Comparison of opioid-free and opioid-inclusive propofol anaesthesia for thyroid and parathyroid surgery: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting occur frequently following thyroid and parathyroid surgery and are associated with worse patient outcomes. We hypothesised that opioid-free propofol anaesthesia would reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting compared with opioid-inclusive propofol anaesthesia in patients undergoing these procedures. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, double-blinded controlled trial in adult patients scheduled to undergo thyroid and parathyroid surgery at two medical centres in mainland China. Patients were allocated randomly (1:1, stratified by sex and trial site) to an opioid-free anaesthesia group (esketamine, lidocaine, dexmedetomidine and propofol) or an opioid-inclusive group (sufentanil and propofol). Propofol infusions were titrated to bispectral index 45-55. Patients received prophylaxis for nausea and vomiting using dexamethasone and ondansetron and multimodal analgesia with paracetamol and flurbiprofen axetil. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the first 48 h after surgery. RESULTS: We assessed 557 patients for eligibility and 394 completed this trial. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the first postoperative 48 h was lower in the opioid-free anaesthesia group (10/197, 5%) compared with opioid-inclusive group (47/197, 24%) (OR (95%CI) 0.17 (0.08-0.35), p < 0.001), yielding a number needed to treat of 5.3. Additionally, opioid-free propofol anaesthesia was associated with a reduced need for rescue anti-emetics, lower rates of hypotension and desaturation after tracheal extubation, and higher patient satisfaction. Time to tracheal extubation was prolonged slightly in the opioid-free group. The two groups had similar postoperative pain scores and 30-day outcomes. DISCUSSION: Opioid-free propofol anaesthesia reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing thyroid and parathyroid surgery. An opioid-free anaesthetic regimen can optimise anaesthetic care during thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of different anesthesia strategies for transperineal MRI/US fusion prostate biopsy.

This study aims to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of three different anesthesia strategies, namely chatting while under local anesthesia (Chat-LA), total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), and general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway (GA-LMA), employed in transperineal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound (US) fusion prostate biopsy (TP-MUF-PB). A retrospective study was conducted involving 1202 patients who underwent TP-MUF-PB from June 2016 to April 2023 at The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou, China). Clinical data and outcomes, including total costs, complications, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), were compared. Probability sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also performed. Chat-LA was found to be the most cost-effective option, outperforming both TIVA and GA-LMA. However, subgroup analyses revealed that in younger patients (under 65 years old) and those with smaller prostate volumes (<40 ml), TIVA emerged as a more cost-effective strategy. While Chat-LA may generally be the most cost-effective and safer anesthesia method for TP-MUF-PB, personalization of anesthesia strategies is crucial, considering specific patient demographics such as age and prostate volume.

Efficacy and safety analysis of a HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors: a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Disitamab Vedotin is a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) drug targeting HER2, which has shown a potential synergistic effect between Disitamab Vedotin and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, we plan to conduct a retrospective real-world study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Disitamab Vedotin monotherapy or combined with ICIs in the treatment of advanced or metastatic solid tumors. METHODS: This retrospective study involved patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors who were treated with Disitamab Vedotin monotherapy or combined with ICIs at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from July 2019 to June 2023. The observation items included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). RESULTS: This study included 49 patients, out of which 34 patients were treated with Disitamab Vedotin plus ICIs and 15 patients received Disitamab Vedotin alone. In all patients, the median PFS was 10 months. The 6-month and 1-year OS rates were 91.1% and 82.3%, respectively. Eighteen (36.7%) patients achieved a partial response, and sixteen (32.7%) patients had stable disease. The combination therapy of Disitamab Vedotin plus ICIs showed a higher ORR (44.1% vs. 20.0%) and a longer median PFS (14 vs. 8 months) compared to Disitamab Vedotin alone. The median PFS for patients expressed with HER2 2+/3+ was 10 months and was not reached for patients expressed with HER2 0/1+. Grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 14.7% of patients who received the combination treatment and in 26.7% of patients who received Disitamab Vedotin alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that Disitamab-Vedotin-based treatment, alone or in combination with ICIs, exerted considerable prognosis and good tolerance in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, regardless of the HER2 expression levels. Whether combination therapy with ICIs provides greater therapeutic benefits compared to monotherapy needs to be further explored through randomized controlled trials.