RESUMO
Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was introduced in the 1990s with the aim to decrease the rate of respiratory complications associated with thoracotomy, along with the benefits of reduced morbidity and a quicker return to normal activities provided by minimally invasive techniques. However, MIE is not routinely applied as a standard approach for esophageal cancer worldwide, due to the high technical complexity of this minimally invasive procedure. Therefore, the open transthoracic esophagectomy is considered to be the gold standard for resectable esophageal cancer worldwide nowadays. In this article, the current status of conventional MIE and robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy will be reviewed.
Assuntos
Esofagectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Toracoscopia/métodos , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de SaúdeRESUMO
Pulmonary complications, and especially pneumonia, remain one of the most common complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. These complications are reduced by minimally invasive techniques or by avoiding thoracic access through a transhiatal approach. However, a transhiatal approach does not allow for a full mediastinal lymphadenectomy. A transcervical mediastinal esophagectomy avoids thoracic access, which may contribute to a decrease in pulmonary complications after esophagectomy. In addition, this technique allows for a full mediastinal lymphadenectomy. A number of pioneering studies have been published on this topic. Here, the initial experience is presented as well as a review of the current literature concerning transcervical esophagectomy, with a focus on the robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy procedure.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) with intrathoracic anastomosis is gaining popularity as a treatment for esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to describe postoperative complications and short-term oncologic outcomes for RAMIE procedures using the da Vinci Xi robotic system 4-arm technique. METHODS: Data of 100 consecutive patients with esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction carcinoma undergoing modified Ivor Lewis esophagectomy were prospectively collected. All operations were performed by the same surgeon using an identical intrathoracic anastomotic reconstruction technique with the same perioperative management. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were graded according to Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) definitions. RESULTS: Mean duration was 416 min (±80); 70% of patients had an uncomplicated postoperative recovery. Pulmonary complications were observed in 17% of patients. Anastomotic leakage was observed in 8% of patients. Median ICU stay was 1 day and median overall postoperative hospital stay was 11 days. The 30-day mortality was 1%; 90-day mortality was 3%. A R0 resection was reached in 92% of patients with a median number of 29 dissected lymph nodes. All patients had at least 7 months of follow-up with a median follow-up of 17 months. Median overall survival was not reached yet. CONCLUSION: RAMIE with intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis) for esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction cancer was technically feasible and safe. Postoperative complications and short-term oncologic results were comparable to the highest international standards nowadays.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Laparoscopia , Robótica , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: With the introduction of minimally invasive esophagectomy, postoperative complications rates have decreased. Daily laboratory tests are used to screen patients for postoperative complications. The course of inflammatory indicators after esophagectomy after different surgical approaches has not been described yet. The aim of the study was to describe the postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocyte levels after different surgical approaches for esophagectomy and relate it to postoperative complications. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2018, 217 consecutive patients underwent thoracoabdominal esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. Blood tests to assess CRP and leukocytes were performed daily in all patients. Differences between treatment groups were analyzed with a linear mixed model. All postoperative complications were recorded in a prospective database. Prognostic factors were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: The study evaluated 4 different esophagectomy techniques: open (n = 57), hybrid (n = 53), totally minimally invasive (n = 52), and robot-assisted minimally invasive (n = 55). The increase of inflammatory indicators was significantly higher after open esophagectomy on the first 2 postoperative days compared with the 3 minimally invasive procedures (P < .001). Postoperative CRP values exceeding 200 mg/L on the second postoperative day and open esophagectomy were independently associated with postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Open esophagectomy results in significantly higher CRP and leukocyte values compared with hybrid, minimally invasive, and robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. Open esophagectomy and a CRP increase on the second postoperative day above 200 mg/L are independent positive predictors for postoperative complications in multivariate analysis.
Assuntos
Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Neoplasias Esofágicas/sangue , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/sangue , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos RetrospectivosAssuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Esôfago de Barrett/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Estenose Esofágica/etiologia , Esofagectomia/métodos , Esôfago/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/cirurgia , Estômago/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
Worldwide, the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer with curative intent is perioperative chemotherapy or preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by open transthoracic esophagectomy (OTE) with gastric conduit reconstruction. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was developed to improve the postoperative outcome by reducing the surgical trauma, with comparable short-term oncologic results. However, MIE is a highly complex procedure associated with a long learning curve. In 2003, robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy (RAMIE) was developed to overcome the technical limitations of MIE. Robotic surgery benefits from a stable 3-dimensional, magnified view and articulated instruments enabling precise dissection with 7 degrees of freedom of movement. In this review, the development of RAMIE within our hospital is described using a 5-stage development process for the assessment of surgical innovation (IDEAL).