Comparison of flexible endoscopic needle knife septotomy and peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of Zenker's diverticulum.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Treatment of Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) has evolved from flexible endoscopic septotomy (FES) to peroral endoscopic myotomy (Z-POEM). In this study, we compare efficacy and safety of FES with a needle knife septotomy (FENKS) and Z-POEM for symptomatic ZD. METHODS: Consecutive patients at a single institution who underwent endoscopic ZD treatment by FENKS or Z-POEM were identified. Demographics, clinical characteristics, procedure technique, technical and clinical success, and adverse events (AEs) within 30 days were reviewed and compared between the two groups. AEs were classified by the AGREE classification. Baseline and post-procedure Dakkak and Bennett's (DB) scores were reported at 6, 12 and 24 months. Clinical success (DB score ≤1) was assessed by per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat analyses (ITT). RESULTS: 60 patients (55% M, mean 72±12 yrs.) underwent FENKS (n=21) or Z-POEM (n=39) between 2016 and 2023. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar and overall technical success was 98.3%. Clinical success by PP and ITT analyses at 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention were similar between both groups. The FENKS group had a higher prevalence (29% vs. 5%, p=0.018) and severity (p=0.032) of AEs and were more likely to be hospitalized after treatment (71% vs. 33%, p=0.007). During a median follow up of 18 months, reintervention was required for 5 (10%) in the FENKS (n=2, 9%) and Z-POEM (n=3, 7.6%) groups (p=1.0) a mean 7.6 ± 4.4 months after initial therapy. CONCLUSION: Treatment of ZD with Z-POEM appears to be safer than FENKS with similar short- and mid-term clinical success.

An Unusual Case of Contralateral Hypoglossal and Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsies Following Endotracheal Intubation.

We present an unusual case of a 62-year-old male presenting with contralateral hypoglossal and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsies following endotracheal intubation for emergency cardiac surgery. Postoperative, the patient was referred to Speech and Language Therapy due to concerns regarding the safety of his swallow. Oromotor assessment revealed left-sided tongue weakness and aphonia. Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) revealed a right vocal cord palsy and severe oropharyngeal dysphagia. There were no other focal neurological signs. An MRI head did not demonstrate a medial medullary stroke or other intracranial lesion. CT neck showed no abnormality identified in relation to the course of the right vagus nerve or recurrent laryngeal nerve at the skull base or through the neck respectively. The patient required a gastrostomy for nutrition and hydration. He continued to be assessed at several month intervals over the course of a year using FEES to obtain a range of voice, secretion and swallowing outcome measures. The patient commenced intensive dysphagia therapy targeting pharyngeal drive, hyolaryngeal excursion and laryngeal sensation. Swallow manoeuvres were trialled during FEES and a head-turn to the side of the vocal cord palsy during deglutition reduced aspiration risk which expedited return to oral intake. The patient had partial recovery over twelve months. Hypoglossal nerve palsy completely resolved. The right vocal cord remained paralysed however the left vocal cord compensated enabling the patient to produce a normal voice. The patient was able to take thin fluids and regular diet and the gastrostomy was removed.

Effect of tobacco use on Zenker's diverticulotomy outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes in patients with and without history of tobacco use who underwent Zenker's diverticulotomy (ZD). STUDY DESIGN: Single institution retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary care academic hospital. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent ZD via an open stapler, rigid endoscopic CO2 laser, stapler or harmonic scalpel, and flexible endoscopic technique from January 2006 to December 2020 was performed. Data were abstracted for patient demographics, diverticular features, and rates of adverse events and symptomatic recurrence. RESULTS: Out of 424 patients, 146 (34.4 %) had a history of tobacco use: 126 (29.7 %) were former smokers, and 20 (4.7 %) were active smokers. In univariable cross-sectional analyses, the likelihood of postoperative bleeding, perforation, emergency department visits, unplanned readmission, or recurrence did not demonstrate an association with tobacco use history even after adjustment for age, sex, and surgical approach. Similarly, in Cox Proportional Hazards regression, tobacco use was not associated with an increased risk of recurrence, even after correcting for age, sex, and type of surgery. The median time to recurrence observed in our cohort was 11.5 years amongst non-smokers, 8.7 years amongst former smokers, and 1.2 years amongst active smokers (p = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in post-operative adverse events or frequency of recurrence of ZD between active, former, and non-smokers. Although underpowered and not statistically significant, median time to recurrence appears to be shorter in smokers when compared with former and non-smokers following surgery.

Improvement in swallowing safety after injection laryngoplasty in patients with unilateral vocal paralysis complicated with aspiration.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of injection laryngoplasty (IL) on voice for unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) is supported increasingly in literatures, yet less is known for swallowing. Also, prevalence of patient-reported dysphagia is substantially higher than instrumental studies. This prospective study focused on swallowing outcomes, with predetermined flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) protocol that simulates daily life situation. METHODS: Adult patients with UVFP and aspiration receiving IL were recruited. Voice outcome measurements, as well as swallowing outcomes including Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) and FEES, which challenged patients with different fluid volumes: 10 mL, 20 mL, and 90 mL cup sipping were evaluated. RESULTS: Significant improvements were demonstrated in all voice outcomes. Significant changes were also presented inEAT-10 (P < 0.01). Pre-operatively, penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) was 1.5 ± 1.3, 1.9 ± 1.7 and 2.3 ± 1.8 for 10 mL, 20 mL and 90 mL serial sipping, and improved to 1.1 ± 0.3, 1.1 ± 0.4 and 1.4 ± 0.7 post-operatively (P < 0.01). Safe swallowing (PAS ≤ 2) was achieved in all, except for one patient, who presented with a post-injection PAS of 4 (material enters the airway, contacts the vocal folds, and is ejected from the airway) on 90 mL cup sipping, whose pre-injection PAS was 7 (residue in trachea). CONCLUSION: Maintaining swallowing function suitable for social environment is important. Our results demonstrated the feasibility of the predetermined FEES protocol, and positive effects of IL on both voice and swallowing outcomes.

Diagnostic accuracy of the 'Dysphagia Screening Tool for Geriatric Patients' (DSTG) compared to Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for assessing dysphagia in hospitalized geriatric patients - a diagnostic study.

BACKGROUND: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is highly prevalent among hospitalized geriatric patients. The screening instruments used to date have been evaluated primarily in stroke patients. This diagnostic study aimed to validate a new screening instrument for oropharyngeal dysphagia, the 'Dysphagia Screening Tool for Geriatric Patients' (DSTG), as compared to one of the gold standards, flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Geriatric inpatients admitted to five geriatric hospitals in Germany were consecutively evaluated using both DSTG and FEES in random order and by different evaluators blinded to the results of the other evaluation. In the FEES examination, a score of more than 3 on Rosenbek's Penetration Aspiration Scale was considered evidence of clinically relevant oropharyngeal dysphagia. Sensitivity, specificity and further measures of test performance were calculated for DSTG. RESULTS: The 53 volunteers recruited were on average 85 years of age, 56.6% were women. Twenty patients (37.7%) were diagnosed with dysphagia using FEES. Of these, 12 were screened as positive on DSTG. Of the 33 FEES negative patients, 4 tested positive on DSTG. The following test parameters were calculated for DSTG: sensitivity: 0.60, 95% confidence interval [0.39 ; 0.78], specificity 0.88 [0.73 ; 0.95], positive predictive value 0.75 [0.51 ; 0.90], negative predictive value 0.78 [0.63 ; 0.89], positive likelihood ratio 4.95 [1.85 ; 13.27], negative likelihood ratio 0.46 [0.26 ; 0.79]. In a receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.77 [0.62 ; 0.91]. No adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: The DSTG appears to be a valid instrument for screening of oropharyngeal dysphagia in geriatric inpatients.

Confidence, Accuracy, and Reliability of Penetration-Aspiration Scale Ratings on Flexible Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing by Speech Pathologists.

This study investigated rater confidence when rating airway invasion with the penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) on flexible endoscopic evaluations of swallowing (FEES), raters' accuracy against a referent-standard, inter-rater reliability, and potential associations between clinician confidence, experience, and accuracy. Thirty-one clinicians who use FEES in their daily practice were asked to judge airway invasion with the PAS and to rate their confidence that their score was correct (0-100) for 40 video clips, five in each of the 8 PAS categories. We found that raters were most confident in rating PAS 1, 7, and 8. The average confidence score across all videos was 76/100. Confidence did not have a significant relationship with accuracy against the referent-standard. Accuracy was highest for PAS 1 (92%), followed by PAS 8 (80%), PAS 7 (77%), and PAS 4 (72%). Accuracy was below 60% for PAS 2, 3, 5, and 6, the lowest being for PAS 3 (49%). Mean accuracy for all ratings, compared to referent-standard ratings, was highest for the intermediate group (71%), followed by expert (68%) and novice (65%). In general, we found that certain PAS scores tend to be rated more accurately, and that participating SLPs had varied confidence in PAS ratings on FEES. Potential reasons for these findings as well as suggested next steps are discussed.

Flexible endoscopic Zenker's diverticulotomy - A retrospective review of outcomes in 75 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Flexible endoscopic Zenker's diverticulotomy (FEZD) is a procedure performed primarily by gastroenterologists for treatment of symptomatic Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). Given the lack of prior investigations with large sample sizes, we report on one of the largest series of patients who underwent FEZD. METHODS: A review of patients who underwent FEZD at our institution from 2006 to 2021 was performed. Data were abstracted for patient demographics, clinical features, procedural characteristics, adverse events, and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients (37 women) with mean age of 77.9 (33-102) years and mean (range) follow-up of 1.1 (0-13.2) years were identified. 67.9 % of FEZD cases were performed under general anesthesia. The mean procedure time was 37.1 min. Same day discharge and resumption of oral intake was seen in 56.4 % and 57.1 % of cases, respectively. Adverse events included intraprocedural bleeding (15.7 %) controlled with endoscopic means, infection (4.8 %) exclusively managed with antibiotics in all but one case, subcutaneous emphysema (2.4 %), and perforation (10.7 %) conservatively managed in all but one case. 97.6 % of patients had sustained subjective improvement in symptoms following their procedure. Fifteen patients (20 %) experienced recurrence after undergoing initial FEZD-26.7 % percent of whom were sufficiently treated with repeat FEZDs. Younger age was associated with recurrence (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: FEZD is an effective, safe procedure for the management of symptomatic ZD. It is a viable alternative for patients in whom otorhinolaryngological procedures via rigid endoscopy are not an option.

Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in children with type 1 spinal muscular atrophy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to report on implementing flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in infants and toddlers with type 1 spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). In addition, a comparison of FEES results and clinical scores was carried out. METHODS: A prospective pilot study was conducted including ten symptomatic children with SMA type 1 (two SMN2 copies). They started treatment with one of the three currently approved therapies for SMA at a median age of 3.8 months (range 0.7-8.9). FEES was performed according to a standard protocol using Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and Murray Secretion Scale as a primary outcome. The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP-INTEND) for motor function, Neuromuscular Disease Swallowing Status Scale (NdSSS), Oral and Swallowing Abilities Tool (OrSAT), and single clinical swallowing-related parameters were also assessed. RESULTS: Distinct swallowing disorders were already evident in eight children at inclusion. The most common findings from FEES were pharyngeal secretion pooling, penetration, and aspiration of saliva and food as well as delayed initiation of swallowing. Despite an average increase in motor function, no comparable improvement was found in swallowing function. None of the surveyed clinical scores showed a significant dependence on PAS in a mixed linear model. CONCLUSIONS: Valuable information regarding the status of dysphagia can be gathered endoscopically, particularly concerning secretion management and when oral intake is limited. Currently available clinical tools for children with type 1 may represent a change in nutritional status but are not yet mature enough to conclude swallowing ability. Further development is still required.

[Diagnostics and treatment of post-stroke dysphagia]. / Diagnostik und Therapie der Dysphagie nach einem Schlaganfall.

BACKGROUND: Post-stroke dysphagia is highly prevalent and leads to severe complications, such as aspiration pneumonia and malnutrition. Despite the high clinical relevance dysphagia management is heterogeneous and often inadequate. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review article is to provide an overview of the diagnostic and treatment strategies for post-stroke dysphagia based on recent studies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Narrative literature review. RESULTS: Dysphagia screening should be performed as early as possible in every stroke patient, e.g., with a simple water swallowing test or a multiconsistency protocol. Subsequently, flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is indicated in patients with abnormal screening results or existing risk factors for dysphagia. Dietary modifications, oral hygiene measures, and nutritional therapy can help reduce complications. Behavioral swallowing therapy or experimental therapies, such as neurostimulation procedures and pharmacological approaches aim to improve swallowing function and have shown promising results in studies. CONCLUSION: Timely management of dysphagia is necessary to reduce complications.

The role of peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's diverticulum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Zenker's peroral endoscopic myotomy (Z-POEM) has revolutionized the therapeutic strategy for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) with promising results. We conducted this meta-analysis to estimate the safety and efficacy of Z-POEM for ZD and compare the feasibility and effectiveness of Z-POEM with that of flexible endoscopic septotomy (FES). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to query for studies that assessed the safety and efficacy of Z-POEM for ZD. All articles published from inception to July 31, 2021 were included. The primary outcomes were the overall technical success rate, clinical success rate, incidence of adverse events, and clinical recurrence rate. RESULTS: Eleven studies involving 357 patients undergone Z-POEM were included. Overall, the quality of included studies was above average, with five studies rated as high quality and six ranked as moderate quality. The overall pooled technical success rate for Z-POEM was 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 93.6-97.9%; I2 = 0%). The total pooled clinical success rate for Z-POEM was 93.0% (95% CI 89.4-95.4%; I2 = 0%). The pooled incidence of adverse events for Z-POEM was 12.4% (95% CI 9.1-16.7%; I2 = 0%). The pooled clinical recurrence rate for Z-POEM was 11.2% (95% CI 7.6-16.2%; I2 = 0%). The clinical success for Z-POEM was significantly better than that of FES (relative risk [RR]: 1.11; CI 95% 1.03-1.18; p = 0.004, I2 = 0%), while there were no significant differences in technical success, adverse events, and clinical recurrence between Z-POEM and FES. CONCLUSION: Z-POEM could be an effective and safe therapeutic modality for ZD, and even has a slightly higher clinical success rate than FES. However, comparative studies with long-term follow-up will be needed to further confirm our finding.

Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety (VASES): A Standardized Approach to Rating Pharyngeal Residue, Penetration, and Aspiration During FEES.

The primary aim of this study was to describe the development of the Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety (VASES)-a standardized method to rate pharyngeal residue, penetration, and aspiration during FEES. As a secondary aim, we explored the feasibility of training novices to interpret FEES using VASES. Literature review and consensus panel discussions were used to develop standardized rules for VASES. A training protocol was developed and criterion ratings were established. Twenty-five novice raters completed VASES training and pre-/post-training assessments. Statistical analyses were used to examine pre- to post-training differences in the accuracy, reliability, and time to rate each video clip using VASES. Four sets of VASES rules were developed, including 'what', 'where', 'when', and 'how' to rate FEES. Large, significant post-training improvements in rating accuracy were observed across all seven VASES outcome measures (Cohen's d range 0.74-1.59). Additionally, inter-rater reliability increased for four of the seven outcome measures, and the amount of time to rate each video clip decreased from 2.6 min pre-training to 1.5 min post-training. VASES is a standardized FEES rating method used to enhance the subjective analysis of pharyngeal residue, penetration, and aspiration. It can be feasibly taught to novice raters with a high level of success and may be an effective method to analyze swallowing safety and efficiency in clinical and research practices. Future research is needed to test the validity of VASES by examining its relationship with other validated FEES rating scales.

Advancing Laryngeal Adductor Reflex Testing Beyond Sensory Threshold Detection.

Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST) is a promising clinical tool to assess airway integrity via the laryngeal adductor reflex (LAR). The current clinical protocol relies on sensory threshold detection, as relatively little is known about the motor response of this sensorimotor airway protective reflex. Here, we focused on characterizing normative LAR motion dynamics in 20 healthy young participants using our prototype high-pressure syringe-based air pulse device and analytic software (VFtrack™) that tracks vocal fold (VF) motion in endoscopic videos. Following device bench testing for air pulse stimulus characterization, we evoked and objectively quantified LAR motion dynamics in response to two suprathreshold air pulse stimuli (40 versus 60 mm Hg), delivered to the arytenoid mucosa through a bronchoscope working channel. The higher air pressures generated by our device permitted an approximate 1 cm endoscope working distance for continual visualization of the bilateral VFs throughout the LAR. Post hoc video analysis identified two main findings: (1) there are variant and invariant subcomponents of the LAR motor response, and (2) only a fraction of suprathreshold stimuli evoked complete glottic closure during the LAR. While the clinical relevance of these findings remains to be determined, we have nonetheless demonstrated untapped potential in the current FEESST protocol. Our ongoing efforts may reveal LAR biomarkers to quantify the severity of laryngeal pathology and change over time with natural disease progression, spontaneous recovery, or in response to intervention. The ultimate goal is to facilitate predictive modeling of patients at high risk for dysphagia-related aspiration pneumonia.

Dynamics of lidocaine in topical anesthesia for office-based laryngeal procedures: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To study topical lidocaine for office-based laryngeal procedures recording onset, duration, and subjective experience of topical anesthesia. STUDY DESIGN: Nine healthy volunteers were anesthetized with 4 % lidocaine endoscopically. Laryngeal sensitivity prior to and during anesthesia was recorded until normal sensation returned measured by air-puff sensory testing. Subjective experience of the process was recorded. METHODS: Questionnaires regarding subjective experience were completed prior to, during, and after anesthesia. Laryngeal sensitivity via air-pulse trigger of the laryngeal adductor reflex (LAR) prior to and after 3 mL shower of 4 % lidocaine was recorded at 30 second intervals until the larynx was insensate with no LAR at 10 mmHg. Time to anesthesia was recorded and post-endoscopy questionnaire was given. Upon subjective change in sensation, sensitivity via air-pulse trigger of the LAR was recorded until baseline sensation returned. A post-anesthesia questionnaire recorded the subjective experience. RESULTS: Average time to full anesthesia was 110 s (±31.2). Subjective return of sensation was noted at 10 min (±2.5), however time to return to normal LAR was 22 min (±5.8). Based on three standard deviations, 99.7 % of the population will be anesthetized at 3.4 min, report subjective change at 18.2 min and regain full sensation at 40 min. CONCLUSIONS: Office-based laryngeal procedures should be performed at least 2 min following topical 4 % lidocaine with a window for manipulation of at least 16 min. Oral intake should be delayed for over 45 min to ensure complete return of sensation. The laryngeal shower of lidocaine is subjectively tolerated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2C Outcomes Research.

Safety of office-based flexible endoscopic procedures of the pharynx and larynx under topical anesthesia.

INTRODUCTION: Flexible endoscopic procedures (FEP) using a working channel allowed otolaryngologists to perform more procedures on the pharynx and the larynx under local anesthesia. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of this technique by studying the adverse effects of this practice in an office-based setting. METHODS: This is a monocentric retrospective cohort study. We searched the database using the French procedural code for FEP performed in an outpatient setting between January 2005 and December 2020. Data regarding the patient's characteristics, indications, and periprocedural complications were extracted. RESULTS: In total, we included 231 patients with a total of 308 FEP: 36% biopsy, 20% hyaluronic acid injection (including 3.5% at the level of the cavum), 20% injection of other substances (in descending order: botulinum toxin, cidofovir, physiological serum, cortisone), 20% exploration for an occult tumor, 3% samples for microbiological analysis, 1% other procedures. Of the 308 FEP included in this study, 24 patients (10.3%) had complications corresponding to 7.8% of the procedures performed. During the procedures, reported complications include minor laryngeal bleeding (n = 5), vasovagal syncope (n = 5), laryngospasm (n = 1) or nausea (n = 3), dysphagia (n = 3), and voice disorders (n = 3). Post-procedural complications were hypertensive crisis (n = 1), asthma attack (n = 1), pneumonia (n = 1), laryngitis (n = 1). Using the Clavien-Dindo classification system, these complications could be defined as grade I (laryngeal bleeding, vasovagal syncope, laryngospasm, dysphagia, nausea, voice disorders, and laryngitis) and grade II (hypertensive crisis, asthma attack, pneumonia) in 9.1% and 1.2% of cases, respectively. Most of these complications were self-limiting, while asthma attacks, pneumonia, laryngitis, and voice disorders required a medical intervention. All complications were managed without sequelae. There was no serious complication grade (no grade III, IV or V). CONCLUSIONS: FEP, which is now well standardized in our institution, makes it possible to carry out a wide range of interventions with little morbidity. These results are in line with those of literature but this technique remains out of nomenclature in France. Our experience led to the development of an evidence-based standard of care that can serve as a framework for practitioners on a nationwide level, while the work to establish official guidelines by the French society of phoniatrics and laryngology is in progress.

Dysphagia in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease as a surrogate of brain involvement?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD) are demyelinating disorders that typically affect the optic nerves and the spinal cord. However, recent studies have demonstrated various forms of brain involvement indicating encephalitic syndromes, which consequently are included in the diagnostic criteria for both. Swallowing is processed in a distributed brain network and is therefore disturbed in many neurological diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in NMOSD and MOGAD using flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) as a surrogate parameter of brain involvement. METHODS: Thirteen patients with NMOSD and MOGAD (mean age 54.2 ± 18.6 years, six men) who received FEES during clinical routine were retrospectively reviewed. Their extent of oropharyngeal dysphagia was rated using an ordinal dysphagia severity scale. FEES results were compared to a control group of healthy individuals. Dysphagia severity was correlated with the presence of clinical and radiological signs of brain involvement, the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the occurrence of pneumonia. RESULTS: Oropharyngeal dysphagia was present in 8/13 patients, including six patients without other clinical indication of brain involvement. Clinical or subclinical swallowing impairment was significantly more severe in patients with NMOSD and MOGAD compared to the healthy individuals (p = 0.009) and correlated with clinical signs of brain involvement (p = 0.038), higher EDSS (p = 0.006) and pneumonia (p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Oropharyngeal dysphagia can occur in NMOSD and MOGAD and might be associated with pneumonia and disability. FEES may help to detect subclinical brain involvement.

Validation of the German Version of the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale.

The aim of this study was to validate the German Version of the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale and to investigate the impact of rater experience and training. The English original scale was translated into German language using a forward-backward method. For the validation, 30 images of different pharyngeal residue amounts have been selected and assigned to the scales' severity levels by two experts. 28 raters rated the images in randomized order in two passes. To investigate the impact of experience and training, raters were grouped into subgroups. Statistical analysis was carried out using kappa statistics. The results demonstrate excellent residue ratings for construct validity, inter-rater reliability and intra-rater reliability regarding overall group and all subgroups (Kappa > 0.90). No significant differences were found between groups by experience and inconstant differences were found between groups by training. The German version of the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale is a valid, reliable instrument for scoring location and severity of pharyngeal residue in the context of flexible endoscopic evaluations of swallowing.

Double-catheter lavage combined with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis failed to percutaneous catheter drainage.

BACKGROUND: Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is a serious local complication of acute pancreatitis, with high mortality. Minimally invasive therapy including percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) has become the preferred method for IPN instead of traditional open necrosectomy. However, the efficacy of double-catheter lavage in combination with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement after PCD failure is unknown compared with surgical necrosectomy. METHODS: A total of 27 cases of IPN patients with failure PCD between Jan 2014 and Dec 2015 were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Fifteen patients received double-catheter lavage in combination with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement, and 12 patients underwent open necrosectomy. The primary endpoint was the composite end point of major complications or death. The secondary endpoint included mortality, major complication rate, ICU admission length of stay, and overall length of stay. RESULTS: The primary endpoint occurrence rate in double-catheter lavage in combination with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement group (8/15, 53%) was significantly lower than that in open necrosectomy group (11/12, 92%) (RR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.04 - 2.84, P < 0.05). Though the mortality between two groups showed no statistical significance (0% vs. 17%, P = 0.19), the rate of new-onset multiple organ failure and ICU admission length of stay in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in open necrosectomy group (13% vs. 58%, P = 0.04; 0 vs. 17, P = 0.02, respectively). Only 40% of patients required ICU admission after percutaneous debridement, which was markedly lower than the patients who underwent surgery (83%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Double-catheter lavage in combination with percutaneous flexible endoscopic debridement showed superior effectiveness, safety, and convenience in patients with IPN after PCD failure as compared to open necrosectomy.

Safety of flexible endoscopic biopsy of the pharynx and larynx under topical anesthesia.

Recent advancements in transnasal endoscopy enable a shift in diagnostic workup of lesions in the pharynx and larynx, from an examination with biopsy under general anesthesia to an office-based examination with flexible endoscopic biopsy under topical anesthesia. Procedural complications were evaluated to assess the safety of office-based flexible endoscopic biopsy in patients with benign and malignant laryngopharyngeal lesions. Patients who underwent flexible endoscopic biopsy from 2012 to 2016 were evaluated retrospectively. Complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications. A total of 201 flexible endoscopic biopsies were performed in 187 patients. Two Clavien-Dindo grade I (laryngospasm and anterior epistaxis), one grade II (laryngeal bleeding), and one grade IIIb (laryngeal edema) complication were observed. The first complication was self-limiting and the other three required an intervention. All patients fully recovered without sequelae. Flexible endoscopic biopsy appears to be a safe office-based procedure for the diagnosis of benign and malignant laryngopharyngeal lesions.

[Management of dysphagia in acute stroke : A prospective study for validation of current recommendations]. / Dysphagiemanagement beim akuten Schlaganfall : Eine prospektive Studie zur Überprüfung der geltenden Empfehlungen.

BACKGROUND: The German expert recommendations on the management of dysphagia in patients after acute stroke suggest an algorithm for clinical and technical investigations to identify patients at risk for aspiration and thus reduce the rate of aspiration pneumonia. The effectiveness of this algorithm has, however, not yet been prospectively validated . METHODS: In this study 144 consecutive stroke patients were assessed by a full bedside swallowing assessment including the screening procedures of standardized swallowing assessment (SSA) and 2 out of 6. Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) was performed in all patients. RESULTS: Aspiration was diagnosed in 25 patients (17.4%) by FEES. The SSA predicted aspiration with a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 55.5% and the 2 out of 6 screening with a sensitivity of 68.0% and a specificity of 61.0%. Of the patients 7 with negative screening for 2 out of 6 and 6 patients with negative SSA showed silent aspiration with the penetration aspiration scale (PAS 8) during FEES (28% of all patients with aspiration). Significant predictors for aspiration were dysarthria, dysphonia, abnormal volitional cough and cough after swallowing water; however, in multivariable analysis only dysarthria and cough after swallowing water were identified as independent predictors for aspiration. The rate of aspiration pneumonia was 2.8%. CONCLUSION: Clinical screening alone is not sufficient to identify patients at risk for aspiration pneumonia. The FEES should be used at a low threshold in cases of severe stroke and minor clinical abnormalities, especially concerning isolated dysarthria and cough after swallowing water; therefore, current recommendations should be correspondingly modified.

Reliability of the penetration aspiration scale with flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.

OBJECTIVES: The Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS), although designed for videofluoroscopy, has been utilized with flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in both research and clinical practice. The purpose of this investigation was to determine inter- and intrarater reliability of the PAS with FEES as a function of clinician FEES experience and retest interval. METHODS: Three groups of 3 clinicians (N=9) with varying FEES experience (beginning, intermediate, and advanced) assigned PAS scores to 35 swallows. Initial ratings were repeated following short-term (ie, 1 day) and long-term (ie, 1 week) retest intervals. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to assess interrater reliability on the first rating for each group. The coefficients were .91, .82, and .89 for the beginning, intermediate, and advanced clinicians, respectively. Overall interrater reliability across all 9 clinicians, irrespective of experience, was .85. Intraclass correlation coefficients were also calculated to assess intrarater reliability. The intrarater reliability for short- and long-term ratings was .90, .94, and .96 and .96, .97, and .94 for the beginning, intermediate, and advanced clinicians, respectively. Overall intrarater reliability across all 9 clinicians and all 3 ratings was .94. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent inter- and intrarater reliability was evidenced with the application of the PAS for FEES regardless of clinician experience and retest interval.