Assessing the learning curve associated with a novel flexible robot in the pre-clinical and clinical setting.

BACKGROUND: Transoral robotic surgery has been successfully used by head and neck surgeons for a variety of procedures but is limited by rigid instrumentation and line-of-sight visualization. Non-linear systems specifically designed for the aerodigestive tract are needed. Ease of use of these new systems in both training and clinical environments is critical in its widespread adoption. METHODS: Residents, fellows, and junior faculty performed four tasks on an anatomical airway mannequin using the Medrobotics FLEX™ Robotic System: expose and incise the tonsil, grasp the epiglottis, palpate the vocal processes, and grasp the interarytenoid space. These tasks were performed once a day for four days; after a 4-month time gap, subjects were asked to perform these same tasks for three more days. Time to task completion and total distance driven were tracked. In addition, a retrospective analysis was performed analyzing one attending physician's experience with clinical usage of the robot. RESULTS: 13 subjects completed the initial round of the mannequin simulation and 8 subjects completed the additional testing 4 months later. Subjects rapidly improved their speed and efficiency at task completion. Junior residents were slower in most tasks initially compared to senior trainees but quickly reached similar levels of efficiency. Following the break there was minimal degradation in skills and continued improvement in efficiency was observed with additional trials. There was significant heterogeneity in the analyzed clinical cases, but when analyzing cases of similar complexity and pathology, clear decreases in overall operative times were demonstrable. CONCLUSION: Novice users quickly gained proficiency with the FLEX™ Robotic System in a training environment, and these skills are retained after several months. This learning could translate to the clinical setting if a proper training regimen is developed. The Medrobotics FLEX™ Robotic System shows promise as a surgical tool in head and neck surgery in this study.

Using a Multi-pronged Behavioral Intervention to Standardize Antibiotic Prophylaxis at the Time of Foley Catheter Removal After Radical Prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify antibiotic prescribing patterns at the time of foley catheter removal after radical prostatectomy and implement a multi-pronged behavioral intervention to standardize antibiotic use. METHODS: This was a single-institution study examining the prescribing of antibiotics at the time of foley catheter removal after radical prostatectomy. Pre-intervention data were collected retrospectively to establish baselines for antibiotic prescribing, patient characteristics, and urinary tract infection rates. A single dose of an oral antibiotic taken at the time of foley catheter removal was recommended as the standard antibiotic protocol. A multi-pronged behavioral intervention was used to encourage compliance with our protocol. Adherence to the protocol, quantity of antibiotics prescribed, and rate of urinary tract infection were recorded prospectively. Durability of the intervention was evaluated during a post-intervention phase. RESULTS: A total of 416 patients and 6 surgeons were included in the study. Accordance with the standardized antibiotic protocol was 59% in the pre-intervention phase and 91% in the intervention phase (P = .03). No patients in the intervention or post-intervention phase were prescribed more than one dose of an antibiotic. The rate of urinary tract infection did not differ across the study phases. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a multi-pronged behavioral intervention resulted in a high rate of surgeon compliance with a standardized antibiotic protocol. This led to a significant reduction in antibiotic use with no change in the rate of urinary tract infection after foley catheter removal after radical prostatectomy.

Implementing Change Through an Outpatient Antibiotic Stewardship Program.

PURPOSE: We sought to implement a multi-pronged behavioral intervention to reduce and tailor antibiotic use for two common urologic outpatient procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a non-blinded intervention study that consisted of a pre-intervention phase (11/2018-1/2019), an intervention phase (1/2020-12/2020) in which a multi-pronged behavioral intervention was implemented, and a post-intervention phase (1/2021-3/2021). We examined antibiotic use for cystoscopy and transrectal prostate biopsy at three separate urologic outpatient clinics. A multi-pronged behavioral intervention consisted of formal physician education, modification of the electronic health order sets, clinic staff education, literature review, development and introduction of patient questionnaires, and individual audit feedback. The primary outcome was 30-day infections. Secondary outcomes were adherence to the recommended antibiotic protocols, questionnaire completion, and Escherichia coli outpatient antibiograms. RESULTS: A total of 2374 patients underwent 3047 cystoscopies and 547 patients underwent 559 prostate biopsies. The proportions of cystoscopy patients receiving antibiotic prophylaxis and prostate biopsy patients receiving augmented antibiotic prophylaxis decreased 33% and 35%, respectively. The odds of post-cystoscopy infection were not different between the pre-intervention and intervention phases and were lower in the post-intervention phase. The odds of post-biopsy infection were not changed between the pre-intervention and intervention or between the pre-intervention and post-intervention phases. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a multi-pronged behavioral intervention reduced and tailored antibiotic use without an increase in 30-day infections. These findings suggest that outpatient antibiotic stewardship and facilitating rapid adoption of guidelines can be accomplished via this approach.

Understanding Effects of Visual Feedback Delay in AR on Fine Motor Surgical Tasks.

Latency is a pervasive issue in various systems that can significantly impact motor performance and user perception. In medical settings, latency can hinder surgeons' ability to quickly correct movements, resulting in an experience that doesn't align with user expectations and standards of care. Despite numerous studies reporting on the negative effects of latency, there is still a gap in understanding how it impacts the use of augmented reality (AR) in medical settings. This study aims to address this gap by examining how latency impacts motor task performance and subjective perceptions, such as cognitive load, on two display types: a monitor display, traditionally used inside an operating room (OR), and a Microsoft HoloLens 2 display. Our findings indicate that both level of latency and display type impact motor performance, and higher latencies on the HoloLens result in relatively poor performance. However, cognitive load was found to be unrelated to display type or latency, but was dependent on the surgeon's training level. Surgeons did not compromise accuracy to gain more speed and were generally well aware of the latency in the system irrespective of their performance on task. Our study provides valuable insights into acceptable thresholds of latency for AR displays and proposes design implications for the successful implementation and use of AR in surgical settings.

Utilizing a Questionnaire to Implement a Risk-based Antibiotic Prophylaxis Protocol for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a risk-based antibiotic prophylaxis protocol for patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy. METHODS: We created a risk-based protocol for antibiotic prophylaxis before transrectal prostate biopsy. Patients were screened for infection risk-factors with a self-administered questionnaire. The protocol was implemented from January 1, 2020 to March 31, 2020. We compared patient risk-factors, antibiotic regimens, and 30-day infection rates for patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsies during the intervention and for a 3-month period before the intervention. RESULTS: There were 116 prostate biopsies in the preintervention group and 104 in the intervention group. Although there was no significant difference in the number of high-risk patients between the 2 groups (48% vs 55%; P = .33), the percentage of patients treated with augmented prophylaxis decreased from 74% to 45% (P = 0.03). The duration of antibiotic administration and the median number of doses prescribed also decreased significantly. Despite significant decreases in antibiotic use, there were no differences in infection rates (5% vs 5%; P = .90) or sepsis rates (1% vs 2%; P = .60). CONCLUSION: We developed a risk-based protocol for prophylactic antibiotics before prostate biopsy. The protocol was associated with less antibiotic use but did not lead to an increase in infectious complications.