Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity assessment of a novel high-frequency sensor device for anterior tibial translation measurement in loaded and unloaded condition: an exploratory cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and manual tests remain the standard for diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Furthermore, the passive knee displacement, also described as anterior tibial translation (ATT), is used in order to make decisions about surgery or to assess rehabilitation outcomes. Unfortunately, these manual tests are limited to passive situations, and their application to assess knee stability in loaded, weight-bearing positions are missing. Therefore, a new device with high-performance sensors and a new sensor setting was developed. The aim of this exploratory cross-sectional study was to assess the test-retest reliability of this new device in a first step and the concurrent validity in a second step. METHODS: A total of 20 healthy volunteers were measured. Measurement consistency of the new device was assessed on the basis of reliability during Lachman test setting and in loaded position by artificial knee perturbation in a test-retest procedure. In a second step, the concurrent validity was evaluated with the Lachmeter® as a reference instrument. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), the minimal detectable change (MDC) and Bland-Altman analysis were evaluated to assess the quality criteria. RESULTS: The measurements with the new device during the Lachman test provided a mean ATT of 5.46±2.22mm. The SEM ranged from 0.60 to 0.69mm resulting in an MDC between 1.67 and 1.93mm for the new device. In the loaded test situation, the mean ATT was 2.11±1.20mm, with test-retest reliability also showing good correlation (r>0.83). The comparison of the two measurement methods with an ICC of (r>0.89) showed good correlation, which also underlines the reasonable agreement of the Bland-Altman analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of the test-retest reliability of the new device during the knee stability testing in passive situation as well as in a functional, loaded situation presented good reliability. In addition, the new device demonstrated good agreement with the reference device and therefore good validity. Furthermore, the quality criteria demonstrated the ability of the new device to detect the cut-off value (3-5mm) described in the literature for the diagnosis of ACL-deficient knees, which underlines the clinical relevance of this new device as a reliable and valid tool.

Knee kinematics are not different between asymmetrical and symmetrical tibial baseplates in total knee arthroplasty: A fluoroscopic analysis of step-up and lunge motions.

PURPOSE: This clinical fluoroscopy study investigated knee kinematics of two different cemented fixed-bearing, posterior-stabilised (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs: an asymmetric tibial component including an asymmetric insert designed to optimise personalised balance and fit and its precursor symmetrical design with symmetric insert. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients (16 TKAs from each treatment group) participating in a randomised controlled trial comparing TKA migration was included. The exclusion criterion was the use of walking aids. Flat-panel fluoroscopic recordings of step-up and lunge motions were acquired 1-year postoperatively. Medial and lateral contact points (CPs) were determined to calculate CP displacement, femoral axial rotation and pivot position. Using linear mixed-effects modelling techniques, kinematics between TKA designs were compared. RESULTS: During knee extension between 20° flexion and full extension, the CPs moved anteriorly combined with a small internal femoral rotation (a screw-home mechanism). Whereas CP movement was reversed: femoral rollback, external femoral rotation while flexing the knee between full extension and 20° knee flexion, At larger flexion angles, femoral axial rotation (FAR) occurred around a lateral pivot point both during step-up and lunge. The symmetric design had a 2.3° larger range of FAR compared to the asymmetric design during lunge (p = 0.02). All other kinematics were comparable. CONCLUSION: Despite the differences in design, this study showed that the asymmetric and symmetric PS TKA designs had mostly comparable knee kinematics during step-up and lunge motions. It is therefore expected that the functionality of the successor TKA design is similar to that of its precursor design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Gait kinematics and knee stability 10-years following posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty comparable to healthy adults >55.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term objective biomechanical and functional parameters of a high-flexion total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design against healthy older adults to determine whether knee biomechanics are comparable in both populations. METHODS: One cohort of patients with a primary TKA, and a cohort of healthy adults over 55 years old with no musculoskeletal deficits or arthritis participated. Bilateral knee range of motion (RoM) was assessed with a goniometer, and gait patterns were analysed with a three-dimensional-motion capture system. An arthrometer quantified the anterior-posterior laxity of each knee. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS software (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Twenty-three knees were replaced in 20 patients. At 9.8 ± 3.1 years postoperatively, patients' knees had a statistically significantly poorer RoM than healthy controls' knees (n = 23) due to limited flexion; p < 0.0001. Patients also failed to achieve the same degree of knee flexion as controls during downhill gait. No kinematic differences were observed during mid-flexion in level nor downhill gait; a state that has been associated with instability (p = 0.614; not significant [n.s]). There were no differences between groups in knee laxity (n.s). CONCLUSION: Patients in this study had similar gait patterns to healthy older adults during mid-flexion and were no more likely than the healthy controls to exhibit anterior-posterior translation of the knee > 7 mm; a known risk factor of instability. However, the knee flexion range was poorer. This likely led to bilateral pathological knee flexion patterns during downhill gait. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Mobile medial pivot (lateral slide)-type total knee arthroplasty exhibited different motion patterns between under anaesthesia and weight-bearing condition.

PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which has medial pivot and mobile-bearing mechanisms, has been developed and clinically used. However, the in vivo dynamic kinematics of the mobile medial pivot-type TKA (MMPTKA) is unclear. This study analysed the in vivo kinematics of MMPTKA in weight-bearing and nonweight-bearing conditions. METHODS: The study included 10 knees that underwent primary TKA using MMPTKA. After TKA, lateral view radiographs of the knee in full extension, 90° of flexion and passive full flexion were taken under general anaesthesia in the nonweight-bearing condition. At least 6 months postoperatively, knee motion during squatting from a weight-bearing standing position was observed using a flat-panel detector and analysed using the three-dimensional-to-two-dimensional image registration technique. RESULTS: Under anaesthesia: in passive full flexion, the anteroposterior (AP) locations of the femoral component's medial and lateral distal points were 10.2 and 16.0 mm posterior, and the rotational angles of the femoral component's X-axis (FCX) and insert were 8.1° external rotation and 18.5° internal rotation to full extension, respectively. Squatting: the AP translations of the femoral component's medial and lateral most distal points were 2.2 and 6.4 mm, and the rotational angles of the FCX and insert were 5.7° and 1.6° external rotation, respectively. Significant differences were observed in the AP translation of the femoral component's medial and lateral most distal points and changes in the insert's rotational angle when comparing under anaesthesia and squatting. CONCLUSIONS: The kinematics of the insert in MMPTKA was significantly influenced by loading and muscle contraction. The femoral component exhibited substantial external rotation and posterior translation under anaesthesia, which may contribute to achieving an optimal range of motion. The insert remained relatively stable during squatting and minimal rotation was observed, indicating good stability. MMPTKA was expected to demonstrate rational kinematics by incorporating mobile and medial pivot mechanisms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prospective biomechanical case series study.

The Difference in the Assessment of Knee Extension/Flexion Angles during Gait between Two Calibration Methods for Wearable Goniometer Sensors.

Frontal and axial knee motion can affect the accuracy of the knee extension/flexion motion measurement using a wearable goniometer. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that calibrating the goniometer on an individual's body would reduce errors in knee flexion angle during gait, compared to bench calibration. Ten young adults (23.2 ± 1.3 years) were enrolled. Knee flexion angles during gait were simultaneously assessed using a wearable goniometer sensor and an optical three-dimensional motion analysis system, and the absolute error (AE) between the two methods was calculated. The mean AE across a gait cycle was 2.4° (0.5°) for the on-body calibration, and the AE was acceptable (<5°) throughout a gait cycle (range: 1.5-3.8°). The mean AE for the on-bench calibration was 4.9° (3.4°) (range: 1.9-13.6°). Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) analysis revealed that the AE of the on-body calibration was significantly smaller than that of the on-bench calibration during 67-82% of the gait cycle. The results indicated that the on-body calibration of a goniometer sensor had acceptable and better validity compared to the on-bench calibration, especially for the swing phase of gait.

Can We Target Close Therapeutic Goals in the Gait Re-Education Algorithm for Stroke Patients at the Beginning of the Rehabilitation Process?

(1) Background: The study aimed to determine the most important activities of the knee joints related to gait re-education in patients in the subacute period after a stroke. We focused on the tests that a physiotherapist could perform in daily clinical practice. (2) Methods: Twenty-nine stroke patients (SG) and 29 healthy volunteers (CG) were included in the study. The patients underwent the 5-meter walk test (5mWT) and the Timed Up and Go test (TUG). Tests such as step up, step down, squat, step forward, and joint position sense test (JPS) were also performed, and the subjects were assessed using wireless motion sensors. (3) Results: We observed significant differences in the time needed to complete the 5mWT and TUG tests between groups. The results obtained in the JPS show a significant difference between the paretic and the non-paretic limbs compared to the CG group. A significantly smaller range of knee joint flexion (ROM) was observed in the paretic limb compared to the non-paretic and control limbs in the step down test and between the paretic and non-paretic limbs in the step forward test. (4) Conclusions: The described functional tests are useful in assessing a stroke patient's motor skills and can be performed in daily clinical practice.

Physiological Axial Tibial Rotation of the Knee During a Weightbearing Flexion.

Axial tibial rotation is a characteristic motion of the knee, but how it occurs with knee flexion is controversial. We investigated the mechanisms of tibial rotations by analyzing in vivo tibiofemoral articulations. Twenty knees of 20 living human subjects were investigated during a weightbearing flexion from full extension to maximal flexion using a dual fluoroscopic imaging system. Tibiofemoral articular contact motions on medial and lateral femoral condyles and tibial surfaces were measured at flexion intervals of 15 deg from 0 deg to 120 deg. Axial tibial rotations due to the femoral and tibial articular motions were compared. Articular contact distances were longer on femoral condyles than on tibial surfaces at all flexion intervals (p < 0.05). The articular distance on medial femoral condyle is longer than on lateral side during flexion up to 60 deg. The internal tibial rotation was 6.8 ± 4.5 deg (Mean ± SD) at the flexion interval of 0-15 deg, where 6.1 ± 2.6 deg was due to articulations on femoral condyles and 0.7 ± 5.1 deg due to articulations on tibial surfaces (p < 0.05). The axial tibial rotations due to articulations on femoral condyles are significantly larger than those on tibial surfaces until 60 deg of flexion (p < 0.05). Minimal additional axial tibial rotations were observed beyond 60 deg of flexion. The axial tibial rotations were mainly attributed to uneven articulations on medial and lateral femoral condyles. These data can provide new insights into the understanding of mechanisms of axial tibial rotations and serve as baseline knowledge for improvement of knee surgeries.

Comparison of accuracy for hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle by X-ray and knee motion analysis system and the relationships between HKA and gait posture.

BACKGROUND: The lower limb mechanical axis was used to assess the severity of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) with varus/valgus deformity and the accuracy of targeted lower limb alignment correction after operation by conventional X-rays. There are lots of parameters to assess the gait in elder patients such as velocity, stride length, step width and swing/stance ratio by knee joint movement analysis system. However, the correlation between the lower limb mechanical axis and gait parameters is not clear. This study is aimed at obtaining the accuracy of the lower limb mechanical axis by the knee joint movement analysis system and the correlation between the lower limb mechanical axis and gait parameters. METHODS: We analysed 3D knee kinematics during ground gait of 99 patients with KOA and 80 patients 6 months after the operations with the vivo infrared navigation 3D portable knee joint movement analysis system (Opti-Knee®, Innomotion Inc, Shanghai, China). The HKA (Hip-Knee-Ankle) value was calculated and compared to X-ray findings. RESULTS: HKA absolute variation after the operation was 0.83 ± 3.76°, which is lower than that before the operation (5.41 ± 6.20°, p = 0.001) and also lower than the entire cohort (3.36 ± 5.72). Throughout the cohort, a significant correlation with low coefficients (r = -0.19, p = 0.01) between HKA value and anterior-posterior displacement was found. In comparing the HKA values measured on the full-length alignment radiographs and 3D knee joint movement analysis system (Opti-Knee), there was a significant correlation with moderate to high coefficients (r = 0.784 to 0.976). The linear correlation analysis showed that there was a significant correlation between the values of HKA measured by X-ray and movement analysis system (R2 = 0.90, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Data with equivalent results as HKA, the 6DOF of the knee and ground gait data could be provided by infrared navigation based 3D portable knee joint movement analysis system comparing with the conventional X-rays. There is no significant effect of HKA on the kinematics of the partial knee joint.

Preoperative quantitative pivot shift does not correlate with in vivo kinematics following ACL reconstruction with or without lateral extraarticular tenodesis.

PURPOSE: Quantitative pivot shift (QPS) testing using PIVOT technology can detect high- and low-grade rotatory knee instability following anterior cruciate ligament injury or reconstruction (ACLR). The aim of this project was to determine if preoperative QPS correlates with postoperative knee kinematics in the operative and contralateral, healthy extremity following ACLR with or without lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) using a highly precise in vivo analysis system. A positive correlation between preoperative QPS and postoperative tibial translation and rotation following ACLR with or without LET in the operative and healthy, contralateral extremity was hypothesized. METHODS: Twenty patients with ACL injury and high-grade rotatory knee instability were randomized to undergo anatomic ACLR with or without LET as part of a prospective randomized trial. At 6 and 12 months postoperatively, in vivo kinematic data were collected using dynamic biplanar radiography superimposed with high-resolution computed tomography scans of patients' knees during downhill running. Total anterior-posterior (AP) tibial translation and internal-external tibial rotation were measured during the gait cycle. Spearman's rho was calculated for preoperative QPS and postoperative kinematics. RESULTS: In the contralateral, healthy extremity, a significant positive correlation was seen between preoperative QPS and total AP tibial translation at 12 months postoperatively (rs = 0.6, p < 0.05). There were no additional significant correlations observed between preoperative QPS and postoperative knee kinematics at 6 and 12 months postoperatively in the operative and contralateral, healthy extremity for combined isolated ACLR and ACLR with LET patients as well as isolated ACLR patients or ACLR with LET patients analyzed separately. DISCUSSION: The main finding of this study was that there was a significant positive correlation between preoperative QPS and total AP tibial translation at 12 months postoperatively in the contralateral, healthy extremity. There were no significant correlations between preoperative QPS and postoperative in vivo kinematics at 6 and 12 months following ACLR with or without LET. This suggests that QPS as measured with PIVOT technology does correlate with healthy in vivo knee kinematics, but QPS does not correlate with in vivo kinematics following ACLR with or without LET.

Progression of varus deformity in osteoarthritic knees induces anterior paradoxical motion of the femur during early knee flexion.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the position of the femur relative to the tibia throughout range of motion in the osteoarthritic knee to evaluate knee kinematics and assess its relationship with the degree of varus deformity. METHODS: In this study, 116 preoperative knees with varus deformity were evaluated using a navigation system. The internal-external, anteroposterior, and mediolateral positions of the femur relative to the tibia were measured at maximum extension, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°, 105°, and 120°, and maximum flexion angles. From these parameters, two-dimensional translation of the surgical epicondylar axis was projected onto the tibial axial plane, and the femoral movement was evaluated relative to the tibia. In addition, the knees were retrospectively classified into three groups according to their degrees of preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle: mild (< 10°), moderate (10°-20°), and severe (> 20°). Then, the differences in each parameter between these groups were investigated. The Steel-Dwass test was performed to identify the difference among three groups. Statistical significance was set at p values < 0.05. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the anteroposterior position of the femur relative to the tibia among the three groups, especially from extension to early flexion (p < 0.05). The anteroposterior position at knee extension deviated posteriorly according to the progression of varus deformity. Rotational and mediolateral translation were not significantly different among the groups. Normal knee kinematics were diminished in almost all cases in each group. In addition, anterior paradoxical motion of the femur during early knee flexion was observed in 45.6% (n = 26), 57.1% (n = 28), and 80.0% (n = 8) of cases in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. The anteroposterior position of the femur relative to the tibia at knee extension was significantly more posterior in patients with than in those without anterior paradoxical motion (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The anteroposterior position of the femur relative to the tibia changed according to the progression of varus deformity in osteoarthritic knees, especially from knee extension to early flexion. Posterior deviation of the femur at knee extension induced its anteroposterior movement relative to the tibia, resulting in anterior paradoxical motion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

No difference of gait parameters in patients with image-free robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to a conventional technique: early results of a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: In recent studies, robotic-assisted surgical techniques for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) have demonstrated superior implant positioning and limb alignment compared to a conventional technique. However, the impact of the robotic-assisted technique on clinical and functional outcomes is less clear. The aim of this study was to compare the gait parameters of UKA performed with conventional and image-free robotic-assisted techniques. METHODS: This prospective, single-center study included 66 medial UKA, randomized to a robotic-assisted (n = 33) or conventional technique (n = 33). Gait knee kinematics was assessed on a treadmill at 6 months to identify changes in gait characteristics (walking speed, each degree-of-freedom: flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, internal-external rotation, and anterior-posterior displacement). Clinical results were assessed at 6 months using the IKS score and the Forgotten Joint Score. Implants position was assessed on post-operative radiographs. RESULTS: Post-operatively, the whole gait cycle was not significantly different between groups. In both groups, there was a significant improvement in varus deformity between the pre- and post-operative gait cycle. There was no significant difference between the two groups in clinical scores, implant position, revision, and complication rates. CONCLUSION: No difference of gait parameters could be identified between medial UKA performed with image-free robotic-assisted technique or with conventional technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective randomized controlled trial.

Patient-specific resurfacing implant knee surgery in subjects with early osteoarthritis results in medial pivot and lateral femoral rollback during flexion: a retrospective pilot study.

PURPOSE: Metallic resurfacing implants have been developed for the treatment of early, small, condylar and trochlear osteoarthritis (OA) lesions. They represent an option for patients who do not fulfill the criteria for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or are too old for biological treatment. Although clinical evidence has been collected for different resurfacing types, the in vivo post-operative knee kinematics remain unknown. The present study aims to analyze the knee kinematics in subjects with patient-specific episealer implants. This study hypothesized that patient-specific resurfacing implants would lead to knee kinematics close to healthy knees, resulting in medial pivot and a high degree of femoral rollback during flexion. METHODS: Retrospective study design. Fluoroscopic analysis during unloaded flexion-extension and loaded lunge was conducted at > 12 months post-surgery in ten episealer knees, and compared to ten healthy knees. Pre- and post-operative clinical data of the episealer knees were collected using a visual analog scale (VAS), the EQ 5d Health, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaires. RESULTS: A consistent medial pivot was observed in both episealer and healthy knees. Non-significant differences were found in the unloaded (p = 0.15) and loaded (p = 0.51) activities. Although lateral rollback was observed in both groups, it was significantly higher for the episealer knees in both the unloaded (p = 0.02) and loaded (p = 0.01) activities. Coupled axial rotation was significantly higher in the unloaded (p = 0.001) but not in the loaded (p = 0.06) activity in the episealer knees. Improved scores were observed at 1-year post-surgery in the episealer subjects for the VAS (p = 0.001), KOOS (p = 0.001) and EQ Health (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: At 12 month follow-up, a clear physiological knee kinematics pattern of medial pivot, lateral femoral rollback and coupled axial external femoral rotation during flexion was observed in patients treated with an episealer resurfacing procedure. However, higher femoral rollback and axial external rotation in comparison to healthy knees was observed, suggesting possible post-operative muscle weakness and consequent insufficient stabilization at high flexion.

Validity and Reliability of a Wearable Goniometer Sensor Controlled by a Mobile Application for Measuring Knee Flexion/Extension Angle during the Gait Cycle.

Knee kinematics during gait is an important assessment tool in health-promotion and clinical fields. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of a wearable goniometer sensor for measuring knee flexion angles throughout the gait cycle. Twenty-two and seventeen participants were enrolled in the validation and reliability study, respectively. The knee flexion angle during gait was assessed using a wearable goniometer sensor and a standard optical motion analysis system. The coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) between the two measurement systems was 0.992 ± 0.008. Absolute error (AE) was 3.3 ± 1.5° (range: 1.3-6.2°) for the entire gait cycle. An acceptable AE (<5°) was observed during 0-65% and 87-100% of the gait cycle. Discrete analysis revealed a significant correlation between the two systems (R = 0.608-0.904, p ≤ 0.001). The CMC between the two measurement days with a 1-week interval was 0.988 ± 0.024, and the AE was 2.5 ± 1.2° (range: 1.1-4.5°). A good-to-acceptable AE (<5°) was observed throughout the gait cycle. These results indicate that the wearable goniometer sensor is useful for assessing knee flexion angle during the stance phase of the gait cycle.

Medial meniscus posterior root repair influences sagittal length and coronal inclination of the anterior cruciate ligament: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (PRTs) lead to abnormal kinematic changes in the knee and may induce pathological external rotation of the tibia during knee flexion. This study aimed to investigate changes in the length and inclination of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) after MM posterior root repair using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: This retrospective study included 44 patients who underwent MM posterior root repair between 2016 and 2019. Clinical outcomes were evaluated before and after surgery. MRI examinations were performed at 10°/90° of knee flexion preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. The ACL length, proximal angle, and distal angle were determined using the sagittal view. MM extrusion and ACL inclination angle were determined using the coronal view. RESULTS: Clinical outcomes significantly improved 1 year after surgery. The postoperative ACL length (29.7 ± 2.4 mm) and proximal angle (47.0 ± 7.4°) at 90° of knee flexion decreased relative to the preoperative values (31.5 ± 2.3 mm and 51.8 ± 8.7°, P < 0.01). The postoperative ACL inclination (64.9 ± 5.6°) at 10° of knee flexion decreased relative to the preoperative value (69.7 ± 5.6°, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Pathologically-stretched linear ACL at 90° of knee flexion and a steep ACL inclination at 10° of knee flexion could be reduced after MM posterior root repair. This suggests that pullout repair could restore MM function as a secondary stabilizer, thereby preventing meniscal and cartilage degeneration.

A Musculoskeletal Model Customized for Sagittal and Frontal Knee Kinematics With Improved Knee Joint Stability.

Current lower limb musculoskeletal (MSK) models focus on sagittal plane kinematics. However, abnormal gait is typically associated with sagittal plane motions crossing into other planes, limiting the use of current MSK models. The purpose of this study was twofold, first, to extend the capability of a full-body MSK model from the literature to include frontal knee plane kinematics during healthy gait, and second, to propose and implement a realistic muscle discretization technique. Two MSK model constructs were derived-the first construct (Knee2_SM) allowed two degrees-of-freedom (sagittal and coronal) at the knee and the second construct (Knee2_MM) implemented multiline elements for all the lower limb muscles in conjunction with two knee degrees-of-freedom. Motion analysis data of normal gait cycle from 10 healthy adults were used to compare joint kinematics, muscle moment arms, muscle forces, and muscle activations, between new constructs and the original model. Knee varus-valgus trajectories were estimated with the mean peak values ranging from 9.49 deg valgus to 1.57 deg varus. Knee2_MM predicted a significant difference (p < 0.05) in moment arms and forces in those muscles responsible for medial-lateral stability of the knee. The simulated muscle activations generated by the Knee2_MM model matched more closely to the experimental electromyography (EMG) when qualitatively compared. This study enhances the capability of the sagittal plane full-body MSK model to incorporate knee varus-valgus motion while keeping the joint stability intact and improving muscle prediction.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with lateral extraarticular tenodesis better restores native knee kinematics in combined ACL and meniscal injury.

PURPOSE: To determine if anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) is beneficial for restoring knee kinematics with concomitant meniscal pathology causing rotatory knee instability. METHODS: Twenty patients with an ACL tear were randomized to either isolated ACLR or ACLR with LET. Patients were divided into four groups based on the surgery performed and the presence of meniscal tear (MT): ACLR without MT, ACLR with MT, ACLR with LET without MT, and ACLR with LET with MT. Kinematic data normalized to the contralateral, healthy knee were collected using dynamic biplanar radiography superimposed with high-resolution computed tomography scans of patients' knees during downhill running. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) and tibial rotation (TR) as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed at 6- and 12-months postoperatively. RESULTS: At 6 months, ACLR with LET resulted in significantly decreased ATT at heel strike compared to ACLR (ACLR without MT: 0.3 ± 0.8 mm and ACLR with MT: 1.4 ± 3.1 mm vs. ACLR with LET without MT: - 2.5 ± 3.4 mm and ACLR with LET with MT: - 1.5 ± 1.2 mm ATT, p = 0.02). At 6 months, at toe off ACLR with LET better restored ATT to that of the contralateral, healthy knee in patients with meniscal pathology, while in patients without meniscal pathology, ACLR with LET resulted in significantly decreased ATT (1.0 ± 2.6 mm ATT vs. - 2.6 ± 1.7 mm ATT, p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in kinematics or PROMs between groups at 12 months. CONCLUSION: For combined ACL and meniscus injury, ACLR with LET restores native knee kinematics at toe off but excessively decreases ATT at heel strike in the early post-operative period (6 months) without altering knee kinematics in the long term. Future large-scale clinical studies are needed to better understand the function of LET and ultimately improve patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

A Framework for Analytical Validation of Inertial-Sensor-Based Knee Kinematics Using a Six-Degrees-of-Freedom Joint Simulator.

The success of kinematic analysis that relies on inertial measurement units (IMUs) heavily depends on the performance of the underlying algorithms. Quantifying the level of uncertainty associated with the models and approximations implemented within these algorithms, without the complication of soft-tissue artefact, is therefore critical. To this end, this study aimed to assess the rotational errors associated with controlled movements. Here, data of six total knee arthroplasty patients from a previously published fluoroscopy study were used to simulate realistic kinematics of daily activities using IMUs mounted to a six-degrees-of-freedom joint simulator. A model-based method involving extended Kalman filtering to derive rotational kinematics from inertial measurements was tested and compared against the ground truth simulator values. The algorithm demonstrated excellent accuracy (root-mean-square error ≤0.9°, maximum absolute error ≤3.2°) in estimating three-dimensional rotational knee kinematics during level walking. Although maximum absolute errors linked to stair descent and sit-to-stand-to-sit rose to 5.2° and 10.8°, respectively, root-mean-square errors peaked at 1.9° and 7.5°. This study hereby describes an accurate framework for evaluating the suitability of the underlying kinematic models and assumptions of an IMU-based motion analysis system, facilitating the future validation of analogous tools.

A Comparison of Inertial Measurement Unit and Motion Capture Measurements of Tibiofemoral Kinematics during Simulated Pivot Landings.

Injuries are often associated with rapid body segment movements. We compared Certus motion capture and APDM inertial measurement unit (IMU) measurements of tibiofemoral angle and angular velocity changes during simulated pivot landings (i.e., ~70 ms peak) of nine cadaver knees dissected free of skin, subcutaneous fat, and muscle. Data from a total of 852 trials were compared using the Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoAs): the Certus system was considered the gold standard measure for the angle change measurements, whereas the IMU was considered the gold standard for angular velocity changes. The results show that, although the mean peak IMU knee joint angle changes were slightly underestimated (2.1° for flexion, 0.2° for internal rotation, and 3.0° for valgus), the LoAs were large, ranging from 35.9% to 49.8%. In the case of the angular velocity changes, Certus had acceptable accuracy in the sagittal plane, with LoAs of ±54.9°/s and ±32.5°/s for the tibia and femur. For these rapid motions, we conclude that, even in the absence of soft tissues, the IMUs could not reliably measure these peak 3D knee angle changes; Certus measurements of peak tibiofemoral angular velocity changes depended on both the magnitude of the velocity and the plane of measurement.

Influence of the forehand stance on knee biomechanics: Implications for potential injury risks in tennis players.

The open stance forehand has been hypothesized to be more traumatic for knee injuries in tennis than the neutral stance forehand. This study aims to compare kinematics and kinetics at the knee during three common forehand stroke stances (attacking neutral stance ANS, attacking open stance AOS, defensive open stance DOS) to determine if the open stance forehand induces higher knee loadings and to discuss its potential relationship with given injuries. Eight advanced tennis players performed eight repetitions of forehand strokes with each stance (ANS: forward run and stroke with feet parallel with the hitting direction, AOS: forward run and stroke with feet perpendicular to the hitting direction, DOS: lateral run and stroke with feet perpendicular to the hitting direction) at maximal effort. All the trials were recorded with an optoelectronic motion capture system. The flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, external-internal rotation angles, intersegmental forces and torques of the right knee were calculated. Ground reaction forces were measured with a forceplate. The DOS increases vertical GRF, maximum knee flexion and abduction angles, range of knee flexion-extension, peak of compressive, distractive and medial knee forces, peak of knee abduction and external rotation torques. Consequently, the DOS appears potentially more at risk for given knee injuries.

Small lateral meniscus tears propagate over time in ACL intact and deficient knees.

PURPOSE: To quantify propagation of small longitudinal tears in the lateral meniscus in ACL intact and deficient knees. METHODS: Using a robotic testing system, 5-Nm of external tibial torque + 5-Nm of valgus torque + 250-N of axial compression was applied to 14 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees while the knees were flexed from 30° to 90°. Knees were divided into two groups: intact (N = 8) and ACL deficient (N = 6). Kinematic data was recorded for four knee states: intact or ACL deficient knee, after posterior arthrotomy, meniscus tear at baseline, and after 500 cycles of the applied loading condition. RESULTS: Lateral meniscus tear length increased throughout the 500 cycles regardless of the ACL integrity (p < 0.001). Overall, an increase of 28.7% and 26.1% was observed in intact and ACL deficient knees, respectively. In intact knees, external tibial rotation increased with meniscus tear propagation at all flexion angles by up to 45.5% (p = 0.019). In contrast, knee kinematics in ACL deficient knees were not affected by meniscus tear propagation (n.s.). In ACL deficient knees, resultant forces in the lateral meniscus increased at all flexion angles by up to 116.5% (p = 0.012). No differences in forces were observed in the intact knees (n.s.). CONCLUSION: The data of this study show that small longitudinal tears in the lateral meniscus propagate significantly regardless of the integrity of the ACL and even after only 100 cycles of knee loading. The propagation of such tears altered kinematics and forces in the knee. Therefore, small, longitudinal lateral meniscus tears that are untreated in current clinical practices may propagate when loaded.