[Skills assessment for the practice of fetal ultrasound biometry: Prospective validation of the OSAUS METHOD score]. / Évaluation des compétences pour la pratique de la biométrie échographique fœtale : validation prospective du score OSAUS METHOD.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a customized variant for fetal biometry of the generic OSAUS score (Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills) METHODS: The 5-points OSAUS METHOD grid was elaborated by defining five target skills specific to fetal biometry for each thematic item of the generic score. The level of skills of 43 trainees was prospectively assessed during an ultrasound examination by using this grid. The results of the "novice" level group (experience<10 ultrasounds) were compared to those of the "intermediate" level group (experience≥10 ultrasounds) (I). The reached/non-reached skills ratio within the different items composing the score allowed the identification of priority areas of improvement (II). Previously published distribution and actual distribution of ratings according to the generic pass/fail score were compared (III). RESULTS: Median scores of "novices" (n=29) and "intermediates" (n=14) groups were statistically different, 1.87 (±0.75) and 3.31 (±0.83) (P=1.85-5), respectively and corresponded to the pre-existing experience (I). A lower ratio of reached skill allowed the identification of "documentation of the examination" item as a priority area of improvement for both groups (II). The relevance of the pass/fail score is consolidated, even if an overlap was observed between novices and intermediates groups (III). CONCLUSIONS: The relevancy and feasibility of using OSAUS scoring method for fetal biometry are supported. In addition, the possibility of comparisons with generic OSAUS remains.

[Training in fetal ultrasound biometry: Prospective assesment of Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) efficiency]. / Apprentissage de la biométrie échographique fœtale : évaluation prospective de la performance de l'Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS).

BACKGROUND: Fetal biometry quality directly influences obstetrical care relevance. However, obstetrician proficiencies are heterogeneous in particular during initial training. OBJECTIVES: To assess the predictive value of OSAUS scale to identify operators with enough command to perform a valid estimation of fetal weight (EFW) (I). This study also assesses OSAUS intra-operator inter-exams variability (II) and pass/fail score relevancy (III). METHODS: Lecturers in Nancy University Hospital assessed trainees' proficiency for EWF systematically and prospectively through OSAUS scale. The trainee assessment was performed right after the one of the senior operator (reference EFW) on three consecutive patients during standard care ultrasounds. To ensure variability in proficiency within the sample, previous practice was taken into account during enrollment ("novices" and "intermediates" for<20 and 20 past exams, respectively). Correlation between mean OSAUS and validity of EFW (a valid EFW was defined by a difference with the reference EWF<0.8 Z-score) and variability between consecutive assessments were assessed. RESULTS: The study population was constituted of 8 "novice" and 8 "intermediate" trainees. Association between OSAUS and EFW validity was significant (P<0.03) (I). Intra-operator inter-exams variability was majored in the "novice" group (coefficients of variation were 25% vs. 10% in "novice" and "intermediate" group respectively) (II). Within the sample, specificity and positive predictive value of a pass/fail score OSAUS>3.5 to predict EFW validity were 77% and 71%, respectively (III). CONCLUSION: A 3.5 OSAUS pass/fail score could provide a relevant threshold to estimate operator proficiency in assessing fetal biometry in an autonomous and secure way.

Improving students' ability to perform a standardized foetal biometry plane using ultrasound simulators.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess progress made in the ultrasound (US) measurement of femur length (FL) by students after one hour of training on US obstetric simulators. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical residents and midwives registered for the 2016 French national foetal US diploma were invited to a 1-hour US training course with simulators. The time to acquire the FL plane with changing foetal presentation was prospectively measured before and after the training. Every image was recorded, and quality criteria were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty new learners trained in foetal US were evaluated. The time needed to measure the FL was significantly shorter in the post-test versus the pre-test (86s versus 125, P=0.015). The quality criteria were statistically similar before and after training regarding the angle to horizontal (10.0° versus 9.6°, P=0.84) and FL (31.3mm versus 32.0mm, P=0.15). CONCLUSION: The time needed to obtain the FL plane was reduced by 30% after a 1-hour US simulation training session.

[Screening and diagnosis of small for gestational age fetuses]. / Modalités de dépistage et de diagnostic du fœtus petit pour l'âge gestationnel.

OBJECTIVE: Define the mode of screening and diagnosis of fetal small for gestational age (SGA). METHODS: Bibliographic research by consulting Pubmed database and guidelines of the international professional societies. Keywords used: Intra uterine growth retardation or restriction, small for gestational age, curve, chart, fetal biometry, screening, velocity, fundal height measurement. RESULTS: The performance of ultrasound to detect SGA is low. The mode of screening and diagnosis of SGA must be well defined to be consensual. The fundal height measurement keeps its place in the screening from 22SA (grade C). The criteria for measuring ultrasound parameters defined by the comité technique d'échographie are recommended (professional agreement). They allow the calculation of the estimated fetal weight (EFW). That must be transferred to the reference curve adopted (professional agreement). The introduction of audit on techniques for measuring ultrasound parameters should be encouraged (grade B). CONCLUSION: Fetal biometry must be interpreted according to the clinical context and ultrasound including Doppler (grade C). To improve the performance of ultrasound, there is no need to another ultrasound examination in late pregnancy (grade A) except after a clinical suspicion (grade C). The minimum interval between two biometric tests is 3 weeks (grade B). This interval may be lower if the EFW is important in the decision of any fetal extraction (professional consensus).