Workload of home care nurses: Italian adaptation, validity, and reliability of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index questionnaire.

The aim of this study was to adapt the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) to the home care setting and translate and validate it in Italian. An online questionnaire containing the Italian version of the NASA-TLX adapted to the home care setting was administered to home care nurses to measure workload. Content Validity Index, Exploratory, and Confirmatory Factor Analyses were used to measure the psychometric characteristics of the modified NASA-TLX. The modified Italian version of NASA-TLX_HC-IT showed good psychometric characteristics in measuring the workload of home care nurses, with excellent fit indices. The reliability, calculated with Cronbach's alpha, was 0.73, indicating adequate reliability. A negative correlation between workload and job satisfaction among home care nurses, as well as a positive association between high workload and intention to leave the workplace, was verified. The modified Italian version of the NASA-TLX_HC-IT was confirmed to be a valid and reliable instrument to measure workload in home care nursing. Furthermore, the correlation between workload and the intention to leave the workplace among home care nurses was an important result that community nursing managers should consider preventing the shortage of home care nurses.

Working conditions, missed care and patient experience in home care nursing in Italy: An observational study.

INTRODUCTION: The aging of the population requires an appropriate knowledge of the type of care that needs to be provided to inform healthcare policies. In Italy, neither home care nursing, nor the patient experiences have ever been described. OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of nurses and care recipients involved in home care. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in 18 Italian Regions. Between April and October 2023, data from nurses and patients involved in home care were collected through two surveys. Psychosocial conditions in workplaces, missed care, and care experiences were assessed using validated tools. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's correlations were performed. RESULTS: A total of 46 local healthcare units were included in this study, with a total of 2549 nurses and 4709 care recipients. Nurses (mean age 46.60; 79.48% female; 44.68% regional nursing diploma as the highest qualification) reported good working conditions (42.37; SD = 12.25; range = 0-100) and a high mean number of missed care activities (5.11; SD = 3.19; range 0-9). Most nurses (83.41%) reported high levels of job satisfaction, while 20.28% intended to leave their job. Patients (mean age 75.18; 57.57% female; 36.95% primary school), on the other hand, rated positively the care they had received (8.23; range = 0-10). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the perception of critical issues at work and some missed care, satisfaction in nurses and patients was high. These data constitute a preliminary snapshot of the studied phenomena, which will be investigated through more in-depth analyses.

Community health services in European literature: A systematic review of their features, outcomes, and nursing contribution to care.

BACKGROUND: To meet the population's needs, community care should be customized and continuous, adequately equipped, and monitored. INTRODUCTION: Considering their fragmented and heterogeneous nature, a summary of community healthcare services described in European literature is needed. The aim of this study was to summarize their organizational models, outcomes, nursing contribution to care, and nursing-related determinants of outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Embase in October 2022 and October 2023 (for updated results). Quantitative studies investigating the effects of community care, including nursing contribution, on patient outcomes were included and summarized. Reporting followed the PRISMA checklist. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022383856). RESULTS: Twenty-three studies describing six types of community care services were included, which are heterogeneous in terms of target population, country, interventions, organizational characteristics, and investigated outcomes. Heterogeneous services' effects were observed for access to emergency services, satisfaction, and compliance with treatment. Services revealed a potential to reduce rehospitalizations of people with long-term conditions, frail or older persons, children, and heart failure patients. Models are mainly multidisciplinary and, although staffing and workload may also have an impact on provided care, this was not enough investigated. DISCUSSION: Community health services described in European literature in the last decade are in line with population needs and suggest different suitable models and settings according to different care needs. Community care should be strengthened in health systems, although the influence of staffing, workload, and work environment on nursing care should be investigated by developing new management models. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICY: Community care models are heterogeneous across Europe, and the optimum organizational structure is not clear yet. Future policies should consider the impact of community care on both health and economic outcomes and enhance nursing contributions to care.

Effectiveness of the Primary Nursing Model on nursing documentation accuracy: A quasi-experimental study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To analyse the Primary Nursing Model's effect on nursing documentation accuracy. BACKGROUND: The Primary Nursing is widely implemented since it has been considered as the ideal model of care delivery based on the relationship between the nurse and patient. However, previous research has not examined the relationship between Primary Nursing and nursing documentation accuracy. DESIGN: A pretest-posttest-follow-up design was used. METHODS: The study was conducted from August 2018 to February 2020 in eight surgical and medical wards in an Italian university hospital. The Primary Nursing was implemented in four wards (study group), while in the other four, the Team Nursing was practised (control group). Nursing documentation accuracy was evaluated through the D-Catch instrument. From the eight wards, 120 nursing documentations were selected randomly for each time point (pre-test, post-test and follow-up) and in each group. Altogether, 720 nursing documents were assessed. The study adhered to the TREND checklist. RESULTS: The Primary Nursing and Team Nursing Models exhibited significant differences in mean scores for documentation accuracy: assessment on admission, nursing diagnosis, nursing intervention and patient outcome accuracy. No differences between the two groups were found for record structure accuracy and legibility between the posttest and follow-up. CONCLUSION: Primary Nursing exerts an overall positive effect on nursing documentation accuracy and persists over time. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The benefits from Primary Nursing implementation included better-documented patient outcomes. The use of Primary Nursing linked with the use of the nursing process allowed for a more individualised and problem-solving approach. Nurse managers should consider the implementation of Primary Nursing to improve care quality.

The impact of education on patients' psycho-emotional status during allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a multicenter prospective study by thes Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo.

PURPOSE: Depressive disorders are the most common manifestation of psychological distress in allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Few studies have yet investigated the relationship between therapeutic educational interventions and outcomes in these patients with specific attention to those related to mental health. Aim of this study was to understand how much educational intervention can represent a protective factor in preventing psycho-emotional distress-related issues in this setting. DESIGN: A prospective observational study of a multicenter cohort was conducted. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. METHODS: A pre-transplant therapeutic educational programme was offered to a cohort of adult patients undergoing allo-HSCT recruited in ten transplant centers of the GITMO network between May 2018 and January 2019. Depression, Anxiety and Stress scale was used to collect data on psycho-emotional distress at admission (T0), at the day of transplant (T1) and at discharge (T2). Descriptive data were collected and reported, and comparative analyses were done among patients who were compliant with the pre-transplant educational intervention and those who did not (for any reason). FINDINGS: A cohort of 133 allo-HSCT patients was observed. In patients who did not receive pre-transplant educational intervention, higher levels of depression at admission (p = 0.01) and at the day of transplant (p = 0.03), higher levels of anxiety (p = 0.01 and p = 0.01 respectively) as well as higher levels of stress (p < 0.01 and p = 0.01) were observed. Problem solving and "face to face" interview were the best methods to provide education to patients. Those who received pre-transplant education through "face-to-face" interview reported significant low levels of depression during the whole hospital stay period (p < 0.01; p = 0.01; p = 0.01) and less anxiety and stress at admission (p < 0.05 and p = 0.01 respectively). Depression was more represented in female than male participants at T0 (16.5% vs 9.0%; p = 0.01), while among T0 and T2 the males had a significant higher increasing of depression than females (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that pretreatment therapeutic educational programs with specific learning modalities can be effective in limiting the potential risk of developing moderate-to-severe anxiety-depressive states and stress symptoms related to allo-HSCT. IMPLICATIONS FOR PSYCHOSOCIAL PROVIDERS: Further studies are needed to confirm our results and to understand whether containing psycho-emotional distress can have any relationship with medium- and long-term post-transplant complications.

Diagnostic features of SARS-COVID-2-positive patients: A rapid review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: To identify the main diagnostic features of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients at the time of hospitalisation and their prevalence. BACKGROUND: Since the COVID-19 outbreak in China in December of 2019, several studies attempted to identify the epidemiological, viral and clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2. Given the rapid widespread transmission of the COVID-19 disease worldwide, a more comprehensive and up-to-date understanding of its features is needed to better inform nurses, clinicians and public health policy makers. METHODS: A rapid review and meta-analysis were carried out to identify the main diagnostic features of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients at the time of hospitalisation. All case series, cross-sectional, case-control and cohort studies published from 01/01/2020 till 30/06/2020 in English and Chinese that stated all or at least two of the outcomes of interest (clinical features, laboratory and radiological findings) were included. We performed a random-effects model meta-analysis to calculate pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals. Conduction of the review adheres to the PRISMA checklist. RESULTS: 21 studies involving 8837 patients were included in the quantitative synthesis. Fever, cough and fatigue were the most common clinical features, while the most relevant laboratory abnormalities at the time of hospitalisation were lymphopenia, elevated C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase. CT images showed a bilateral lung involvement, with ground glass infiltrates and patchy shadows on most patients. CONCLUSION: This review provides an up-to-date synthesis of main diagnostic features of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients at the time of hospitalisation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Our findings could provide guidance for nurses and clinicians to early identification of positive patients at the time of the hospitalisation through a complete definition of main clinical features, laboratory and CT findings.

Exploring hospital compliance with the primary nursing care model: validating an inventory using the Delphi method.

BACKGROUND: The primary nursing care model is considered a personalized model of care delivery based on care continuity and on the relationship between the nurse and patient. Primary nursing checklists are not often mentioned in the literature; however, they represent a valid instrument to develop, implement, and evaluate primary nursing. The aim of this study was to create a structured checklist to explore hospital compliance in primary nursing. METHODS: The Delphi method was used to develop and validate a checklist. The preliminary version was created and sent to three experts for their opinions. Their comments were ultimately used in the first version, which included four components with 19 items regarding primary nursing characteristics. A two-round Delphi process was used to generate consensus items. The Delphi panel consisted of six experts working in primary nursing contexts and/or teaching or studying primary nursing. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire from July 2020 to January 2021. These experts were asked to rate each element for relevance using a 4-point Likert-type scale. Furthermore, the consensus among the panel of experts was set at ≥78%, with selected items being voted "quite relevant" and "highly relevant". Content validity index (I-CVI) and modified kappa statistic were also calculated. Following expert evaluation, the first version of the checklist was modified, and the new version, constituting 17 items, was sent to the same experts. RESULTS: The first version of the checklist demonstrated a main relevance score of 3.34 (SD = 0.83; range = 1.3-4; mean I-CVI = 0.84; range: 0.83-1), but three items did not receive an adequate I-CVI score, that is, lower than 0.78. After the second round, the I-CVIs improved. The main score of relevance was 3.61 (SD: 0.35; range = 2.83-4; mean = I-CVI: 0.93). The S-CVI/UA was 0.58, and the S-CVI/Ave was 0.93. CONCLUSION: Measuring primary nursing compliance should be implemented to provide continuous feedback to nurses. Moreover, utilizing valid checklists could permit comparing different results from others' research. Future research should be conducted to compare the results from the checklist with nursing outcomes.

The awareness of the IBD nurse position among patients from an Italian tertiary IBD centre.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a chronic condition characterized by acute relapses which have an important impact on the quality of life of patients, both physically and psychologically. In the personalized care of IBD patients, a key role is covered by the IBD nurse, who provides psychological and educational support, as well as a source of contact for all patients. AIM: Aim of the present study was to assess the perception of IBD patients about roles, competences and abilities of the IBD nurses in a specialized center. This is the base for further programs aiming to improve quality of care. METHODS: A questionnaire composed of 15 statements regarding the role of the IBD nurse in their treatment was offered to all patients attending this IBD center over a 3-month period. Results were showed comparing those of patients currently receiving treatment with a biologic therapy to those receiving non-biologic therapy. RESULTS: Patients in this center have a poor awareness of the IBD nurse role, particularly those not receiving biologic treatment. Although most patients are aware that they can use the IBD nurse as a point of contact, the majority are not aware of the qualifications of the IBD nurse to discuss their treatment options and provide psychological support. CONCLUSION: Our survey shows that the figure of the IBD nurse is still poorly recognised by patients, with a likely resultant underutilisation of the services of a highly skilled and educated professional. Several key issues for improvement for the IBD nurse service have been raised by this study and warrant similar investigation in other centres.

Nursing Diagnoses as Predictors of Hospital Length of Stay: A Prospective Observational Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the number of nursing diagnoses on hospital admission is an independent predictor of the hospital length of stay. DESIGN: A prospective observational study was carried out. A sample of 2,190 patients consecutively admitted (from July to December 2014) in four inpatient units (two medical, two surgical) of a 1,547-bed university hospital were enrolled for the study. METHODS: Data were collected from a clinical nursing information system and the hospital discharge register. Two regression analyses were performed to investigate if the number of nursing diagnoses on hospital admission was an independent predictor of length of stay and length of stay deviation after controlling for patients' sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender), clinical variables (disease groupers, disease severity morbidity indexes), and organizational hospital variables (admitting inpatient unit, modality of admission). FINDINGS: The number of nursing diagnoses was shown to be an independent predictor of both the length of stay (ß = .15; p < .001) and the length of stay deviation (ß = .19; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of nursing diagnoses is a strong independent predictor of an effective hospital length of stay and of a length of stay longer than expected. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The systematic inclusion of standard nursing care data in electronic health records can improve the predictive ability on hospital outcomes and describe the patient complexity more comprehensively, improving hospital management efficiency.

[Relevance of NANDA-I diagnoses in patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a Delphi study]. / Rilevanza delle diagnosi NANDA-I nei pazienti sottoposti a Trapianto di Cellule Staminali Emopoietiche: uno studio Delphi.

INTRODUCTION: Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ( HSCT) has become the standard of care for some haematological diseases that do not respond to traditional treatments: pre-transplant therapy still causes high mortality and morbidity today. Due to the high risk, patient care requires careful evalua- tion and often complex, intensive and non-risk free interventions; the NANDA-I classification provides a way to classify and standardise areas of nursing interest. A previous consensus among experts had iden- tified 61 diagnoses, according to the classification NANDA-I 2018-2020, relevant in onco-haematolo- gical field. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify which of the 61 diagnoses were relevant for patients undergoing HSCT. METHOD: A Delphi study was conducted in two rounds; a structured questionnaire on a 4 point Likert scale was used to build consensus, involving 57 experienced nurse enrolled in Italian GITMO Centres. RESULTS: The present study has identified 34 relevant NANDA-I diagnoses in patients undergoing HSCT; it also defined 11 as important diagnoses having obtained absolute consensus. DISCUSSION: Use the NANDA-I diagnoses to know, from a panel of experts, the most important and relevant health problems associated with the toxicity of pre- HCSE treatment, it can direct assistance and resources towards expercied and known outcomes so as to be able to intervene effectively with performances aimed at reducing risks and specific complications.

Quantification of nursing care and creation of economic indicators: an observational study protocol.

BACKGROUND: The literature on hospital admissions costs shows that classification of hospitalization systems such as the DRG system used in Italy, do not reflect the real cost of the production factors used, including those of nursing care in relation to the complexity of the hospital effort. OBJECTIVE: This concept paper outlines the study protocol and the methodology used to measure nursing care in economic terms. The objective of the study is developed on the assumption of creating economic indicators from a quantitative analysis of nursing activities provided to specific patients, in order to determine not only who costs but also the reasons for the cost, and demonstrate the variability of nursing not only for DRG, but also each individual patient. METHODS: A retrospective study and a longitudinal prospective study will be performed. In the first phase of the study, using a bottom-up Microcosting methodology the type, volume, time and costs of nursing activities for DRG will be determined and the incidence of nursing costs on reimbursement will be highlighted.In the second phase, the above analysis will be supplemented by the recognition of the complexity of individual cases measured through the Corridor Triage(Tri-CO), in order to figure out the incidence of costs of nursing activities on the reimbursement in relation to the level of care complexity. Main sources of data: hospital discharge card (SDO); Professional Assessment Instrument (PAI); datasets for collecting the time of delivery of nursing activities on PAI. Power calculation: For retrospective study, the survey will be conducted on a sample of 150 patients hospitalized in the first quarter of 2016. For the longitudinal prospective study, 150 patients will be included in the first quarter of 2017 after the structured introduction of Tri-CO as a valuation tool of care complexity. The sample examined is approximately 30% of the total number of admissions per year. RESULTS: The study started in February 2016 and the results are expected for May 2017. Through this study it is expected to verify whether by implementing a unbundling approach, ie the "unpacking" of the production factors (nursing activity costs) used for the explication of hospitalization, and by adopting a methodology based on standard analytical costs, a more detailed knowledge of the overall DRG rate data available today will be obtained, which is currently lacking of explicit notation of all the amounts that make up it.

[Development and implementation of pediatric and neonatal nursing information system in an hospital setting: the pediatric PAI]. / Sviluppo e implementazione di un sistema informativo infermieristico pediatrico in ambito ospedaliero: il PAI pediatrico.

The Professional Assessment Instrument (PAI) is a clinical nursing information system used in the adult inpatient units of the A. Gemelli university hospital in Rome (Italy). The PAI allows for the systematic collection of nursing care data in order to improve the quality of care. So far, few clinical nursing information systems have been developed in the neonatal and pediatric care setting. The aim of this study is to describe the development and implementation of a clinical nursing information system (PAIped) for the neonatal and pediatric care setting. METHODS: The Patient-and Family-Centered Care model was used to develop the contents of the PAIped. A web platform application was developed for the PAIped. The standard nursing terminology Clinical Care Classification System was used. A decisionmaking support system was developed within the PAIped to support nurses in making diagnoses and in selecting the most appropriate nursing interventions. RESULTS: A clinical nursing information system using a standard nursing terminology was developed in the pediatric and neonatal care setting. After a test phase, the PAIped was implemented in all the pediatric and neonatal inpatient units of the A. Gemelli university hospital. CONCLUSION: The development and implementation of the PAIped in the A. Gemelli university hospital allowed the monitoring of nursing care processes and accurate nursing documentation.

Prevalence of nursing diagnoses as a measure of nursing complexity in a hospital setting.

AIMS: To describe the prevalence of nursing diagnoses on admission among inpatient units and medical diagnoses and to analyse the relationship of nursing diagnoses to patient characteristics and hospital outcomes. BACKGROUND: Nursing diagnoses classify patients according to nursing dependency and can be a measure of nursing complexity. Knowledge regarding the prevalence of nursing diagnoses on admission and their relationship with hospital outcomes is lacking. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. METHODS: Data were collected for 6 months in 2014 in four inpatient units of an Italian hospital using a nursing information system and the hospital discharge register. Nursing diagnoses with prevalence higher or equal to 20% were considered as 'high frequency.' Nursing diagnoses with statistically significant relationships with either higher mortality or length of stay were considered as 'high risk.' The high-frequency/high-risk category of nursing diagnoses was identified. RESULTS: The sample included 2283 patients. A mean of 4·5 nursing diagnoses per patient was identified; this number showed a statistically significant difference among inpatient units and medical diagnoses. Six nursing diagnoses were classified as high frequency/high risk. Nursing diagnoses were not correlated with patient gender and age. A statistically significant perfect linear association (Spearman's correlation coefficient) was observed between the number of nursing diagnoses and both the length of stay and the mortality rate. CONCLUSION: Nursing complexity, as described by nursing diagnoses, was shown to be associated with length of stay and mortality. These results should be confirmed after considering other variables through multivariate analyses. The concept of high-frequency/high-risk nursing diagnoses should be expanded in further studies.

[Standardization of data collection in midwifery care: a literature review]. / La standardizzazione della raccolta dati nella Midwifery Care: revisione della letteratura.

INTRODUCTION: midwifery records currently do not systematically collect data regarding midwifery care provided. Midwifery Minimum Data Sets (MMDS) have been developed to perform uniform and standardized data collection. AIM: to describe features, purposes and use of MMDSs in obstetrical care. METHOD: a literature review was conducted using Medline, CINAHL and Scopus databases. The following key words were used: "data set", "midwifery" and "maternity care. RESULTS: twelve of 752 potentially eligible articles were included. Six MMDS were identified: Nurse - Midwifery Clinical Data Set, Optimality Index-United States, ACNM Benchmarking Data Collection Form, Midwives Alliance of North America Data Set, American Association of Birth Centers Uniform Data Set, Women's Health Care Minimum Data Set. Overall, the purpose of the different MMDSs was to record systematically the midwifery care provided and patient outcomes. The various MMDS had differing features; different data were collected related to women (e.g. socio-demographic data, anamnesis), their newborns (e.g. Apgar score, weight) and the midwifery care provided in different phases (e.g. antepartum, intrapartum). Generally, MMDS were used in north-American countries and their use showed the efficacy of midwifery interventions and the importance of systematic data collection. DISCUSSION: an organized and standardized approach is needed to provide accurate data collection of maternal and neonatal health outcomes and midwifery care. The development and validation of MMDS in the Italian context is needed.

Psychometric evaluation of the Positions on Nursing Diagnosis scale.

AIM: To study the psychometric properties of the Positions on Nursing Diagnosis (PND) scale. BACKGROUND: The PND is a scale to measure nurses' attitudes toward nursing diagnosis. In previous studies, reliability of the scale was supported but its construct validity is still unclear with studies reporting both one-factor and three-factor models. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with a convenience sample of 262 nurses enrolled from one general public hospital and three long-term care facilities in Italy. Construct validity was assessed with confirmatory factor analysis. Criterion and contrasting-group validities were tested, as well as internal consistency reliability. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis showed the adequacy of a one-factor model of the PND scale. Criterion and contrasting-group validities were supportive, as was internal consistency reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The PND is a valid and reliable scale to measure nurses' attitudes toward nursing diagnosis. Its use in practice and research is recommended.

Nursing diagnoses and theoretical frameworks in neonatal units: a literature review.

AIM: To identify nursing diagnoses and theoretical frameworks used in neonatal units through a literature review. METHOD: Cinahl, Medline and Lilacs, database were used to perform this study. The descriptors used were: "Nursing Diagnosis" AND "Models, Nursing" OR "Nursing Theory" AND "Infant" OR "Newborn". The search was limited to articles published from 2000 to November 2013. Studies were selected only if they were written in English, Spanish, Portuguese and Italian. RESULTS: In the literature review two taxonomies and six major theoretical frameworks were identified. The most frequently detected nursing diagnoses were: activity intolerance, impaired spontaneous ventilation, ineffective breathing pattern, risk for aspiration, delayed growth and development, Ineffective breastfeeding, Ineffective infant feeding pattern, hyperthermia / hypothermia, risk for infection, impaired tissue integrity, Interrupted family processes, risk for impaired parenting, risk for impaired attachment, interrupted family processes. Diagnoses applying to parents' psychosocial sphere were identified, enabling the newborn's integral evaluation, including the family. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing diagnoses provide nurses working in neonatal units the opportunity of an effective management of the care process as well as the availability of the needed data in order to continuously improve a quality-based nursing care. The use of one model or more reference models represents a way to help professional action.

[Definition and variables of complexity of nursing care: a literature review]. / Definizione e variabili costituenti la complessità assistenziale infermieristica. Una revisione della letteratura.

Complexity of nursing care represents an important indicator in the planning and management of nursing resources and healthcare management. However, the term is not clearly defined in the literature. The aim of this article is to outline the main concepts associated with complexity of nursing care, trying to shed light on the different variables that constitute it. We conducted a review of the literature and selected 12 articles. The terms associated with the concept of complexity of nursing care include nursing intensity, nursing work, nursing workload, patient acuity and severity of illness. The literature review indicates that complexity of nursing care appears to be one of the variables of care intensity, the latter being defined as a commitment of care delivered to the patient. It is associated with the concepts of nursing work, nursing workload, patient acuity and severity of illness. Understanding and clarifying the concept of complexity of care is fundamental in order to measure and evaluate the real demand for nursing care by individual patients.

Predictive Power of Dependence and Clinical-Social Fragility Index and Risk of Fall in Hospitalized Adult Patients: A Case-Control Study.

OBJECTIVES: Accidental falls are among the leading hospitals' adverse events, with incidence ranging from 2 to 20 events per 1.000 days/patients. The objective of this study is to assess the relationship between in-hospital falls and the score of 3 DEPendence and Clinical-Social Fragility indexes. METHODS: A monocentric case-control study was conducted by retrieving data of in-hospital patients from the electronic health records. RESULTS: Significant differences between the mean scores at the hospital admission and discharge were found. The BRASS scale mean (SD) values at the admission and at the discharge were also significantly higher in cases of in-hospital falls: at the admission 10.2 (±7.7) in cases versus 7.0 (±8.0) in controls ( P = 0.003); at the discharge 10.0 (±6.4) versus 6.7 (±7.5) ( P = 0.001). Barthel index mean (SD) scores also presented statistically significant differences: at the admission 60.3 (±40.6) in cases versus 76.0 (±34.8) in controls ( P = 0.003); at discharge 51.3 (±34.9) versus 73.3 (±35.2) ( P = 0.000).Odds ratios were as follows: for Barthel index 2.37 (95% CI, 1.28-4.39; P = 0.003); for Index of Caring Complexity 1.45 (95% CI, 0.72-2.91, P = 0. 255); for BRASS index 1.95 (95% CI, 1.03-3.70, P = 0.026). With BRASS index, the area under the curve was 0.667 (95% CI, 0.595-0.740), thus indicating a moderate predictive power of the scale. CONCLUSIONS: The use of only Conley scale-despite its sensitivity and specificity-is not enough to fully address this need because of the multiple and heterogeneous factors that predispose to in-hospital falls. Therefore, the combination of multiple tools should be recommended.

Standardized Nursing Diagnoses in a Surgical Hospital Setting: A Retrospective Study Based on Electronic Health Data.

Introduction: In electronic health records (EHRs), standardized nursing terminologies (SNTs), such as nursing diagnoses (NDs), are needed to demonstrate the impact of nursing care on patient outcomes. Unfortunately, the use of NDs is not common in clinical practice, especially in surgical settings, and is rarely included in EHRs. Objectives: The aim of the study was to describe the prevalence and trend of NDs in a hospital surgical setting by also analyzing the relationship between NDs and hospital outcomes. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted. All adult inpatients consecutively admitted to one of the 15 surgical inpatient units of an Italian university hospital across 1 year were included. Data, including the Professional Assessment Instrument and the Hospital Discharge Register, were collected retrospectively from the hospital's EHRs. Results: The sample included 5,027 surgical inpatients. There was a mean of 6.3 ± 4.3 NDs per patient. The average distribution of NDs showed a stable trend throughout the year. The most representative NANDA-I ND domain was safety/protection. The total number of NDs on admission was significantly higher for patient whose length of stay was longer. A statistically significant correlation was observed between the number of NDs on admission and the number of intra-hospital patient transfers. Additionally, the mean number of NDs on admission was higher for patients who were later transferred to an intensive care unit compared to those who were not transferred. Conclusion: NDs represent the key to understanding the contribution of nurses in the surgical setting. NDs collected upon admission can represent a prognostic factor related to the hospital's key outcomes.