Content Validity of the Modified Functional Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (f-SARA) Instrument in Spinocerebellar Ataxia.

The functional Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (f-SARA) assesses Gait, Stance, Sitting, and Speech. It was developed as a potentially clinically meaningful measure of spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) progression for clinical trial use. Here, we evaluated content validity of the f-SARA. Qualitative interviews were conducted among individuals with SCA1 (n = 1) and SCA3 (n = 6) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) with SCA expertise (USA, n = 5; Europe, n = 3). Interviews evaluated symptoms and signs of SCA and relevance of f-SARA concepts for SCA. HCP cognitive debriefing was conducted. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed by ATLAS.TI software. Individuals with SCA1 and 3 reported 85 symptoms, signs, and impacts of SCA. All indicated difficulties with walking, stance, balance, speech, fatigue, emotions, and work. All individuals with SCA1 and 3 considered Gait, Stance, and Speech relevant f-SARA concepts; 3 considered Sitting relevant (42.9%). All HCPs considered Gait and Speech relevant; 5 (62.5%) indicated Stance was relevant. Sitting was considered a late-stage disease indicator. Most HCPs suggested inclusion of appendicular items would enhance clinical relevance. Cognitive debriefing supported clarity and comprehension of f-SARA. Maintaining current abilities on f-SARA items for 1 year was considered meaningful for most individuals with SCA1 and 3. All HCPs considered meaningful changes as stability in f-SARA score over 1-2 years, 1-2-point change in total f-SARA score, and deviation from natural history. These results support content validity of f-SARA for assessing SCA disease progression in clinical trials.

Development of the coreHEM mental health patient-reported outcome measure - A novel mental health outlook measure for people with haemophilia.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, no quality-of-life instrument exists that captures the full experience of the mental health outlook (MHO), a coreHEM core outcome, in people with haemophilia, including the potential transformational experience of receiving gene therapy. AIM: To describe the methods used to develop a content validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that measures MHO for people with haemophilia. METHODS: A conceptual framework, developed from a literature/evidence review, was used to create an interview guide and draft a questionnaire. Males aged 15 or older with severe/moderate haemophilia were eligible to participate in concept elicitation or cognitive debriefing interviews. The conceptual framework was refined based on a thematic analysis of concept elicitation interviews and PROM items were developed from the conceptual framework. Cognitive debriefing sessions that prioritised relevance and understanding of the PROM were held in two rounds; items were updated iteratively. RESULTS: A conceptual framework with five domains (stigma, anxiety, depression, life interference and identity) was constructed from over 300 identified MHO concepts. Fifty-three participants took part in interviews. After 32 concept elicitation interviews, the framework was updated by including eight new sub-concepts and eliminating two. Updates to the questionnaire included items added or removed and improved wording. The final coreHEM MHO PROM has 26 questions in two sections (general mental health associated with haemophilia, and a gene therapy section). CONCLUSIONS: The instrument is content-validated and can be used as an exploratory outcome. MHO scores can be measured and compared to give more insight into patient quality of life.

Psychological Safety and Hierarchy in Operating Room Debriefing: Reflexive Thematic Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Debriefing is a team discussion in a constructive, supportive environment. Barriers exist to consistent, effective team debriefing in the clinical setting, especially in operating theaters. The purpose of this study was to gain insights from frontline workers on how to set up an effective debriefing policy for our operating room. METHODS: This was a qualitative study in which we interviewed operating room workers in a tertiary children's hospital. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded. Data were analysed using the reflexive thematic analysis technique within a critical realism paradigm. RESULTS: Interviews were analysed from 40 operating room staff: 14 nurses, seven anesthetic technicians, seven anaesthetists, and 12 surgeons; 25 (65%) were female. The three key themes were (1) "commitment to learning"-healthcare workers are committed to teamwork and quality improvement; (2) "it is a safe space"-psychological safety is a prerequisite for, and is enhanced by, debriefing; and (3) "natural leader"-the value of leadership, but also constructs around leadership that maintain hierarchies. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological safety is both a prerequisite for and a product of debriefing. Leadership, if viewed as a collective responsibility, could help break down power structures. Given the results of this study and evidence in the literature, it is likely that routine debriefing, if well done, will improve psychological safety, facilitate team learning, reduce errors, and improve patient safety.

Helping clinicians debrief themselves: a simple how-to guide.

The operating theatre is a dynamic and challenging environment where effective teamwork is essential. Routine clinical debriefings, which involve brief reflections on collaboration to identify successes and areas for improvement, have proved to enhance teamwork, particularly in the operating theatre. However, barriers such as time constraints, conflicting priorities, and a lack of standardised debriefing processes hinder their regular use. Implementation of TALK©, a voluntary self-debriefing method, showed significant improvements in debriefing performance and integration of debriefing into routine practice, although long-term consistency remains a challenge.

Implementation of the TALK© clinical self-debriefing tool in operating theatres: a single-centre interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Debriefing in operating theatre environments leads to benefits in mortality, efficiency, productivity, and safety culture; however, it is still not regularly performed. TALK© is a simple and widely applicable team self-debriefing method to collaboratively learn and improve. METHODS: An interventional study introducing TALK© for voluntary clinical debriefing was carried out in operating theatre environments in a UK National Health Service hospital over 18 months. It explored compliance with the Five Steps to Safer Surgery and changes in behaviour in surgical teams regarding consideration and completion of debriefing. RESULTS: Team briefing and compliance with the WHO surgical safety checklist were performed consistently (>95% and >98%, respectively) throughout the study, which included 460 surgical lists. Consideration of debriefing increased at all data collection periods after intervention, from 35.6% to 60.3-97.4% (P≤0.003). Performance of debriefing, which was 23.3% at baseline, reached 39% at 6 months (P=0.039). Team planning of actions for improvement during debriefing also increased (P<0.001). A decline in performance of debriefing and subsequent improvement actions was observed after 6 months, albeit rates were above baseline at 18 months. The most reported reason not to carry out a debriefing was 'lack of issues'. After implementation, nurses and allied healthcare professionals increased their contribution to initiating and leading debriefing. Reported barriers were <18% at baseline, and decreased after intervention. CONCLUSIONS: A simple intervention introducing TALK© for voluntary debriefing in theatres prompted significant changes in team behaviour and sustained growth regarding consideration and performance of debriefing, especially in the first 6 months.

Structured feedback and operative video debriefing with critical view of safety annotation in training of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The learning curve in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is lengthened compared to open surgery. It has been reported that structured feedback and training in teams of two trainees improves MIS training and MIS performance. Annotation of surgical images and videos may prove beneficial for surgical training. This study investigated whether structured feedback and video debriefing, including annotation of critical view of safety (CVS), have beneficial learning effects in a predefined, multi-modal MIS training curriculum in teams of two trainees. METHODS: This randomized-controlled single-center study included medical students without MIS experience (n = 80). The participants first completed a standardized and structured multi-modal MIS training curriculum. They were then randomly divided into two groups (n = 40 each), and four laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs) were performed on ex-vivo porcine livers each. Students in the intervention group received structured feedback after each LC, consisting of LC performance evaluations through tutor-trainee joint video debriefing and CVS video annotation. Performance was evaluated using global and LC-specific Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills (OSATS) and Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) scores. RESULTS: The participants in the intervention group had higher global and LC-specific OSATS as well as global and LC-specific GOALS scores than the participants in the control group (25.5 ± 7.3 vs. 23.4 ± 5.1, p = 0.003; 47.6 ± 12.9 vs. 36 ± 12.8, p < 0.001; 17.5 ± 4.4 vs. 16 ± 3.8, p < 0.001; 6.6 ± 2.3 vs. 5.9 ± 2.1, p = 0.005). The intervention group achieved CVS more often than the control group (1. LC: 20 vs. 10 participants, p = 0.037, 2. LC: 24 vs. 8, p = 0.001, 3. LC: 31 vs. 8, p < 0.001, 4. LC: 31 vs. 10, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Structured feedback and video debriefing with CVS annotation improves CVS achievement and ex-vivo porcine LC training performance based on OSATS and GOALS scores.

Translation of the Preference-Based Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Scale into French.

The objective of this study was to translate the Preference-Based Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Scale to French-Canadian. After the scale underwent forward and back translations, the expert committee examined the translated versions and found minor grammatical errors and suggested idioms to be changed to better represent French-Canadian language. Cognitive debriefing interviews were carried out to assess the pre-final version for clarity, and minor changes were made. Consensus from the expert committee and people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis on the measure's clarity, word choice, and meaning were achieved, resulting in the final French version of the Preference-Based Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Scale.

Unringing the bell: Successful debriefing following a rich false memory study.

In rich false memory studies, familial informants often provide information to support researchers in planting vivid memories of events that never occurred. The goal of the current study was to assess how effectively we can retract these false memories via debriefing - i.e., to what extent can we put participants back the way we found them? We aimed to establish (1) what proportion of participants would retain a false memory or false belief following debriefing, and (2) whether richer, more detailed memories would be more difficult to retract. Participants (N = 123) completed a false memory implantation protocol as part of a replication of the "Lost in the Mall" study (Loftus & Pickrell, Psychiatric Annals, 25, 720-725, 1995). By the end of the protocol, 14% of participants self-reported a memory for the fabricated event, and a further 52% believed it had happened. Participants were then fully debriefed, and memory and belief for the false event were assessed again. In a follow-up assessment 3 days post-debriefing, the false memory rate had dropped to 6% and false belief rates also fell precipitously to 7%. Moreover, virtually all persistent false memories were found to be nonbelieved memories, where participants no longer accepted that the fabricated event had occurred. Richer, more detailed memories were more resistant to correction, but were still mostly retracted. This study provides evidence that participants can be "dehoaxed", and even very convincing false memories can be retracted.

Using simulation to improve pharmacy operators' handling of cytotoxic spills.

INTRODUCTION: International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners guidelines recommend having standard operating procedures (SOPs) and initial and yearly retraining programs on cytotoxic spill handling for pharmacy operators (POs). This study aimed to create a simulation-based training (SBT) program on this subject and evaluate its impact on POs' real-life performance. METHODS: Randomly formed pairs of POs underwent a 2.5-hour training program, including two simulation exercises (a broken cytotoxic vial on the floor and a leaking cytotoxic bag) in a simulated pharmacy production unit. Each participant applied the cytotoxic spill handling SOPs. The PO and trainer-pharmacist did a debriefing after each exercise. Satisfaction was recorded on a 0-to-100% scale. A 20-item questionnaire assessed general knowledge about cytotoxic spill handling before and after the training. One month before and one month after the training, the POs underwent a real-life test when the trainer broke a fake cytotoxic vial in the cytotoxic storage area. Their performance in applying the SOPs was assessed on a 20-point checklist, and the time to handle the spill was recorded. RESULTS: Twelve POs participated. Mean satisfaction score was 98.9%. Mean knowledge score improved from 10.8/20 (SD = 2.0) before training to 14.5/20 (SD = 1.6) after training (p < 0.05). Mean real-life SOP performance improved from 78.6% (SD = 7.4%) to 97.1% (SD = 5.2%) (p < 0.05). Mean time to handle cytotoxic spills decreased from 17.3 minutes (SD = 3.6 minutes) to 11.9 minutes (SD = 1.5 minutes) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: POs improved their knowledge and real-life competencies for handling cytotoxic spills. This training will be included in POs' initial and continuing training programs.

Perceptions of medical students on narrow learning objectives and structured debriefing in medical escape rooms: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Escape rooms are increasingly used in medical education as a complementary learning technique or even alternative to traditional educational approaches. Few studies focus on debriefing following medical escape rooms and how escape rooms can be used to achieve pre-defined learning objectives. Evaluating the use of narrow learning objectives may increase the depth of reflections and transform an engaging team event into an effective learning opportunity. This study aimed to explore participants' experiences and perceived learning outcomes of narrow learning objectives in a medical escape room with debriefing. METHODS: In this explorative, qualitative study, participants saw a video lecture, participated in an escape room experience, and in a following debriefing. Throughout this learning session, the learning objectives concerned "exchange of information" and are therefore relatively narrow. Participants then participated in a semi-structured focus group interview and completed a demographic questionnaire. Participants were volunteer final-year medical students. Focus group interview recordings were transcribed and analysed using systematic text condensation. RESULTS: Thirty-two students in eight groups completed the study. Five themes were described in the analysis of the focus group interviews: Experience with the narrow learning objectives, topics discussed in the debriefing, learning mechanisms, learning outcomes concerning exchange of information and influences of the learning approach. CONCLUSIONS: Narrow learning objectives and structured debriefing seem to increase perceived learning depth of medical escape room sessions. Using semi-structured debriefing still allows for discussions of other elements relevant to the students. CLINICAL TRIALS: Clinical.trials ID NCT04783259.

A comparison of rapid cycle deliberate practice and traditional reflective debriefing on interprofessional team performance.

BACKGROUND: In simulation-based education, debriefing is necessary to promote knowledge acquisition and skill application. Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice (RCDP) and Traditional Reflective Debriefing (TRD) are based in learning theories of deliberate practice and reflective learning, respectively. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of TRD versus RCDP on acquisition of conceptual knowledge and teamwork skills among interdisciplinary learners in the pediatric emergency department. METHODS: One hundred sixty-four learners including emergency department attending physicians, fellows, nurses, medical technicians, paramedics, and respiratory therapists, participated in 28 in-situ simulation workshops over 2 months. Groups were quasi-randomized to receive RCDP or TRD debriefing. Learners completed a multiple-choice test to assess teamwork knowledge. The TEAM Assessment Tool assessed team performance before and after debriefing. Primary outcomes were teamwork knowledge and team performance. RESULTS: Average pre-intervention baseline knowledge assessment scores were high in both groups (TRD mean 90.5 (SD 12.7), RCDP mean 88.7 (SD 15.5). Post-test scores showed small improvements in both groups (TRD mean 93.2 (SD 12.2), RCDP mean 89.9 (SD 13.8), as indicated by effect sizes (ES = 0.21 and 0.09, for TRD and RCDP, respectively). Assessment of team performance demonstrated a significant improvement in mean scores from pre-assessment to post-assessment for all TEAM Assessment skills in both TRD and RCDP arms, based on p-values (all p < 0.01) and effect sizes (all ES > 0.8). While pre-post improvements in TEAM scores were generally higher in the RCDP group based on effect sizes, analysis did not indicate either debriefing approach as meaningfully improved over the other. CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not demonstrate that either TRD versus RCDP was meaningfully better in teamwork knowledge acquisition or improving skill application and performance. As such, we propose Reflective Deliberate Practice as a framework for future study to allow learners to reflect on learning and practice in action.

Exploring the experiences and perceptions of trainees undertaking a critical incident debrief training programme: A qualitative study.

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Critical incident debriefing is an occupational health tool for supporting healthcare workers following critical incidents. Demand for debriefing has increased following the Covid-19 pandemic. There is now a need for more trained debrief facilitators to meet demand, but there is a dearth of literature regarding how best to train facilitators. This study addressed this by exploring participant experiences of an online critical incident debrief training programme. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 individuals who received a 5-day training programme based on the Critical Incident Stress Management model. Participants were recruited from a range of professional disciplines including psychology, nursing and human resources within one British healthcare system. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The analysis produced three themes. Managing trainee experiences and expectations suggested that disciplinary heterogeneity in training groups supported inter-participant knowledge exchange. However, this variation also meant that training materials did not meet the learning needs of all participants. Modality of training suggested that while online learning was acceptable for some, others experienced screen fatigue and found it hard to build rapport with other participants. Systematic and organisational obstacles to training access and delivery suggested that lack of managerial support and organisational mental health stigma may be barriers to accessing training. CONCLUSION: A 5-day online CISM-based training programme was acceptable to participants. Organisations implementing critical incident debrief training may benefit from (1) offering both in-person and online training options, and (2) tailoring course materials according to the disciplinary make-up of groups.

Translation and Psychometric Testing of the Hägerbäumer Presenteeism Scale in English.

PURPOSE: Interest in presenteeism has increased in research. Presenteeism is a behaviour of going to work despite illness. It has been predominantly measured using single items, which introduce limitations to validity. To overcome these limitations, Hägerbäumer developed a German multi-item presenteeism scale. METHODS: The aim of the study was to provide an English translation and psychometric testing of the scale. This was conducted in two phases with native English-speaking employed adults. Phase 1 includes translation and cognitive debriefing, phase 2 testing construct validity and internal consistency reliability. RESULTS: Cognitive debriefing with 10 employees revealed no problems with understanding or answering the translated items. In total, 487 employed adults participated in the study, of which data from 287 were included in the analysis. For structural validity, the goodness-of-fit indicators all reached their thresholds (TLI = 0.98, CFI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.07, SRMR = 0.02). The scale does not show differences between sexes and age groups but between sectors (F6,70.95 = 5.53, p < 0.001). The internal consistency reliability was satisfactory with α = 0.89 (CI 95%, 0.87-0.91). CONCLUSION: The translated multidimensional scale for measuring presenteeism at the behavioural level demonstrated good psychometric properties in an initial validation. Further psychometric testing is required before using this scale in cross-national comparison in research and international companies.

An Innovative Method to Debrief Critical Events.

PURPOSE: To explore if cold debriefing, which by definition, occurs days to weeks following the critical event, addresses identified barriers to routine debriefing and results in instituting debriefing as standard practice in the perianesthesia division at the site hospital. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive design using case study reviews METHODS: Seven critical events, meeting the criteria of a preproject list, were debriefed by the patient's primary nurse using a cold debriefing method. Following the debriefing session, the nurse outlining the event, and the staff in attendance were asked to complete a short survey. Knowledge gained or education needed, suggestions for process improvements, and perceived safety of the environment, and feeling safe to provide feedback were assessed. FINDINGS: Identified barriers were reduced with the institution of cold debriefing. An average of 33% of the working staff were able to attend at least one debriefing session, indicating the barrier of time may be diminished by using cold debriefing. Most staff and debriefers also felt the environment was safe, and feedback provided during the debriefing sessions resulted in identified needed education and process improvement measures. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of cold debriefing to share and examine information following a critical event may address common barriers, result in process improvement measures, and identify educational needs required by the perianesthesia staff.

Use of different debriefing methods after in situ simulation with intensive care unit nurses.

BACKGROUND: The debriefing phase is the simulation phase where performance improves and learning occurs. AIM: This study examined the effects of the learning conversation (LC)-based, 3D (defusing, discovering and deepening) model-based and unstructured debriefing methods on satisfaction and debriefing experience after in-situ simulation among intensive care unit (ICU) nurses. STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized controlled experimental study, three debriefing methods were compared, according to which 119 ICU nurses were divided into the following groups: LC group (n = 38), 3D group (n = 40) and control group (n = 41). In- situ simulation was performed with an intensive care patient scenario. p < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The total Debriefing Experience Scale-Experience with Debriefing part scores were 89.76 ± 8.10 in the LC group, 88.90 ± 8.70 in the 3D group and 88.29 ± 7.28 in the control group. No significant difference was found in debriefing experience and satisfaction between the groups (p > .05), but a significant difference was observed in the LC group. The groups showed a homogeneous distribution regarding participant characteristics. CONCLUSION: Debriefing experience and satisfaction do not differ between the methods. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Implementation of the simulation in the ICU in - situ with ICU nurses is beneficial in obtaining a fidelity experience. Performing the debriefing application after simulation in line with the model supports the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) debriefing standards.

Intensive care unit nurses' perceptions of debriefing after critical incidents: A qualitative descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: Intensive care unit (ICU) nurses are exposed to critical incidents daily at their workplace, which may have long-term physical and psychological impacts. Despite the growing evidence supporting clinical debriefing in health care to prevent these impacts, a scarcity of literature exists to support its use in the adult intensive care setting. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to explore nurses' perceptions of clinical debriefing after critical incidents in an adult ICU. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive design was utilised. Thematic analysis of data from individual semistructured interviews with six ICU nurses was undertaken. FINDINGS: In this study, two themes were identified. Firstly, participants valued hot debriefing after critical incidents for the key reasons of having an opportunity to reflect on and learn from a critical incident and reduce normalisation of stressful situations. Secondly, when logistical factors such as communication, timing, and location were not considered, the attendance at debriefings was negatively influenced. Participants identified that ICU nurses commonly prioritised patient tasks over attending a debrief; therefore, teamwork and flexibility with logistics was crucial. CONCLUSIONS: Hot debriefing, of a short duration and close to the time of the event, was valued and played an important role in staff wellbeing and self-care, contributing to preventing self-blame and normalisation of stressful situations. A clearer definition of the term along with greater recognition of types of events that could be considered critical incidents is required for staff support after critical incidents in the complex intensive care setting.

Proactive debriefing to promote wellbeing in intensive care nurses: A protocol.

BACKGROUND: The dynamic, rewarding, yet challenging environment of the intensive care unit is experienced in extremes by intensive care nurses. To ensure intensive care nurses can continue to fulfil their professional roles and responsibilities, careful consideration and promotion of collective and individual wellbeing is required. Regular proactive debriefing provides an opportunity to commune, connect, and reflect on the challenging nature of clinical work and is a potential intervention to aid in the promotion of wellbeing. AIM/OBJECTIVE: This study aims to collaboratively develop, implement, and evaluate a proactive debriefing intervention, which will target the promotion of nurses' wellbeing. STUDY PLAN: This hybrid effectiveness-implementation study will use a pretest/post-test design to test a codesigned proactive debriefing intervention on the wellbeing of nurses working in a large quaternary intensive care unit. This research will be conducted in two phases. Phase one will consist of focus groups and a codesign workshop. Phase two surrounds the implementation and analysis of the codesigned intervention.

Low-fidelity Medical Simulation: Relevance in the Learning of Dental Students in South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare embraces simulation's learning boost, from medicine to dentistry. But can it unlock the secrets of intricate fixed prosthodontics? This study takes a pioneering step to find out. AIM: To evaluate low-fidelity medical simulation (LFMSim) in fixed prosthodontics by assessing its effectiveness in training corono-radicular preparations and by exploring participants' perceptions of LFMSim as an innovative teaching tool for developing pre-practice skills. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, descriptive study was executed to explore these facets among 6th-year students. The Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH©) evaluation grid, student version, was employed for assessment. The study encompassed one week, from 03/03/2023 to 10/03/2023. RESULTS: The study involved 28 learners with an average age of 23 and a sex ratio of 0.33, half of whom had prior exposure to simulation sessions. Seventy-five percent of participants watched the instructional video a day before the simulation, with nine expressing presession stress. Overall, 19% of students found the session as expected, while 43% considered it better than anticipated. Satisfaction levels varied, with 50% indicating they were "rather satisfied," and 46.4% expressing absolute satisfaction. The Debriefing Assessment using DASH yielded an average score of 4.85. CONCLUSION: The study's findings shed light on the effectiveness of LFMSim in training corono-radicular preparations and post-space impressions for fixed prosthodontics among 6th-year students. The varied satisfaction levels and the emphasis on debriefing discussions suggest avenues for improving simulation sessions in the future. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: These insights are pertinent for educators and institutions aiming to enhance dental education through innovative teaching tools like simulation. By refining simulation sessions based on debriefing feedback, educators can better prepare students for real-world clinical scenarios, ultimately improving patient care outcomes. This highlights the practical importance of incorporating simulation-based learning into dental curricula. How to cite this article: Hadyaoui D, Boukhris H, Riahi Z, et al. Low-fidelity Medical Simulation: Relevance in the Learning of Dental Students in South Africa. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(5):463-472.

Effect of simulation based workshop on changing faculty perception for simulation-based education.

Objective: To compare the perceptions of participants before and after a one-day workshop on Simulation-based Education. The other objective was to determine the feedback of participants about the one day workshop on Simulation-based Education. Methods: In March 2023, a one-day workshop on Simulation-Based-Education (SBE) was conducted by the Department of Medical Education of Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical Education in collaboration with the foreign guest faculty through zoom. This workshop was conducted with the participants (faculty members) of the Certificate program. The study adopted quasi experimental (pretest posttest) research design. For data collection we used a validated questionnaire which compromises of three parts. Data was analyzed using SPSS 23. This is a semi-structured questionnaire which consists of four parts. The first part entails the demographic data of the participants. The second structured part collects the perception of participants through 26 statements on 5 points Likert scale (strongly disagree = 1, disagree = 2, agree to some extent = 3, agree = 4, strongly agree = 5). Results: The mean difference in participant perceptions was significant (P<0.05)on 13 statements: Improves communication skills (pretest 3.05±1.050, posttest 4.20±1.056; p=0.004), enhance teamwork (pretest 3.30±0.979, posttest 4.30±0.923; p=0.004), overcomes the challenge of uncooperative patients during real practice (pretest 3.80±0.696, posttest 4.30±0.470; p= 0.008), enact live patients (pretest 2.70±0.923, posttest 3.65±1.040; p=0.004), incopororation into medical education (pretest 3.20±0.894, posttest 4.40±0.503; p=0.000), provide safe, reliastic and conducive learning environment (pretest 2.85±0.875, postest4.00±0.795; p=0.000), provide easy learning (pretest 2.75±0.716, posttest 4.05±0.605 p=0.000), decrease ethical issues with more repeated practice (pretest 2.75±0.716, posttest 3.90±0.788; p=0.000), reduces the effort put in by a faculty in clinical teaching (pretest 2.80±0.696, posttest 3.45±0.999; p=0.039), supplement to clinical practice (pretest 2.75±0.444, posttest 4.55±0.510; p=0.000), evidence required for simulation activities (pretest 2.95±0.605, posttest 4.10±0.641; p=0.000), able to add simulation in clinical subject (pretest 3.15±1.089, posttest 3.80±0.834; p= 0.055), can instruct complex skills without simulation (pretest 2.55±0.887, posttest 3.40±0.883; p=0.018). Conclusions: The study signifiacnaty changed the faculty members' perceptions of simulation-based education.These encouraging findings may influence their future practice in simulation-based education, allowing them to provide safe, high-quality health care in the workplace and, eventually, enhance patient outcomes.

Getting slapped and kicked: the experience of judicial bullying for lawyers providing publicly funded criminal defence.

Judicial bullying has received increased attention in Australia in the past decade. Traditional attitudes that dismissed judicial bullying as a rite of passage have been superseded by recognition about the negative impact it has on lawyers' mental health and wellbeing. In interviews about wellbeing and burnout with lawyers in five Australian jurisdictions, judicial bullying was identified as having a significant role in lawyers' mental health and careers. This research affirms current formal steps being undertaken in Victoria to address judicial bullying, but also emphasises the informal mechanisms employed by lawyers to mitigate the risk and reduce the impact of judicial bullying.