Asian patients (47-52% uncomfortable). Although 26% of patients reported stigma related to overweight/obesity, only 8% reported a history of stigmatization or discrimination due to NAFLD. Among providers, 38% believed that the term "fatty" was stigmatizing, while 34% believed that "nonalcoholic" was stigmatizing, more commonly in MENA (43%); 42% providers (gastroenterologists/hepatologists 45% vs. 37% other specialties, p = 0.03) believed that the name change to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (or MASLD) might reduce stigma. Regarding the new nomenclature, the percentage of providers reporting "steatotic liver disease" as stigmatizing was low (14%). CONCLUSIONS: The perception of NAFLD stigma varies among patients, providers, geographic locations and sub-specialties. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Over the past decades, efforts have been made to change the nomenclature of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to better align with its underlying pathogenetic pathways and remove any potential stigma associated with the name. Given the paucity of data related to stigma in NAFLD, we undertook this global comprehensive survey to assess stigma in NAFLD among patients and providers from around the world. We found there is a disconnect between physicians and patients related to stigma and related nomenclature. With this knowledge, educational programs can be developed to better target stigma in NAFLD among all stakeholders and to provide a better opportunity for the new nomenclature to address the issues of stigma.

The obesity-related mutation gene on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

The prevalence of overweight and obesity is increasing, leading to metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) characterized by excessive accumulation of liver fat and a risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The driver gene mutations may play the roles of passengers that occur in single 'hotspots' and can promote tumorigenesis from benign to malignant lesions. We investigated the impact of high body weight and BMI on HCC survival using The Cancer Genome Atlas Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma (TCGA-LIHC) dataset. To explore the effects of obesity-related gene mutations on HCC, we collected driver mutation genes in 34 TCGA patients with BMI ≥ 27 and 23 TCGA patients with BMI < 27. The digital PCR performing the PBMC samples for the variant rate by clinical cohort of 96 NAFLD patients. Our analysis showed that obesity leads to significantly worse survival outcomes in HCC. Using cbioportal, we identified 414 driver mutation genes in patients with obesity and 127 driver mutation genes in non-obese patients. Functional analysis showed that obese-related genes significantly enriched the regulated lipid and insulin pathways in HCC. The insulin secretion pathway in patients with obesity HCC-specific survival identified ABCC8 and PRKCB as significant genes (p < 0.001). It revealed significant differences in gene mutation and gene expression profiles compared to non-obese patients. The digital PCR test ABCC8 variants were detected in PBMC samples and caused a 14.5% variant rate, significantly higher than that of non-obese NAFLD patients. The study findings showed that the gene ABCC8 was a patient with the obesity-related gene in NAFLD, which provides the probability that ABCC8 mutation contributes to the pre-cancer lesion biomarker for HCC.

Chronic Hepatitis C Related Steatotic Liver Disease Is More Than "Miscellaneous Steatotic Liver Disease".

The terminology and definition of fatty liver disease has evolved significantly. Recently, the overarching term of steatotic liver disease (SLD) has been endorsed by international societies.1,2 SLD further encompasses individuals with cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs), namely, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).

Chronic Viral Hepatitis B and C Outweigh MASLD in the Associated Risk of Cirrhosis and HCC.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The impact of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) on the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by chronic hepatitis B (CHB) or C infection and antiviral treatment statuses is not well-known. METHODS: A total of 336,866 adults aged ≥30 years were prospectively enrolled in a health screening program between 1997-2013. MASLD was identified by abdominal ultrasonography and cardiometabolic profiles. Data linkage was performed using 3 nationwide databases-National Health Insurance, Cancer Registry, and Death Certification System-to obtain information on antiviral treatment, vital status, and newly diagnosed cirrhosis and HCC. Follow-up was conducted until December 31, 2019. RESULTS: In the total population, 122,669 (36.4%) had MASLD. Over a mean follow-up of 15 years, 5562 new cases of cirrhosis and 2273 new cases of HCC were diagnosed. Although MASLD significantly increased the cumulative risks of cirrhosis or HCC (P < .0001), the associated risk was more pronounced when comparing CHB or C infection with the presence of MASLD. Stratifying the participants based on their MASLD and CHB or C statuses, hazard ratios (HRadj) with 95% confidence intervals for HCC were 8.81 (7.83-9.92) for non-steatotic liver disease (SLD) with CHB or C, 1.52 (1.32-1.74) for MASLD without CHB or C, and 8.86 (7.76-10.12) for MASLD with CHB or C, compared with non-SLD without CHB or C (all P < .0001). Among CHB or C patients who received antivirals during follow-up, MASLD was associated with increased risks of cirrhosis and HCC, with HRadj of 1.23 (1.01-1.49) and 1.32 (1.05-1.65), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the need to prioritize treatment of chronic viral hepatitis before addressing MASLD.

Sex Differences in Treatment Response to Nucleos(t)ide Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B: A Multicenter Longitudinal Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It is unclear if there may be sex differences in response to nucleos(t)ide analogs including virologic response (VR), biochemical response (BR), complete response (CR), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence among hepatitis B patients. We compared nucleos(t)ide analog treatment outcomes by sex. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 3388 treatment-naïve adult hepatitis B patients (1250 female, 2138 male) from the Real-World Evidence from the Global Alliance for the Study of Hepatitis B Virus consortium who initiated therapy with either entecavir or tenofovir from 22 sites (Argentina, Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and the United States). We used propensity-score matching to balance background characteristics of the male and female groups and competing-risks analysis to estimate the incidence and subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs) of VR, BR, CR, and HCC. RESULTS: Females (vs males) were older (52.0 vs 48.6 y); less likely to be overweight/obese (49.3% vs 65.7%), diabetic (9.9% vs 13.1%), or cirrhotic (27.9% vs 33.0%); and had a lower HBV DNA level (5.9 vs 6.0 log10 IU/mL) and alanine aminotransferase level (91 vs 102 IU/L) (all P < .01). However, after propensity-score matching, relevant background characteristics were balanced between the 2 groups. Females (vs males) had similar 5-year cumulative VR (91.3% vs 90.3%; P = .40) and HCC incidence rates (5.1% vs 4.4%; P = .64), but lower BR (84.0% vs 90.9%; P < .001) and CR (78.8% vs 83.4%; P = .016). Males were more likely to achieve BR (SHR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.17-1.46; P < .001) and CR (SHR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.31; P = .016), but VR and HCC risks were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences exist for treatment outcomes among hepatitis B patients. Male sex was associated with a 16% higher likelihood of clinical remission and a 31% higher likelihood of biochemical response than females, while virologic response and HCC incidence were similar between the 2 groups.

Long-term Risks of Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Across Steatotic Liver Disease Subtypes.

INTRODUCTION: The prospective study aimed to investigate the long-term associated risks of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) across various subtypes of steatotic liver disease (SLD). METHODS: We enrolled 332,175 adults who participated in a health screening program between 1997 and 2013. Participants were categorized into various subtypes, including metabolic dysfunction-associated SLD (MASLD), MASLD with excessive alcohol consumption (MetALD), and alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), based on ultrasonography findings, alcohol consumption patterns, and cardiometabolic risk factors. We used computerized data linkage with nationwide registries from 1997 to 2019 to ascertain the incidence of cirrhosis and HCC. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 16 years, 4,458 cases of cirrhosis and 1,392 cases of HCC occurred in the entire cohort, resulting in an incidence rate of 86.1 and 26.8 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The ALD group exhibited the highest incidence rate for cirrhosis and HCC, followed by MetALD, MASLD, and non-SLD groups. The multivariate adjusted hazard ratios for HCC were 1.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51-2.44), 2.91 (95% CI 2.11-4.03), and 2.59 (95% CI 1.93-3.48) for MASLD, MetALD, and ALD, respectively, when compared with non-SLD without cardiometabolic risk factors. The pattern of the associated risk of cirrhosis was similar to that of HCC (all P value <0.001). The associated risk of cirrhosis for ALD increased to 4.74 (95% CI 4.08-5.52) when using non-SLD without cardiometabolic risk factors as a reference. DISCUSSION: This study highlights elevated risks of cirrhosis and HCC across various subtypes of SLD compared with non-SLD, emphasizing the importance of behavioral modifications for early prevention.

Systematic integration of molecular and clinical approaches in HCV-induced hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play a crucial role in gene expression and regulation, with dysregulation of miRNA function linked to various diseases, including hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). There is still a gap in understanding the regulatory relationship between miRNAs and mRNAs in HCV-HCC. This study aimed to investigate the function and effects of persistent HCV-induced miRNA expression on gene regulation in HCC. METHODS: MiRNA array data were used to identify differentially expressed miRNAs and their targets, and miRNAs were analyzed via DIANA for KEGG pathways, gene ontology (GO) functional enrichment, and Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA) for hepatotoxicity, canonical pathways, associated network functions, and interactive networks. RESULTS: Seventeen miRNAs in L-HCV and 9 miRNAs in S-HCV were differentially expressed, and 5 miRNAs in L-HCV and 5 miRNAs in S-HCV were significantly expressed in liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) tumors. Grouped miRNA survival analysis showed that L-HCV miRNAs were associated with survival in LIHC, and miRNA‒mRNA targets regulated viral carcinogenesis and cell cycle alteration through cancer pathways in LIHC. MiRNA-regulated RCN1 was suppressed through miRNA-oncogene interactions, and suppression of RCN1 inhibited invasion and migration in HCC. CONCLUSION: Persistent HCV infection induced the expression of miRNAs that act as tumor suppressors by inhibiting oncogenes in HCC. RCN1 was suppressed while miRNAs were upregulated, demonstrating an inverse relationship. Therefore, hsa-miR-215-5p, hsa-miR-10b-5p, hsa-let-7a-5p and their target RCN1 may be ideal biomarkers for monitoring HCV-HCC progression.

Single-tube, single-strip lateral flow assays utilizing loop-mediated isothermal amplification for simultaneous hepatitis B and C viral detection.

Globally, hepatitis B virus (HBV) affects over 250 million people, whereas hepatitis C virus (HCV) affects approximately 70 million people, posing major public health challenges. Despite the availability of vaccines and treatments, a lack of comprehensive diagnostic coverage has left many cases undiagnosed and untreated. To address the need for sensitive, specific, and accessible diagnostics, this study introduced a multiplex loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay with lateral flow detection for simultaneous HBV and HCV testing. This assay achieved exceptional sensitivity and was capable of detecting HBV and HCV concurrently in a single tube and on a single strip within 25 min, achieving the required clinical sensitivity (10 and 103 genomic copies/reaction for HBV and HCV, respectively). The method was validated in clinical samples of various viral genotypes, achieving an equivalent limit of detection. Additionally, a custom portable heating device was developed for field use. The assay developed here, capable of direct viral detection on the strip, shows promise in supplanting current methods that solely identify antibodies and necessitate additional qPCR for viral activity assessment. This economical and rapid assay aligns with point-of-care testing needs, offering significant advancements in enhancing viral hepatitis diagnostics in settings with limited resources.

Antiviral therapy substantially reduces HCC risk in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection in the indeterminate phase.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: HCC risk in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is higher in the indeterminate phase compared with the inactive phase. However, it is unclear if antiviral therapy reduces HCC risk in this population. We aimed to evaluate the association between antiviral therapy and HCC risk in the indeterminate phase. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We analyzed 855 adult (59% male), treatment-naïve patients with CHB infection without advanced fibrosis in the indeterminate phase at 14 centers (USA, Europe, and Asia). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance the treated (n = 405) and untreated (n = 450) groups. The primary outcome was HCC development. The mean age was 46±13 years, the median alanine transaminase was 38 (interquartile range, 24-52) U/L, the mean HBV DNA was 4.5±2.1 log 10 IU/mL, and 20% were HBeAg positive. The 2 groups were similar after IPTW. After IPTW (n = 819), the 5-, 10-, and 15-year cumulative HCC incidence was 3%, 4%, and 9% among treated patients (n = 394) versus 3%, 15%, and 19%, among untreated patients (n = 425), respectively ( p = 0.02), with consistent findings in subgroup analyses for age >35 years, males, HBeAg positive, HBV DNA>1000 IU/mL, and alanine transaminase

Assessment of hepatitis B virus relapse in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with prophylactic nucleos(t)ide analogues: Implications for overall mortality.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aimed to explore the risk factors associated with virological and clinical relapse, as well as their impact on overall mortality, in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients receiving nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) therapy prior to chemotherapy initiation. METHODS: From 2010 to 2020, we conducted a prospective cohort study involving patients with HBV infection undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy. We utilized the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression models to assess risk factors. RESULTS: We observed that TDF or TAF (HR: 2.16, 95% CI 1.06-4.41; p = .034), anthracycline (HR: 1.73, 95% CI 1.10-2.73; p = .018), baseline HBV DNA (HR: 1.55, 95% CI 1.33-1.81; p < .001) and end-of-treatment HBsAg titre >100 IU/mL (HR: 7.81, 95% CI 1.94-31.51; p = .004) were associated with increased risk of virological relapse. Additionally, TDF or TAF (HR: 4.91, 95% CI 1.45-16.64; p = .011), baseline HBV DNA (HR: 1.48, 95% CI 1.10-1.99; p = .009) and end-of-treatment HBsAg titre >100 IU/mL (HR: 6.09, 95% CI .95-38.87; p = .056) were associated with increased risk of clinical relapse. Furthermore, we found that virological relapse (HR: 3.32, 95% CI 1.33-8.32; p = .010) and clinical relapse (HR: 3.59, 95% CI 1.47-8.80; p = .005) significantly correlated with all-cause mortality in HBV patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy with prophylactic NUCs therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of virological and clinical relapse was linked to baseline HBV DNA, end-of-treatment HBsAg levels and TDF or TAF for prophylaxis; additionally, experiencing relapse heightens the risk of all-cause mortality. Further research is warranted to explore potential strategies for preventing virological and clinical relapse in high-risk patients.

The interplay of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and viral hepatitis on liver disease severity: A large community-based study in a viral endemic area.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and its interplay with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in terms of liver disease severity is elusive. METHODS: A mass surveillance program was conducted in a viral hepatitis endemic area. The objective was to identify MAFLD/non-MAFLD subjects with advanced liver disease. RESULTS: Two thousand two hundred and forty-two (41.7%) of the 5378 subjects were identified as having MAFLD, and 375 (7.0%) had advanced liver disease. The proportions of anti-HCV and HBsAg seropositivity were 19.3% and 9.7%, respectively. The proportions of advanced fibrosis in subjects with non-viral hepatitis (NBNC), HBV and HCV infection were 2.8%, 5.7% and 23.4%, respectively. Subjects with MAFLD had a significantly higher proportion of advanced fibrosis (8.7% vs 5.7%, P < 0.001). Factors associated with advanced fibrosis included age (odds ratio [OR]/95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.8/3.7-6.0, P < 0.001), male sex (OR/CI: 1.3/1.0-1.7, P = 0.019), anti-HCV seropositivity (OR/CI: 5.9/4.6-7.5, P = 0.019), MAFLD-lean metabolic dysregulation (MS) (OR/CI: 2.6/1.3-5.2, P = 0.005; compared with the non-MAFLD group) and MAFLD-diabetes (OR/CI: 1.5/1.1-2.1, P = 0.008; compared with the non-MAFLD group). MAFLD did not aggravate liver disease severity in patients with viral hepatitis. However, among NBNC subjects, factors associated with advanced liver disease included MAFLD-lean MS group (OR/CI: 9.1/2.4-34.6, P = 0.001; compared with non-MAFLD group) and MAFLD-DM group (OR/CI: 2.0/1.2-3.2, P = 0.004; compared with non-MAFLD group). CONCLUSIONS: MAFLD patients with diabetes and metabolic dysregulation had a higher risk of advanced liver disease. The effect was more significant in non-viral hepatitis subjects in a community level.

Prevalence, proportions of elevated liver enzyme levels, and long-term cardiometabolic mortality of patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study estimated the prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) according to cardiometabolic risk factors. The long-term impacts of MASLD on all-cause and cardiometabolic-specific mortality were evaluated. METHODS: We enrolled 343 816 adults aged ≥30 years who participated in a health screening program from 1997 through 2013. MASLD was identified on the basis of abdominal ultrasonography and metabolic profiles. The participants were further categorized by liver enzyme elevation. Baseline cardiometabolic comorbidities were classified on the basis of self-reported medication use and clinical seromarkers. All-cause and cardiometabolic-specific deaths were determined through computerized data linkage with nationwide death certifications until December 31, 2020. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of MASLD was 36.4%. Among patients with MASLD, 35.9% had abnormal liver enzyme levels. Compared with patients without MASLD, abnormal liver enzymes were positively associated with cardiometabolic comorbidities in patients with MASLD (Pfor trend < 0.001). After follow-up, patients with MASLD had a 9%-29% higher risk of all-cause, cardiovascular-related, or diabetes-related mortality. In the groups with MASLD and elevated and normal liver enzyme levels, the multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios for cardiovascular deaths were 1.14 (1.05-1.25) and 1.10 (1.03-1.17), respectively, and those for diabetes deaths were 1.42 (1.05-1.93) and 1.24 (0.98-1.57), respectively, compared with those in the non-MASLD group (Pfor trend < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Individuals with MASLD and elevated liver enzyme levels exhibited significantly higher risks of all-cause and cardiometabolic deaths and should be monitored and given consultation on cardiometabolic modifications.

Mortality in patients with chronic hepatitis B treated with tenofovir or entecavir: A multinational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The benefits of entecavir (ETV) versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in reducing the development of chronic hepatitis B (CHB)-related hepatocellular carcinoma remain controversial. Whether mortality rates differ between patients with CHB treated with ETV and those treated with TDF is unclear. METHODS: A total of 2542 patients with CHB treated with either ETV or TDF were recruited from a multinational cohort. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to balance the differences in baseline characteristics between the two patient groups. We aimed to compare the all-cause, liver-related, and non-liver-related mortality between patients receiving ETV and those receiving TDF. RESULTS: The annual incidence of all-cause mortality in the entire cohort was 1.0/100 person-years (follow-up, 15 757.5 person-years). Patients who received TDF were younger and had a higher body mass index, platelet count, hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid levels, and proportion of hepatitis B e-antigen seropositivity than those who received ETV. The factors associated with all-cause mortality were fibrosis-4 index > 6.5 (hazard ratio [HR]/confidence interval [CI]: 3.13/2.15-4.54, P < 0.001), age per year increase (HR/CI: 1.05/1.04-1.07, P < 0.001), alanine aminotransferase level per U/L increase (HR/CI: 0.997/0.996-0.999, P = 0.003), and γ-glutamyl transferase level per U/L increase (HR/CI: 1.002/1.001-1.003, P < 0.001). No significant difference in all-cause mortality was observed between the ETV and TDF groups (log-rank test, P = 0.69). After propensity score matching, no significant differences in all-cause, liver-related, or non-liver-related mortality were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes of all-cause mortality and liver-related and non-liver-related mortality did not differ between patients treated with ETV and those receiving TDF.

Benefits of Hepatitis C Viral Eradication: A Real-World Nationwide Cohort Study in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) increases the risk of liver cirrhosis (LC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This nationwide cohort study assessed the effectiveness of viral eradication of CHC. METHODS: The Taiwanese chronic hepatitis C cohort and Taiwan hepatitis C virus (HCV) registry are nationwide HCV registry cohorts incorporating data from 23 and 53 hospitals in Taiwan, respectively. This study included 27,577 individuals from these cohorts that were given a diagnosis of CHC and with data linked to the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients received either pegylated interferon and ribavirin or direct-acting antiviral agent therapy for > 4 weeks for new-onset LC and liver-related events. RESULTS: Among the 27,577 analyzed patients, 25,461 (92.3%) achieved sustained virologic response (SVR). The mean follow-up duration was 51.2 ± 48.4 months, totaling 118,567 person-years. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) for incident HCC was 1.39 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.95, p = 0.052) among noncirrhotic patients without SVR compared with those with SVR and 1.82 (95% CI 1.34-2.48) among cirrhotic patients without SVR. The HR for liver-related events, including HCC and decompensated LC, was 1.70 (95% CI 1.30-2.24) among cirrhotic patients without SVR. Patients with SVR had a lower 10-year cumulative incidence of new-onset HCC than those without SVR did (21.7 vs. 38.7% in patients with LC, p < 0.001; 6.0 vs. 18.4% in patients without LC, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: HCV eradication reduced the incidence of HCC in patients with and without LC and reduced the incidence of liver-related events in patients with LC.

Addition of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to Pre-DAA FIB-4 does not increase prediction value for de novo liver complications in hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) achieve high sustained virologic response (SVR) in chronic hepatitis C patients; yet a proportion of patients still experience de novo liver complications after SVR. Identification of risk factors is clinically important. FIB-4 index is a useful noninvasive tool to assess fibrosis, while neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a biomarker for systemic inflammation. Our study aimed to investigate whether the addition of NLR can increase the prediction power of pre-DAA FIB-4 for de novo liver complications after SVR. METHODS: We recruited patients via The Taiwan HCV Registry (TACR) and National Health Insurance Registry Database. The inclusion criteria were patients who achieved SVR12 after DAA and were followed for at least 24 months after SVR12. Liver complications included ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, and HCC. RESULTS: Totally 7657 patients were recruited from 2013 to 2018. Among them, 3674 patients (48.0%) had a FIB-4 value > 3.25 and 491 patients (6.4%) had a NLR >4 before DAA. After two-year of follow-up after SVR 12, 214 patients (2.8%) developed de novo liver complications. Factors associated with liver complications included male gender, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, and pre-DAA FIB-4 >3.25 in multivariate analyses. Addition of NLR slightly did not increase the power of predicting liver complications. CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of de novo liver complications after SVR is low during short-term follow-up. Elevated pre-DAA FIB-4 is associated with de novo liver complications after SVR, whereas the addition of pre-DAA NLR does not increase the prediction power.

Impact of HCV eradication by directly acting antivirals on glycemic indices in chronic hepatitis C patients -a nationwide Taiwan HCV registry.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication using antiviral agents augments the metabolic profile. Changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in chronic hepatitis C patients who receive glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) remain elusive. METHODS: Data from 2417 patients treated with GLE/PIB from the Taiwan HCV Registry were analyzed, and pretreatment HbA1c levels were compared with 3-months after the-end-of treatment levels. A sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as undetectable HCV RNA at 12 weeks after the end of treatment. A significant change in HbA1c level was defined as the 75th percentile of the change in the HbA1c level before and after treatment (decrement >0.2%). RESULTS: Serum HbA1c levels decreased significantly (6.0 vs 5.9%, P < 0.001). Post-treatment HbA1c levels decreased in all subgroups, except in non-SVR patients (5.7 vs 5.7%, P = 0.79). Compared to patients without significant HbA1c improvement (decrement >0.2%), those with HbA1c improvement were older (60.2 vs 58.6 years, P < 0.001), had higher serum creatinine levels (1.9 vs 1.6 mg/dL, P < 0.001), triglycerides (129.8 vs 106.2 mg/dL, P < 0.001), fasting glucose (135.8 vs 104.0 mg/dL, P < 0.001), and pretreatment HbA1c (7.1 vs 5.7%, P < 0.001) and had a higher proportion of male sex (57.9% vs 50.9%, P = 0.003), diabetes (84.3 vs 16.8%, P < 0.001), more advanced stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) (15.7 vs 11.1 %, P < 0.001), anti-diabetic medication use (47.3 vs 16.4%, P < 0.001) and fatty liver (49.6 vs 38.3 %, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the factors associated with significant HbA1c improvement were age (odds ratio [OR]/95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.01/1.00-1.02, P = 0.01), HbA1c level (OR/CI: 2.83/2.48-3.24, P < 0.001) and advanced CKD stages (OR/CI: 1.16/1.05-1.28, P = 0.004). If the HbA1c variable was not considered, the factors associated with significant HbA1c improvement included alanine aminotransferase level (OR/CI, 1.002/1.000-1.004, P = 0.01), fasting glucose level (OR/CI: 1.010/1.006-1.013, P < 0.001), and diabetes (OR/CI: 3.35/2.52-4.45, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The HbA1c levels improved shortly after HCV eradication using GLE/PIB. The improvement in glycemic control can be generalized to all subpopulations, particularly in patients with a higher baseline HbA1c level or diabetes.

Strategies for Removal of Barriers to Hepatitis C Elimination in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major global health threat, with serious consequences including liver cirrhosis and cancer. Despite efforts to combat HCV, an estimated 1.5 million new infections occur each year and HCV was the sixth leading cause of death in 2017. Nevertheless, political leaders are increasingly interested in the fight against HCV, and the achievements of countries such as Rwanda, Egypt, India, Mongolia, Pakistan, Georgia, and Ukraine have given hope that the elimination plan to reduce new infections to 90% and mortality to 65% by 2030 is possible. It is true that some African countries can attest to the difficulty of operationalizing the HCV program with expensive testing platforms and HCV drugs that few could afford in the past, let alone the logistics involved, given that active case detection is an asset for HCV elimination. The inability to add direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) to the national essential drug list and negotiate DAA cost subsidies remains a major challenge in Africa. The lessons learned from implementing and scaling up the human immunodeficiency virus program can provide a strong framework to deliver comprehensive HCV services. We present the strategies used by some African countries to move toward HCV elimination, describe the challenges they have faced, and suggest realistic solutions.

HCV Microelimination for High-risk Special Populations.

The World Health Organization has set tremendous goals to eliminate viral hepatitis by 2030. However, most countries are currently off the track for achieving these goals. Microelimination is a more effective and practical approach that breaks down national elimination targets into goals for smaller and more manageable key populations. These key populations share the characteristics of being highly prevalent for and vulnerable to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Microelimination allows for identifying HCV-infected people and linking them to care more cost-effectively and efficiently. In this review, we discuss the current obstacles to and progress in HCV microelimination in special populations, including uremic patients undergoing hemodialysis, people who inject drugs, incarcerated people, people living in hyperendemic areas, men who have sex with men with or without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, transgender and gender-diverse populations, and sex workers. Scaling up testing and treatment uptake to achieve HCV microelimination may facilitate global HCV elimination by 2030.

Metformin reduces hepatocellular carcinoma incidence after successful antiviral therapy in patients with diabetes and chronic hepatitis C in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is known to increase the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among individuals with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). We aimed to evaluate whether metformin reduces HCC risk among individuals with DM and CHC after successful antiviral therapy. METHODS: Individuals with CHC who achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) after interferon-based therapy were enrolled in a large-scale, multicenter cohort in Taiwan (T-COACH). Cases of HCC at least 1 year after SVR were identified through linkage to the catastrophic illness and cancer registry databases. RESULTS: Of 7,249 individuals with CHC enrolled in the study, 781 (10.8%) had diabetes and 647 (82.8%) were metformin users. During a median follow-up of 4.4 years, 227 patients developed new-onset HCC. The 5-year cumulative HCC incidence was 10.9% in non-metformin users and 2.6% in metformin users, compared to 3.0% in individuals without DM (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.83; 95% CI 1.57-5.08 and aHR 1.46; 95% CI 0.98-2.19, respectively). Cirrhosis was the most important factor significantly associated with higher HCC risk in Cox regression analysis, followed by DM non-metformin use, older age, male sex, and obesity; whereas hyperlipidemia with statin use was associated with a lower HCC risk. Using the two most crucial risk factors, cirrhosis and DM non-metformin use, we constructed a simple risk model that could predict HCC risk among individuals with CHC after SVR. Metformin use was shown to reduce the risk of all liver-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin use greatly reduced HCC risk after successful antiviral therapy in individuals with diabetes and CHC. A simple risk stratification model comprising cirrhosis and DM non-metformin use could predict long-term outcomes in individuals with CHC after SVR. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: The current study provides evidence that metformin could reduce hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence after successful antiviral therapy among those with diabetes and chronic hepatitis C in a large-scale nationwide cohort study. Although successful antiviral therapy greatly reduces HCC risk in individuals with chronic hepatitis C, those with cirrhosis, diabetes, obesity, and the elderly remain at high risk of HCC development. We demonstrated that a simple risk model composed of two crucial unfavorable factors, cirrhosis and diabetes without metformin use, predicts the risk of HCC and major liver-related complications after successful antiviral therapy in individuals with chronic hepatitis C. Metformin use is highly recommended for individuals with diabetes and chronic hepatitis C after viral eradication to reduce the risk of HCC.

Influence of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease With Increased Liver Enzyme Levels on the Risk of Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The influence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) on the long-term risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Asian populations has not been widely investigated. METHODS: We enrolled 129,374 adults aged 30 years and older, all of whom participated in a health screening program from 2008 through 2013, were seronegative for hepatitis B surface antigen and anti-hepatitis C virus antibodies, and had limited daily alcohol consumption (<20 g/d for men and <10 g/d for women). Abdominal ultrasonography was performed to determine the presence of NAFLD. The participants were divided into the following groups: NAFLD with increased or normal liver enzyme levels, and non-NAFLD with normal liver enzyme levels. The incidences of cirrhosis and HCC were determined through computerized data linkage with nationwide registries. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratios of NAFLD on the risks of cirrhosis and HCC. RESULTS: The incidence rates of cirrhosis and HCC increased as follows: non-NAFLD with normal liver enzyme levels (n = 66,801; 51%), NAFLD with normal liver enzyme levels (n = 41,461; 32%), and NAFLD with increased liver enzyme levels (n = 21,112; 16%). In the NAFLD group with increased liver enzyme levels and the NAFLD group with normal liver enzyme levels, the corresponding multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios for cirrhosis were 3.51 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.36-5.22) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.46-1.16), and for HCC were 1.91 (95% CI: 1.08-3.38) and 0.57 (95% CI: 0.31-1.04), respectively, compared with the non-NAFLD group (P for trend < .001). The findings were consistent after restricting the analysis to nonobese individuals (body mass index, <25 kg/m2) and nonobese individuals without diabetes (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with NAFLD and increased liver enzyme levels showed significantly higher risks for cirrhosis and HCC and should be monitored.