RESUMO
PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has put a substantial burden on the Italian healthcare system, resulting in the restructuring of hospitals to care for COVID-19 patients. However, this has likely impacted access to care for patients experiencing other conditions. We aimed to quantify the impact of COVID-19 on access to care for patients with urgent/emergent urological conditions throughout Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 33 urological units in the AGILE consortium, asking clinicians to report on the number of urgent/emergent urological patients seen and/or undergoing surgery over a 3-week period during the peak of the COVID-19 outbreak and a reference week prior to the outbreak. ANOVA and linear regression models were used to quantify these changes. RESULTS: Data from 27 urological centres in Italy showed a decrease from 956 patients/week seen just prior to the outbreak to 291 patients/week seen by the end of the study period. There was a difference in the number of patients with urgent/emergent urological disease seen within/during the different weeks (all p values < 0.05). A significant decrease in the number of patients presenting with haematuria, urinary retention, urinary tract infection, scrotal pain, renal colic, or trauma and urgent/emergent cases that required surgery was reported (all p values < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In Italy, during the COVID-19 outbreak there has been a decrease in patients seeking help for urgent/emergent urological conditions. Restructuring of hospitals and clinics is mandatory to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the healthcare system should continue to provide adequate levels of care also to patients with other conditions.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Urologia/tendências , Assistência Ambulatorial , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Surtos de Doenças , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Análise de Regressão , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e Questionários , Doenças Urológicas/epidemiologia , Doenças Urológicas/terapia , Urologia/métodosRESUMO
Introduction: Osteomyelitis of the pubic symphysis is a rare condition often occurring in patients with radiation therapy-related urethral strictures after prostate cancer treatment. Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who presented with osteomyelitis of the pubic symphysis from November 2016 to September 2021. We investigated the factors leading to urosymphyseal fistulas, clinical presentation, radiological assessment, treatments, and outcomes. Results: A total 4 cases were collected. All patients underwent surgery and adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Subsequently, they developed stricture of the vesicourethral anastomosis which was initially treated conservatively. Symptoms of pubic bone osteomyelitis included pain in the pubic area, fever, difficulty walking, and recurrent urinary tract infections. In all cases, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed a urinary fistula arising from the vesicourethral anastomosis with the involvement of the pubic bone, and severe osteomyelitis. Due to the failure of conservative treatment, debridement of the pubic bone with cystectomy and ileal conduit was performed in 3 patients. One patient refused surgery and bilateral percutaneous nephrostomies were placed. Patients regained their original performance status 1 to 6 months after surgery. Conclusions: General recommendations for the best diagnostic and therapeutic approach to osteomyelitis of the pubic symphysis due to urosymphyseal fistula still do not exist. Conservative treatment often fails and a surgical approach with definitive urinary diversion may be required.
RESUMO
UNLABELLED: A standardized histologic definition and classification of the patterns of renal tumor pseudocapsular invasion (RTPI) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is not available. We classified RTPI into 2 main histologic patterns: expansive and infiltrative RTPI. Patients with organ-confined RCC and infiltrative RTPI had a greater risk of cancer-specific death and might require stricter postoperative surveillance strategies. INTRODUCTION: A standardized histologic definition and classification of patterns of renal tumor pseudocapsular invasion (RTPI) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is not available. The aim of the present study was to propose a classification of RTPI patterns and assess their correlation with other pathologic features and prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The renal tumor pseudocapsule was assessed by 2 expert genitourinary pathologists on the histologic slides of 190 specimens from radical nephrectomy performed for organ-confined (pT1-pT2) RCC. The histologic patterns of RTPI were classified and described. The association between the RTPI patterns and other pathologic features was assessed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival functions, and Cox regression models were used to assess the predictors of cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: RTPI was classified into 2 main histologic patterns (expansive and infiltrative). Expansive and infiltrative RTPI was observed in 39.5% and 51.6% of cases, respectively. A significant association between the RTPI pattern and Fuhrman grade (P = .006) and RCC histologic subtype (P = .034) was detected. Patients with infiltrative pseudocapsular invasion had significantly poorer 5- and 10-year cancer-specific survival rates than patients with expansive invasion or no invasion (93.6% vs. 98.9% and 84.9% vs. 93%, respectively; P = .039). The presence of infiltrative pseudocapsular invasion was a significant predictor of cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio 4.38, 95% confidence interval 1.04-20.27). CONCLUSION: An expansive and an infiltrative RTPI pattern can be described. In our study, patients with organ-confined RCC and an infiltrative RTPI pattern had a greater risk of cancer-specific death and might require stricter postoperative surveillance strategies.