Postoperative urinary leakage after bilateral totally extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy in a patient with a healed cystostomy and appendectomy: A case report.

We report a case of postoperative urinary leakage after bilateral laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphy. A man in his upper 80s with a healed cystostomy and appendectomy underwent bilateral TEP herniorrhaphy. Urinary leakage was noted by ultrasound examination 4 days after bilateral TEP. Cystography and computed tomography conclusively confirmed a 6-mm extraperitoneal fistula at the site of the previous cystostomy. The fistula involved the anterior bladder wall and was associated with an extended urinoma. The patient was treated by indwelling catheterization using a Foley catheter and repeated ultrasound-guided puncture and aspiration of the inguinal effusion at the bedside. The patient was completely healed 69 days after the operation with no mesh infection or bladder dysfunction. We believe that urinary leakage is possible after TEP herniorrhaphy in patients with a healed suprapubic cystostomy. Therefore, indwelling catheterization using a Foley catheter should be implemented before surgery, and the Foley catheter can be removed within 1 week after surgery if no postoperative urinary leakage is observed. A history of suprapubic cystotomy should not be regarded as a contraindication for TEP surgery. This is the first report of urinary leakage after bilateral TEP herniorrhaphy in a patient with a healed cystostomy and appendectomy.

The downregulation of fibrinogen-like protein 1 inhibits the proliferation of lung adenocarcinoma via regulating MYC-target genes.

Background: The mechanisms involved in the malignant progression of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) are still inconclusive. Fibrinogen-like protein 1 (FGL1) and LAG3 are a pair of immune checkpoints that create an inhibitory immune microenvironment in tumors. However, other roles of FGL1 in LUAD have not been extensively studied. Our study aims to explore the role of FGL1 in the malignant progression of LUAD and to provide new therapeutic targets and strategies for LUAD treatment. Methods: Differential gene expression of FGL1 was analyzed using the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA), Oncomine, UALCAN, and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. A pan-cancer analysis was conducted using the Oncomine, TIMER, and UALCAN databases. A total of 140 tumor tissues and paired normal tissues were collected, IHC and immunofluorescence staining were used to explore the expression of FGL1. GeneMANIA database and STRING database were used to analyze gene-gene interaction and protein-protein interaction, respectively. A mutation analysis was conducted using the cBioPortal database, and an immune infiltration analysis was conducted using the TIMER database. A survival analysis was carried out using the GEPIA and PrognoScan database. The knockdown of FGL1 was confirmed by western blot (WB) and immunofluorescence staining. Cell proliferation was tested by cell cycle analysis and real-time cell analysis. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was used to explore the differential genes of FGL1 knockdown in LUAD cells. Results: Multiple databases showed that FGL1 was highly expressed in LUAD. The results of IHC indicated that FGL1 was highly expressed in the cytoplasm of LUAD cells. FGL1 was negatively associated with immune infiltration in LUAD. The main mutation of FGL1 is deep deletion, the altered group and high expression group indicated poor prognosis. The downregulation of FGL1 lead to a significantly decreased percentage of PC9 cells in S phase, but had little effect on the proliferation of Jurkat T cells. RNA-seq and GSEA analysis indicated that the differential genes were mainly enriched in MYC-target genes, which suggested that the downregulation of FGL1 inhibited cell proliferation by regulating MYC-target genes. Conclusions: FGL1 exerts in LUAD proliferation in addition to immune regulation. The downregulation of FGL1 inhibits the proliferation of LUAD cells by regulating MYC-target genes. Thus, FGL1 may be a novel therapeutic target in LUAD.

Dual immunological and proliferative regulation of immune checkpoint FGL1 in lung adenocarcinoma: The pivotal role of the YY1-FGL1-MYH9 axis.

Rational: Lung cancer is the most common tumor worldwide, with the highest mortality rate and second highest incidence. Immunotherapy is one of the most important treatments for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD); however, it has relatively low response rate and high incidence of adverse events. Herein, we explored the therapeutic potential of fibrinogen-like protein 1 (FGL1) for LUAD. Methods: Data from GEPIA and ACLBI databases were assessed to explore gene-gene correlations and tumor immune infiltration patterns. A total of 200 patients with LUAD were recruited. FGL1 levels in the serum and cellular supernatant were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In vitro and in vivo experiments were performed to assess the effect FGL1 on the proliferation of LUAD cells. Cocultures were performed to explore the effect of FGL1 knockdown in lung cancer cells on T cells, concerning cytokine secretion and viability. PROMO and hTFtarget databases were used for transcription factor prediction. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), chromatin immunoprecipitation, and dual luciferase reporter assays were performed to validate the identified transcription factor of FGL1. Immunoprecipitation, mass spectrometry and gene ontology analysis were performed to explore the downstream partners of FGL1. Results: FGL1 expression in LUAD was positively associated with PDL1, but not for PD1 expression. Moreover, FGL1 was positively associated with the CD3D expression and negatively associated with FOXP3, S100A9, and TPSB2 within the tumor site. FGL1 promotes the secretion of interleukin-2 by T cells in vitro, simultaneously inducing their apoptosis. Indeed, YY1 is the upstream molecule of FGL1 was found to be transcriptionally regulated by YY1 and to directly by to MYH9 to promote the proliferation of LUAD cells in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions: FGL1 is involved in the immunological and proliferative regulation of LUAD cells by controlling the secretion of important immune-related cytokines via the YY1-FGL1-MYH9 axis. Hence, targeting FGL1 in LUAD may pave the way for the development of new immunotherapies for tackling this malignancy.

IGSF11 and VISTA: a pair of promising immune checkpoints in tumor immunotherapy.

Immunotherapy has become the major treatment for tumors in clinical practice, but some intractable problems such as the low response rate and high rates of immune-related adverse events still hinder the progress of tumor immunotherapy. Hence, it is essential to explore additional immunotherapy treatment targets. In this review, we focus on the structure, expression and expression-related mechanisms, interactions, biological functions and the progress in preclinical/clinical research of IGSF11 and VISTA in tumors. We cover the progress in recent research with this pair of immune checkpoints in tumor immune regulation, proliferation, immune resistance and predictive prognosis. Both IGSF11 and VISTA are highly expressed in tumors and are modulated by various factors. They co-participate in the functional regulation of immune cells and the inhibition of cytokine production. Besides, in the downregulation of IGSF11 and VISTA, both inhibit the growth of some tumors. Preclinical and clinical trials all emphasize the predictive role of IGSF11 and VISTA in the prognosis of tumors, and that the predictive role of the same gene varies from tumor to tumor. At present, further research is proving the enormous potential of IGSF11 and VISTA in tumors, and especially the role of VISTA in tumor immune resistance. This may prove to be a breakthrough to solve the current clinical immune resistance, and most importantly, since research has focused on VISTA but less on IGSF11, IGSF11 may be the next candidate for tumor immunotherapy.

The Proliferative Role of Immune Checkpoints in Tumors: Double Regulation.

Cancer remains a serious social health problem, and immunotherapy has become the major treatments in tumor treatment. Additionally, improving the efficiency and safety of treatment is necessary. Further, more therapy targets are warranted for future tumor treatments. In this review, in addition to examining the currently recognized role of immune regulation, we focus on the proliferative role of 15 immune checkpoints in various tumors, including PD1, PD-L1, FGL1, CD155, CD47, SIRPα, CD276, IDO1, SIGLEC-15, TIM3, Galectin-9, CD70, CD27, 4-1BBL, and HVEM. We managed to conclude that various immune checkpoints such as PD1/PD-L1, FGL1, CD155, CD47/SIRPα, CD276, and SIGLEC-15 all regulate the cell cycle, and specifically through Cyclin D1 regulation. Furthermore, a variety of signal pathways engage in proliferation regulation, such as P13K, AKT, mTOR, and NK-κB, which are also the most common pathways involved in the regulation of immune checkpoint proliferation. Currently, only PD1/PD-L1, CD47/SIRPα, TIM3/Galectin-9, and CD70/CD27 checkpoints have been shown to interact with each other to regulate tumor proliferation in pairs. However, for other immune checkpoints, the role of their receptors or ligands in tumor proliferation regulation is still unknown, and we consider the enormous potential in this area. An increasing number of studies have validated the various role of immune checkpoints in tumors, and based on this literature review, we found that most of the immune checkpoints play a dual regulatory role in immunity and proliferation. Therefore, the related pathways in proliferation regulation can served the role of therapy targets in tumor therapy. Further, great potential is displayed by IDO1, SIGLEC-15, 4-1BBL, and HVEM in tumor proliferation regulation, which may become novel therapy targets in tumor treatment.

Immune Checkpoint LAG3 and Its Ligand FGL1 in Cancer.

LAG3 is the most promising immune checkpoint next to PD-1 and CTLA-4. High LAG3 and FGL1 expression boosts tumor growth by inhibiting the immune microenvironment. This review comprises four sections presenting the structure/expression, interaction, biological effects, and clinical application of LAG3/FGL1. D1 and D2 of LAG3 and FD of FGL1 are the LAG3-FGL1 interaction domains. LAG3 accumulates on the surface of lymphocytes in various tumors, but is also found in the cytoplasm in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. FGL1 is found in the cytoplasm in NSCLC cells and on the surface of breast cancer cells. The LAG3-FGL1 interaction mechanism remains unclear, and the intracellular signals require elucidation. LAG3/FGL1 activity is associated with immune cell infiltration, proliferation, and secretion. Cytokine production is enhanced when LAG3/FGL1 are co-expressed with PD-1. IMP321 and relatlimab are promising monoclonal antibodies targeting LAG3 in melanoma. The clinical use of anti-FGL1 antibodies has not been reported. Finally, high FGL1 and LAG3 expression induces EGFR-TKI and gefitinib resistance, and anti-PD-1 therapy resistance, respectively. We present a comprehensive overview of the role of LAG3/FGL1 in cancer, suggesting novel anti-tumor therapy strategies.

Clinical Research on the Mechanisms Underlying Immune Checkpoints and Tumor Metastasis.

This study highlights aspects of the latest clinical research conducted on the relationship between immune checkpoints and tumor metastasis. The overview of each immune checkpoint is divided into the following three sections: 1) structure and expression; 2) immune mechanism related to tumor metastasis; and 3) clinical research related to tumor metastasis. This review expands on the immunological mechanisms of 17 immune checkpoints, including TIM-3, CD47, and OX-40L, that mediate tumor metastasis; evidence shows that most of these immune checkpoints are expressed on the surface of T cells, which mainly exert immunomodulatory effects. Additionally, we have summarized the roles of these immune checkpoints in the diagnosis and treatment of metastatic tumors, as these checkpoints are considered common predictors of metastasis in various cancers such as prostate cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and melanoma. Moreover, certain immune checkpoints can be used in synergy with PD-1 and CTLA-4, along with the implementation of combination therapies such as LIGHT-VTR and anti-PD-1 antibodies. Presently, most monoclonal antibodies generated against immune checkpoints are under investigation as part of ongoing preclinical or clinical trials conducted to evaluate their efficacy and safety to establish a better combination treatment strategy; however, no significant progress has been made regarding monoclonal antibody targeting of CD28, VISTA, or VTCN1. The application of immune checkpoint inhibitors in early stage tumors to prevent tumor metastasis warrants further evidence; the immune-related adverse events should be considered before combination therapy. This review aims to elucidate the mechanisms of immune checkpoint and the clinical progress on their use in metastatic tumors reported over the last 5 years, which may provide insights into the development of novel therapeutic strategies that will assist with the utilization of various immune checkpoint inhibitors.

PD-L1 expression and immune cells infiltration in primary tracheobronchial neoplasm.

BACKGROUND: Primary tracheobronchial neoplasm is rare yet poses a serious threat to life. Due to its low incidence, the immune microenvironment of such tumors remained unclear. This study aimed to clarify the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and infiltration of immune cells in primary tracheobronchial neoplasm, which might be useful for guiding treatment and evaluating clinical outcome. METHODS: We assessed retrospectively the expression of PD-L1 and infiltration in cells expressing CD8, CD16, CD68, CD163 and FOXP3 in 21 patients with primary tracheobronchial neoplasm who underwent surgery in Tangdu Hospital from January 2016 to July 2021. The expression of PD-L1 was assessed based on the tumor proportion score system. The density of immune cells was analyzed by automatic image analysis software. RESULTS: In this study, all of 16 participants with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) had no expression of PD-L1, whereas 4/5 (80%) of those with squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) were positive for PD-L1 expression. Compared with ACC, the density of FOXP3+ cells in both the intratumoral region and peritumoral region was higher in SCC (P<0.01). The density of FOXP3+ cells was significantly higher than that of CD8+, CD16+, and CD163+ cells in SCC in the intratumoral region (P<0.01). In contrast, the density of FOXP3+ cells was significantly lower than that of CD8+, CD16+, and CD68+ cells in ACC in both the intratumoral region and peritumoral regions. The density of CD68+ cells was significantly higher than that of CD8+ cells (P<0.05) and CD163+ cells (P<0.01) in ACC in the intratumoral region. Furthermore, the tumors of patients with metastasis more commonly of immune-excluded status, in which the CD8+ cells accumulated in peritumoral region. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the expression of PD-L1 in primary tracheobronchial neoplasm was mainly concentrated in patients with SCC. In the immune microenvironment of SCC, FOXP3+ cells were the dominant immune cells, while in the immune microenvironment of ACC, CD68+ cells were the main immune cells. Therefore, the immune microenvironment was significantly different in primary tracheobronchial neoplasm according to histology.