Sleeve-Dor Fundoplication - An Innovative Surgical Technique to Avoid the Epidemic Long Term de Novo Gastroesophageal Reflux and Barrett´s Esophagus After Sleeve Gastrectomy for Obesity.

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in current literature showed an increased risk of "de novo" gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and increased risk for Barrett's esophagus in longer follow-up series, with a possibility of esophageal adenocarcinoma in this population. Adding primarily an anterior Dor Fundoplication to SG (Sleeve-Dor) may protect the patient for future and can potentially avoid these chronic complications for patients with obesity. METHODOLOGY: A standard SG is performed laparoscopically, and a small redundance of the fundus is maintained as a wrap, and this will be fixed to the right crura without dissection of the anatomy of the hiatus. The resulted anterior 180° Dor fundoplication is usually sufficient to relieve or to avoid reflux symptomatic. DISCUSSION: Based on our preliminary and literature experiences, the SG with anterior Dor fundoplication (Sleeve-Dor) procedure could provide favorable safety profile, satisfactory reflux control and good bariatric outcomes. The complication rate is lower compared to published for Nissen Sleeve or Sleeve-Rossetti technique, with no leaks or major complications recorded to date. Sleeve-Dor procedure may be a potential primary and standard surgery for morbidly obese patients, especially for patients with preoperative GERD symptoms without major findings at endoscopy.

Intragastric Single-Port Surgery: An Innovative and Multipurpose Technique for the Therapy of Upper Digestive Tract Lesions.

Background: Endoscopic treatment can represent a technical challenge for several special situations, such as resecting gastric tumors with larger size or in unfavorable sites and performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This study aims to describe an innovative and multipurpose technique, intragastric single-port surgery (IGS), which can be applied for abovementioned special situations and for assessing its safety, feasibility, and efficacy. Methods: IGS technique was performed through a 2-3 cm skin incision, where the stomach wall is exteriorized and fixed to the skin. The single-port device is inserted and intragastric access is gained for laparoscopic or endoscopic instruments. Three purposes of IGS were performed: (1). gastric intraluminal lesions resection; (2). to perform ERCP after RYGB; and (3). revision of pancreaticogastric anastomosis after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Results: IGS was performed successfully in 20 patients. Ten patients underwent gastric intraluminal lesion resection, mostly for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (n = 7, 70%); all pathological specimens were with negative margin, mean operation time was 102.3 ± 43.5 minutes, and mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.6 ± 1.5 days. Nine patients underwent ERCP after RYGB, cleaning of the bile duct was successful in all patients (100%), and mean operation time and mean postoperative hospital stay were 140.6 ± 46.3 minutes and 4.4 ± 2.6 days, respectively. One patient underwent pancreaticogastric anastomosis revision. There were no mortalities in our series. Conclusions: IGS is a safe, feasible, and effective technique for gastric intraluminal lesion resection and for performing ERCP after RYGB, while it has the potential for other future applications.

Novel Trocar-Free Elastic Liver Retractor in Bariatric Surgery Patients: Comparison of a Standard Laparoscopic Retraction With the First Series Using the LiVac Sling System.

During upper gastrointestinal surgery, retraction of the liver plays an essential role in the visualization and creation of an optimal surgical field. Liver retraction may be problematic, particularly in obese patients. The use of conventional liver retractors requires additional skin incision and has the potential to cause pain as well as liver injuries. The present study is the first to evaluate the performance and safety of the LiVac Sling (Livac Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia) trocar-free retractor system in bariatric surgery patients. In this retrospective study, data from laparoscopic primary or revisional bariatric surgeries that were performed with the LiVac Sling system and a standard retractor between May 2017 and December 2017 were collected. Demographic data, body mass index, type of surgery, number and indication of LiVac Sling system used, surgery time, and complications were analyzed. In total, 51 procedures were included. Twenty Sling devices have been used in 17 patients (13 female; 75%). The distribution of baseline characteristics was similar between the standard retractor group and LiVac Sling retractor group. In the LiVac Sling group, the number of trocars used was significantly reduced over the study period. Within 30 days postoperatively, no complications could be identified, and no device-related adverse events were reported. In this bariatric population, the use of the LiVac Sling for liver retraction was safe. No device-related adverse events were registered, and compared with standard retraction, the number of trocars used could be reduced by one.

European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery changed the management of numerous surgical conditions. It was associated with many advantages over open surgery, such as decreased postoperative pain, faster recovery, shorter hospital stay and excellent cosmesis. Since two decades single-incision endoscopic surgery (SIES) was introduced to the surgical community. SIES could possibly result in even better postoperative outcomes than multi-port laparoscopic surgery, especially concerning cosmetic outcomes and pain. However, the single-incision surgical procedure is associated with quite some challenges. METHODS: An expert panel of surgeons has been selected and invited to participate in the preparation of the material for a consensus meeting on the topic SIES, which was held during the EAES congress in Frankfurt, June 16, 2017. The material presented during the consensus meeting was based on evidence identified through a systematic search of literature according to a pre-specified protocol. Three main topics with respect to SIES have been identified by the panel: (1) General, (2) Organ specific, (3) New development. Within each of these topics, subcategories have been defined. Evidence was graded according to the Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. Recommendations were made according to the GRADE criteria. RESULTS: In general, there is a lack of high level evidence and a lack of long-term follow-up in the field of single-incision endoscopic surgery. In selected patients, the single-incision approach seems to be safe and effective in terms of perioperative morbidity. Satisfaction with cosmesis has been established to be the main advantage of the single-incision approach. Less pain after single-incision approach compared to conventional laparoscopy seems to be considered an advantage, although it has not been consistently demonstrated across studies. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the increased direct costs (devices, instruments and operating time) of the SIES procedure and the prolonged learning curve, wider acceptance of the procedure should be supported only after demonstration of clear benefits.

New technique of intragastric sleeve: viability and survival in a pig model.

Developing a less invasive, practical and cost-effective operative technique for obesity treatment represents a pressing need for our society. In this way, intragastric single port sleeve by endoplication was tested in six pigs during 18 weeks. Celiotomy was performed with animal placed in dorsal decubitus position. Single port gastrostomy was performed and double tobacco pouch sutures were made in fundic region, making a gastric sleeve. At the end, stomach layers and skin were closed in a conventional manner. Means and the standard deviations of surgical time were calculated. The procedure was simple and all animals survived; there were no significant blood loss and no intra and postoperative complications. The procedure was fast (67.4 minutes). The technique has the advantage of not requiring the use of mechanical sutures, making it less costly. The innovation of this procedure was the use of a single port gastrostomy device to perform an intraluminal sleeve. What made this technique less invasive were the use of a single port, nonmanipulation of the stomach intra-abdominally, ease of execution and no need of pneumoperitoneum. The new technique is acceptable and has reproducible viability, had a short procedure time without intra and postoperative complications.

How I Do It: New Dissector Device Allows for Effective Operative Field in Transoral Endoscopic Thyroid Surgery Using Vestibular Approach.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive thyroid and parathyroid resections are rarely performed. Promising new endoscopic transoral approaches to the anterior neck (transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach [TOETVA]) have been described with good results and few complications. This study evaluates a new device to allow the safe entrance of trocars in the subplatysmal space for TOETVA in a cadaver model. METHODS: The technique was performed in 4 unilateral thyroidectomies in female cadavers. The technical steps consisted of a 10-mm incision made at the center of the oral vestibule followed by subplatysmal hydrodissection. The blunt dissector is a metallic stick with an olive at the end and promotes progressive gain in subplatysmal space enlarging the operative field. The instrument was inserted creating a space below the platysma to the anterior neck and the strap muscles. Three trocars were inserted in the vestibular area. The dissection begins by cutting the linea alba cervicalis. The isthmus was dissected and transected. Anatomical structures as the superior thyroid artery, parathyroid glands, and the recurrent laryngeal nerve could be safely identified with magnified vision. RESULTS: Optimal operative field due to subplatysmal dissection by the device allowed for exposition of thyroid and parathyroid glands in all cases. Unilateral thyroidectomy was performed in a mean of 54 minutes with excellent aesthetic results. CONCLUSIONS: The new device is a promising feature to allow safe transoral thyroid surgery in a cadaver model. Further studies in clinical series are needed to evaluate the broad application of the device.

Transcolonic Perirectal NOTES Access (PNA): A feasibility study with survival in swine model.

Transrectal access still has some unsolved issues such as spatial orientation, infection, access and site closure. This study presents a simple technique to perform transcolonic access with survival in a swine model series. A new technique for NOTES perirectal access to perform retroperitoneoscopy, peritoneoscopy, liver and lymphnode biopsies was performed in 6 pigs, using Totally NOTES technique. The specimens were extracted transanally. The flexible endoscope was inserted through a posterior transmural incision and the retrorectal space. Cultures of bacteria were documented for the retroperitoneal space and intra abdominal cavity after 14 days. Rectal site was closed using non-absorbable sutures. There was no bowel cleansing, nor preoperative fasting. The procedures were performed in 6 pigs through transcolonic natural orifice access using available endoscopic flexible instruments. All animals survived 14 days without complications, and cultures were negative. Histopathologic examination of the rectal closure site showed adequate healing of suture line and no micro abscesses. The results of feasibility and safety of experimental Transcolonic NOTES potentially brings new frontiers and future wider applications for minimally invasive surgery. The treatment of colorectal, abdominal and retroperitoneal diseases through a flexible Perirectal NOTES Access (PNA) is a promising new approach.

Intra-abdominal Trocar-Free Vacuum Liver Retractor for Upper-Gastrointestinal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic upper-gastrointestinal (GI) surgery, an adequate retraction of the liver is crucial. Especially in single-port surgery and obese patients, problems may occur during liver retraction. The current study seeks to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the LiVac trocar-free liver retractor in laparoscopic upper-GI surgery. METHODS: The present study is a nonrandomized dual-center clinical series describing our preliminary results using the LiVac system for liver retraction. The primary end points of the present study included the effectiveness and safety of the LiVac device as well as complications and documentation of problems with the device during surgery. RESULTS: The device was used in 11 patients for simple and complex laparoscopic procedures. The mean age of the study population was 59.6 years (SD = 20.6; range = 30-84). There were 6 female and 5 male patients with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 31.9 kg/m2 (SD = 8.1; range = 26.0-45.3). The efficacy of the device was excellent in all cases, reducing the number of trocars needed. There were no device-related complications. CONCLUSION: The LiVac liver retractor is easy to use and provides a good exposure of the operative field in upper-GI laparoscopic surgery, even in obese patients with a high BMI.

Single port laparoscopic splenectomy for wandering spleen with splenomegaly in a patient with Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome.

Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome is a rare genetic condition characterized by typical facial appearance, growth delay, psychomotor retardation and seizures, with a mosaic of other abnormalities reported in the literature. The occurrence of symptomatic wandering spleen with massive splenomegaly and with an indication for splenectomy has not been yet described for this disease. This study reports the first case in the literature of single port splenectomy for this rare condition. In a 21-year-old female patient with Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome, with abdominal pain and the diagnosis of wandering spleen with splenomegaly (25 cm diameter) led to an indication of elective splenectomy. In supine position under general anesthesia, single port umbilical splenectomy was performed without laparoscopic assistance, splenic vessels were ligated by sutures, and the specimen was transumbilically extracted. Operative time was 85 min, with minimal bleeding, and resumed oral intake on the same day. No intraoperative or post-operative complications occurred, and the patient was discharged in 48 h. Single port access splenectomy is feasible and is evolving as an attractive alternative therapy for hematological diseases requiring splenectomy.

Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic liver resection.

BACKGROUND: Potential benefits of laparoscopic liver resections (LLRs) over open liver resections (OLRs) such as the clinical outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) have not convincingly been investigated, yet. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who had undergone LLR and OLR at our department between 1 June 2014 and 10 October 2016 were identified. HRQoL was assessed using the short form 36 (SF-36). All patients who returned the surveys were then retrospectively analysed with regards to the perioperative outcome. RESULTS: We received 66 eligible questionnaires (50%). The number of major liver resections did not significantly differ between both groups (LLR: 11 [33%], OLR: 16 [48%], P = 0.211).The proportion of patients with two or more co-morbidities (P = 0.044) and liver cirrhosis (P = 0.016), respectively, was significantly higher in the LLR group, when compared to the OLR group (LLR: 11 [33%] vs. 3 of 33 patients [9%], P = 0.016). HRQoL scores were good with no significant differences between both groups. Among these patients, there were significantly more pulmonary complications in the OLR group, and length of hospital stay was longer when compared to the LLR group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic liver surgery can be performed safely even in multimorbid elderly patients resulting in high HRQoL scores.

Single-port unilateral transaxillary totally endoscopic thyroidectomy: A survival animal and cadaver feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Single-port unilateral axillary thyroidectomy has great potential to become a valid alternative technique for thyroid surgery. We tested the technique in a study on live animals and cadavers to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained in our university by the Council of Ethics for the study in surviving animals and cadavers. Subtotal thyroidectomy using unilateral axillary single port was performed in five dogs and five cadavers. Performing incision in the axillary fossa, a disposable single port was inserted. The dissection progressed for creating a subcutaneous tunnel to the subplatysmal region; after opening the platysma muscle and separation of the strap muscles, the thyroid gland was identified. After key anatomical landmarks were identified, the dissection was started at the upper pole towards the bottom, and to the isthmus. Specimens were extracted intact through the tunnel. Clinical and laboratorial observations of the experimental study in a 15-day follow-up and intraoperative data were documented. RESULTS: All surgeries were performed in five animals which survived 15 days without postoperative complications. In the surgeries successfully performed in five cadavers, anatomical landmarks were recognised and intraoperative dissection of recurrent nerves and parathyroid glands was performed. Mean operative time was 64 min (46-85 min) in animals and 123 min (110-140 min) in cadavers, with a good cosmetic outcome since the incision was situated in the axillary fold. CONCLUSION: The technique of single-port axillary unilateral thyroidectomy was feasible and reproducible in the cadavers and animal survival study, suggesting the procedure as an alternative to minimally invasive surgery of the neck.

"Down-to-Up" transanal NOTES Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Preliminary series of 9 patients.

BACKGROUND: Applications for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) to access the abdominal cavity have increased in recent years. Despite potential advantages of transanal and transcolonic NOTES for colorectal pathology, it has not been widely applied in the clinical setting. This study describes a series of nine patients for whom we performed transanal retrograde ("Down-to-Up") total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under IRB approval, informed consent was obtained from each patient with rectal adenocarcinoma. Rectosigmoidectomy with total mesorectal excision was performed using low rectal translumenal access to the mesorectal fascia and subsequent dissection in a retrograde fashion. This was achieved using either a single port device or flexible colonoscope with endoscopic instrumentation and laparoscopic assistance. This was followed by transanal extraction of the specimen and hand-sewn anastomosis. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 311 min. Mean hospital stay was 7.56 days. Complications occurred in two patients, and consisted of one anastomotic leakage with reoperation and one intraoperative conversion to open surgery because of impossibility to dissect the specimen. TME specimen integrity was adequate in six patients. CONCLUSION: This series suggests that a retrograde mesorectal dissection via a NOTES technique is feasible in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. This technique may act as a complimentary part of operative treatment for rectal cancer alongside other minimally invasive strategies. Long-term follow up will be needed to assess oncological results.

Perirectal NOTES access: "down-to-up" total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical natural orifice surgery has been applied for abdominal surgery in recent years, mostly by vaginal and oral access. The study describes preliminary successful human applications of transcolonic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), using a new transrectal total mesorectal excision procedure for rectal cancer. METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for the study. In 2 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma, total mesorectal resection and rectosigmoidectomy with lymphadenectomy was performed using a low NOTES transcolonic access. "Down-to-up" mesorectal dissection was achieved either using a flexible scope or a transrectal single port device. The specimens were extracted transanally, and transorificial low anastomosis was performed. RESULTS: Operative time was 350 and 360 minutes, respectively; no complications occurred and patients were discharged after 6 days. CONCLUSION: Successful human reports on transcolonic NOTES suggest potential applications. The treatment of colorectal diseases through transorificial single port or flexible perirectal NOTES access are promising new approaches besides current methods to improve patient care.

NOTES: basic and advanced surgical applications outside of the urological field.

Ten years ago the American gastroenterologist Anthony Kalloo described for the first time the concept of Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery - NOTES. His revolutionary vision generated such an unprecedented worldwide momentum of creativity and renovation in the surgical community to push the current limit of the research in the minimal invasive surgery field toward the unimaginable goal of non visible scar surgery. At present time several NOTES applications are continuously reported by many teams all around the world and the aim of the present paper was to illustrate the clinical evidence registered up to now as well as to inform about the ongoing research efforts made to perform non visible scar surgery to treat more complex surgical diseases.

Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) for High-Risk Patients, High Body Mass Index (> 50 kg/m2) Patients, and Contraindication to Abdominal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: For high-risk classified patients, patients with superobesity and in cases of contraindication to abdominal surgery, traditional bariatric surgery might lead to potential morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a novel and effective bariatric therapy for morbidly obese patients. Our research group initially evaluated the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of ESG for high-risk, high body mass index (BMI) patients, and patients contraindicated to abdominal surgeries. METHODS: Eligible patients characterized as high-risk for bariatric surgery due to high-BMI, severe comorbidities, or impenetrable abdomen were prospectively documented. ESG was performed by using Overstich® (Apollo Endosurgery, Austin, TX, USA). Primary outcomes included technical success, post-procedure adverse events and mortality, and the change of weight and BMI. RESULTS: ESG was successfully performed for all patients (N = 24, mean age was 55.6 (± 9.2) years old, 75% male). Baseline weight and BMI were 157.9 (± 49.1) kg and 49.9 (± 14.4) kg/m2. According to Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS), 8 (33.3%), 14 (58.3%), and 2 (8.3%) patients were respectively classified as EOSS 2, 3, and 4. Mean operation time was 114.7 (± 26.0) min, without intraoperative complication. Weight loss, BMI reduction, %total weight loss (%TWL), and %excess weight loss (%EWL) were 17.5 (± 14.6) kg, 5.6 (± 4.6) kg/m2, 12.2% (± 8.9%), and 29.1% (± 17.9%) at post-ESG 12-month, respectively. One (4.2%) moderate post-procedure adverse event (gastric mucosal bleeding) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: ESG can be used as a safe, feasible, and effective option for the therapy of patients with superobesity, high-risk patients, and patients contraindicated to abdominal surgery. Graphical Abstract.

International multicenter trial on clinical natural orifice surgery--NOTES IMTN study: preliminary results of 362 patients.

OBJECTIVES: Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is evolving as a promising alternative for abdominal surgery. IMTN Registry was designed to prospectively document early results of natural orifice surgery among a large group of clinical cases. METHODS: Sixteen centers from 9 countries were approved to participate in the study, based on study protocol requirements and local institutional review board approval. Transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic natural orifice surgery was clinically applied in 362 patients. Intraoperative and postoperative parameters were prospectively documented. RESULTS: Mean operative time for transvaginal cholecystectomy was 96 minutes, compared with 111 minute for transgastric cholecystectomy. A general complication rate of 8.84% was recorded (grade I-II representing 5.8%, grade III-IV representing 3.04%). No requirement for any analgesia was found in one fourth of cholecystectomy and appendectomy patients. CONCLUSIONS: Results of clinical applications of NOTES in the IMTN Study showed the feasibility of different methods of this new minimally invasive alternative for laparoscopic and open surgery.

Intragastric single-port surgery (IGS) for gastric endophytic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): A novel surgical treatment.

BACKGROUND: Intragastric surgery with a single incision has been performed for several diseases, such as gastric tumors[1] and pancreatic pseudocyst[2], safety, feasibility and potential benefits of which have been reported in previous relevant studies[3]. METHODS: The video shows a 65-year-old man with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, preoperative abdominal CT scan and endoscopy suggested an endophytic tumor located in gastric corpus, suggesting gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Intragastric single-port surgery (IGS) was indicated. RESULTS: Under general anesthesia, patient was placed in supine position. Surgeons stood on the right side of the patient. After a 2.5cm transverse incision was made on left upper abdominal wall, gastric anterior wall was exteriorized and fixed to the skin incision. Single-port device was inserted inside the stomach after anterior gastric wall was opened. Next, laparoscope was introduced into gastric cavity and identified the location of tumor. Full thickness resection of the tumor was performed by using linear stapler, then stapler line was embedded with continuous sutures. Finally, after specimen and single-port device removal, the stomach incision was closed extracorporeally. The operation time was 112 minutes. Final pathology confirmed GIST (4.5cm) with negative margins and patient discharged after 4 days, without postoperative complications. In 1-year follow-up time, without recurrence or death. CONCLUSION: IGS is safe and effective for gastric endophytic GIST resection, which not only preserves all advantages of conventional laparoscopic operation, but also includes other benefits like obviating the need of abdominal cavity exploration, potential reduction of risk of neoplasm seeding, and offering good postoperative cosmetic result.

The "Hug" Technique-Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with Preservation of the Posterior Wrap in Patients with Previous Nissen Fundoplication: a Simple Solution for a Complex Problem.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic conversion of Nissen Fundoplication to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a complex procedure due to increased operative time, morbidity, and length of hospital stay (LOS). In this study, a new simplified technique avoiding the total dismantling of the previous Nissen repair to construct the gastric pouch, the so-called hug technique is presented for the conversion of Nissen fundoplication to RYGB. METHODS: The present study is a prospective single-center clinical series reporting on the feasibility and safety of the "hug" technique for the creation of laparoscopic RYGB. The major innovation of this approach is the fact that the posterior part of the fundoplication wrap is left in place without further dissection or manipulation. The anterior part is stapled and remains attached to the excluded stomach. Prospective data on intraoperative and postoperative morbidity and bariatric outcomes were collected. RESULTS: A total of 44 consecutive patients with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 43.7 kg/m2 (SD = 4.0, range = 35.6-52.0) underwent the "hug" procedure between 2004 and 2015. Mean operative time was 72 min (58-105 min). Morbidity was 4.5%, with no mortality. For patients with follow-up at 3 years, the percentage of total body weight loss (%TBWL) was 32.5%; the excess weight loss (EWL) was 64.2%. CONCLUSION: In contrast to current other techniques of bariatric surgery for patients having previously undergone a Nissen fundoplication, the "hug" procedure to create an RYGB is safe and simple to perform. This technique avoids the deconstruction of the previous repair and is still maintaining anti-reflux anatomy. Nevertheless, there is a need for further studies to evaluate the long-term outcomes of the procedure.