Mechanically-assisted non-invasive ventilation: A step forward to modulate and to improve the reproducibility of breathing-related motion in radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: When using highly conformal radiotherapy techniques, a stabilized breathing pattern could greatly benefit the treatment of mobile tumours. Therefore, we assessed the feasibility of Mechanically-assisted non-invasive ventilation (MANIV) on unsedated volunteers, and its ability to stabilize and modulate the breathing pattern over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers underwent 2 sessions of dynamic MRI under 4 ventilation modes: spontaneous breathing (SP), volume-controlled mode (VC) that imposes regular breathing in physiologic conditions, shallow-controlled mode (SH) that intends to lower amplitudes while increasing the breathing rate, and slow-controlled mode (SL) that mimics end-inspiratory breath-holds. The last 3 modes were achieved under respirator without sedation. The motion of the diaphragm was tracked along the breathing cycles on MRI images and expressed in position, breathing amplitude, and breathing period for intra- and inter-session analyses. In addition, end-inspiratory breath-hold duration and position stability were analysed during the SL mode. RESULTS: MANIV was well-tolerated by all volunteers, without adverse event. The MRI environment led to more discomfort than MANIV itself. Compared to SP, VC and SH modes improved the inter-session reproducibility of the amplitude (by 43% and 47% respectively) and significantly stabilized the intra- and inter-session breathing rate (p < 0.001). Compared to VC, SH mode significantly reduced the intra-session mean amplitude (36%) (p < 0.002), its variability (42%) (p < 0.001), and the intra-session baseline shift (26%) (p < 0.001). The SL mode achieved end-inspiratory plateaus lasting more than 10 s. CONCLUSION: MANIV offers exciting perspectives for motion management. It improves its intra- and inter-session reproducibility and should facilitate respiratory tracking, gating or margin techniques for both photon and proton treatments.

Prehabilitation for patient positioning: pelvic exercises assist in minimizing inter-fraction sacral slope variability during radiation therapy.

Reproducible patient positioning is essential for precision in radiation therapy (RT) delivery. We tested the hypothesis that a structured daily pre-treatment stretching regimen is both feasible and effective for minimizing variability in positioning, as measured by sacral slope angles (SSA). Eight female subjects undergoing pelvic radiotherapy performed a structured daily hip exercise regimen (extension and external rotation) immediately prior to both simulation imaging and daily treatment, throughout their RT course. This exercising cohort was compared to a retrospective review of 20 subjects (17 women and 3 men) undergoing RT, who had usual care. SSA measurements from daily pre-treatment imaging were compared to SSA measurements from the simulation CT. The average variation in SSA among the intervention subjects was 0.91° (± 0.58°), with a range among subjects of 0.57°-1.27°. The average variation for the control subjects was 2.27° (± 1.43°), ranging 1.22°-5.09°. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.0001). There was a statistically significant SSA variation between groups at each week of treatment. There was no significant variation among the intervention subjects between week 1 and later weeks, whereas subjects in the control group demonstrated significant SSA variation between week 1 and later weeks. We demonstrated a significant decrease in the variability of SSA by implementing a simple pre-treatment exercise program, while control subjects exhibited increasing variation in SSA over the course of treatment. We conclude that there is a potential benefit of prehabilitation during pelvic RT; however, a larger randomized control trial is required to confirm the findings.Clinical Trial: This research project was approved by the University of Massachusetts Medical School IRB (IRB ID H00012353) on January 21, 2017. The study is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine, found with identifier NCT03242538.

Image-guided study of inter-fraction and intra-fraction set-up variability and margins in reverse semi-decubitus breast radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the inter-fraction set-up error and intra-fraction motion during reverse semi-decubitus (RSD) breast radiotherapy, and to determine a planning target volume (PTV) margin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pre- and post-treatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were prospectively acquired at fractions 1, 4, 7, 8, 11, and 14 for 30 patients who underwent RSD breast radiotherapy. Online correction for initial set-up error greater than 5 mm or 2° was performed and post-correction CBCT was acquired. An off-line analysis was performed to quantify initial and residual inter-fraction set-up errors and intra-fraction motion in three-dimensions. Patient inter-fraction errors were analysed for time trends during the course of radiotherapy. PTV margins were calculated from the systematic and random errors. RESULTS: The initial inter-fraction population systematic errors were 1.8-3.3 mm (translation) and 0.5° (rotation); random errors were 1.8-2.1 mm (translation) and 0.3-0.5° (rotation). After online correction, the residual inter-fraction population systematic errors were 1.2-1.8 mm (translation) and 0.3-0.4° (rotation); random errors were 1.4-1.6 mm (translation) and 0.3-0.4° (rotation). Intra-fraction population systematic and random errors were ≤ 1.3 mm (translation) and ≤ 0.2° (rotation). The magnitude of inter-fraction set-up errors in the anterior-posterior direction, roll, and yaw were significantly correlated with higher body weight and body mass index (BMI). The inter-fraction set-up error did not change significantly as a function of time during the course of radiotherapy. The magnitude of intra-fraction motion was not correlated with patient characteristics and treatment time. The total PTV margins accounting for pre-correction and intra-fraction errors were 6.5-10.2 mm; those accounting for post-correction and intra-fraction errors were 4.7-6.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT is an effective modality to evaluate and improve the inter-fraction set-up reproducibility in RSD breast radiotherapy, particularly for patients with higher BMI. Intra-fraction motion was minimal during RSD breast radiotherapy.