Partial and complete explantation of aortic endografts in the modern era.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the progressive advancement of devices for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), endografts continue to fail, requiring explant. We present a single-institutional experience of EVAR explants, characterizing modern failure modes, presentation, and outcomes for partial and complete EVAR explantation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of all EVARs explanted at an urban quaternary center from 2001 to 2020, with one infected endograft excluded. Patient and graft characteristics, indications, and perioperative and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Partial versus complete explants were performed per surgeon discretion without a predefined protocol. This process was informed by patient risk factors; asymptomatic, symptomatic, or ruptured aneurysm presentation; and anatomical or intraoperative factors, including endoleak type. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2020, 52 explants met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. More than one-half (57.7%) were explants of EVAR devices placed at outside institutions, designated nonindex explants. Most patients were male (86.5%), the median age was 74 years (interquartile range, 70-78 years). More than one-half (61.5%) were performed in the second decade of the study period. The most commonly explanted grafts were Gore Excluder (n = 9 grafts), Cook Zenith (n = 8), Endologix AFX (n = 7), Medtronic Endurant (n = 5), and Medtronic Talent (n = 5). Most grafts (78.8%) were explanted for neck degeneration or sac expansion. Five were explanted for initial seal failure, five for symptomatic expansion, and seven for rupture. The median implant duration was 4.2 years, although ranging widely (interquartile range, 2.6-5.1 years), but similar between index and nonindex explants (4.2 years vs 4.1 years). Partial explantation was performed in 61.5%, with implant duration slightly lower, 3.2 years versus 4.4 years for complete explants. Partial explantation was more frequent in index explants (68.2% vs 56.7%). The median length of stay was 8 days. The median intensive care unit length of stay was 3 days, without significant differences in nonindex explants (4 days vs 3 days) and partial explants (4 days vs 3 days). Thirty-day mortality occurred in two nonindex explants (one partial and one complete explant). Thirty-day readmission was similar between partial and complete explants (9.7% vs 5.0%), without accounting for nonindex readmissions. Long-term survival was comparable between partial and complete explants in Cox regression (hazard ratio, 2.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-7.56; P = .12). CONCLUSIONS: Explants of EVAR devices have increased over time at our institution. Partial explant was performed in more than one-half of cases, per operating surgeon discretion, demonstrating higher blood loss, more frequent acute kidney injury, and longer intensive care unit stays, however with comparable short-term mortality and long-term survival.

Editor's Choice - Comparison of Outcomes for Major Contemporary Endograft Devices Used for Endovascular Repair of Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of mortality, rupture, and secondary intervention following endovascular repair (EVAR) of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) using contemporary endograft devices from three major manufacturers. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using linked clinical registry (Australasian Vascular Audit) and all payer administrative data. Patients undergoing EVAR for intact AAA between 2010 and 2019 in New South Wales, Australia were identified. Rates of all cause death, secondary rupture, and secondary intervention (subsequent aneurysm repair; other secondary aortic intervention) were compared for patients treated with Cook, Medtronic, and Gore standard devices. Inverse probability of treatment weighted proportional hazards and competing risk regression were used to adjust for patient, clinical, and aneurysm characteristics, using Cook as the referent device. RESULTS: This study identified 2 874 eligible EVAR patients, with a median follow up of 4.1 (maximum 9.5) years. Mortality rates were similar for patients receiving different devices (ranging between 7.0 and 7.3 per 100 person years). There was no statistically significant difference between devices in secondary rupture rates, which ranged between 0.4 and 0.5 per 100 person years. Patients receiving Medtronic and Gore devices tended to have higher crude rates of subsequent aneurysm repair (1.5 per 100 person years) than patients receiving Cook devices (0.8 per 100 person years). This finding remained in the adjusted analysis, but was only statistically significant for Medtronic devices (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.02 - 2.47; HR 1.73, 95% CI 0.94 - 3.18, respectively). CONCLUSION: Major endograft devices have similar overall long term safety profiles. However, there may be differences in rates of secondary intervention for some devices. This may reflect endograft durability, or patient selection for different devices based on aneurysm anatomy. Continuous comparative assessments are needed to guide evidence for treatment decisions across the range of available devices.

Pre-clinical In Vitro Models of Vascular Graft Coating in the Prevention of Vascular Graft Infection: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular graft infection (VGI) is a feared complication. Prevention is of the utmost importance and vascular graft coatings (VGCs) could offer a potential to do this, with in vitro research a first crucial step. The aim of this study was to summarise key features of in vitro models investigating coating strategies to prevent VGI in order to provide guidance for the setup of future translational research. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. For each database, a specific search strategy was developed. Quality was assessed with the Toxicological data Reliability Assessment Tool (ToxRTool). In vitro models using a VGC and inoculation of the graft with a pathogen were included. The type of graft, coating, and pathogen were summarised. The outcome assessment in each study was evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 4 667 studies were identified, of which 45 papers met the inclusion criteria. The majority used polyester grafts (68.2%). Thirty-one studies (68.9%) included antibiotics, and nine studies (20%) used a commercial silver graft in their protocol. New antibacterial strategies (e.g., proteolytic enzymes) were investigated. A variety of testing methods was found and focused mainly on bacterial adherence, coating adherence and dilution, biofilm formation, and cytotoxicity. Ninety-three per cent of the studies (n = 41) were considered unreliable. CONCLUSION: Polyester is the preferred type of graft to coat on. The majority of coating studies are based on antibiotics; however, new coating strategies (e.g., antibiofilm coating) are coming. Many in vitro setups are available. In vitro studies have great potential, they can limit the use, but cannot replace in vivo studies completely. This paper can be used as a guidance document for future in vitro research.

Pre-clinical in vivo Models of Vascular Graft Coating in the Prevention of Vascular Graft Infection: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular graft infection (VGI) remains an important complication with a high mortality and morbidity rate. Currently, studies focusing on the role of vascular graft coatings in the prevention of VGI are scarce. Therefore, the aims of this study were to survey and summarise key features of pre-clinical in vivo models that have been used to investigate coating strategies to prevent VGI and to set up an ideal model that can be used in future preclinical research. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Web of Science. REVIEW METHODS: For each database, a specific search strategy was developed. Quality was assessed with the Toxicological data Reliability Assessment Tool (ToxRTool). The type of animal model, graft, coating, and pathogen were summarised. The outcome assessment in each study was evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 4 667 studies were identified, of which 94 papers focusing on in vivo testing were included. Staphylococcus aureus was the organism most used (n = 65; 67.7%). Most of the graft types were polyester grafts. Rifampicin was the most frequently used antibiotic coating (n = 43, 48.3%). In the outcome assessment, most studies mentioned colony forming unit count (n = 88; 91.7%) and clinical outcome (n = 72; 75%). According to the ToxRTool, 21 (22.3%, n = 21/94) studies were considered to be not reliable. CONCLUSION: Currently published in vivo models are very miscellaneous. More attention should be paid to the methodology of these pre-clinical reports when transferring novel graft coatings into clinical practice. Variables used in pre-clinical reports (bacterial strain, duration of activity coating) do not correspond well to current clinical studies. Based on the results of this review, a proposal for a complete and comprehensive set up for pre-clinical invivo testing of anti-infectious properties of vascular graft coatings was defined.

Risk Factors, Dynamics, and Clinical Consequences of Aortic Neck Dilatation after Standard Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic neck dilatation (AND) occurs after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with self expanding stent grafts (SESs). Whether it continues, ultimately exceeding the endograft diameter leading to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture, remains uncertain. Dynamics, risk factors, and clinical relevance of AND were investigated after EVAR with standard SESs. METHODS: All intact EVAR patients treated from 2000 to 2015 at a tertiary institution were included. Demographic, anatomical, and device related characteristics were investigated as risk factors for AND. Outer to outer diameters were measured at a single standardised aortic level on reconstructed computed tomography (CT) images. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients were included (median follow up 5.2 years, interquartile range [IQR] 3.0, 7.7 years; CT imaging follow up 3.3 years, IQR 1.3, 5.4). Baseline neck diameter was 24 mm (IQR 22, 26) and increased 11.1% (IQR 1.5%, 21.9%) at last CT imaging. Endograft oversizing was 20.0% (IQR 13.6, 28.0). AND was greater during the first year (5.2% [IQR 0, 11.7]) decreasing subsequently (two to four years to 1.4%/year [IQR 0.0, 4.5%], p ≤ .001) and was associated with suprarenal fixation endografts (t value = 7.9, p < .001) and oversizing (t value = 4.4, p < .001). AND exceeding the endograft was 3.5% (95% CI 2.2% - 4.8%) and 14.4% (95% CI 11.0% - 17.8%) at five and eight years, respectively. Excessive AND was associated with baseline neck diameter (OR 1.2/mm, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.41) while the Excluder endograft had a protective effect (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04 - 0.58). Excessive AND was associated with type 1A endoleak (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.1 - 9.7) and endograft migration > 5 mm (HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.4 - 6.9). CONCLUSION: AND after EVAR with SES is associated with endograft oversizing and radial force but decelerates after the first post-operative year. Baseline aortic neck diameter and suprarenal stent bearing endografts were associated with an increased risk of AND beyond nominal stent graft diameter. However, it remains unclear whether patient selection, differences in endograft radial force or the suprarenal stent are accountable for this difference.

[Visceral debranching in hybrid surgery of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms]. / Vistseral'nyi debranching v gibridnoi khirurgii torakoabdominal'nykh anevrizm aorty.

Presented herein is a review of the literature dedicated to the method of visceral debranching, i. e., switching of the visceral and renal branches of the abdominal aorta to its intact portion, using synthetic vascular prostheses as the first stage of hybrid surgical treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms prior to endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. This is accompanied and followed by describing the history of the problem, operative technique, results of studies, as well as the data from registries and meta-analyses. Also discussed are the main complications of the method and measures of their prevention. We conclude that hybrid surgery of the thoracoabdominal portion of the aorta is a promising method in a particular cohort of patients, especially those at high surgical risk of 'open' aortic surgery.

Long-term results after standard endovascular aneurysm repair with the Endurant and Excluder stent grafts.

OBJECTIVE: Many endografts are currently available for standard endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Comparison of long-term outcomes between devices might aid in this decision process, but comparative data are scarce. The purpose of this study was to report long-term clinical outcomes of two commercially available endoprosthesis, the Endurant (Medtronic Vascular, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) and the Excluder (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) stent grafts. METHODS: Patients undergoing standard endovascular repair from July 2004 to December 2011 in a single institution with the Endurant or the Low-Porosity Excluder endografts were eligible. Only patients treated for intact degenerative abdominal infrarenal aneurysms were included. All measurements were performed on center-lumen line reconstructions obtained on dedicated software. The primary end point was primary clinical success, defined as clinical success without the need for an additional or secondary surgical or endovascular procedure. Neck-related events (a composite of type IA endoleak, neck-related secondary intervention, or migration of >5 mm), neck morphology changes, renal function, and overall survival were secondary end points. RESULTS: The study included 277 patients (156 Endurants; 121 Excluders). The median follow-up was 5.8 years (range, 0.1-12.4 years) and did not differ between groups (P = .18). Patients treated with the Endurant stent graft had wider (neck diameter of >28 mm, 27.3% vs 1.7% [P < .001]; neck diameter of 27 mm, [interquartile range (IQR), 24-29 mm] for Endurant and 24 mm [IQR, 22-25 mm] for Excluder; P < .001) and more angulated necks (ß-angle of >60°, 26.7% vs 12.5%; P = .004). Oversizing was greater in the Endurant group (16% [IQR, 12%-22%] vs 13% [IQR, 8%-17%], respectively; P < .001). Patients were treated outside device instructions for use regarding proximal neck: 16.7% in the Endurant and 17.3% in the Excluder group (P = .720). The 7-year primary clinical success was 54.7% for the Endurant and 58.1% for the Excluder groups (P = .53). Freedom from neck-related events at 7 years was 76.7% for the Endurant and 78.8% for Excluder group (P = .94). The Endurant stent graft (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-5.8; P = .009) was an independent predictor of significant renal function decline. Neck dilatation was greater in Endurant-implanted patients (13% [95% CI, 2%-22%] vs 4% [95% CI, 0%-10%]; P < .001). Overall survival at 7 years was 61.4% in the Endurant and 50.3% (n = 50; standard error, 0.047) in the Excluder group (P = .39). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that durable and sustainable results can be obtained with either of these late generation devices. This finding suggests that careful planning and a tailored device selection taking into account the patient's anatomy are more relevant determinants than the graft model itself to obtain clinical success. The Endurant endoprosthesis seems to be associated with a higher rate of neck dilatation and faster decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, but further studies with longer follow-up are necessary to determine the clinical relevance of these findings.

Comparison of midterm results of endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured and elective abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) became an increasingly preferred modality for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair both in elective AAA repair (el-EVAR) and EVAR of a ruptured AAA (r-EVAR) setting. Ruptured AAAs usually have more hostile anatomies and less time for planning. Consequently, more complications may arise after r-EVAR. The purpose of this study was to compare mi-term outcomes between r-EVAR and el-EVAR. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing EVAR from 2000 to 2015 at a tertiary institution was performed. Patients with previous aortic surgery, nonatherosclerotic AAA and isolated iliac aneurysms were excluded. In-hospital casualties or patients who were intraoperatively converted to open repair were also excluded. For the midterm outcome analysis, only patients with at least two postoperative examinations (a 30-day computed tomography scan and a second postoperative examination performed 6 months or later) were considered. The primary end point was freedom from aneurysm-related complications (a composite of type I or III endoleak, aneurysm sac growth, migration of more than 5 mm, device integrity failure, AAA-related death, late postimplant rupture, or AAA-related secondary intervention). Freedom from secondary interventions, neck-related events (defined as a composite of type IA endoleak, migration of more than 5 mm, or preemptive neck-related secondary intervention) and late survival were secondary end points. The impact of device instructions for use (IFU) compliance on neck events was also assessed. RESULTS: The study included 565 patients (65 r-EVAR and 500 el-EVAR). Eighty-two patients were treated outside proximal neck IFU, 13 in the r-EVAR group (21.3%) and 69 (14.5%) in the el-EVAR (P = .16). During the index hospitalization, there were more complications (12.3% vs 3.2%; P = .001) and reinterventions (12.3% vs 2.8%; P < .001) in the r-EVAR group. After discharge, median clinical follow-up time was 4.3 years (interquartile range, 2.1-7.0 years) without differences between both groups. Five-year freedom from AAA-related complications was 53.9% in the r-EVAR group and 65.4% in the el-EVAR (P = .21). In multivariable analysis the r-EVAR group was not at increased risk for late complications (hazard ratio [HR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.61; P = .81). Five-year freedom from neck-related events was 74% in r-EVAR and 82% in the el-EVAR group (P = .345). Patients treated outside neck IFU were at greater risk for neck-related events both in r-EVAR (HR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.8-22.9; P = .004) and el-EVAR group (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-4.5; P < .001). Freedom from secondary interventions at 5 years was 63.0% for r-EVAR and 76.9% for el-EVAR (P = .16). Survival at 5 years was 68.8% in the r-EVAR group and 73.3% in the el-EVAR group (P = .30). CONCLUSIONS: Durable and sustainable midterm outcomes were found for both r-EVAR and el-EVAR patients who survived the postoperative period. Patients treated outside the IFU are at greater risk for late complications. Surveillance protocols may be tailored according to individual anatomy and IFU compliance rather than timing of repair.

Long-term durability of multibranched endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal and pararenal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the durability of multibranched endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) and pararenal aortic aneurysms by examining the rates of late-occurring (beyond 30 days) complications. METHODS: There were 146 patients who underwent endovascular TAAA repair using a stent graft, with a total of 538 caudally oriented self-expanding branches. Four patients died in the perioperative period and were excluded, leaving 142 patients (mean age, 73 ± 8 years; 35 [24.7%] women). Follow-up included clinical examination and computed tomography angiography at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: Mean aneurysm diameter was 67 ± 9 mm. Sixty-seven TAAAs (47.2%) were Crawford type I, II, III, or V; 75 (52.8%) were type IV or pararenal. Three patients (2.1%) died >30 days after operation from perioperative complications. During a mean follow-up of 36 months (±28 months), there were four additional aneurysm-related deaths: one (0.7%) as a result of aneurysm rupture in the presence of untreatable type I endoleak, one (0.7%) after conversion to open repair for stent graft infection, one (0.7%) after occlusion of superior mesenteric artery and celiac branches, and one (0.7%) due to bilateral renal branch occlusion. There was one additional open conversion for stent graft infection (0.7%). Nineteen patients (13.3%) underwent 20 reinterventions for late-occurring complications, including 11 (7.7%) for renal branch occlusion or stenosis, 1 (0.7%) for mesenteric branch stenosis, 4 (2.8%) for graft limb occlusion, 1 (0.7%) for type IB endoleak (distal stent graft migration), and 1 (0.7%) for type III endoleak (fabric erosion); 2 (1.4%) open conversions were performed for stent graft infection. There were no late type IA endoleaks. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, freedom from aneurysm-related death was 91.1% and freedom from aneurysm-related death or reintervention was 76.8% at 5 years. The 5-year overall survival rate of 49.1% reflects the high rate of cardiopulmonary comorbidity. Although renal branch occlusion (23 occlusions of 256 renal branches [8.9%]) was the most common late complication, only five patients required permanent dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Total endovascular repair of TAAAs and pararenal aortic aneurysms using axially oriented cuffs is safe, effective, and durable in the long term.

Anatomic predictors for late mortality after standard endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) management involves a decision process that takes into account anatomic characteristics, surgical risks, patients' preferences, and expected survival. Whereas larger AAA diameter has been associated with increased mortality after both standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open repair, it is unclear whether survival after EVAR is influenced by other anatomic characteristics. The purpose of this study was to determine the importance of baseline anatomic features on survival after EVAR. METHODS: All patients treated at a tertiary teaching center with EVAR for intact standard infrarenal AAA from 2000 to 2014 were included. The civil data registry was queried to determine survival status; causes of death were obtained from death certificates. The primary study end point was to determine the impact of baseline morphologic features on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality after EVAR. RESULTS: This study included 404 EVAR patients (12.1% women; mean age, 73 years) with a median follow-up of 5.8 years (interquartile range, 3.1-7.4 years). The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates for the entire population after EVAR were 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66%-75%) and 43% (95% CI, 37%-50%), respectively. Only AAA diameter >70 mm (hazard ratio [HR], 1.75; 95% CI, 1.20-3.56) was identified as an independent anatomic predictor of all-cause mortality. Death due to cardiovascular causes occurred in 60 (38.5%) patients. Aneurysm-related mortality was responsible for six of the cardiovascular-related deaths. In multivariable analysis, both neck diameter ≥30 mm (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.05-4.43) and AAA diameter >70 mm (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.34-4.46) were identified as independent morphologic risk factors for cardiovascular mortality, whereas >25% circumferential neck thrombus (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.77) was protective. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that patients with AAA diameters >70 mm are at increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. In addition, patients with infrarenal neck diameters ≥30 mm have a greater risk of cardiovascular mortality, although AAA-related deaths were not more frequent in this group of patients. Consequently, a more aggressive management of cardiovascular medical comorbidities may be warranted to improve survival after standard EVAR in these patients.

Patients with large neck diameter have a higher risk of type IA endoleaks and aneurysm rupture after standard endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the most common treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). EVAR has been increasingly used in patients with hostile neck features. This study investigated the outcomes of EVAR in patients with neck diameters ≥30 mm in the prospectively maintained Endurant Stent Graft Natural Selection Global Postmarket Registry (ENGAGE). METHODS: This is a retrospective study comparing patients with neck diameters ≥30 mm with patients with neck diameters <30 mm. The primary end point was type IA endoleak (EL1A). Secondary end points included secondary interventions to correct EL1A, aneurysm rupture, and survival. RESULTS: This study included 1257 patients (mean age, 73.1 years; 89.4% male) observed for a median 4.0 years (interquartile range, 2.7-4.8 years). A total of 97 (7.7%) patients had infrarenal neck diameters ≥30 mm and were compared with the remaining 1160 (92.3%) with neck diameters <30 mm. At baseline, there were no differences between groups regarding demographics and comorbidities other than cardiac disease, which was more frequent in the ≥30-mm neck diameter group (P = .037). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding neck length, angulation, thrombus, or calcification. Mean preoperative AAA diameter was 64.6 ± 11.3 mm in the ≥30-mm neck diameter group and 60.0 ± 11.6 mm in the <30-mm neck diameter group (P < .001). Stent graft oversizing was significantly less in the ≥30-mm neck diameter group (12.2% ± 8.9% vs 22.1% ± 11.9%; P <. 001). Five patients (5.2%) in the ≥30-mm neck diameter group and 30 (2.6%) with neck diameters <30 mm developed EL1A, yielding a 4-year freedom from EL1A of 92.4% vs 96.6%, respectively (P = .09). Oversizing was 21.8% ± 13.0% for patients developing EL1A and 21.3% ± 12.4% for the remaining cohort (P = .99). In adjusting for neck length, AAA diameter, and device oversizing, patients with neck diameter ≥30 mm were at greater risk for development of EL1A (hazard ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-9.3; P = .05). Secondary interventions due to EL1A did not differ between groups (P = .36). AAA rupture occurred in three patients with neck diameter ≥30 mm (3.1%) and in eight patients with neck diameter <30 mm (0.7%; hazard ratio, 5.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-19.2; P = .016); two cases were EL1A related in each group. At 4 years, overall survival was 61.6% for the ≥30-mm neck diameter group and 75.2% for the <30-mm neck diameter group (P = .009), which remained significant on correcting for sex and AAA diameter (P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, patients with infrarenal neck diameter ≥30 mm had a threefold increased risk of EL1A and fivefold risk of aneurysm rupture after EVAR as well as worse overall survival. This may influence the choice of AAA repair and underlines the need for regular computed tomography-based imaging surveillance in this subset of patients. Furthermore, these results can serve as standards with which new, possibly improved technology, such as EndoAnchors (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif), can be compared.

Long-term outcomes of standard endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with severe neck angulation.

OBJECTIVE: Severe neck angulation is associated with complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Newer endografts may overcome this limitation, but the literature lacks long-term results. We studied the long-term outcomes of EVAR in patients with severe neck angulation. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study of a prospective multicenter database was performed. All measurements were made with dedicated software with center lumen line reconstruction. A study group including patients with neck length >15 mm, infrarenal angle (ß) >75 degrees or suprarenal angle (α) >60 degrees, and neck length 10 to 15 mm with ß >60 degrees or α >45 degrees was compared with a control group matched for demographics and other morphologic neck features. The primary end point was type IA endoleak (EL1A). Secondary end points were freedom from neck-related secondary interventions, primary clinical success, and overall survival. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included in the angulated neck group and compared with 65 matched patients. Median follow-up was 7.4 years (interquartile range, 4.8-8.5 years). In the angulated neck group, mean α was 51.4 degrees (±21.1 degrees) and the mean ß was 80.8 degrees (±15.6 degrees); in the nonangulated group, these were 17.9 degrees (±17.0 degrees) and 35.4 degrees (±20.0 degrees), respectively. At 7 years, five patients in the angulated neck group and two nonangulated patients developed EL1A, yielding a freedom from EL1A of 86.1% (n = 14; standard error [SE], 0.069) and 96.6% (n = 34; SE, 0.023), respectively (P = .056). After exclusion of a patient who developed an EL1A secondary to an endograft infection, this difference was significant: 86.1% (n = 14; SE, 0.069) in the angulated neck group and 98.2% (n = 34; SE, 0.018) in the nonangulated group (P = .016). At 7 years, freedom from neck-related secondary interventions was 91.7% (n = 14; SE, 0.059) and 91.6% (n = 29; SE, 0.029), respectively. The 7-year primary clinical success estimates were 41.2% (n = 11; SE, 0.085) and 56.6% (n = 20; SE, 0.072) for the angulated neck and nonangulated groups, respectively (P = .12). The 7-year survival rates were 44.3% (n = 18; SE, 0.076) vs 66.7% (n = 42; SE, 0.059) for the angulated neck and nonangulated groups, respectively (P = .25). Device integrity failure was not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite satisfactory results early and in the midterm, a higher rate of EL1A was identified among patients with severely angulated necks in the long term. However, mortality was not affected by this difference. These findings suggest that EVAR should be used judiciously in patients with extreme angulation of the proximal neck and highlight the need for close follow-up of EVAR, especially in the long term and in patients treated outside instructions for use.

Risk factors and short and medium-term survival after open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are responsible for high rates of rupture-associated morbidity and mortality and can be treated by open or endovascular surgery. OBJECTIVES: To analyze risk factors and survival associated with surgical and endovascular AAA treatment methods. METHODS: A retrospective, longitudinal study involving 41 patients who underwent endovascular or open AAA repair, whether elective or emergency, over a 48-month period, with analysis of preoperative comorbidities, 30-day and 1-year survival, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, transfusion of blood products, duration of surgery, and development of acute kidney failure. Inferential statistics and survival analysis considered a 95% CI and p < 0.05 as significant. RESULTS: Twelve of the 41 patients were treated with open surgery and 29 with endovascular techniques. The majority were male (75%), with an average age of 71 (range: 56 - 90 years). There were no differences in demographic or risk factors between the groups. Overall survival rates for open and endovascular repair were different for both 30 days (37 vs. 72%, p = 0.01) and 360 days (37 vs. 67%, p = 0.01). However, survival rates in elective cases were similar at 30 days (71 vs. 76%, p = 0.44) and 360 days (both 71%, p = 0.34). Endovascular repair showed shorter length of hospital stay (3.0 vs. 4.4 days; p = 0.02) and duration of surgery (111 vs. 163 min; p < 0.01) compared to open repair. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in short- or medium-term survival of AAA patients treated electively with endovascular or open surgery. Hospital stays and duration of surgery were both shorter with minimally invasive treatment.

Iliac Seal Zone Dynamics and Clinical Consequences After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dynamics of the iliac attachment zone after EVAR, and the association with clinical events. METHODS: A tertiary institution's prospective EVAR database was searched to identify common iliac arteries at risk. Internally validated measurements were made, using centre lumen line reconstructions. Iliac dilatation and endograft limb retraction were the main endpoints. Associations between dilatation, retraction, oversizing, and distal seal length were investigated. Association with clinical events (sealing or occlusion) was also explored. RESULTS: Of 452 primary EVAR patients treated from 2004 to 2012, 341 were included (mean age 72 years, 12% female, 597 common iliac arteries). Median follow-up was 4.7 years. At 30 days, the mean iliac diameter increased from 14 mm to 15 mm (p < .001). Over follow-up, it increased to 18 mm (p < .001). Iliac dilatation ≥20% occurred in 295 cases (49.4%) and exceeded the implanted endograft diameter in 170 (28.7%). Limb retraction ≥5 mm was identified in 54 patients (9.1%) and was associated with iliac seal complications (p < 0.001). Iliac endograft extension diameter ≥24 mm (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.7-6.4) and iliac artery dilatation beyond the endograft (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.8) were independent risk factors. Overall, there were 34 (5.7%) iliac seal complications. Retraction of the iliac endograft (OR 1.17 per mm, 95% CI 1.10-1.24) and baseline AAA diameter (1.04 per mm, 95% CI 1.01-1.07) were independent risk factors for seal related complications. Greater initial post-operative iliac seal length was protective (OR 0.94 per mm, 95% CI 0.90-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Iliac dilatation and endograft retraction are common findings during follow-up, potentially leading to adverse clinical events. Optimisation of the iliac seal zone providing a long distal seal length and added attention to patients with large aneurysms or receiving ≥24 mm diameter iliac extensions are recommended. Also, long-term surveillance including CTA is advised to reveal and correct loss of seal at the iliac attachments before adverse clinical events occur.

Endotension Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Retrospective Review of Treatment and Clinical Outcome.

Purpose: : Endotension is a rare late complication characterized by an increase in sac size without any type of endoleak following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Due to its rarity, few studies have demonstrated the mechanism behind and the management of endotension. In this study, we aimed to better understand the treatment and the long-term outcome of endotension in a single-center cohort. Materials and Methods: : This study was designed for a retrospective review of the patients diagnosed with endotension between January 2006 and December 2017. The study patients were categorized into two groups (primary versus secondary) based on the presence of any type of endoleak before the diagnosis of endotension. We collected data related to endotension treatment, intraoperative findings, and long-term outcomes. Results: : In a cohort of 15 patients diagnosed with endotension following EVAR, eight were classified into the primary endotension (PE) group without prior endoleak, and seven exhibited secondary endotension (SE). Among the eight PE patients, endovascular intervention for a preemptive purpose was conducted in six patients; however, three (50%) showed continuous sac expansion and finally received open conversion. Overall, eight patients (five in PE and three in SE) underwent open conversion, and one (12.5%) presented with an undetected endoleak during the operative findings. Postoperative morbidity was observed in three patients with no operative mortality. Conclusion: : Endotension can be managed initially through simple observation for changes on serial images, along with preemptive endovascular intervention. However, surgical intervention should be considered for patients with specific indications including continuous aneurysm sac enlargement, presence of symptoms, suspicions of migration of stent-graft with endoleak, and infection.

How to select the optimal size of frozen elephant trunk in total arch replacement for type A acute aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: Total arch replacement (TAR) with a frozen elephant trunk (FET) is a common technique for acute aortic dissection, but there is no consensus on the optimal size of the FET. METHODS: Forty-four patients who underwent TAR with FET for acute aortic dissection at our hospital since 2014 were included. The aortic diameter obtained from FET was measured on postoperative computed tomography (CT) and the estimated oversizing ratio was calculated. We investigated the relationship between the estimated oversizing ratio and postoperative outcomes. We also measured the maximum true lumen diameter, circumference of the true lumen, and total aortic diameter at the same level as the FET end on preoperative CT and examined the correlation with the aortic diameter obtained from FET. RESULTS: The average estimated oversizing ratio was 109%. Early postoperative CT showed complete thrombosis of the false lumen in 41 (93.2%) patients. No distal stent graft-induced new entry occurred during follow-up. The correlation coefficients between the three measurements and aortic diameter obtained from FET were 0.64 (maximum true lumen diameter), 0.76 (true lumen diameter calculated from circumference), and 0.72 (total aortic diameter), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The aortic diameter obtained from FET on postoperative CT was strongly correlated with the true lumen diameter calculated from the circumference and total aortic diameter on preoperative CT. It is reasonable to select a size of approximately 130% of the true lumen diameter calculated from the circumference or 80% to 85% of the total aortic diameter.

Acute Paraplegia Result from Spinal Ischemia Nine Years After Hybrid Total Arch Repair with Frozen Elephant Trunk: A Case Report.

Spinal cord ischemia due to decreased cord perfusion is a devastating complication in patients with thoracoabdominal dissection following frozen elephant trunk (FET) repair surgery. However, rare occurrence of spinal cord ischemia leading to paraplegia after long-term follow-up of FET repair has been reported. Here, we describe a case of spinal cord ischemia resulting in paraplegia nine years after hybrid total arch repair with FET. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage and serial treatment were utilized to decrease intraspinal pressure and increase blood flow to the spinal cord. Three months after the onset of paraplegia and with treatment and rehabilitation, the patient recovered to walk.

The feasibility of debranching aortic arch and visceral arteries with sutureless telescoping anastomoses during open aortic aneurysm repair.

Background: Open repair of aortic aneurysms frequently requires reimplantation of major aortic vessels. Traditional techniques can be time consuming, require meticulous hemostasis, and risk aneurysmal patch degeneration, which can require a challenging reoperation. We describe our experience using a stent graft to create a sutureless anastomosis that obviates these drawbacks. Methods: Between April 2018 and March 2021, all consecutive adult patients who underwent open repair of the aorta with at least one supra-aortic trunk or visceral vessel reimplanted using the sutureless anastomotic technique were included. Anastomoses were constructed by bridging a branch graft and the target artery with a Viabahn self-expanding stent (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ). Clinical information and perioperative outcomes for the patients were collected and analyzed. Results: Among 26 patients, 50 individual aortic vessels were debranched using sutureless self-expanding stent anastomoses, including 42 visceral vessels and 8 supra-aortic trunk vessels. Technical success was 100%. The median time to complete the anastomosis was 3 minutes, 12 seconds (range, 2-6 minutes). Perioperative mortality was 15% (n = 4). No stent-related complications, such as occlusion, bleeding, stroke, renal failure requiring hemodialysis, bowel ischemia, or the need for anastomotic reintervention, occurred. Follow-up imaging at 1 year revealed a 100% patency rate and no anastomotic stenosis, misalignment, or kinking. Conclusions: The sutureless anastomosis technique to debranch the aorta during open aortic aneurysm repair is technically feasible and reliably hemostatic and does not require early reintervention. The operative outcomes have been acceptable, and the short-term follow-up imaging findings demonstrated excellent patency without anastomotic kinking. In select cases, sutureless anastomoses are a possible alternative to traditional sutured anastomoses during aortic debranching. Further research is needed to compare the operative times and long-term patency of sutureless anastomosis to those of traditional sutured techniques.

Non-prompt surgery for patients with acute type A aortic dissection without pre-operative shock and malperfusion.

Background: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) requires urgent surgical treatment. However, during daily practice, there were some patients with ATAAD sought for medical attention several days after symptoms occurred and some other patients hesitated to receive aortic surgery after the diagnosis of ATAAD was made. This study aims to investigate the surgical outcomes of non-prompt aortic surgery (delayed diagnosis caused by the patient or delayed surgery despite immediate diagnosis) for ATAAD patients. Methods: From November 2004 to June 2020, of more than 200 patients with ATAAD patients who underwent aortic surgery at our hospital, there were 30 patients without pre-operative shock and malperfusion who sought for medical attention with symptoms for several days or delayed aortic surgery several days later despite ATAAD was diagnosed. Of the 30 patients (median age 60.9, range 33.4~82.5 years) in the study group, there were 18 patients undergoing surgery when they arrived at our hospital (delayed diagnosis by the patient) and 12 patients receiving surgery days later (delayed surgery despite immediate diagnosis). Patients with prompt surgery after symptom onset (control group) were matched from our database by propensity score matching. The surgical mortality rate and post-operative morbidities were compared between the study group and control group. Results: The in-hospital mortality was 3.3% for the study group and 6.7% for the control group (p = non-significant). The incidence of post-operative cerebral permanent neurological defect was 0% for the study group and 13.3% for the control group (p = 0.112). There were three patients receiving aortic re-intervention or re-do aortic surgery during follow-up for the study group and two patients for the control group. Conclusion: Prompt surgery for ATAAD is usually a good choice if everything is well prepared. Besides, urgent but non-prompt aortic surgery could also provide acceptable surgical results for ATAAD patients without pre-operative shock and malperfusion who did not seek medical attention or who could not make their minds to undergo surgery immediately after symptom onset. Hospitalization with intensive care is very important for pre-operative preparation and monitoring for the patients who decline prompt aortic surgery.

CT angiography for the assessment of EVAR complications: a pictorial review.

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a minimally invasive treatment proposed as an alternative to open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. EVAR consists in a stent-graft placement within the aorta in order to exclude the aneurysm from arterial circulation and reduce the risk of rupture. Knowledge of the various types of devices is mandatory because some stents/grafts are more frequently associated with complications. CT angiography is the gold standard diagnostic technique for preprocedural planning and postprocedural surveillance. EVAR needs long-term follow-up due to the high rate of complications. Complications can be divided in endograft device-related and systemic complications. The purpose of this article is to review the CT imaging findings of EVAR complications and the key features for the diagnosis.