[The indication of bone scan for patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the indication of bone scan for patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. METHODS: The clinical data of continual 95 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer was involved between January 2006 and December 2010. The relationship between age, PSA, Gleason scores, clinical stage and positive bone scans was respectively compared. RESULTS: The 33 patients (34.7%) with positive bone scans and 62 patients (65.3%) with negative bone scans. The mean age was (74±7) years and (76±7) years respectively in 2 groups respectively. PSA was (70.7±38.1) ng/ml and (28.4±27.2) ng/ml respectively, the difference was significant (t=-5.499, P=0.000). Clinical stage had positive correlation with positive bone scan, the OR value was 4.684. If the Gleason score>7, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of positive bone scan was 64%, 63%, 48% and 77% respectively. If PSA>50 ng/ml, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value was 67%, 86%, 71% and 83% respectively. If Clinical stage>T2, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value was 82%, 81%, 69% and 89% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with PSA≤10 ng/ml or simultaneously PSA≤50 ng/ml and Gleason score≤7 and clinical stage≤T2, bone scan is not necessary. Patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and PSA>50 ng/ml or Gleason score>7 or clinical stage>T2 should undergo bone scan.

Fusion between TMPRSS2 and ETS family members (ERG, ETV1, ETV4) in prostate cancers from northern China.

In this study we evaluated the frequency of fusion between TMPRSS2 and ETS family members (ERG, ETV1, ETV4) in prostate cancers in patients from northern China in order to explore differences in fusion rates among regions in northern and southern China, other parts of Asia, Europe, and North America. We examined 100 prostate cancer patients, diagnosed by means of prostate biopsy; fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to detect the expression of TMPRSS2, ERG, ETV1 and ETV4 in cancer tissue. Differences in gene fusion rates among different ethnics groups were also analyzed. Of the 100 prostate cancer patients, 55 (55%) had the fusion gene. Among the patients with the fusion gene, 46 (83.6%) patients had the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion product, 8 (14.8%) patients had TMPRSS2:ETV1 fusion, 1 (1.6%) patient had TMPRSS2:ETV4.