N° 363 - Évaluation et prise en charge de l'anasarque fœtoplacentaire non immune.

OBJECTIF: Décrire les méthodes actuelles d'évaluation et de prise en charge de l'anasarque fœtoplacentaire non immune en mettant l'accent sur les étiologies traitables ou récurrentes. RéSULTATS: Offrir de meilleurs services de conseil et de prise en charge en cas d'anasarque fœtoplacentaire non immune diagnostiquée en période prénatale. DONNéES: La littérature publiée a été récupérée au moyen de recherches menées dans PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, et la Bibliothèque Cochrane en 2017 à l'aide de mots-clés (« non-immune hydrops fetalis ¼, « fetal hydrops ¼, « fetal therapy ¼, « fetal metabolism ¼). Les articles retenus portaient sur des revues systématiques, des essais cliniques contrôlés, randomisés ou non, des études observationnelles et des études de cas importantes. D'autres publications ont été repérées dans les bibliographies de ces articles. Aucune restriction de date ou de langue n'a été employée. Les recherches ont été mis à jour régulièrement, et les résultats ont été incorporés à la directive clinique jusqu'en septembre 2017. Nous avons également tenu compte de la littérature grise (non publiée) trouvée sur les sites Web d'organismes d'évaluation des technologies de la santé et d'autres organismes liés aux technologies de la santé, dans des collections de directives cliniques et des registres d'essais cliniques, et obtenue auprès d'associations nationales et internationales de médecins spécialistes. AVANTAGES, INCONVéNIENTS ET COûTS: La présente directive clinique renseigne les lecteurs sur les causes de l'anasarque fœtoplacentaire non immune ainsi que sur son évaluation et sa prise en charge. Elle propose également une approche standardisée d'évaluation et de prise en charge, et met l'accent sur la recherche des conditions traitables en période prénatale et des étiologies génétiques récurrentes. VALEURS: La qualité des données probantes a été évaluée en fonction des critères décrits dans le rapport du Groupe d'étude canadien sur les soins de santé préventifs. RECOMMANDATIONS.

Mycophenolate mofetil as second line treatment in autoimmune hepatitis - A retrospective single center analysis.

Background: Most patients with autoimmune hepatitis respond to standard treatment with steroids and azathioprine. While the disease is usually fatal if untreated, patients who respond well to therapy have an excellent prognosis. Nevertheless, second-line treatment is necessary in approximately 20% of patients, due to either intolerance or insufficient response to first line treatment.While data for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients intolerant to azathioprine is encouraging, MMF seems of less benefit in patients with insufficient response to first line treatment, but analyzed data on this issue is limited. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMF as a second-line therapy in patients with AIH. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a monocentric database of AIH patients who received medical care from 2000 to 2022. Clinical, immunological and biochemical parameters were assessed at different time points including last follow-up. Results: Overall, 144 patients with AIH were identified. Fifty out of 144 (35%) AIH patients received MMF. Forty (80%) received MMF due to first line treatment intolerance, while ten (20%) due to insufficient response to first line treatment.Remission with MMF monotherapy was 81.5% in the intolerance group versus 30% in the insufficient response group. Patients switched to MMF because of an insufficient response, more often needed additional prednisolone doses higher than 5 mg/day, a switch to third-line treatment or combination regiments, to achieve disease control. Conclusions: Patients treated with MMF because of intolerance to first line treatment show a good disease control under MMF in the majority of cases. Efficacy is considerably lower in the patients switched to MMF because of an insufficient response to first line treatment.

Enhancement of ionizing radiation response by histamine in vitro and in vivo in human breast cancer.

The radioprotective potential of histamine on healthy tissue has been previously demonstrated. The aims of this work were to investigate the combinatorial effect of histamine or its receptor ligands and gamma radiation in vitro on the radiobiological response of 2 breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7), to explore the potential molecular mechanisms of the radiosensitizing action and to evaluate the histamine-induced radiosensitization in vivo in a triple negative breast cancer model. Results indicate that histamine significantly increased the radiosensitivity of MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells. This effect was mimicked by the H1R agonist 2-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)histamine and the H4R agonists (Clobenpropit and VUF8430) in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells, respectively. Histamine and its agonists enhanced radiation-induced oxidative DNA damage, DNA double-strand breaks, apoptosis and senescence. These effects were associated with increased production of reactive oxygen species, which correlated with the inhibition of catalase, glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities in MDA-MB-231 cells. Histamine was able also to potentiate in vivo the anti-tumoral effect of radiation, increasing the exponential tumor doubling time. We conclude that histamine increased radiation response of breast cancer cells, suggesting that it could be used as a potential adjuvant to enhance the efficacy of radiotherapy.