RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The treatment of advanced desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF) is poorly standardized and primarily based on physician's choice. We assessed systemic treatment preferences for advanced DF among European experts, with the aim to define a control treatment for prospective randomized trials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A structured questionnaire was sent to a group of physicians involved in DF treatment. RESULTS: 54 experts from 14 countries (Europe, Israel) responded. Disease progression and failure of local therapy were typical indications for systemic therapy. Treatment preferences for patients with sporadic DF versus DF associated with Gardner's syndrome were similar. Physicians use at least 5 different classes of drugs (27 agents). The most frequently used compounds were anti-estrogens and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs), in combination or as single agents. The second and third most common systemic approach was chemotherapy based on methotrexate or an anthracycline. Trial activity was limited to 1 country/1 multicentric study. CONCLUSIONS: There is an unmet medical need for evidence-based treatments and well-designed studies. Clinical trials with systemic agents should ideally select a homogeneous DF population with advanced, progressive, ideally symptomatic disease and/or functional impairment after failure of wait-and-see and/or local treatments, and should be randomized, with placebo, anti-estrogens, NSAIDs, or physician's choice as comparator.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Fibromatose Agressiva/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Progressão da Doença , Antagonistas de Estrogênios/uso terapêutico , Europa (Continente) , Fibromatose Agressiva/patologia , Humanos , Israel , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Projetos de Pesquisa , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Leiomyosarcoma is a common subtype of soft tissue sarcoma originating from smooth muscle. We evaluated the clinical course and treatment outcome of patients with metastatic leiomyosarcoma. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients at the University Hospitals Leuven. RESULTS: We identified 122 patients with metastatic leiomyosarcoma, 77 female, median age 59.5 years. Most patients developed leiomyosarcoma in the extremities (35%), the uterus (20%) or the abdomen (19%); 69% developed metachronous metastasis, 31% had synchronous metastatic disease. Most patients (74%) received palliative systemic therapy. The most common first-line treatments were doxorubicin (n = 47) and an anthracycline combined with an alkylator (n = 28). The objective response rate to first-line palliative systemic therapy was 20% and the median progression-free survival was 4.9 months (range 0.1-17.1). The median survival from diagnosis of metastasis was 20.5 months (range 0.4-126.9). On multivariate analysis, metachronous disease, no progressive disease as best response to first-line treatment, the possibility of metastasectomy with curative intent and use of palliative radiotherapy were indicators for better survival. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of patients with metastatic leiomyosarcoma is limited and objective responses to first-line systemic therapy are rare. The treatment of metastatic leiomyosarcoma remains an unmet medical need.