Does autonomic nervous system dysfunction influence cardiovascular disease risk in young adults with intellectual disability?

People with intellectual disability (ID) experience cardiometabolic-related morbidity and mortality. However, it has been suggested that this population presents and lives with underestimated cardiovascular risk factors at a younger age, hence affecting their overall health and quality of life and contributing to early mortality. We assessed autonomic nervous system function in subjects with ID (n = 39), aged 18-45 yr, through measures of sudomotor function, heart rate and systolic blood pressure variability, and cardiac baroreflex function. Traditional clinical cardiovascular measurements and a biochemical analysis were also undertaken. We found that young adults with ID presented with sudomotor dysfunction, impaired cardiac baroreflex sensitivity, and systolic blood pressure variability, when compared with age-matched control subjects (n = 38). Reduced hand and feet electrochemical skin conductance and asymmetry were significantly associated with having a moderate-profound ID. Autonomic dysfunction in individuals with ID persisted after controlling for age, sex, and other metabolic parameters. Subjects in the ID group also showed significantly increased blood pressure, body mass index, and waist/hip circumference ratio, as well as increased plasma hemoglobin A1c and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels. We conclude that autonomic dysfunction is present in young adults with ID and is more marked in those with more severe disability. These finding have important implications in developing preventative strategies to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in people with ID.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Adults with intellectual disability experience higher risk of premature death than the general population. Our investigation highlights increased cardiovascular risk markers and autonomic dysfunction in young adults with intellectual disability compared with control adults. Autonomic dysfunction was more marked in those with a more severe disability but independent of cardiovascular parameters. Assessment of autonomic nervous system (ANS) function may provide insight into the mechanisms of cardiometabolic disease development and progression in young adults with intellectual disability.

Research trends in contemporary health economics: a scientometric analysis on collective content of specialty journals.

INTRODUCTION: Health economics is a thriving sub-discipline of economics. Applied health economics research is considered essential in the health care sector and is used extensively by public policy makers. For scholars, it is important to understand the history and status of health economics-when it emerged, the rate of research output, trending topics, and its temporal evolution-to ensure clarity and direction when formulating research questions. METHODS: Nearly 13,000 articles were analysed, which were found in the collective publications of the ten most specialised health economic journals. We explored this literature using patterns of term co-occurrence and document co-citation. RESULTS: The research output in this field is growing exponentially. Five main research divisions were identified: (i) macroeconomic evaluation, (ii) microeconomic evaluation, (iii) measurement and valuation of outcomes, (iv) monitoring mechanisms (evaluation), and (v) guidance and appraisal. Document co-citation analysis revealed eighteen major research streams and identified variation in the magnitude of activities in each of the streams. A recent emergence of research activities in health economics was seen in the Medicaid Expansion stream. Established research streams that continue to show high levels of activity include Child Health, Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Cost-effectiveness. Conversely, Patient Preference, Health Care Expenditure and Economic Evaluation are now past their peak of activity in specialised health economic journals. Analysis also identified several streams that emerged in the past but are no longer active. CONCLUSIONS: Health economics is a growing field, yet there is minimal evidence of creation of new research trends. Over the past 10 years, the average rate of annual increase in internationally collaborated publications is almost double that of domestic collaborations (8.4% vs 4.9%), but most of the top scholarly collaborations remain between six countries only.

Information Needs and Communication Strategies for People with Coronary Heart Disease: A Scoping Review.

A critical aspect of coronary heart disease (CHD) care and secondary prevention is ensuring patients have access to evidence-based information. The purpose of this review is to summarise the guiding principles, content, context and timing of information and education that is beneficial for supporting people with CHD and potential communication strategies, including digital interventions. We conducted a scoping review involving a search of four databases (Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, Medline) for articles published from January 2000 to August 2022. Literature was identified through title and abstract screening by expert reviewers. Evidence was synthesised according to the review aims. Results demonstrated that information-sharing, decision-making, goal-setting, positivity and practicality are important aspects of secondary prevention and should be patient-centred and evidenced based with consideration of patient need and preference. Initiation and duration of education is highly variable between and within people, hence communication and support should be regular and ongoing. In conclusion, text messaging programs, smartphone applications and wearable devices are examples of digital health strategies that facilitate education and support for patients with heart disease. There is no one size fits all approach that suits all patients at all stages, hence flexibility and a suite of resources and strategies is optimal.

Stress and social isolation, and its relationship to cardiovascular risk in young adults with intellectual disability.

PURPOSE: Stress produces many physiological changes, some of which may contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Individuals with intellectual disability (ID) are exposed to multiple and stressful challenges everyday which may put them at increased cardiovascular risk. This current study aimed to establish whether adults with ID experience higher levels of subjective stress and encounter different stressors (including social isolation) than the general population, and whether there is a relationship between stress and cardiometabolic profile in this population. METHODS: Adults with ID (n = 35) aged 18-45 years completed the Subjective Stress Survey, and underwent a physiological assessment to measure blood pressure, metabolic profile and subclinical CVD risk factors, and were compared to a control group (n = 29). Multiple regression was used to investigate whether cardiometabolic parameters were predicative of SSS scores. RESULTS: Findings showed adults with ID have higher perceived stress levels (total score ID: 21.3 ± 11.4 vs control: 13.9 ± 9.0, p = 0.006), which is elicited by unique stressors, when compared to people without ID. Stress was strongly associated with increased social isolation (r = -0.38, p = 0.002) and with obesity in females with mild ID (r = 0.72). Regression showed that arterial stiffness was predictive of total SSS score (p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Adults with ID aged 18-45 years report higher levels of perceived stress when compared to people without ID.Implications for RehabilitationReducing stress in this young population may prevent development of arterial stiffness, and consequently lower the risk of cardiometabolic morbidity and mortality.There are unique targets for stress management in young adults with intellectual disability, including supporting decision-making and improving self-efficacy.Improving community integration and reducing social isolation may decrease perceived stress in young adults with intellectual disability.

The evolution of digital health technologies in cardiovascular disease research.

When implemented in practice, digital technologies have shown improvements in morbidity and mortality outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). For scholars, research into digital technologies in cardiovascular care has been relatively recent, thus it is important to understand the history of digital health technology in cardiovascular research-its emergence, rate of growth, hot topics, and its temporal evolution. The aim of this study was to analyse more than 16,000 articles in this domain based on their scientometric indicators. Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection was accessed and searched at several levels, including titles, abstracts, keywords, authors, sources and individual articles. Analysis examined the temporal shifts in research and scholarly focus based on keywords, networks of collaboration, topical divisions in relation to digital technologies, and influential publications. Findings showed this research area is growing exponentially. Co-citation analysis revealed twenty prominent research streams and identified variation in the magnitude of activities in each stream. A recent emergence of research activities in digital technology in cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR), out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), and arrythmia research was also demonstrated. Conversely, wearable technologies, activity tracking and electronic medical records research are now past their peak of reported research activity. With increasing amounts of novel technologies becoming available and more patients taking part in remote health care monitoring, further evaluation and research into digital technologies, including their long-term effectiveness, is needed. Furthermore, emerging technologies, which are evaluated and/or validated should be considered for implementation into clinical practice as treatment and prevention modalities for CVD.

Trends of research productivity across author gender and research fields: A multidisciplinary and multi-country observational study.

Bibliographic properties of more than 75 million scholarly articles, are examined and trends in overall research productivity are analysed as a function of research field (over the period of 1970-2020) and author gender (over the period of 2006-2020). Potential disruptive effects of the Covid-19 pandemic are also investigated. Over the last decade (2010-2020), the annual number of publications have invariably increased every year with the largest relative increase in a single year happening in 2019 (more than 6% relative growth). But this momentum was interrupted in 2020. Trends show that Environmental Sciences and Engineering Environmental have been the fastest growing research fields. The disruption in patterns of scholarly publication due to the Covid-19 pandemic was unevenly distributed across fields, with Computer Science, Engineering and Social Science enduring the most notable declines. The overall trends of male and female productivity indicate that, in terms of absolute number of publications, the gender gap does not seem to be closing in any country. The trends in absolute gap between male and female authors is either parallel (e.g., Canada, Australia, England, USA) or widening (e.g., majority of countries, particularly Middle Eastern countries). In terms of the ratio of female to male productivity, however, the gap is narrowing almost invariably, though at markedly different rates across countries. While some countries are nearing a ratio of .7 and are well on track for a 0.9 female to male productivity ratio, our estimates show that certain countries (particularly across the Middle East) will not reach such targets within the next 100 years. Without interventional policies, a significant gap will continue to exist in such countries. The decrease or increase in research productivity during the first year of the pandemic, in contrast to trends established before 2020, was generally parallel for male and female authors. There has been no substantial gender difference in the disruption due to the pandemic. However, opposite trends were found in a few cases. It was observed that, in some countries (e.g., The Netherlands, The United States and Germany), male productivity has been more negatively affected by the pandemic. Overall, female research productivity seems to have been more resilient to the disruptive effect of Covid-19 pandemic, although the momentum of female researchers has been negatively affected in a comparable manner to that of males.