Change in stroke volume during alveolar recruitment maneuvers through transient continuous positive airway pressure or stepwise increase in positive end expiratory pressure in anesthetized patients: a prospective randomized double-blind study.

PURPOSE: Intraoperative alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARM) used during protective ventilation strategy may have severe adverse hemodynamic effects, reported mainly during abrupt continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Stepwise increase and decrease in positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) may be used. We compared the hemodynamic effects of these two maneuvers. METHODS: We enrolled patients scheduled for intermediate to high-risk surgery with continuous arterial pressure and stroke volume (esophageal Doppler) monitoring in a prospective, single-centre, randomized, double-blind study. After induction of anesthesia, we ensured preload independence of stroke volume before an ARM was randomly performed: 30 cm H2O CPAP for 30 sec (CPAP group) or stepwise increase in PEEP from 8 to 20 cm H2O with inspiratory pressure of 10 cm H2O followed by a stepwise decrease in PEEP from 20 to 8 cm H2O (STEP group). The primary outcome was the relative variation in stroke volume. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included in the CPAP and STEP groups. Mean (standard deviation) relative variation in stroke volume was -57 (24)% in the CPAP group and -32 (24)% in the STEP group (difference, -25; 95% confidence interval, -37 to -14; P < 0.001). Changes in systolic, mean, and diastolic arterial pressure over time were not different between groups. The ARM was stopped because of a systolic arterial pressure < 70 mm Hg in four patients in the CPAP group and in one patient in the STEP group. CONCLUSIONS: Alveolar recruitment maneuvers through stepwise increase and decrease in PEEP have a better hemodynamic tolerance than transient CPAP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04802421); first submitted 15 March 2021.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les manœuvres de recrutement alvéolaire (MRA) peropératoire utilisées pendant les stratégies de ventilation protectrice peuvent avoir des effets hémodynamiques indésirables graves, rapportés principalement lors d'une ventilation en pression positive continue (PPC ou CPAP en anglais) abrupte. L'augmentation et la diminution par étapes de la pression expiratoire positive (PEP) peuvent être utilisées. Nous avons comparé les effets hémodynamiques de ces deux manœuvres. MéTHODE: Nous avons recruté des patient·es devant bénéficier d'une chirurgie à risque intermédiaire à élevé avec monitorage continu de la tension artérielle et du volume d'éjection (Doppler œsophagien) dans le cadre d'une étude prospective, monocentrique, randomisée et à double insu. Après induction de l'anesthésie, nous nous sommes assurés de l'indépendance de précharge du volume d'éjection avant qu'une MRA ne soit effectuée au hasard : 30 cm H2O PPC pendant 30 secondes (groupe PPC) ou augmentation progressive de la PEP de 8 à 20 cm H2O avec pression inspiratoire de 10 cm H2O, suivie d'une diminution progressive de la PEP de 20 à 8 cm H2O (groupe STEP). Le critère d'évaluation principal était la variation relative du volume d'éjection. RéSULTATS: Trente-cinq personnes ont été incluses dans les groupes PPC et STEP. La variation relative moyenne (écart type) du volume d'éjection était de −57 (24) % dans le groupe PPC et de −32 (24) % dans le groupe STEP (différence, −25; intervalle de confiance à 95 %, −37 à −14; P < 0,001). Les changements dans la tension artérielle systolique, moyenne et diastolique au fil du temps n'étaient pas différents entre les groupes. Les MRA ont été arrêtées en raison d'une tension artérielle systolique < 70 mm Hg chez quatre patient·es du groupe PPC et chez une personne du groupe STEP. CONCLUSION: Les manœuvres de recrutement alvéolaire par augmentation et diminution par étapes de la PEP ont une meilleure tolérance hémodynamique que la PPC transitoire. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04802421); soumis pour la première fois le 15 mars 2021.

The Effect of Recruitment Maneuver on Static Lung Compliance in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Single-Centre Prospective Clinical Intervention Study.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine whether the use of an alveolar recruitment maneuver (RM) leads to a significant increase in static lung compliance (Cstat) and an improvement in gas exchange in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Material and Methods: A clinical prospective intervention study was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups according to their body mass index (BMI): normal-weight (group I) and pre-obese and obese grade I (group II). Lung mechanics were monitored (Cstat, dynamic compliance-Cdin, peak pressure-Ppeak, plateau pressure-Pplat, driving pressure-DP) alongside gas exchange, and hemodynamic changes (heart rate-HR, mean arterial pressure-MAP) at six time points: T1 (induction of anesthesia), T2 (formation of pneumoperitoneum), T3 (RM with a PEEP of 5 cm H2O), T4 (RM with a PEEP of 7 cm H2O), T5 (desufflation), and T6 (RM at the end). The RM was performed by increasing the peak pressure by +5 cm of H2O at an equal inspiration-to-expiration ratio (I/E = 1:1) and applying a PEEP of 5 and 7 cm of H2O. Results: Out of 96 patients, 33 belonged to group I and 63 to group II. An increase in Cstat values occurred after all three RMs. At each time point, the Cstat value was measured higher in group I than in group II. A higher increase in Cstat was observed in group II after the second and third RM. Cstat values were higher at the end of the surgical procedure compared to values after the induction of anesthesia. The RM led to a significant increase in PaO2 in both groups without changes in HR or MAP. Conclusions: During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the application of RM leads to a significant increase in Cstat and an improvement in gas exchange. The prevention of atelectasis during anesthesia should be initiated immediately after the induction of anesthesia, using protective mechanical ventilation and RM.

Diagnostic accuracy of the peripheral venous pressure variation induced by an alveolar recruitment maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness during high-risk abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing high-risk surgery, it is recommended to titrate fluid administration using stroke volume or a dynamic variable of fluid responsiveness (FR). However, this strategy usually requires the use of a hemodynamic monitor and/or an arterial catheter. Recently, it has been shown that variations of central venous pressure (ΔCVP) during an alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM) can predict FR and that there is a correlation between CVP and peripheral venous pressure (PVP). This prospective study tested the hypothesis that variations of PVP (ΔPVP) induced by an ARM could predict FR. METHODS: We studied 60 consecutive patients scheduled for high-risk abdominal surgery, excluding those with preoperative cardiac arrhythmias or right ventricular dysfunction. All patients had a peripheral venous catheter, a central venous catheter and a radial arterial catheter linked to a pulse contour monitoring device. PVP was always measured via an 18-gauge catheter inserted at the antecubital fossa. Then an ARM consisting of a standardized gas insufflation to reach a plateau of 30 cmH2O for 30 s was performed before skin incision. Invasive mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse pressure, heart rate, CVP, PVP, pulse pressure variation (PPV), and stroke volume index (SVI) were recorded before ARM (T1), at the end of ARM (T2), before volume expansion (T3), and one minute after volume expansion (T4). Receiver-operating curves (ROC) analysis with the corresponding grey zone approach were performed to assess the ability of ∆PVP (index test) to predict FR, defined as an ≥ 10% increase in SVI following the administration of a 4 ml/kg balanced crystalloid solution over 5 min. RESULTS: ∆PVP during ARM predicted FR with an area under the ROC curve of 0.76 (95%CI, 0.63 to 0.86). The optimal threshold determined by the Youden Index was a ∆PVP value of 5 mmHg (95%CI, 4 to 6) with a sensitivity of 66% (95%CI, 47 to 81) and a specificity of 82% (95%CI, 63 to 94). The AUC's for predicting FR were not different between ΔPVP, ΔCVP, and PPV. CONCLUSION: During high-risk abdominal surgery, ∆PVP induced by an ARM can moderately predict FR. Nevertheless, other hemodynamic variables did not perform better.

Expiratory high-frequency percussive ventilation: a novel concept for improving gas exchange.

BACKGROUND: Although high-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) improves gas exchange, concerns remain about tissue overdistension caused by the oscillations and consequent lung damage. We compared a modified percussive ventilation modality created by superimposing high-frequency oscillations to the conventional ventilation waveform during expiration only (eHFPV) with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) and standard HFPV. METHODS: Hypoxia and hypercapnia were induced by decreasing the frequency of CMV in New Zealand White rabbits (n = 10). Following steady-state CMV periods, percussive modalities with oscillations randomly introduced to the entire breathing cycle (HFPV) or to the expiratory phase alone (eHFPV) with varying amplitudes (2 or 4 cmH2O) and frequencies were used (5 or 10 Hz). The arterial partial pressures of oxygen (PaO2) and carbon dioxide (PaCO2) were determined. Volumetric capnography was used to evaluate the ventilation dead space fraction, phase 2 slope, and minute elimination of CO2. Respiratory mechanics were characterized by forced oscillations. RESULTS: The use of eHFPV with 5 Hz superimposed oscillation frequency and an amplitude of 4 cmH2O enhanced gas exchange similar to those observed after HFPV. These improvements in PaO2 (47.3 ± 5.5 vs. 58.6 ± 7.2 mmHg) and PaCO2 (54.7 ± 2.3 vs. 50.1 ± 2.9 mmHg) were associated with lower ventilation dead space and capnogram phase 2 slope, as well as enhanced minute CO2 elimination without altering respiratory mechanics. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrated improved gas exchange using eHFPV as a novel mechanical ventilation modality that combines the benefits of conventional and small-amplitude high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, owing to improved longitudinal gas transport rather than increased lung surface area available for gas exchange.

The efficacy of different alveolar recruitment maneuvers in holmium laser lithotripsy surgery under general anesthesia using a laryngeal mask.

BACKGROUND: Alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARMs) is an important part of lung-protective ventilation strategies (LPVSs), but the optimal duration and interval Remain unclear. METHODS: Patients:252 patients who underwent holmium laser lithotripsy surgery and meet inclusion criteria were included and randomized into three groups based on the duration and frequency of ARMs (Regular, one 30 s ARM (RARMs); Improved and intermittent, three 10s ARMs (IARMs); and Control (C), no ARMs). INTERVENTIONS: Groups R and I received ARMs at 20 cmH2O pressures every 30 min. All patients received the same anesthesia and mechanical ventilation. MEASUREMENTS: Outcomes included heart rate and mean arterial pressure changes during ARMs and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) within the first 7 postoperative days. MAIN RESULTS: Incidences of PPCs in groups R(7.1%) and I (5.0%)were slightly lower than those in group C (8.9%).This indicated the potential to reduce lung injury. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure fluctuations during ARMs were significantly higher in groups R and I than in group C (P < 0.01). The rate of blood pressure decrease was significantly higher in group R than in group I (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: IARMs can reduce cycle fluctuations than RARMs in patients Undergoing holmium laser lithotripsy surgery with laryngeal mask general anesthesia. Low tidal volume ventilation and low PEEP combined with ARM did not significantly reduce the incidence of PPCs in healthy lung patients, but tended to reduce lung injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. ( ChiCTR2000030815 ,15/03/2020). This study was approved by the ethics committee of Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital with approval number(2020-005(Study)-1).

Lung aeration and volumes following alveolar recruitment maneuvers with three airway pressures in healthy anesthetized and mechanically ventilated Beagle dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of three recruitment airway pressures (RPaw) on lung aeration and volumes in mechanically ventilated dogs during propofol anesthesia. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, crossover randomized experimental study. ANIMALS: A total of eight healthy anesthetized experimental Beagle dogs in dorsal recumbency. METHODS: Dogs were mechanically ventilated with a tidal volume of 15 mL kg-1 and zero positive end-expiratory pressure and 100% oxygen. Three maneuvers consisting of a 30 second inspiration at RPaws of 15 (RPaw15), 25 (RPaw25) and 35 (RPaw35) cmH2O were performed randomly, 15 minutes apart. Changes in lung aeration and lung deformation were compared with end-expiratory baseline (before the application of each RPaw) and between-RPaws using computed tomography scans and calculations of global lung strain. Between-group comparisons were performed with one-way anova for repeated measures followed by Tukey test for multiple comparisons. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The amount of nonaeration was minimal (<1%) at baseline and not different with the application of the RPaws. The amount of hypoaeration and normoaeration during baseline decreased with all RPaws (p < 0.001). There was no difference between RPaws regarding hypoaeration (all p > 0.999), whereas normoaeration was higher at RPaw15 than RPaw25 and RPaw35 (p < 0.009). Compared with baseline, the fraction of hyperaerated alveoli increased with each RPaw (p < 0.001) and was lower during RPaw15 than RPaw25 and RPaw35 (both p ≤ 0.007). Global lung strain was lower during RPaw15 than at higher RPaw (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A RPaw of 15 cmH2O for 30 seconds was the recommended RPaw because it was as effective at reversing hypoaeration as RPaws of 25 and 35 cmH2O but with less hyperaeration and potential for overdistension of the lungs in this particular population of dogs with negligible atelectasis.

Comparison of single-breath continuous positive airway pressure manoeuvre with inhaled salbutamol to improve oxygenation in horses anaesthetized for laparotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of single-breath continuous positive airway pressure manoeuvre (CPAP-M) with inhaled salbutamol, and a combination of both. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, clinical study. ANIMALS: A total of 62 client-owned horses (American Society of Anesthesiologists status III-V) anaesthetized for laparotomy. METHODS: Horses were premedicated with intravenous (IV) xylazine (0.4-0.6 mg kg-1), anaesthesia was induced with midazolam (0.06 mg kg-1 IV) and ketamine (2.2 mg kg-1 IV) and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen using volume-controlled ventilation without positive end-expiratory pressure. If PaO2 was < 100 mmHg (13.3 kPa), either a CPAP-M (50 cmH2O for 45 seconds) or salbutamol (0.002 mg kg-1) was administered. The intervention was considered successful if PaO2 reached 100 mmHg (13.3 kPa). If PaO2 remained < 100 mmHg (13.3 kPa), treatments were switched. PaO2/FiO2 ratio and estimated shunt fraction (F-shunt) were derived from data obtained from arterial blood gas measurements. Dynamic compliance (Cdyn) was calculated from variables recorded at the moment of arterial blood analysis. Fisher's exact tests compared success rates between treatments, and linear models were performed to test whether the treatment modified the values of the measurements; p < 0.05. RESULTS: Salbutamol was the first intervention in 28 horses and was effective in 22 horses. CPAP-M was the first intervention in 34 horses and was effective in 26 horses. CPAP-M after salbutamol was performed in six horses, with four responders, and salbutamol after CPAP-M was administered to eight horses, with one responder. Salbutamol, but not CPAP-M, significantly decreased F-shunt. Both salbutamol and CPAP-M significantly increased Cdyn. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Salbutamol and CPAP-M were comparably effective in improving oxygenation and Cdyn in anaesthetized horses with PaO2 < 100 mmHg (13.3 kPa). Whether combining both treatments might be beneficial needs to be confirmed on a larger number of horses.

Effects of individualized positive end-expiratory pressure combined with recruitment maneuver on intraoperative ventilation during abdominal surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Low tidal volume ventilation strategy may lead to atelectasis without proper positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuver (RM) settings. RM followed by individualized PEEP was a new method to optimize the intraoperative pulmonary function. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to compare the effects of individualized PEEP + RM on intraoperative pulmonary function and hemodynamic with other PEEP and RM settings. The primary outcomes were intraoperative oxygenation index and dynamic compliance, while the secondary outcomes were intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure. In total, we identified 15 clinical trials containing 36 randomized groups with 3634 participants. Ventilation strategies were divided into eight groups by four PEEP (L: low, M: moderate, H: high, and I: individualized) and two RM (yes or no) settings. The main results showed that IPEEP + RM group was superior to all other groups regarding to both oxygenation index and dynamic compliance. LPEEP group was inferior to LPEEP + RM, MPEEP, MPEEP + RM, and IPEEP + RM in terms of oxygenation index and LPEEP + RM, MPEEP, MPEEP + RM, HPEEP + RM, IPEEP, and IPEEP + RM in terms of dynamic compliance. All comparisons were similar for secondary outcomes. Our analysis suggested that individualized PEEP and RM may be the optimal low tidal volume ventilation strategy at present, while low PEEP without RM is not suggested.

Definition and clinical evaluation of a recruiting airway pressure based on the specific lung elastance in anesthetized dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the specific lung elastance (SEL) in anesthetized dogs and to evaluate the efficacy of a SEL-based recruiting airway pressure (RPaw) at improving global and regional lung aeration. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective and prospective clinical study. ANIMALS: A total of 28 adult dogs were included in the retrospective study and six adult dogs in the prospective study. METHODS: Retrospective study: SEL and SEL-based RPaw were determined using previously published data. In mechanically ventilated dogs undergoing thoracic computed tomography (CT), SEL was calculated as ΔPL/(VT/EELV), where ΔPL is the driving transpulmonary pressure, VT is the tidal volume and EELV is the end-expiratory lung volume. The ratio of lung to respiratory system elastance (EL/Ers) was determined. SEL and EL/Ers were used to calculate the SEL-based RPaw. Prospective study: dogs underwent thoracic CT at end-expiration and at end-inspiration using the SEL-based RPaw, and global and regional aeration was determined. For analysis of regional aeration, lungs were divided into cranial, intermediate and caudal regions. Regional compliance was also calculated. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The SEL and EL/Ers were 12.7 ± 3.1 cmH2O and 0.54 ± 0.07, respectively. The SEL-based RPaw was 29.1 ± 7.6 cmH2O. In the prospective study, the RPaw was 28.2 ± 1.3 cmH2O. During RPaw, hyperinflation increased (p = 0.0003) whereas poorly aerated (p < 0.0001) and nonaerated (p = 0.01) tissue decreased. Normally aerated tissue did not change (p = 0.265). Regional compliance was higher in the intermediate (p = 0.0003) and caudal (p = 0.034) regions compared with the cranial region. Aeration did not differ between regions (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An SEL-based RPaw reduces poorly and nonaerated lung tissue in anesthetized dogs. In nonsurgical anesthetized dogs, an RPaw near 30 cmH2O is effective at improving lung aeration.

Severe, transient pulmonary ventilation-perfusion mismatch in the lung after porcine high velocity projectile behind armor blunt trauma.

BACKGROUND: Behind armor blunt trauma (BABT) is a non-penetrating injury caused by the rapid deformation of body armor, by a projectile, which may in extreme circumstances cause death. Although there is not a high incidence of high energy BABT, the understanding of the mechanisms is still low, in relation to what is needed for safety threshold levels. BABT is also useful as a model for blunt thoracic trauma, with a compressive speed between traffic accidents and blast caused by explosives. High velocity projectile BABT causes severe hypoxia. The mechanisms are not fully known. We investigated the acute pulmonary consequences in the individual lungs, and the effects of alveolar recruitment. METHODS: 12 swine (mean weight 62.5 kg) were randomized to groups BABT by 7.62 × 51 mm NATO-type bullets (mean velocity 803 m/s) to a military grade ceramic plate armor (n = 7) or control (n = 5). Modified double lumen tracheal tubes provided respiratory dynamics in the lungs separately/intermittently for two hours, with alveolar recruitment after one hour. RESULTS: Venous admixture increased 5 min after BABT (p < .05) and correlated with increased cardiac output. Static compliance decreased 5 minutes after BABT (p < .05) and further by recruitment (p < .005). Physiological dead space decreased 5 minutes after BABT (p < .01) and further by recruitment (p < .01), while not in the contralateral lung. V'A/Q' decreased 5 minutes after BABT (p < .05), also shown in phase III volumetric capnography (p < .05). Most effects regressed after one hour. CONCLUSIONS: High velocity projectile BABT caused hypoxia by a severe and transient decrease in V'A/Q' to <1 and increased venous admixture in the exposed lung. Alveolar recruitment was hemodynamically and respiratory tolerable and increased V'A/Q'. Body armor development should aim at ameliorating severe pulmonary consequences from high projectile velocities which also needs to include further understanding of how primary and secondary effects are distributed between the lungs.

Respiratory physiology of COVID-19-induced respiratory failure compared to ARDS of other etiologies.

BACKGROUND: Whether respiratory physiology of COVID-19-induced respiratory failure is different from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) of other etiologies is unclear. We conducted a single-center study to describe respiratory mechanics and response to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in COVID-19 ARDS and to compare COVID-19 patients to matched-control subjects with ARDS from other causes. METHODS: Thirty consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to an intensive care unit in Rome, Italy, and fulfilling moderate-to-severe ARDS criteria were enrolled within 24 h from endotracheal intubation. Gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and ventilatory ratio were measured at PEEP of 15 and 5 cmH2O. A single-breath derecruitment maneuver was performed to assess recruitability. After 1:1 matching based on PaO2/FiO2, FiO2, PEEP, and tidal volume, COVID-19 patients were compared to subjects affected by ARDS of other etiologies who underwent the same procedures in a previous study. RESULTS: Thirty COVID-19 patients were successfully matched with 30 ARDS from other etiologies. At low PEEP, median [25th-75th percentiles] PaO2/FiO2 in the two groups was 119 mmHg [101-142] and 116 mmHg [87-154]. Average compliance (41 ml/cmH2O [32-52] vs. 36 ml/cmH2O [27-42], p = 0.045) and ventilatory ratio (2.1 [1.7-2.3] vs. 1.6 [1.4-2.1], p = 0.032) were slightly higher in COVID-19 patients. Inter-individual variability (ratio of standard deviation to mean) of compliance was 36% in COVID-19 patients and 31% in other ARDS. In COVID-19 patients, PaO2/FiO2 was linearly correlated with respiratory system compliance (r = 0.52 p = 0.003). High PEEP improved PaO2/FiO2 in both cohorts, but more remarkably in COVID-19 patients (p = 0.005). Recruitability was not different between cohorts (p = 0.39) and was highly inter-individually variable (72% in COVID-19 patients and 64% in ARDS from other causes). In COVID-19 patients, recruitability was independent from oxygenation and respiratory mechanics changes due to PEEP. CONCLUSIONS: Early after establishment of mechanical ventilation, COVID-19 patients follow ARDS physiology, with compliance reduction related to the degree of hypoxemia, and inter-individually variable respiratory mechanics and recruitability. Physiological differences between ARDS from COVID-19 and other causes appear small.

Lung ultrasound score to determine the effect of fraction inspired oxygen during alveolar recruitment on absorption atelectasis in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although the intraoperative alveolar recruitment maneuver (RM) efficiently treats atelectasis, the effect of FIO2 on atelectasis during RM is uncertain. We hypothesized that a high FIO2 (1.0) during RM would lead to a higher degree of postoperative atelectasis without benefiting oxygenation when compared to low FIO2 (0.4). METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position were allocated to low- (FIO2 0.4, n = 44) and high-FIO2 (FIO2 1.0, n = 46) groups. RM was performed 1-min post tracheal intubation and post changes in supine and Trendelenburg positions during surgery. We set the intraoperative FIO2 at 0.4 for both groups and calculated the modified lung ultrasound score (LUSS) to assess lung aeration after anesthesia induction and at surgery completion. The primary outcome was modified LUSS at the end of the surgery. The secondary outcomes were the intra- and postoperative PaO2 to FIO2 ratio and postoperative pulmonary complications. RESULTS: The modified LUSS before capnoperitoneum and RM (P = 0.747) were similar in both groups. However, the postoperative modified LUSS was significantly lower in the low FIO2 group (median difference 5.0, 95% CI 3.0-7.0, P < 0.001). Postoperatively, substantial atelectasis was more common in the high-FIO2 group (relative risk 1.77, 95% CI 1.27-2.47, P < 0.001). Intra- and postoperative PaO2 to FIO2 were similar with no postoperative pulmonary complications. Atelectasis occurred more frequently when RM was performed with high than with low FIO2; oxygenation was not benefitted by a high-FIO2. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position, absorption atelectasis occurred more frequently with high rather than low FIO2. No oxygenation benefit was observed in the high-FIO2 group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03943433 . Registered 7 May 2019.

Evaluation of alveolar recruitment maneuver on respiratory resistance during general anesthesia: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Alveolar recruitment maneuvers enable easily reopening nonaerated lung regions via a transient elevation in transpulmonary pressure. To evaluate the effect of these maneuvers on respiratory resistance, we used an oscillatory technique during mechanical ventilation. This study was conducted to assess the effect of the alveolar recruitment maneuvers on respiratory resistance under routine anesthesia. We hypothesized that respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (R5) after the maneuver would be decreased after the lung aeration. METHODS: After receiving the ethics committee's approval, we enrolled 33 patients who were classified with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of 1, 2 or 3 and were undergoing general anesthesia for transurethral resection of a bladder tumor within a 12-month period from 2017 to 2018. The recruitment maneuver was performed 30 min after endotracheal intubation. The maneuver consisted of sustained manual inflation of the anesthesia reservoir bag to a peak inspiratory pressure of 40 cmH2O for 15 s, including 5 s of gradually increasing the peak inspiratory pressure. Respiratory resistance was measured using the forced oscillation technique before and after the maneuver, and the mean R5 was calculated during the expiratory phase. The respiratory resistance and ventilator parameter results were analyzed using paired Student's t-tests, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We analyzed 31 patients (25 men and 6 women). R5 was 7.3 ± 1.6 cmH2O/L/sec before the recruitment maneuver during mechanical ventilation and was significantly decreased to 6.4 ± 1.7 cmH2O/L/sec after the maneuver. Peak inspiratory pressure and plateau pressure were significantly decreased, and pulmonary compliance was increased, although the values were not clinically relevant. CONCLUSION: The recruitment maneuver decreased respiratory resistance and increased lung compliance during mechanical ventilation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Name of registry: Japan Medical Association Center for Clinical Trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: reference JMA-IIA00136. Date of registration: 2 September 2013. URL of trial registry record: https://dbcentre3.jmacct.med.or.jp/JMACTR/App/JMACTRE02_04/JMACTRE02_04.aspx?kbn=3&seqno=3582.

Comparison of the efficacy of two ventilatory strategies in improving arterial oxygen tension and content in anaesthetized sheep.

OBJECTIVE: To compare F-shunt and oxygen content indices in sheep ventilated with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O alone or preceded by a stepwise alveolar recruitment manoeuvre (ARM). STUDY DESIGN: Randomized crossover design. ANIMALS: A total of six nonpregnant Brogna ewes weighing 34-47 kg, undergoing thoracolumbar magnetic resonance scan. METHODS: In medetomidine-sedated sheep, anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane 1.1% ± 0.1% and an inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) of 0.4. Animals were placed in left lateral recumbency and, after 10 minutes of spontaneous breathing, mechanically ventilated with 5 cmH2O of PEEP with (group ARM) or without (group PEEP) a stepwise recruitment manoeuvre. Maintaining a fixed driving pressure of 15 cmH2O, PEEP was increased from 0 to 20 cmH2O every 3 minutes in 5 cmH2O increments. In each sheep, arterial blood samples were collected to measure arterial gases and to calculate F-shunt, PaO2/alveolar oxygen partial pressure (PAO2) and PaO2/FIO2 during spontaneous breathing before mechanical ventilation (T0), after 20 minutes of ventilation (T20) and during spontaneous breathing at extubation (Text). RESULTS: Both ventilatory strategies improved the arterial oxygen content although four animals in group PEEP showed oxygen content compatible with hypoxia compared with group ARM. F-shunt values were not statistically different at any time point in sheep that underwent only PEEP ventilation while they decreased at T20 and Text compared with T0 in group ARM. At extubation F-shunt was statistically lower in sheep that underwent an ARM. Mechanical ventilation improved PaO2/PAO2 and PaO2/FIO2 but they did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: and clinical relevance The stepwise ARM evaluated in this study improved oxygenation indices and decreased F-shunt. This effect was maintained at extubation compared with sheep that were ventilated with only PEEP 5 cmH2O.

Effects of alveolar recruitment maneuver on end-expiratory lung volume during one-lung ventilation.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM) during one-lung ventilation (OLV) on end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) of the dependent lung. METHODS: Patients who were planned to undergo lung resection surgery for lung tumors and needed OLV for at least 1 h were included in the study. After turning the patients into the lateral position under total intravenous anesthesia, OLV was commenced using a double-lumen endobronchial tube. EELV was measured using the nitrogen washout technique at 20 min after OLV started (baseline) and 15, 30, 45, 60 min after ARM was performed on the dependent lung. RESULTS: Among 42 patients who completed the study, EELV increased at 15 min after ARM by 20% or greater compared with baseline in 21 patients (responders). Responders were significantly shorter in height (158 vs. 165 cm, p = 0.01) and had smaller preoperative functional residual capacity (2.99L vs. 3.65L, p = 0.02) than non-responders. Before ARM, responders had significantly higher driving pressure (14.2 vs. 12.4 cmH2O, p = 0.01) and lower respiratory system compliance (23.6 vs. 31.4 ml/cmH2O, p = 0.0002) than non-responders. Driving pressure temporarily dropped after ARM in responders, while no significant change was observed in non-responders. Fourteen out of 21 responders kept EELV 20% or more increased EELV than baseline at 60 min after ARM. CONCLUSION: EELV of the dependent lung was increased by 20% or greater in half of the patients responding to ARM. The increased volume of the dependent lung caused by ARM was maintained for 60 min in two-thirds of the responders.

Changes in stroke volume during an alveolar recruitment maneuvers through a stepwise increase in positive end expiratory pressure and transient continuous positive airway pressure in anesthetized patients. A prospective observational pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recruitment maneuvers may be used during anesthesia as part of perioperative protective ventilation strategy. However, the hemodynamic effect of recruitment maneuvers remain poorly documented in this setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational study performed in operating theatre including patients scheduled for major vascular surgery. Patients were monitored with invasive arterial pressure and esophageal doppler. After induction of general anesthesia, before surgery began, preload optimization based on stroke volume (SV) variation following fluid challenge was performed. Then, an alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM) through stepwise increase in positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was performed. Hemodynamic data were noted before, during, and after the alveolar recruitment maneuver. RESULTS: ARM through stepwise increase in PEEP and CPAP were applied in 22 and 14 preload independent patients, respectively. Relative changes in SV during ARMs were significantly greater in the ARMCPAP group (-39 ± 20%) as compared to the ARMPEEP group (-15 ± 22%; P = 0.002). The difference (95% CI) in relative decrease in SV between ARMCPAP and ARMPEEP groups was -24% (-38 to -9; P = 0.001). Changes in arterial pressure, cardiac index, pulse pressure variation, peak velocity, and corrected flow time measures were not different between groups. CONCLUSION: During anesthesia, in preload independent patients, ARMs through CPAP resulted in a significantly greater decrease in SV than stepwise increase in PEEP. During anesthesia, ARM should be used cautiously.

High frequency percussive ventilation increases alveolar recruitment in early acute respiratory distress syndrome: an experimental, physiological and CT scan study.

BACKGROUND: High frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) combines diffusive (high frequency mini-bursts) and convective ventilation patterns. Benefits include enhanced oxygenation and hemodynamics, and alveolar recruitment, while providing hypothetic lung-protective ventilation. No study has investigated HFPV-induced changes in lung aeration in patients with early acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: Eight patients with early non-focal ARDS were enrolled and five swine with early non-focal ARDS were studied in prospective computed tomography (CT) scan and animal studies, in a university-hospital tertiary ICU and an animal laboratory. Patients were optimized under conventional "open-lung" ventilation. Lung CT was performed using an end-expiratory hold (Conv) to assess lung morphology. HFPV was applied for 1 hour to all patients before new CT scans were performed with end-expiratory (HFPV EE) and end-inspiratory (HFPV EI) holds. Lung volumes were determined after software analysis. At specified time points, blood gases and hemodynamic data were collected. Recruitment was defined as a change in non-aerated lung volumes between Conv, HFPV EE and HFPV EI. The main objective was to verify whether HFPV increases alveolar recruitment without lung hyperinflation. Correlation between pleural, upper airways and HFPV-derived pressures was assessed in an ARDS swine-based model. RESULTS: One-hour HFPV significantly improved oxygenation and hemodynamics. Lung recruitment significantly rose by 12.0% (8.5-18.0%), P = 0.05 (Conv-HFPV EE) and 12.5% (9.3-16.8%), P = 0.003 (Conv-HFPV EI). Hyperinflation tended to increase by 2.0% (0.5-2.5%), P = 0.89 (Conv-HFPV EE) and 3.0% (2.5-4.0%), P = 0.27 (Conv-HFPV EI). HFPV hyperinflation correlated with hyperinflated and normally-aerated lung volumes at baseline: r = 0.79, P = 0.05 and r = 0.79, P = 0.05, respectively (Conv-HFPV EE); and only hyperinflated lung volumes at baseline: r = 0.88, P = 0.01 (Conv-HFPV EI). HFPV CT-determined tidal volumes reached 5.7 (1.1-8.1) mL.kg-1 of ideal body weight (IBW). Correlations between pleural and HFPV-monitored pressures were acceptable and end-inspiratory pleural pressures remained below 25cmH20. CONCLUSIONS: HFPV improves alveolar recruitment, gas exchanges and hemodynamics of patients with early non-focal ARDS without relevant hyperinflation. HFPV-derived pressures correlate with corresponding pleural or upper airways pressures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02510105 . Registered on 1 June 2015. The trial was retrospectively registered.

An alveolar recruitment maneuver followed by positive end-expiratory pressure improves lung function in healthy dogs undergoing laparoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of an alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM) followed by 5 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in dogs undergoing laparoscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical study. ANIMALS: A group of 20 dogs undergoing laparoscopic ovariectomy. METHODS: Dogs were sedated with acepromazine and methadone intramuscularly; anesthesia was induced with propofol intravenously and maintained with inhaled isoflurane. The following baseline ventilatory setting (BVS) was administered: tidal volume of 12 mL kg-1, inspiratory to expiratory ratio of 1:2, inspiratory pause 25% of inspiratory time, no PEEP and a respiratory rate to maintain end-tidal carbon dioxide tension between 5.3 and 7.3 kPa. Then, 10 minutes after the pneumoperitoneum, 10 dogs (RM) underwent a sustained inflation ARM followed by BVS plus 5 cmH2O PEEP, while 10 dogs (NO-RM) were left with BVS throughout the procedure. Gas exchange and respiratory system mechanics were evaluated before the pneumoperitoneum (PPpre), before ARM (PP10), 30 minutes later (PP30) and 20 minutes after pneumoperitoneum discontinuation (PPpost20). Data were analyzed using anova (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The Fshunt at PP30 and PPpost20 was lower (p < 0.001) in the RM (2.3 ± 2.2 and 4.7 ± 3.7%) than in the NO-RM (5.2 ± 2.1 and 11.1 ± 5.2%), and PaO2 at PP30 and PPpost20 was higher (p < 0.001) in the RM (67.3 ± 4.2 and 60.1 ± 9.4 kPa) than in the NO-RM (50.2 ± 7.4 and 45.5 ± 11.1 kPa). Static compliance of the respiratory system at PP30 and PPpost20 was greater (p < 0.001) in the RM (2.4 ± 0.2 and 2.1 ± 0.4 mL cmH2O-1 kg-1) than in the NO-RM (0.9 ± 0.4 and 1.2 ± 0.2 mL cmH2O-1 kg-1). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In dogs undergoing laparoscopy, ARM followed by 5 cmH2O PEEP improves gas exchange and respiratory system mechanics.

Effects of pneumoperitoneum and of an alveolar recruitment maneuver followed by positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiopulmonary function in sheep anesthetized with isoflurane-fentanyl.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of pneumoperitoneum alone or combined with an alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM) followed by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on cardiopulmonary function in sheep. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, crossover study. ANIMALS: A total of nine adult sheep (36-52 kg). METHODS: Sheep were administered three treatments (≥10-day intervals) during isoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia and volume-controlled ventilation (tidal volume: 12 mL kg-1) with oxygen: CONTROL (no intervention); PNEUMO (120 minutes of CO2 pneumoperitoneum); PNEUMOARM/PEEP (PNEUMO protocol with an ARM instituted after 60 minutes of pneumoperitoneum). The ARM (5 cmH2O increases in PEEP of 1 minute duration until 20 cmH2O of PEEP) was followed by 10 cmH2O of PEEP until the end of anesthesia. Cardiopulmonary data were recorded until 30 minutes after abdominal deflation. RESULTS: PaO2 was decreased from 435-462 mmHg (58.0-61.6 kPa) (range of mean values in CONTROL) to 377-397 mmHg (50.3-52.9 kPa) in PNEUMO (p < 0.05). Quasistatic compliance (Cqst, mL cmH2O-1 kg-1) was decreased from 0.85-0.92 in CONTROL to 0.52-0.58 in PNEUMO. PaO2 increased from 383-385 mmHg (51.1-51.3 kPa) in PNEUMO to 429-444 mmHg (57.2-59.2 kPa) in PNEUMOARM/PEEP (p < 0.05) and Cqst increased from 0.52-0.53 in PNEUMO to 0.70-0.74 in PNEUMOARM/PEEP. Abdominal deflation in PNEUMO did not restore PaO2 and Cqst to control values. Cardiac index (L minute-1 m2) decreased from 4.80-4.70 in CONTROL to 3.45-3.74 in PNEUMO and 3.63-3.76 in PNEUMOARM/PEEP. Compared with controls, ARM/PEEP with pneumoperitoneum decreased mean arterial pressure from 81 to 68 mmHg and increased mean pulmonary artery pressure from 10 to 16 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Abdominal deflation did not reverse the pulmonary function impairment associated with pneumoperitoneum. The ARM/PEEP improved respiratory compliance and reversed the oxygenation impairment induced by pneumoperitoneum with acceptable hemodynamic changes in healthy sheep.

Effects of intraoperative protective lung ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with laparoscopic surgery: prospective, randomized and controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory functions are usually impaired during pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. This randomized, controlled and single-blinded study was performed to evaluate whether intraoperative protective lung ventilation influences postoperative pulmonary complications after laparoscopic hepatobiliary surgery. METHODS: Sixty-two patients were randomized to receive either conventional ventilation with alveolar recruitment maneuver (tidal volume of 10 ml/kg with inspiratory pressure of 40 cmH2O for 30 s after the end of pneumoperitoneum, group R), or protective lung ventilation (low tidal volume of 6 ml/kg with positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] of 5 cmH2O, group P). Induction and maintenance of anesthesia were done with balanced anesthesia. Respiratory complications such as atelectasis, pneumonia or desaturation were observed postoperatively. The length of hospital stay, arterial blood gas analysis, peak inspiratory pressure and hemodynamic variables were also recorded. Results are presented as mean ± SD or number of patients (%). RESULTS: Postoperative pulmonary complications (P = 0.023) and desaturation below 90 % (P = 0.016) occurred less frequently in group P than in group R. Eight patients of group R and 3 patients of group P showed atelectasis. Pneumonia was diagnosed in 1 patient of group R. No differences were observed in the length of hospital stay, arterial blood gas analysis (pH, PaO2, PaCO2 and PAO2) and hemodynamic variables except PAO2, AaDO2 and peak inspiratory pressure between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Protective lung ventilation (low tidal volume with PEEP) during pneumoperitoneum was associated with less incidences of pulmonary complications than conventional ventilation with alveolar recruitment maneuver after laparoscopic hepatobiliary surgery.