Associations between blood antioxidant levels and femoral neck strength.

BACKGROUND: Studies have confirmed that antioxidants contribute to a lower risk of osteoporosis, which is an independent factor for femoral neck fracture (FNF). However, the associations between blood antioxidant levels and femoral neck strength remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to test the hypothesis that levels of blood antioxidants are positively associated with composite indices of bone strength in femoral neck, which integrate the bending strength index (BSI), compressive strength index (CSI), and impact strength index (ISI), in a population of middle-aged and elderly individuals. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized data from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study. Blood levels of antioxidants were measured and analyzed. RESULTS: In total, data from 878 participants were analyzed. Results of Spearman correlation analyses indicated that blood levels of 6 antioxidants (total lutein, zeaxanthin, alpha-carotene, 13-cis-beta-carotene, trans-beta-carotene and total lycopene) were positively associated with CSI, BSI, or ISI in middle-aged and elderly individuals. Conversely, blood gamma-tocopherol and alpha-tocopherol levels were negatively associated with CSI, BSI, or ISI scores. Furthermore, linear regression analyses suggested that only blood zeaxanthin levels remained positively associated with CSI (odds ratio, OR 1.27; 95% CI: 0.03, 2.50; p = 0.045), BSI (OR, 0.54; 95% CI: 0.03-1.06; p = 0.037), and ISI (OR, 0.06; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.13; p = 0.045) scores in the study population after adjusting for age and sex. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that elevated blood zeaxanthin levels were significantly and positively associated with femoral neck strength (CSI, BSI, or ISI) in a population of middle-aged and elderly individuals. These findings suggest that zeaxanthin supplementation may reduce FNF risk independently.

Relationships Between Pulmonary Function and Composite Indices of Femoral Neck Strength in Korean Men (KNHANES IV).

BACKGROUND: Despite the close relationship between osteoporosis and chronic pulmonary diseases, few studies have evaluated relationships between pulmonary functions and bone quality. We investigated associations between pulmonary function test results and femoral neck strength indices (SIs) in Korean men. METHODS: This population-based, cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey IV on 936 men aged ≥ 19 years. Pulmonary functions (forced vital capacity [FVC] and forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1]) were measured using a dry rolling seal spirometer. Femoral neck SIs, relative to load, were calculated by hip dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for compression strength index (CSI), bending strength index (BSI), and impact strength index (ISI). RESULTS: The 443 (47.3%) of the 936 men were current smokers. FVC, FVC percentage with respect to the expected normal value, FEV1, and FEV1 percentage with respect to the expected normal value (FEV1p) were positively associated with CSI and BSI after adjusting for confounders, including smoking history (ß = 0.003-0.223, P = 0.005-0.036). FEV1 and FEV1p were positively associated with ISI (ß = 0.000-0.014, P = 0.010-0.025). Of components of femoral neck SIs, bone mineral density was correlated with FEV1 and FEV1p (ß = 0.001-0.037, P = 0.017-0.019). After adjusting for all confounders, all femoral neck SIs increased with FVC quintiles (P for trends = 0.001-0.012), and CSI and BSI increased with FEV1 quintiles (P for trends = 0.034-0.043). CONCLUSION: Reduced pulmonary function was correlated with reduced femoral neck strength, even after adjusting for smoking history in Korean men. Femoral neck SIs might be useful tools for evaluating bone health in men with reduced pulmonary function.

Association between obesity and femoral neck strength according to age, sex, and fat distribution.

Indicators of total and abdominal obesity were negatively associated with femoral neck strength indices. There are age-, sex-, and fat distribution-specific differences in the magnitude of these associations. These suggested that indicators of obesity with different magnitude according to age, sex, and fat distribution associated with poor bone health. INTRODUCTION: Fat regulates bone metabolism, but the associations of total and abdominal obesity with bone health are inconsistent. We investigated the association between indicators of obesity and composite indices of femoral neck (FN) strength reflecting the risk of hip fracture. METHODS: This population-based cross-sectional study examined data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Participants were divided into groups according to age (25-49/≥50 years) and sex. We examined total fat mass (TFM) and percentage fat mass (pFM) as indicators of total obesity and truncal fat mass (TrFM) as an indicator of abdominal obesity. We calculated the composite indices of FN strength and anthropometric clinical indicators of abdominal obesity. RESULTS: TFM, pFM, and TrFM were negatively associated with the composite indices, irrespective of age and sex (P < 0.001-0.005). Most anthropometric clinical indicators of abdominal obesity showed negative associations with the composite indices regardless of age and sex (P < 0.001-0.048), except for women aged 25-49 years. In men, magnitudes of the negative contributions of TFM to the composite indices were significantly stronger at age 25-49 years than at age ≥50 years. Magnitudes of negative associations of TFM with the composite indices were greater in men than in women. TrFM had a more detrimental effect than TFM on FN strength in men aged 25-49 years and in women of both ages. CONCLUSION: Indicators of total and abdominal obesity negatively associated with FN strength, and magnitudes of their effects on bone health differed according to age, sex, and fat distribution.

Higher BMI and lower femoral neck strength in males with type 2 diabetes mellitus and normal bone mineral density.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and osteoporosis are two age-associated diseases. Body mass index (BMI) is positively associated with osteoporosis or osteopenia in T2DM population. Bone mineral density does not necessarily reflect the alterations in bone microarchitecture. Our aims were to investigate the relationship between BMI and femoral neck strength in males with T2DM and normal range of bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: This study enrolled 115 males (median age 53.3 years) with T2DM and normal BMD. Femoral neck strength indexes, including compression strength index (CSI), bending strength index (BSI), impact strength index (ISI), were calculated by parameters generated from Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry software. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationships between BMI and femoral neck strength variables. RESULTS: Compared with T2DM-normal weight group, T2DM-overweight group and T2DM-obesity group had a higher femur neck and total femur BMDs. Cross sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), cross sectional area (CSA), section modulus (SM) were significantly higher (all p<0.05), and buckling ratio (BR) (6.35±2.08 vs 7.18±1.71) was lower in T2DM-obesity group than in T2DM-normal weight group. Compared with T2DM-normal weight group, CSI (all p<0.001), BSI (all p<0.001), ISI (all p<0.001) were significantly reduced in T2DM-obesity and T2DM-overweight groups. Pearson correlation analysis indicated that BMI was negatively correlated with CSI (r= - 0.457, p<0.001), BSI(r = -0.397, p<0.001), ISI (r = - 0.414, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher BMI is associated with lower femoral neck strength in males with T2DM and normal BMD. It implies that femoral neck fracture risk increases in obese and diabetic males, despite their high bone density.

[Predictive effect of femoral neck strength composite indexes on femoral head collapse in non-traumatic osteonecrosis of femoral head].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the predictive effect of the femoral neck strength composite indexes on femoral head collapse in non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) compared with bone turnover marker. METHODS: The non-traumatic ONFH patients who were admitted and received non-surgical treatment between January 2010 and December 2016 as the research object. And 96 cases (139 hips) met the selection criteria and were included in the study. There were 54 males (79 hips) and 42 females (60 hips), with an average age of 40.2 years (range, 22-60 years). According to whether the femoral head collapsed during follow-up, the patients were divided into collapsed group and non-collapsed group. The femoral neck width, hip axis length, height, body weight, and bone mineral density of femoral neck were measured. The femoral neck strength composite indexes, including the compressive strength index (CSI), bending strength index (BSI), and impact strength index (ISI), were calculated. The bone turnover marker, including the total typeⅠcollagen amino terminal elongation peptide (t-P1NP), ß-crosslaps (ß-CTx), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), 25 hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], and N-terminal osteocalcin (N-MID), were measured. The age, gender, height, body weight, body mass index (BMI), bone mineral density of femoral neck, etiology, Japanese Osteonecrosis Investigation Committee (JIC) classification, femoral neck strength composite indexes, and bone turnover marker were compared between the two groups, and the influencing factors of the occurrence of femoral head collapse were initially screened. Then the significant variables in the femoral neck strength composite indexes and bone turnover marker were used for logistic regression analysis to screen risk factors; and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the significant variables' impact on non-traumatic ONFH. RESULTS: All patients were followed up 3.2 years on average (range, 2-4 years). During follow-up, 46 cases (64 hips) had femoral head collapse (collapsed group), and the remaining 50 cases (75 hips) did not experience femoral head collapse (non-collapsed group). Univariate analysis showed that the difference in JIC classification between the two groups was significant ( Z=-7.090, P=0.000); however, the differences in age, gender, height, body weight, BMI, bone mineral density of femoral neck, and etiology were not significant ( P>0.05). In the femoral neck strength composite indexes, the CSI, BSI, and ISI of the collapsed group were significantly lower than those of the non-collapsed group ( P<0.05); in the bone turnover marker, the t-P1NP and ß-CTx of the collapsed group were significantly lower than those of the non-collapsed group ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference in N-MID, 25(OH)D or ALP between groups ( P>0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the CSI, ISI, and t-P1NP were risk factors for femoral collapse in patients with non-traumatic ONFH ( P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the cut-off points of CSI, BSI, ISI, t-P1NP, and ß-CTx were 6.172, 2.435, 0.465, 57.193, and 0.503, respectively, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were 0.753, 0.642, 0.903, 0.626, and 0.599, respectively. CONCLUSION: The femoral neck strength composite indexes can predict the femoral head collapse in non-traumatic ONFH better than the bone turnover marker. ISI of 0.465 is a potential cut-off point below which future collapse of early non-traumatic ONFH can be predicted.