Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Ano de publicação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Theor Appl Genet ; 137(8): 183, 2024 Jul 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39002016

RESUMO

KEY MESSAGE: The exploration and dissection of a set of QTLs and candidate genes for gray leaf spot disease resistance using two fully assembled parental genomes may help expedite maize resistance breeding. The fungal disease of maize known as gray leaf spot (GLS), caused by Cercospora zeae-maydis and Cercospora zeina, is a significant concern in China, Southern Africa, and the USA. Resistance to GLS is governed by multiple genes with an additive effect and is influenced by both genotype and environment. The most effective way to reduce the cost of production is to develop resistant hybrids. In this study, we utilized the IBM Syn 10 Doubled Haploid (IBM Syn10 DH) population to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with resistance to gray leaf spot (GLS) in multiple locations. Analysis of seven distinct environments revealed a total of 58 QTLs, 49 of which formed 12 discrete clusters distributed across chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 10. By comparing these findings with published research, we identified colocalized QTLs or GWAS loci within eleven clustering intervals. By integrating transcriptome data with genomic structural variations between parental individuals, we identified a total of 110 genes that exhibit both robust disparities in gene expression and structural alterations. Further analysis revealed 19 potential candidate genes encoding conserved resistance gene domains, including putative leucine-rich repeat receptors, NLP transcription factors, fucosyltransferases, and putative xyloglucan galactosyltransferases. Our results provide a valuable resource and linked loci for GLS marker resistance selection breeding in maize.


Assuntos
Cercospora , Mapeamento Cromossômico , Resistência à Doença , Doenças das Plantas , Locos de Características Quantitativas , Zea mays , Zea mays/genética , Zea mays/microbiologia , Resistência à Doença/genética , Doenças das Plantas/genética , Doenças das Plantas/microbiologia , Cercospora/genética , Melhoramento Vegetal , Fenótipo , Haploidia , Genótipo , Genes de Plantas
2.
Plant Dis ; 2022 Jun 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35678622

RESUMO

Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the most important crops in China. Since 2020, a new leaf spot disease has occurred in southwest China in areas such as Yunnan, Sichuan and Hubei provinces. Typical symptoms appeared after tasseling. The spots are scattered on the leaf surface, round to oval in shape with diameter range 3-20 mm. Spots are initially water-soaked, gradually turning yellow or white. In 2021, diseased leaf samples with typical white spot were collected for pathogen isolation and identification in Qujing, Yunnan province. Four small pieces of leaf tissue (about 0.25 cm2 in area) were excised from the edge of the necrotic lesion of each plant, surface sterilized with 75% ethanol for 1 min, rinsed three times with sterile distilled water, and soaked in sterile distilled water for 5 min. The solution was plated on Luria Broth medium (LB) plate (Shin et al. 2022) . After incubation at 28°C for 24 h, round, smooth-edged yellow colonies appeared in the LB plate. The bacterium isolated was gram-negative, negative for oxidase, positive for peroxidase, indole, citrate (Wells et al. 1987). Three strains (PA21QJ01, PA21QJ02 and PA21QJ03) showed identical colony morphology. PA21QJ01 was used for further molecular analyses. DNA was extracted from fresh colonies cultured in LB(Shin et al. 2022), and the fragments at the 16S rDNA, gyrB and rpoB loci were amplified using primers 27F/1492R (Galkiewicz and Kellogg 2008), UP-1/UP-2r (Yamamoto and Harayama 1995) and rpoBCM81-F/rpoBCM32b-R (Brady et al. 2008), respectively. The sequences of fragments of 16S rDNA, gyrB and rpoB from isolate PA21QJ01 were was deposited in GenBank (accession number: OM184301.1, OM302500, OM302499). A search for homologous sequences using BLAST resulted in 99.9, 99.6 and 99.8% identity of 16S rDNA, gyrB and rpoB, respectively, with sequences from the NN08200 of Pantoea ananatis (GenBank accession numbers: MK415050.1 for 16S rDNA, CP035034.1 for gyrB and CP035034.1.1 for rpoB). Above molecular results indicated that PA21QJ01 isolated from maize white spot is P. ananatis. Pathogenicity tests were performed on tasseled plants of the suscptible maize variety Wugu1790. After culture in LB medium plate at 30°C for 12 h, the bacterial solution was used for inoculation at a concentration of 1 × 108 CFU ml-1. After 7 days of inoculation, the leaves of the plants appeared water-soaked. After 10 days, white spot developed with brown margin. In contrast, the control plants remained healthy and symptomless. The same P. ananatis was reisolated in the inoculated maize plants, fulfilled Koch's law. In the last decade, P. ananatis has been reported to cause maize white spot in South Africa, Mexico, Poland, Argentina, Brazil (Sauer et al. 2015), and Ecuador (Toaza et al.2021). It has caused crop diseases with other crops, such as onion, rice, pineapple, melon, and sorghum, and others (Sauer et al. 2015). It caused leaf blight and leaf steak in rice in China (Yu et al. 2021). This is the first report of maize white spot caused by P. ananatis in China. However, to our knowledge, this is the first report of maize white spot disease in China. Attentions should be paid to screening for disease-resistant resources and breeding disease-resistant hybrids. Reference: Wells, J. M. et al. 1987. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37:136-143. Shin, G. Y. et al. 2022. Plant Dis. Doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-21-1810-SC. Brady, C., et al. 2008. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 31:447. Galkiewicz, J. P., and Kellogg, C. A. 2008. APPL ENVIRON MICROB, 74.24: 7828-7831. Toaza, A. et al. 2021. Plant Dis. Doi:10.1094/PDIS-02-21-0298-PDN Yamamoto, S., and Harayama, S. 1995. APPL ENVIRON MICROB, 61:1104.L. Sauer, A. V. et al. 2015. Agronomy Science and Biotechnology. Doi:10.33158/ASB.2015v1i1p21 Yu et al. 2021. Plant Dis. Doi:10.1094/PDIS-05-21-0988-PDN.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA