RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing has had a significant impact on genetic disease diagnosis, but the interpretation of the vast amount of genomic data it generates can be challenging. To address this, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology have established guidelines for standardized variant interpretation. In this manuscript, we present the updated Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein Standards for Constitutional Sequence Variants Classification, incorporating modifications from leading genetics societies and the ClinGen initiative. RESULTS: First, we standardized the scientific publications, documents, and other reliable sources for this document to ensure an evidence-based approach. Next, we defined the databases that would provide variant information for the classification process, established the terminology for molecular findings, set standards for disease-gene associations, and determined the nomenclature for classification criteria. Subsequently, we defined the general rules for variant classification and the Bayesian statistical reasoning principles to enhance this process. We also defined bioinformatics standards for automated classification. Our workgroup adhered to gene-specific rules and workflows curated by the ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels whenever available. Additionally, a distinct set of specifications for criteria modulation was created for cancer genes, recognizing their unique characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The development of an internal consensus and standards for constitutional sequence variant classification, specifically adapted to the Brazilian population, further contributes to the continuous refinement of variant classification practices. The aim of these efforts from the workgroup is to enhance the reliability and uniformity of variant classification.
Assuntos
Testes Genéticos , Variação Genética , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Mutação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Teorema de Bayes , Genoma HumanoRESUMO
Preliminary evidence suggests that statins may prevent major perioperative vascular complications. METHODS: We randomized 648 statin-naïve patients who were scheduled for noncardiac surgery and were at risk for a major vascular complication. Patients were randomized to a loading dose of atorvastatin or placebo (80 mg anytime within 18hours before surgery), followed by a maintenance dose of 40 mg (or placebo), started at least 12hours after the surgery, and then 40 mg/d (or placebo) for 7days. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, and stroke at 30days. RESULTS: The primary outcome was observed in 54 (16.6%) of 326 patients in the atorvastatin group and 59 (18.7%) of 316 patients in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.60-1.26, P=.46). No significant effect was observed on the 30-day secondary outcomes of all-cause mortality (4.3% vs 4.1%, respectively; HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.53-2.47, P=.74), nonfatal myocardial infarction (3.4% vs 4.4%, respectively; HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.35-1.68, P=.50), myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (13.2% vs 16.5%; HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.53-1.19, P=.26), and stroke (0.9% vs 0%, P=.25). CONCLUSION: In contrast to the prior observational and trial data, the LOAD trial has neutral results and did not demonstrate a reduction in major cardiovascular complications after a short-term perioperative course of statin in statin-naïve patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. We demonstrated, however, that a large multicenter blinded perioperative statin trial for high-risk statin-naïve patients is feasible and should be done to definitely establish the efficacy and safety of statin in this patient population.
Assuntos
Atorvastatina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Infarto do Miocárdio/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Idoso , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/sangue , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Isquemia Miocárdica/sangue , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Miocárdica/prevenção & controle , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Medição de Risco , Troponina/sangueRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a myeloid neoplasm associated with a high morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis, risk stratification and therapy selection in AML have changed substantially in the last decade with the progressive incorporation of clinically relevant molecular markers. METHODS: In this work, our aim was to describe a real-world genomic profiling experience in AML and to demonstrate the impact of the European Leukemia Net 2022 update on risk stratification in AML. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: One hundred and forty-one patients were evaluated with an amplicon-based multi-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. The most commonly mutated genes were FLT3, DNMT3A, RUNX1, IDH2, NPM1, ASXL1, SRSF2, NRAS, TP53 and TET2. Detection of FLT3 ITD with NGS had a sensitivity of 96.3% when compared to capillary electrophoresis. According to ELN 2017, 26.6%, 20.1%, and 53.3% of patients were classified as having a good, moderate, or unfavorable risk. When ELN 2022 was used, 15.6%, 27.8%, and 56.6% of patients were classified as favorable, moderate, or unfavorable risk, respectively. When ELN 2022 was compared to ELN 2017, thirteen patients (14.4%) exhibited a different risk classification, with a significant decrease in the number of favorable risk patients, what has immediate clinical impact. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we have described a real-world genomic profiling experience in AML and the impact of the 2022 ELN update on risk stratification.
Assuntos
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Nucleofosmina , Humanos , Mutação , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Medição de Risco , Genômica , PrognósticoRESUMO
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered a new treatment option for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. However, data are not well established on overall survival and delaying surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer, as well as on those patients that ultimately cannot undergo surgery. We analyzed pancreatic cancer patients treated in a tertiary hospital from January 2016 to December 2020. Patients with resectable stage I and II pancreatic cancer were evaluated regarding surgery, neoadjuvant treatment, and other clinical demographics. The survival function was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the relationship between the variables of interest and the overall survival (OS) was assessed by adopting the proportional regression Cox models. A total of 216 patients were evaluated. 81 of them with resectable/borderline resectable disease and 135 with unresectable /metastatic disease at diagnosis. Median OS for stage I and II disease were 36 and 28 months, respectively. For resectable pancreatic cancer median OS was 28 months, for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer median OS was 11 months. Median OS for stage III (locally advanced) and stage IV (metastatic) were 10 and 7 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). Median OS of 9 months were obtained for patients with stage I and II that did not undergo surgery compared to 25 months in patients that underwent surgery in any time (p < 0.001). Comparing patients with localized disease, median OS for patients treated with upfront surgery was 28 months, compared to 15 months in patients treated with neoadjuvant approach (p = 0.04). Most patients that did not undergo surgery have decline of performance status or disease progression on neoadjuvant treatment. On multivariable analysis in pancreatic cancer stages I and II, including age, sex, borderline or resectable disease, CA 19-9, positive lymph nodes and neoadjuvant treatment, the surgery was the only factor associated with improved overall survival (p = 0.04). Upfront surgery should still be considered a standard of care approach for resectable pancreatic cancer. Biomarker driven studies and randomized trials with combination therapies are necessary to address neoadjuvant chemotherapy and delaying surgery in purely resectable pancreatic cancer.
Assuntos
Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Pâncreas/patologia , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMO
Hearing loss (HL) is a common sensory deficit in humans and represents an important clinical and social burden. We studied whole-genome sequencing data of a cohort of 2,097 individuals from the Brazilian Rare Genomes Project who were unaffected by hearing loss to investigate pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants associated with nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL). We found relevant frequencies of individuals harboring these alterations: 222 heterozygotes (10.59%) for sequence variants, 54 heterozygotes (2.58%) for copy-number variants (CNV), and four homozygotes (0.19%) for sequence variants. The top five most frequent genes and their corresponding combined allelic frequencies (AF) were GJB2 (AF = 1.57%), STRC (AF = 1%), OTOA (AF = 0.69%), TMPRSS3 (AF = 0.41%), and OTOF (AF = 0.29%). The most frequent sequence variant was GJB2:c.35del (AF = 0.72%), followed by OTOA:p. (Glu787Ter) (AF = 0.61%), while the most recurrent CNV was a microdeletion of 57.9 kb involving the STRC gene (AF = 0.91%). An important fraction of these individuals (n = 104; 4.96%) presented variants associated with autosomal dominant forms of NSHL, which may imply the development of some hearing impairment in the future. Using data from the heterozygous individuals for recessive forms and the Hardy-Weinberg equation, we estimated the population frequency of affected individuals with autosomal recessive NSHL to be 1:2,222. Considering that the overall prevalence of HL in adults ranges from 4-15% worldwide, our data indicate that an important fraction of this condition may be associated with a monogenic origin and dominant inheritance.
RESUMO
Programs for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV have reduced the transmission rate of perinatal HIV infection and have thereby increased the number of HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) infants. Natural immunity to HIV-1 infection in both mothers and newborns needs to be further explored. In this study, we compared the expression of antiviral restricting factors in HIV-infected pregnant mothers treated with antiretroviral therapy (ART) in pregnancy (n=23) and in cord blood (CB) (n=16), placental tissues (n=10-13) and colostrum (n=5-6) samples and compared them to expression in samples from uninfected (UN) pregnant mothers (n=21). Mononuclear cells (MNCs) were prepared from maternal and CB samples following deliveries by cesarean section. Maternal (decidua) and fetal (chorionic villus) placental tissues were obtained, and colostrum was collected 24 h after delivery. The mRNA and protein expression levels of antiviral factors were then evaluated. We observed a significant increase in the mRNA expression levels of antiviral factors in MNCs from HIV-infected mothers and CB, including the apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme 3G (A3G), A3F, tripartite motif family-5α (TRIM-5α), TRIM-22, myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA), stimulator of interferon (IFN) genes (STING) and IFN-ß, compared with the levels detected in uninfected (UN) mother-CB pairs. Moreover, A3G transcript and protein levels and α-defensin transcript levels were decreased in the decidua of HIV-infected mothers. Decreased TRIM-5α protein levels in the villi and increased STING mRNA expression in both placental tissues were also observed in HIV-infected mothers compared with uninfected (UN) mothers. Additionally, colostrum cells from infected mothers showed increased tetherin and IFN-ß mRNA levels and CXCL9 protein levels. The data presented here indicate that antiviral restricting factor expression can be induced in utero in HIV-infected mothers. Future studies are warranted to determine whether this upregulation of antiviral factors during the perinatal period has a protective effect against HIV-1 infection.
Assuntos
Sangue Fetal/metabolismo , Regulação da Expressão Gênica/imunologia , Infecções por HIV/sangue , Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Imunidade Inata/imunologia , Viremia/prevenção & controle , Desaminase APOBEC-3G , Fatores de Restrição Antivirais , Western Blotting , Brasil , Proteínas de Transporte/metabolismo , Vilosidades Coriônicas/metabolismo , Colostro/metabolismo , Citidina Desaminase/metabolismo , Primers do DNA/genética , Decídua/metabolismo , Feminino , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Interferon beta/economia , Interferon beta/metabolismo , Leucócitos Mononucleares/metabolismo , Proteínas de Membrana/metabolismo , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidade Menor , Mães , Proteínas de Resistência a Myxovirus/metabolismo , Gravidez , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Proteínas Repressoras/metabolismo , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Proteínas com Motivo Tripartido , Ubiquitina-Proteína Ligases , Viremia/metabolismoRESUMO
Backgroung Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a myeloid neoplasm associated with a high morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis, risk stratification and therapy selection in AML have changed substantially in the last decade with the progressive incorporation of clinically relevant molecular markers. Methods In this work, our aim was to describe a real-world genomic profiling experience in AML and to demonstrate the impact of the European Leukemia Net 2022 update on risk stratification in AML. Results and Discussion One hundred and forty-one patients were evaluated with an amplicon-based multi-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. The most commonly mutated genes were FLT3, DNMT3A, RUNX1, IDH2, NPM1, ASXL1, SRSF2, NRAS, TP53 and TET2. Detection of FLT3 ITD with NGS had a sensitivity of 96.3% when compared to capillary electrophoresis. According to ELN 2017, 26.6%, 20.1%, and 53.3% of patients were classified as having a good, moderate, or unfavorable risk. When ELN 2022 was used, 15.6%, 27.8%, and 56.6% of patients were classified as favorable, moderate, or unfavorable risk, respectively. When ELN 2022 was compared to ELN 2017, thirteen patients (14.4%) exhibited a different risk classification, with a significant decrease in the number of favorable risk patients, what has immediate clinical impact. Conclusions In conclusion, we have described a real-world genomic profiling experience in AML and the impact of the 2022 ELN update on risk stratification (AU)