Efficacy of Antibiotic Combinations against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Automated Time-Lapse Microscopy and Static Time-Kill Experiments.

Antibiotic combination therapy is used for severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria, yet data regarding which combinations are most effective are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro efficacy of polymyxin B in combination with 13 other antibiotics against four clinical strains of MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa We evaluated the interactions of polymyxin B in combination with amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, fosfomycin, linezolid, meropenem, minocycline, rifampin, temocillin, thiamphenicol, or trimethoprim by automated time-lapse microscopy using predefined cutoff values indicating inhibition of growth (≤106 CFU/ml) at 24 h. Promising combinations were subsequently evaluated in static time-kill experiments. All strains were intermediate or resistant to polymyxin B, antipseudomonal ß-lactams, ciprofloxacin, and amikacin. Genes encoding ß-lactamases (e.g., blaPAO and blaOXA-50) and mutations associated with permeability and efflux were detected in all strains. In the time-lapse microscopy experiments, positive interactions were found with 39 of 52 antibiotic combination/bacterial strain setups. Enhanced activity was found against all four strains with polymyxin B used in combination with aztreonam, cefepime, fosfomycin, minocycline, thiamphenicol, and trimethoprim. Time-kill experiments showed additive or synergistic activity with 27 of the 39 tested polymyxin B combinations, most frequently with aztreonam, cefepime, and meropenem. Positive interactions were frequently found with the tested combinations, against strains that harbored several resistance mechanisms to the single drugs, and with antibiotics that are normally not active against P. aeruginosa Further study is needed to explore the clinical utility of these combinations.

A Multiplex Fluidic Chip for Rapid Phenotypic Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing.

Many patients with severe infections receive inappropriate empirical treatment, and rapid detection of bacterial antibiotic susceptibility can improve clinical outcome and reduce mortality. To this end, we have developed a multiplex fluidic chip for rapid phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing of bacteria. A total of 21 clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus aureus were acquired from the EUCAST Development Laboratory and tested against amikacin, ceftazidime, and meropenem (Gram-negative bacteria) or gentamicin, ofloxacin, and tetracycline (Gram-positive bacteria). The bacterial samples were mixed with agarose and loaded in an array of growth chambers in the chip where bacterial microcolony growth was monitored over time using automated image analysis. MIC values were automatically obtained by tracking the growth rates of individual microcolonies in different regions of antibiotic gradients. Stable MIC values were obtained within 2 to 4 h, and the results showed categorical agreement with reference MIC values as determined by broth microdilution in 86% of the cases.IMPORTANCE Prompt and effective antimicrobial therapy is crucial for the management of patients with severe bacterial infections but is becoming increasingly difficult to provide due to emerging antibiotic resistance. The traditional methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) used in most clinical laboratories are reliable but slow with turnaround times of 2 to 3 days, which necessitates the use of empirical therapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics. There is a great need for fast and reliable AST methods that enable starting targeted treatment within a few hours to improve patient outcome and reduce the overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The multiplex fluidic chip for phenotypic AST described in the present study may enable data on antimicrobial resistance within 2 to 4 h, allowing for an early initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy.

Combination of polymyxin B and minocycline against multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: interaction quantified by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling from in vitro data.

Lack of effective treatment for multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (MDR-Kp) necessitates finding and optimising combination therapies of old antibiotics. The aims of this study were to quantify the combined effect of polymyxin B and minocycline by building an in silico semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model and to predict bacterial kinetics when exposed to the drugs alone and in combination at clinically achievable unbound drug concentration-time profiles. A clinical K. pneumoniae strain resistant to polymyxin B [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) = 16 mg/L] and minocycline (MIC = 16 mg/L) was selected for extensive in vitro static time-kill experiments. The strain was exposed to concentrations of 0.0625-48 × MIC, with seven samples taken per experiment for viable counts during 0-28 h. These observations allowed the development of the PKPD model. The final PKPD model included drug-induced adaptive resistance for both drugs. Both the minocycline-induced bacterial killing and resistance onset rate constants were increased when polymyxin B was co-administered, whereas polymyxin B parameters were unaffected. Predictions at clinically used dosages from the developed PKPD model showed no or limited antibacterial effect with monotherapy, whilst combination therapy kept bacteria below the starting inoculum for >20 h at high dosages [polymyxin B 2.5 mg/kg + 1.5 mg/kg every 12 h (q12h); minocycline 400 mg + 200 mg q12h, loading + maintenance doses]. This study suggests that polymyxin B and minocycline in combination may be of clinical benefit in the treatment of infections by MDR-Kp and for isolates that are non-susceptible to either drug alone.

Engineering a palette of eukaryotic chromoproteins for bacterial synthetic biology.

BACKGROUND: Coral reefs are colored by eukaryotic chromoproteins (CPs) that are homologous to green fluorescent protein. CPs differ from fluorescent proteins (FPs) by intensely absorbing visible light to give strong colors in ambient light. This endows CPs with certain advantages over FPs, such as instrument-free detection uncomplicated by ultra-violet light damage or background fluorescence, efficient Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) quenching, and photoacoustic imaging. Thus, CPs have found utility as genetic markers and in teaching, and are attractive for potential cell biosensor applications in the field. Most near-term applications of CPs require expression in a different domain of life: bacteria. However, it is unclear which of the eukaryotic CP genes might be suitable and how best to assay them. RESULTS: Here, taking advantage of codon optimization programs in 12 cases, we engineered 14 CP sequences (meffRed, eforRed, asPink, spisPink, scOrange, fwYellow, amilGFP, amajLime, cjBlue, meffBlue, aeBlue, amilCP, tsPurple and gfasPurple) into a palette of Escherichia coli BioBrick plasmids. BioBricks comply with synthetic biology's most widely used, simplified, cloning standard. Differences in color intensities, maturation times and fitness costs of expression were compared under the same conditions, and visible readout of gene expression was quantitated. A surprisingly large variation in cellular fitness costs was found, resulting in loss of color in some overnight liquid cultures of certain high-copy-plasmid-borne CPs, and cautioning the use of multiple CPs as markers in competition assays. We solved these two problems by integrating pairs of these genes into the chromosome and by engineering versions of the same CP with very different colors. CONCLUSION: Availability of 14 engineered CP genes compared in E. coli, together with chromosomal mutants suitable for competition assays, should simplify and expand CP study and applications. There was no single plasmid-borne CP that combined all of the most desirable features of intense color, fast maturation and low fitness cost, so this study should help direct future engineering efforts.

A Novel Microfluidic Assay for Rapid Phenotypic Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria Detected in Clinical Blood Cultures.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate antibiotic therapy is critical in the management of severe sepsis and septic shock to reduce mortality, morbidity and health costs. New methods for rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing are needed because of increasing resistance rates to standard treatment. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a novel microfluidic method and the potential to directly apply this method on positive blood cultures. METHODS: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, tigecycline and/or vancomycin for Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus were determined using a linear antibiotic concentration gradient in a microfluidic assay. Bacterial growth along the antibiotic gradient was monitored using automated time-lapse photomicrography and growth inhibition was quantified by measuring greyscale intensity changes in the images. In addition to pure culture MICs, vancomycin MICs were determined for S. aureus from spiked and clinical blood cultures following a short centrifugation step. The MICs were compared with those obtained with the Etest and for S. aureus and vancomycin also with macrodilution. RESULTS: The MICs obtained with the microfluidic assay showed good agreement internally as well as with the Etest and macrodilution assays, although some minor differences were noted between the methods. The time to possible readout was within the range of 2 to 5 h. CONCLUSIONS: The examined microfluidic assay has the potential to provide rapid and accurate MICs using samples from positive clinical blood cultures and will now be tested using other bacterial species and antibiotics.