RESUMO
Objectives Fistula-in-ano is a common condition that negatively affects the quality of life of its sufferers. A high anal fistula poses a significant challenge for surgeons due to its proximity to the anorectal ring and the potential risk of incontinence rather than recurrence. Many modalities have been used in a justified search for a satisfactory cure for the condition, but the seton remains a mainstay of surgical treatment. Therefore, the rationale of this study is to assess the outcome of treating a high anal fistula using the cutting seton technique in a hospital in Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia. The evaluation is intended through a retrospective analysis of patients' outcomes, comparing its effectiveness to similar articles. Methods This is a retrospective study that includes 50 patients with high anal fistulas who were treated with a cutting seton at the National Guard Hospital over a four-year period (2019-2022). Information obtained from medical records included clinical and demographic data. The data collected during the study was compiled and statistically analyzed using the SPSS Statistics version 26.0 (IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 50 patients with high anal fistula treated with a cutting seton were included: 82% were males and 18% were females, with 66% below 45 years of age. Approximately 92% had inter-sphincteric fistulas, and only 28% had a recurrent fistula. Almost all patients (98%) had an MRI done before surgery. Around 70% of patients were completely cured, 26% had minor complications, 8% of the operated patients experienced mild incontinence, and only one recurrence (2%). Conclusion The cutting seton is still a valid modality in treating patients with a high anal fistula, as it is considerably safe, effective, and yields good outcomes. Standard preoperative assessment and thorough surgical techniques are cornerstones for achieving a satisfactory outcome.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Liver abscesses differ in their aetiology, location, and number. Image-guided percutaneous drainage techniques are the currently used management for liver abscesses. We conducted our study to compare the clinical safety and efficacy of percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) to percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD). METHODS: A systematic review of major reference databases was undertaken in February 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare PNA to PCD in treating liver abscess patients. The quality of the included trials was assessed using the Cochrane tool. Statistical meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan and open meta-analyst software. RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs were included in this review, with 1676 patients enrolled. The overall quality of the included trials was moderate, with most domains of unclear risk. PCD was superior to PNA in the success rate (RR = 1.23; 95% CI [1.12, 1.36], P < 0.00001), time for achieving 50% reduction of cavity size (MD = -2.32; 95% CI [-3.07, -1.57], P < 0.00001), and time for clinical improvement (MD = -1.92; 95% CI [-2.55, -1.28], P < 0.00001). The two modalities did not differ in the days of hospital stay, duration of IV antibiotics, and time needed for total or subtotal reduction of cavity size (P = 0.36, P = 0.06 and P = 0.40, respectively). High heterogeneity levels were detected. Regarding major complications, the two modalities were equally safe (P = 0.39). CONCLUSION: PCD has a higher success rate and results in a faster 50% reduction in the abscess cavity size and clinical improvement. The two modalities are equally safe.