What We Know about and What Is New in Primary Aldosteronism.

Primary aldosteronism (PA), a significant and curable cause of secondary hypertension, is seen in 5-10% of hypertensive patients, with its prevalence contingent upon the severity of the hypertension. The principal aetiologies of PA include bilateral idiopathic hypertrophy (BIH) and aldosterone-producing adenomas (APAs), while the less frequent causes include unilateral hyperplasia, familial hyperaldosteronism (FH) types I-IV, aldosterone-producing carcinoma, and ectopic aldosterone synthesis. This condition, characterised by excessive aldosterone secretion, leads to augmented sodium and water reabsorption alongside potassium loss, culminating in distinct clinical hallmarks: elevated aldosterone levels, suppressed renin levels, and hypertension. Notably, hypokalaemia is present in only 28% of patients with PA and is not a primary indicator. The association of PA with an escalated cardiovascular risk profile, independent of blood pressure levels, is notable. Patients with PA exhibit a heightened incidence of cardiovascular events compared to counterparts with essential hypertension, matched for age, sex, and blood pressure levels. Despite its prevalence, PA remains frequently undiagnosed, underscoring the imperative for enhanced screening protocols. The diagnostic process for PA entails a tripartite assessment: the aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) as the initial screening tool, followed by confirmatory and subtyping tests. A positive ARR necessitates confirmatory testing to rule out false positives. Subtyping, achieved through computed tomography and adrenal vein sampling, aims to distinguish between unilateral and bilateral PA forms, guiding targeted therapeutic strategies. New radionuclide imaging may facilitate and accelerate such subtyping and localisation. For unilateral adrenal adenoma or hyperplasia, surgical intervention is optimal, whereas bilateral idiopathic hyperplasia warrants treatment with mineralocorticoid antagonists (MRAs). This review amalgamates established and emerging insights into the management of primary aldosteronism.

Anatomy and anatomical variations of adrenal veins and its application to adrenal venous sampling.

PURPOSE: Our aim was to study the anatomy of the left and right main adrenal veins (LAV and RAV) and to identify their anatomical variations in order to see the practical application of these findings to adrenal venous sampling (AVS). METHODS: Our work is based on dissection of 80 adrenal glands from fresh corpses in the forensic medicine department. We studied the number, the drainage, the direction and the level of termination of the main adrenal veins. RESULTS: The average length of the LAV was 21 mm. It ended in 100% of cases at the upper edge of the left renal vein with a mean connection angle of 70° and after an anastomosis with the lower phrenic vein in 36 cases(90%). The average length of the RAV was 9 mm. It ended in 100% of cases at the level of the retro hepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) mainly on its posterior face in 21 cases (53%) and on its right lateral border in 18 cases (45%). The mean angle of the RAV in relation to the vertical axis of the IVC was 40°, with extremes ranging from 15° to 90°. CONCLUSIONS: AVS seems to be easier on the left than on the right side because of the greater length of the adrenal vein (21 mm vs. 9 mm) and a greater angle of connection (70° with the left renal vein vs. 40° with the IVC), which explains the lower success rate of cannulation and the more frequent occurrence of blood sample contamination on the right side.

Prognostic models to predict complete resolution of hypertension after adrenalectomy in primary aldosteronism: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Complete resolution of hypertension (CRH) after adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism is far from a certainty. Although several prognostic models have been proposed to predict outcome after adrenalectomy, studies have not clarified which of the available models can be used reliably in clinical practice. To identify, describe and appraise all prognostic models developed to predict CRH, and meta-analyse their predictive performances. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science for development and validation studies of prognostic models. After selection, we extracted descriptive statistics and aggregated area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) using meta-analysis. From 25 eligible studies, we identified 12 prognostic models used for predicting CRH after total adrenalectomy in primary aldosteronism. We report the results for 3 models that had available data from at least 3 external validation studies: the primary aldosteronism surgical outcome (PASO) score (AUC: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.86; 95% predictive interval [PI]: 0.04-1.00), Utsumi nomogram (AUC: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.72-0.85; 95% PI: 0.03-1.00) and the aldosteronoma resolution score (ARS) model (AUC: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.74-0.80; 95% PI: 0.59-0.86 for all studies and AUC: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.75-0.85; 95% PI: 0.57-0.93 for the studies with the same adrenal vein sampling-guided adrenalectomy rate compared to the models meta-analysed). The PASO score, Utsumi nomogram and ARS model showed comparable discrimination performance to predict CRH in primary aldosteronism. Unlike the ARS model, the number of external validation studies for the PASO score and the Utsumi nomogram was relatively low to draw definite conclusions.

Best Practices: Indications and Procedural Controversies of Adrenal Vein Sampling for Primary Aldosteronism.

Primary hyperaldosteronism (PA) is the most common secondary form of hyper-tension in middle-aged adults. Its harmful effects exceed those of essential hyper-tension. Once PA is diagnosed, treatment hinges on whether aldosterone secretion is unilateral or bilateral, as the former can be effectively treated with adrenalectomy but the latter is treated medically with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists such as spironolactone or eplerenone. Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is critical in this determination. There is wide variation in how AVS is performed, including whether to use synthetic adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation and where the catheter tip should be placed during left adrenal gland sampling. In addition, some institutions and guidelines omit AVS in young patients (i.e., those younger than an age threshold ranging from 35 to 40 years old) who have unilateral adrenal findings on cross-sectional imaging. In this article, we provide background on PA and performance of AVS and then summarize the evidence supporting best practices for these three areas of controversy regarding how and when to perform AVS.

Bilateral co-secretory lesions presenting with coexisting Cushing syndrome and primary aldosteronism: a case report.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing number of cases of aldosterone- and cortisol-producing adenomas (A/CPAs) reported in the context of primary aldosteronism (PA). Most of these patients have PA complicated with subclinical Cushing's syndrome; cases of apparent Cushing's syndrome (CS) complicated with aldosteronism are less reported. However, Co-secretory tumors were present in the right adrenal gland, a cortisol-secreting adenoma and an aldosterone-producing nodule (APN) were present in the left adrenal gland, and aldosterone-producing micronodules (APMs) were present in both adrenal glands, which has not been reported. Here, we report such a case, offering profound insight into the diversity of clinical and pathological features of this disease. CASE PRESENTATION: The case was a 45-year-old female from the adrenal disease diagnosis and treatment centre in West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The patient presented with hypertension, moon-shaped face, central obesity, fat accumulation on the back of the neck, disappearance of cortisol circadian rhythm, ACTH < 5 ng/L, failed elevated cortisol inhibition by dexamethasone, orthostatic aldosterone/renin activity > 30 (ng/dL)/(ng/mL/h), and plasma aldosterone concentration > 10 ng/dL after saline infusion testing. Based on the above, she was diagnosed with non-ACTH-dependent CS complicated with PA. Adrenal vein sampling showed no lateralization for cortisol and aldosterone secretion in the bilateral adrenal glands. The left adrenocortical adenoma was removed by robot-assisted laparoscopic resection. However, hypertension, fatigue and weight gain were not alleviated after surgery; additionally, purple striae appeared in the lower abdomen, groin area and inner thigh, accompanied by systemic joint pain. One month later, the right adrenocortical adenoma was also removed. CYP11B1 were expressed in the bilateral adrenocortical adenomas, and CYP11B2 was also expressed in the right adrenocortical adenomas. APN existed in the left adrenal gland and APMs in the adrenal cortex adjacent to bilateral adrenocortical adenomas. After another surgery, her serum cortisol and plasma aldosterone returned to normal ranges, except for slightly higher ACTH. CONCLUSIONS: This case suggests that it is necessary to assess the presence of PA, even in CS with apparent symptoms. As patients with CS and PA may have more complicated adrenal lesions, more data are required for diagnosis.

Discordant imaging: adrenal vein sampling in almost half of patients with primary aldosteronism and a unilateral adrenal adenoma.

BACKGROUND: Primary hyperaldosteronism (PHA) is an underdiagnosed cause of secondary hypertension, with an increased risk of cardiovascular and renal complications compared with those with essential hypertension alone. Distinguishing between unilateral and bilateral aldosterone secretion is important as management differs. Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is the gold standard for determining lateralisation. Current international guidelines suggest AVS may be omitted in those aged <35 years with PHA and a unilateral adrenal adenoma on imaging. AIM: To characterise all patients referred for AVS at Waitemata District Health Board (WDHB), review the success rate of AVS and compare concordance of AVS with imaging. METHODS: All patients who underwent AVS in WDHB from January 2015 to September 2020 were retrospectively assessed. Clinical records, laboratory data and radiological findings were reviewed. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients underwent AVS, with four excluded as private records were unable to be obtained. Of the 92 patients included, age ranged from 22 to 79 years. AVS was successful on first attempt in 89 (96.7%) patients. AVS and imaging findings were concordant in 62.2% of patients. One (14.3%) of seven aged <35 years had discordant results, and 16 (47%) of 34 patients with a unilateral adenoma on imaging had discordant results to AVS. CONCLUSIONS: AVS at WDHB is successful on first attempt in most patients. AVS is essential in the management of PHA for those deemed to be surgical candidates, regardless of age.

Benefits of adrenal venous sampling with preoperative four-dimensional CT imaging.

BACKGROUND: The effects of adrenal venous sampling (AVS) may be limited by the anatomical variants of adrenal veins. PURPOSE: To investigate the benefits of AVS for patients who underwent four-dimensional computed tomography (4D CT) before AVS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed the images of contrast-enhanced four phase three-dimensional (3D) and 4D CT in patients who received AVS between February 2010 and February 2021. A total of 112 patients (59 women; mean age = 55.3 ± 11.8 years) were enrolled. Of the entire population, 49.1% (55/112) underwent 4D CT, whereas 50.9% (57/112) underwent 3D CT. The anatomical features of adrenal veins and procedural data were obtained. Simple linear regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between imaging protocols and AVS. RESULTS: On comparison of the two groups, the 4D cohort had a higher success rate (98.2% vs. 78.9%; P = 0.001), shorter procedure and fluoroscopy time (73.6 ± 37.3 min vs. 110.5 ± 47.9 min; P < 0.001 and 28.7 ± 31.2 min vs. 97.4 ± 251.7 min; P = 0.047, respectively), lower radiation exposure (243.5 ± 315.5 mGycm2 vs. 613.4 ± 674.6 mGycm2; P < 0.001) and less contrast volume (46.2 ± 42.7 ml vs. 68.3 ± 47.4 ml vs; P = 0.014). In simple linear regression analysis, positive and negative identification of right adrenal vein before AVS significantly influenced the success rate (unstandardized coefficients [UC] = 0.304, standardized coefficients [SC] = 0.304; P = 0.001) and operation duration (UC = -46.124, SC = -0.318; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pre-procedural 4D CT may facilitate successful AVS. Compared with four-phase 3D CT, this protocol is better to shorten the operation and fluoroscopy time, and to reduce the radiation dose and contrast consumption.

Subtyping primary aldosteronism by inconclusive adrenal vein sampling: A derivation and validation study in a tertiary centre.

OBJECTIVE: Indices based on aldosterone/cortisol (A/C) concentration in the successfully cannulated adrenal vein (AV) and in the inferior vena cava (IVC) (AV/IVC) appear to be possible markers to verify the subtype of primary aldosteronism (PA) in the case of inconclusive results of adrenal vein sampling (AVS). The variability of results in previous studies encouraged us to calculate AV/IVC and adrenal A/C cutoff values that could predict the aetiology of PA. METHODS: This retrospective study included 96 patients who underwent AVS due to PA between 2015 and 2020. The derivation cohort ultimately consisted of 60 patients with bilaterally successful AVS and a clear diagnosis of unilateral or bilateral disease. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to find the optimal A/C and AV/IVC cutoff values predicting the subtype of PA. The validation cohort consisted of 11 patients with either unsuccessful cannulation or a borderline lateralization index (LI), those patients underwent adrenalectomy because their indices were suggestive of unilateral disease based on the derivation cohort data. RESULTS: The cutoff values of A/C ≤ 0.63 or AV/IVC ≤ 0.37 identified unaffected glands with a sensitivity of 91.2% and 97.1%, respectively, and a specificity of 90.7% and 88.4%, respectively. Unilateral ipsilateral gland involvement was characterized by A/C ≥ 3.5 or AV/IVC ≥ 3.4 with a corresponding specificity of 100%. All patients in the validation cohort achieved biochemical remission postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: A/C and AV/IVC cutoff values could be a useful tool to determine the subtype of PA in patients with unilateral successful AVS as well as in patients with a borderline LI.

Apparent failed and discordant adrenal vein sampling: A potential confounding role of cortisol cosecretion?

OBJECTIVE: Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) and computed tomography (CT) often show confusingly discordant lateralisation results in primary aldosteronism (PA). We tested a biochemical algorithm using AVS data to detect cortisol cosecretion as a potential explanation for discordant cases. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis from a large PA + AVS database. PATIENTS: All patients with PA and AVS, 2005-2020. MEASUREMENTS: An algorithm using biochemical data from paired AVS + CT images was devised from physiological first principles and informed by data from unilateral, AVS-CT concordant patients. The algorithm involved calculations based upon the expectation that low cortisol levels exist in adrenal vein effluent opposite an aldosterone-and-cortisol-producing adrenal mass and may reverse lateralisation due to inflated aldosterone/cortisol ratios. MAIN OUTCOMES: The algorithm was applied to cases with discordant CT-AVS lateralisation to determine whether this might be a common or explanatory finding. Clinical and biochemical characteristics of identified cases were collected via chart review and compared to CT-AVS concordant cases to detect evidence of biological plausibility for cortisol cosecretion. RESULTS: From a total of 588 AVS cases, 141 AVS + CT pairs were clear unilateral PA cases, used to develop the three-step algorithm for AVS interpretation. Applied to 88 AVS + CT discordant pairs, the algorithm suggested possible cortisol cosecretion in 40%. Case review showed that the proposed cortisol cosecretors, as identified by the algorithm, had low/suppressed adrenocorticotropic hormone levels, larger average nodule size and lower plasma aldosterone. CONCLUSIONS: Pending external validation and outcome verification by surgery and tissue immunohistochemistry, cortisol cosecretion from aldosteronomas may be a common explanation for discordant CT-AVS results in PA.

Cost-effectiveness of adrenal vein sampling- vs computed tomography-guided adrenalectomy for unilateral adrenaloma in primary aldosteronism.

PURPOSE: Adrenalectomies performed for the treatment of primary aldosteronism due to unilateral adenoma are traditionally confirmed with, and guided by, results from adrenal vein sampling (AVS). However, the usefulness of AVS at the expense of cost and complications is debated, and many institutions have independent protocols that use AVS to varying degrees. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness of AVS- vs computed tomography (CT)-based adrenalectomy was calculated using decision tree models. The tree was populated with values describing biochemical post-operative outcomes from the published literature; patients were placed into AVS- or CT-dependent treatment arms. Biochemical outcomes were defined based on patients' potassium levels and aldosterone-renin ratios. Patients underwent adrenalectomies and received medical management dosed based on surgical outcomes. Costs were represented by Medicare (FY2021) reimbursement rates (US$) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated using published morbidity and survival data. A willingness-to-pay of $100,000 per QALY gained was set to determine the most cost-effective strategy. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) associated with biochemical outcomes. RESULTS: The base case analyses favored the use of AVS-guided care, which cost $307.65 more but yielded 0.78 more QALYs, resulting in an ICER of $392.57. These results were upheld by all one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses. In 100,000 random-sampling simulations, AVS-guided care was favored 100% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with primary aldosteronism receiving adrenalectomies with curative intent, the more cost-effective method based on biochemical outcomes is AVS-based care. Recent literature suggests biochemical resolution should be favored over clinical resolution, due to long-term detriments of increased aldosterone independent of clinical symptoms.

A cadaveric anatomical study: anatomy and anatomical variations of left adrenal vein.

PURPOSE: Control of adrenal vein is the key of adrenal surgery. Its anatomy can present variations. Our aim was to study the anatomy of the main left adrenal vein (LAV) and its anatomical variations. METHODS: Our work is based on dissection of 40 cadavers. We studied the number of LAV and the drainage of the main adrenal vein as well as its level of termination. We measured its length, its width and the distance between its termination level and the termination level of the gonadal vein (GV). RESULTS: The average length of the LAV was 21 mm its mean width was 5 mm. It ended in 100% of cases at the upper edge of the left renal vein after an anastomosis with the lower phrenic vein in 36 cases (90%) and without anastomosis with the lower phrenic vein in four cases (10%). The left adrenal vein ended at the upper edge of the left renal vein either at the same level as the termination of the left GV in 14 cases (35%) or within the termination of the left GV in 26 cases (65%) by an average of 8 mm. The LAV was unique central vein in 22 cases (55%) and in 12 cases (30%), a major central adrenal vein with several small veins was found. CONCLUSIONS: The LAV is usually unique but there are variations in number. There are also variations in the level of its termination in the left renal vein as well as its anastomosis. During surgery, in case of difficulty, the left GV and the adrenal-diaphragmatic venous trunk could be used as benchmarks.

Significance of aldosterone gradient within left adrenal vein in diagnosing unilateral subtype of primary aldosteronism.

CONTEXT: The success rate of cannulation of the right adrenal vein is limited. The aldosterone gradient within the same adrenal vein branch is specific for aldosterone-producing adenoma. OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to investigate whether the absolute aldosterone gradient within the left adrenal vein (left-AV absolute aldosterone gradient) indicates unilateral excess aldosterone. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective cross-sectional study in a single referral centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 123 consecutive patients with primary aldosteronism who had successful adrenal vein sampling (AVS) data were examined. The left-AV absolute aldosterone gradient was considered significant when a gradient of >4:1 in the aldosterone-to-cortisol ratio between the common trunk vein and central vein was found. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The prevalence of the unilateral subtype in patients with a significant left-AV absolute aldosterone gradient. RESULTS: The prevalence of the unilateral subtype was higher in patients with than without a significant left-AV absolute aldosterone gradient (88.2% [15/17] vs 21.7% [23/106], P < .001). Of 60 patients with spontaneous hypokalemia, left unilateral disease on computed tomography, or both, a significant left-AV absolute aldosterone gradient was present only in patients with the unilateral subtype on AVS (42.9% [15/35]), but not in those with the bilateral subtype (0.0% [0/25]). These data were validated in an external cohort. CONCLUSION: The presence of a significant left-AV absolute aldosterone gradient can be used to diagnose the left unilateral subtype of primary aldosteronism on AVS in patients with spontaneous hypokalemia, left unilateral disease on computed tomography or both.

Outcomes in unilateral primary aldosteronism after surgical or medical therapy.

CONTEXT: Studies find surgery superior to medications in the treatment of primary aldosteronism (PA). It would be ideal to compare surgical and medical therapy in patients with unilateral PA only, who have the option between these treatment modalities. However, this is challenging as most patients with unilateral PA on adrenal vein sampling (AVS) undergo surgery. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of surgery and medications in patients with confirmed or likely unilateral PA. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 274 patients with PA managed at two referral centres from 2000 to 2019. PATIENTS: 154 patients identified with unilateral PA using AVS and a validated clinical prediction model were treated with surgical (n = 86) or medical (n = 68) therapy. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was a composite incident cardiovascular event comprising acute myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke, atrial fibrillation or congestive cardiac failure. Secondary outcomes were clinical and biochemical control. RESULTS: Cardiovascular outcomes were comparable, with the surgery group having an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.32-2.67), p = .89. Both treatments improved clinical and biochemical control, but surgery resulted in better systolic blood pressure, 133.0 ± 11.7 mmHg versus 137.9 ± 14.6 mmHg, p = .02, and lower defined daily dosages of antihypertensive medications, 1.0 (IQR 0.0-2.0) versus 2.6 (IQR 0.8-4.3), p < .001. In addition, 12 of 86 patients in the surgery group failed medical therapy before opting for surgery. CONCLUSION: In patients with unilateral PA who can tolerate medications, medical therapy improves clinical and biochemical control, and may offer similar cardiovascular protection. However, surgery reduces pill burden, may cure hypertension and is recommended for unilateral PA.

Diagnostic Impact of Adrenal Vein Sampling in Adrenal Cushing's Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Adrenal Cushing's syndrome is characterized by ACTH-independent hypercortisolism. Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is not routinely employed prior to management decisions, and few studies have investigated the value of AVS in this population. We assessed whether AVS provides a diagnostic benefit for treatment planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients with imaging and biochemical evidence of adrenal Cushing's syndrome undergoing AVS at our institution from 2015 to 2020 were analyzed retrospectively, including demographic and clinical characteristics. AVS lateralization index was determined by comparing the (cortisol/ipsilateral reference hormone) ratios of both adrenal veins. lateralization index of 2 or greater was considered diagnostic of unilateral disease. Post-management clinical improvement was defined as serum cortisol normalization, symptomatic improvement, or both. RESULTS: Cross-sectional imaging noted bilateral adrenal enlargement or nodules in three patients, and unilateral nodules in three patients. AVS results were discordant with imaging in three patients. Treatment included medical management in two patients, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in one patient, and laparoscopic adrenalectomy in two patients. One patient was lost to follow up. AVS results aided management planning in five patients, definitively changing treatment from surgery to medical management in one patient. All five patients demonstrated clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS: AVS offered useful information for determining appropriate management of adrenal Cushing's syndrome, especially distinguishing unilateral from bilateral disease. Even in bilateral disease, AVS may show a dominant gland, potentially allowing a staged unilateral adrenalectomy, before assessing the need for completion adrenalectomy or medical management. Larger studies are needed to better establish whether AVS offers significant benefit for this population.

Anatomy of Left Inferior Phrenic Vein in Patients Without Portal Hypertension.

OBJECTIVE. The left inferior phrenic vein (LIPV) can be an origin of a gastrorenal shunt from gastric varices. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the angiographic anatomy of the LIPV, particularly anastomoses of the LIPV with the portal vein (PV). SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Of 240 patients with primary aldosteronism who underwent adrenal venous sampling from April 2011 to July 2019, 236 had normal liver and renal function and were included in this study. Of those patients, 214 had evaluable LIPV venography. The angiographic anatomy of the LIPV was classified as type 1 when the subdiaphragmatic transverse part of the LIPV could be visualized or as type 2 when it could not. Type 1 was subclassified into type 1a, which was defined as the transverse part of the LIPV connected with a single vein, or type 1b, which was defined as the transverse part of the LIPV connected with several veins via anastomoses. Type 2 LIPVs were subclassified into type 2a, in which the LIPV had an undeveloped vertical part; type 2b, in which the LIPV had backflow into systemic veins; or type 2c, in which the LIPV had a connection to the PV. The presence of an anastomosis with the PV was defined as the PV being visualizable on LIPV venography. RESULTS. Assessment of LIPV venography revealed type 1 in 71.5% (153/214) of patients, including type 1a (22.4%, 48/214) and type 1b (49.1%, 105/214). Type 2 LIPVs were observed in 28.5% (61/214) of patients, including types 2a (6.5%, 14/214), 2b (11.2%, 24/214), and 2c (10.7%, 23/214). An anastomosis of the LIPV with the PV was found in 28.0% (60/214) of patients, including 10.7% (23/214) with type 2c and 17.3% (37/214) with type 1 with a visible PV. The anastomoses of the LIPV with the PV were of various sizes. CONCLUSION. The angiographic anatomy of the LIPV varied and was commonly formed from several veins connected by anastomoses. An anastomosis between the LIPV and PV, which might be the origin of gastric varices, was found in 28.0% of patients.

Determination of adrenal hypersecretion in primary Aldosteronism without aldosterone-production adenomas.

BACKGROUND: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is highly prevalent in hypertensive population. Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is the only procedure to assess adrenal aldosterone hypersecretion in PA. PA patients without aldosterone-producing adenomas (APA) frequently have unilateral aldosterone hypersecretion (UAH). These patients could bear inappropriate adrenalectomy without AVS. This study aims to identify which clinical characteristics should be recommended to perform AVS in these PA patients. METHODS: This study was performed from January 2018 to July 2019 at a center for hypertension and metabolic diseases. Adrenal computed tomography (CT) scan, biochemical evaluation, and AVS were performed. RESULTS: Total 141 patients were included in this study. Aldosterone to renin ratio (ARR) after confirmatory test is highly associated with adrenal laterality. The specificity of ARR > 10 (ng/dL)/(mU/L) after confirmatory test is 100%. After confirmatory test, patients with ARR > 10 (ng/dL)/(mU/L) had higher plasma aldosterone concentration and incidences of ischemic heart diseases and renal damage(p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: After confirmatory tests, ARR > 10 (ng/dL)/(mU/L) indicates adrenal laterality, with increasingly cardiorenal damage in PA patients without APA. Thus, AVS should be recommended in these patients before surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03398785 , Date of Registration: December 24, 2017.

Feasibility and effectiveness of a single-catheter approach for adrenal vein sampling in patients with primary aldosteronism.

BACKGROUND: Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is the preferred method for subtyping patients with primary aldosteronism, while the procedure is technically challenging. This study evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of a single-catheter approach for AVS. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 106 consecutive patients who underwent AVS was performed to determine the procedural success and complication rates. Bilateral AVS procedures were performed using a single 5-Fr Tiger catheter with repeated manual reshaping. RESULTS: We successfully advanced the catheter into the bilateral adrenal veins of all patients and reached a 90.6% procedural success rate of AVS. The procedural period was 33.0 ± 8.2 min, the fluoroscopy period was 5.8 ± 1.7 min, and the diagnostic contrast used was 17.3 ± 5.5 ml. Only one patient (0.9%) had a hematoma at the femoral puncture site. No other complications were observed. The operation period gradually shortened as the cumulative number of operations increased. The number of procedures required to overcome the learning curve was about 33 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The single-catheter approach is feasible and effective for AVS. Moreover, this approach required a relatively short learning curve for an inexperienced trainee.

Prediction of unilateral hyperaldosteronism on adrenal vein sampling using captopril challenge test in patients with primary aldosteronism.

Captopril challenge test (CCT) is a simple and safe confirmatory test for primary aldosteronism (PA). We investigated the effectiveness of the indices after captopril administration for prediction of unilateral hyperaldosteronism (UHA) on adrenal vein sampling (AVS). We studied 238 patients with PA who had CCT and successful AVS between July 2007 and December 2019 in Sapporo City General Hospital. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the diagnostic performance for prediction of UHA on AVS in regard to the reduction rate of plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) after captopril administration was inferior to aldosterone to renin ratio (ARR) and PAC (area under the ROC curve 0.72 vs. 0.84, 0.72 vs. 0.89, respectively, both p < 0.01). Based on the optimal cut-off values in ARR (897 pg/mL/ng/mL/h, sensitivity 64.6%, specificity 93.0%) and PAC (203 pg/mL, sensitivity 73.9%, specificity 93.0%) after captopril administration, the patients were divided into three groups: (1) both positive, (2) one positive, and (3) both negative. The prevalence of UHA on AVS in the three groups were 90.0%, 52.9%, and 7.3%, respectively. In the first group, 31 of 32 patients with unilateral nodular lesion on CT had an ipsilateral unilateral AVS. In conclusion, the combination of post-captopril ARR and PAC is useful for prediction of laterality diagnosis on AVS. AVS is strongly recommended in patients with both positive or one positive results for the optimal cut-off values of post-captopril ARR and PAC and is weakly recommended in patients with both negative results.

Therapeutic Outcomes with Surgical and Medical Management of Primary Aldosteronism.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of secondary hypertension and is significantly under-diagnosed. Delays in diagnosis and treatment can lead to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study is to review the management of PA, with a focus on medical and surgical treatment outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: PA causes cardiovascular dysfunction in excess of degree of hypertension. Adrenalectomy demonstrates a therapeutic advantage over mineralocorticoid antagonist (MRA) therapy, after controlling for degree of hypertension and subtype of PA. Higher rates of atrial fibrillation, heart failure, stroke, and incidence of chronic kidney disease are observed in subjects treated with MRAs than in subjects treated with adrenalectomy. The therapeutic benefit of surgery may reflect definitive resolution of excess aldosterone. Complete mineralocorticoid blockade may achieve similar benefit to adrenalectomy. Adrenalectomy is the most effective treatment for unilateral PA. Biomarkers for MRA therapy might inform optimal medical therapy of bilateral adrenal hyperplasia.

Learning curve of adrenal vein sampling. / è‚¾ä¸Šè ºé™è„‰é‡‡è¡€å­¦ä¹ æ›²çº¿çš„åˆ†æž.

OBJECTIVES: Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is one of the recognized effective methods for the identification of primary aldosteronism, and the success rate is related to the skill level of the operator. This study aims to analyze the learning curve of AVS and to determine the number of staged cases of AVS procedure success rate, and to provide a reference for the standardized use of AVS. METHODS: The age, gender, blood pressure, surgery success rate, operation time, radiation dose, and operation-related complications of 120 patients with primary aldosteronism who underwent continuous AVS in the Second Xiangya Hospital from August 2015 to February 2021 were retrospectively collected. The cumulative sum analysis was used to analyze the learning curve of the operator. The minimum cases who were proficient in the operation was determined according to the learning curve, and the patients were divided into 4 groups a, b, c, and d according to the time sequence of receiving AVS based on the cut-off point. The AVS success rate, radiation dose, operation time, and complications of each group were analyzed. RESULTS: The cumulative sum analysis showed that the learning curves were divided into a learning stage and a mastery stage with 30 cases as the cut-off point, and the operation experience of the surgeon was from raw to mature. The success rates of the a, b, c, and d groups were 66.7%, 86.7%, 93.3%, and 96.7%, respectively. Compared with b, c, and d groups, the success rate in group a was significant decreased (all P<0.05), the operative time in group a was significantly lengthened (all P<0.05), and the radiation dose in group a was significantly increased (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: After accumulating the AVS experience of 30 cases of primary aldosteronism, the operation time is obviously shortened, the radiation dose is significantly decreased, the operative complications are significantly reduced, and the learning curve enters a plateau. In the future, the success rate of AVS procedure may be improved through further standardized training.