Prognostic impact of the findings of the genetic test in left dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.

Background: The diagnosis of left dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (LDAC) is sometimes complex. The Padua group recently published a document with criteria to identify patients with LDAC, requiring a compatible genetic variant for diagnosis. Due to the gaps in the knowledge of the role of genetics in its pathogenesis, our objective is to describe the findings of the genetic test in patients with LDAC in our center and its prognostic impact. Methods: Single-center prospective cohort study, in which we recruited 77 patients diagnosed with LDAC or biventricular arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy according to the criteria of Sen-Chowdhry et al. Results: We obtained a positive result in the genetic test in 53.2 %. The desmoplakin gene was the most affected (16.9 %). The mean value of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction was 45.6 ± 13.1 %, with no significant differences in the severity of the dysfunction according to genetics (p = 0.187). Among the patients with positive genetics there was a greater number of segments in the LV affected by fibrosis (p = 0.043). Regarding fatty infiltration in the LV and number of affected segments, there were no significant differences between groups (p = 0.144). MACE was recorded in 23 patients (29.9 %). The positive result in the genetic test was not significantly associated with the occurrence of MACE (p = 0.902). Conclusion: In our study, we did not find mutations responsible for the disease in practically half of the cases. Despite the existence of a high proportion of MACE during follow-up, there were no prognostic differences according to the result of the genetic test.

Role of cardiac magnetic resonance in the differential diagnosis between arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular involvement and previous infectious myocarditis.

AIMS: Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular involvement (ACM-LV), particularly in case of isolated left ventricular involvement (i.e. left dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, LDAC) and previous infectious myocarditis (pIM) may have overlapping clinical and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) features. To date, there are no validated CMR criteria for the differential diagnosis between these conditions. The present study aimed to identify CMR characteristics to distinguish ACM-LV from pIM. METHODS AND RESULTS: This observational, retrospective, single-centre study included 30 pIM patients and 30 ACM-LV patients. In ACM-LV patients CMR was performed at diagnosis; in patients with pIM, CMR was performed six months after acute infection. CMR analysis included quantitative assessment of left ventricle (LV) volumes, systolic function and wall thicknesses, qualitative and quantitative assessment of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences. Compared with pIM, ACM-LV patients showed slightly larger LV volumes, more frequent regional wall motion anomalies and reduced wall thicknesses. ACM-LV patients had higher amounts of LV LGE and extension. Notably, the LDAC subgroup had the highest amount of LV LGE. LV LGE amount > 15 g and a LV LGE percentage > 30% of LV mass discriminated ACM-LV from pIM with a 100% specificity. LGE segmental distribution was superimposable among the groups, except for septal segments that were more frequently involved in ACM-LV and LDAC patients. CONCLUSIONS: A great extension of LV LGE (a cut-off of LGE >15 g and a percentage above 30% of LV LGE in relation to total myocardial mass) discriminates ACM-LV from pIM with extremely high specificity.

Diagnostic delay in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.

AIMS: Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) may be challenging, as it comprises diverse phenotypes (right dominant, biventricular, and left dominant), and each may overlap with other clinical entities. The issue of differential diagnosis with conditions mimicking ACM has been previously highlighted; however, a systematic analysis of ACM diagnostic delay, and of its clinical implications, is lacking. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data of all ACM patients from three Italian Cardiomyopathy Referral Centres were reviewed to assess the time from first medical contact to definitive ACM diagnosis; a significant diagnostic delay was defined as a time to ACM diagnosis ≥2 years. Baseline characteristics and clinical course of patients with and without diagnostic delay were compared. Of 174 ACM patients, 31% experienced diagnostic delay, with a median time to diagnosis of 8 years (20% in right-dominant ACM, 33% in left-dominant ACM, and 39% in biventricular). Patients with diagnostic delay, when compared with those without, more frequently exhibited an ACM phenotype with left ventricular (LV) involvement (74 vs. 57%, P = 0.04) and a specific genetic background (none had plakophilin-2 variants). The most common initial (mis)diagnoses were dilated cardiomyopathy (51%), myocarditis (21%), and idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia (9%). At follow-up, all-cause mortality was greater in those with diagnostic delay (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic delay is common in patients with ACM, particularly in the presence of LV involvement, and is associated with greater mortality at follow-up. Clinical suspicion and increasing use of tissue characterization by cardiac magnetic resonance in specific clinical settings are of key importance for the timely identification of ACM.

Almost one-third of patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) experience a diagnostic delay >2 years. These patients are mostly affected by an ACM phenotype with left ventricular (LV) involvement and present worse mortality compared with those without diagnostic delay.Diagnostic delay is common in patients with ACM, particularly in the presence of LV involvement, and is associated with greater mortality at follow-up.The most common initial (mis)diagnoses were dilated cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, and idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia. Clinical suspicion and increasing use of tissue characterization by cardiac magnetic resonance in these specific clinical settings are of key importance to identify ACM in a timely fashion.

Left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy due to desmoplakin mutation: a case report.

The case of a 49-year-old man with acute onset of heart failure is presented. The initial work-up showed a dilated cardiomyopathy with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. In the differential diagnostic process, hypertensive, ischaemic, and valvular aetiologies were discarded. Subsequently, a cardiac magnetic resonance revealed global hypokinesis and inferior and anterior subepicardial fibrosis. Once differential diagnoses of subepicardial fibrosis (myocarditis, sarcoidosis, and Chagas disease) were discarded, a genetic panel was performed, resulting in a heterozygous mutation of desmoplakin (DSP) gene c.6697_6698del. A left-dominant DSP arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy mutation was diagnosed. Structural myocardial abnormalities and ventricular arrhythmias characterize arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Up to 50% of cases are associated with mutations in DSP genes (JUP, DSP, and PKP2). DSP is the fundamental component of the desmosome structure and provides structural support through intercellular adhesion. Therefore, when frequent differential diagnoses are discarded, genetic studies for dilated cardiomyopathy and DSP mutation should be considered.

Cardiac magnetic resonance features of left dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: differential diagnosis with myocarditis.

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings suggesting a suspected left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (LDAC) may be difficult to distinguish from those related to previous myocarditis; however, especially in patients with ventricular arrhythmias (VA) with ECG morphology consistent with a left ventricle (LV) origin differential diagnosis is fundamental. Aim of the study was to identify potential imaging features at CMR specific for LDAC diagnosis. Between January 2011 and December 2019, we enrolled 15 consecutive stable patients with a recent diagnosis of significant VA and ECG morphology consistent with a LV origin, detection of potential LV arrhythmic substrate at CMR and undergoing a clinically-indicated LV endomyocardial biopsy showing tissue abnormalities consistent with the diagnosis of LDAC. From the same CMR-endomyocardial biopsy registry, a second group of 30 consecutive patients who underwent CMR and biopsy with a histological diagnosis of previous myocarditis were identified. (1) Subepicardial LGE at the level of the posterolateral wall of the LV was detected in 13 cases of LDAC vs. 21 cases of myocarditis; (2) fat infiltration, and particularly subepicardial posterolateral fat infiltration, was found in almost all LDAC patients vs. one myocarditis only (p < 0.01). (3) No differences in other CMR findings or in any clinical or echocardiographic parameters were found between patients with a biopsy consistent with LDAC vs. myocarditis. In patients with significant VA and ECG morphology consistent with a LV origin, the presence of morpho-functional involvement of the subepicardial layer of LV posterolateral wall at CMR (LGE, fat infiltration, wall dyskinesis) supports LDAC diagnosis.

Dilated left ventricle with multiple outpouchings - a severe congenital ventricular diverticulum or left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (LDAC) is a relatively rare disease characterized by poor prognosis that exacerbates the incidence of sudden cardiac death and ventricular arrhythmias. Clinically, LDAC is constantly overlooked or misdiagnosed as myocardial infarction, myocarditis, and dilated cardiomyopathy, owing to atypical and nonspecific clinical manifestations at an early stage. CASE SUMMARY: A 57-year-old woman was diagnosed with sinus bradycardia and chronic bifascicular block during a health check. She occasionally experienced mild chest pain and paroxysmal palpitation during activity in the past 2 years. Comprehensive auxiliary examinations, including electrocardiogram, echocardiography, coronary computerized tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging, revealed that she had LDAC instead of congenital ventricular diverticulum. The physicians prescribed standard oral therapy for heart failure and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Consequently, her left ventricular systolic function and symptoms remained stable at the 2-year follow-up after discharge. CONCLUSION: Based on this case, clinicians need to be aware of LDAC in patients with localized left ventricular lesions and multiple electrocardiographic abnormalities. Multimodality cardiovascular imaging is effective in identification of multiple types of cardiomyopathy and cardiac inner structures.

A case series of desmoplakin cardiomyopathy: a mimic of viral myocarditis.

Background: Clinical features and imaging presentation of myocarditis can overlap with other inflammatory or arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies. Desmoplakin (DSP) is an important structural cardiac protein. Mutations in the DSP gene are associated with a variant of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Interestingly, this distinct genetic cardiomyopathy can also present with a myocardial inflammation and fibrosis pattern that may mimic other forms of myocarditis including viral myocarditis, which can raise a clinical challenge. We report two cases of DSP cardiomyopathy, which were initially thought to represent coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) myocarditis. Case summary: First patient is a 21-your-old woman with no past medical history but family history of presumed 'viral myocarditis' and ventricular tachycardia in her brother. She presented with acute chest pain and elevated cardiac enzymes. She tested positive for COVID-19 and given the suspicion for possible COVID-19 related acute myocarditis, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging obtained and revealed regional wall motion abnormalities, several areas of subepicardial and pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Ambulatory cardiac monitoring showed runs of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia and considering her family history of arrhythmogenic myocarditis, genetic testing was performed that was positive for a likely pathogenic heterozygous mutation of DSP gene. She declined the recommended implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).Second patient is a 34-year-old physician with no significant past medical history who works at a COVID-19 unit and presented with syncope and was found to have ventricular tachycardia. Echocardiogram revealed severely dilated left ventricle and globally depressed systolic function with left ventricular ejection fraction of 20%. Coronary computed tomography angiography showed no evidence of coronary atherosclerosis. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed several areas of mid myocardial and pericardial LGE. Subcutaneous ICD was implanted and an endomyocardial biopsy had evidence of lymphocytic myocarditis and adipose tissue infiltration of the myocardium. Genetic testing revealed pathogenic heterozygous DSP mutation. He underwent epicardial ablation for the episodes of ventricular tachycardia despite medical therapy. He was able to return to work and has not had any further episodes of arrhythmia. Conclusion: Mutations in the DSP gene are associated with left dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, which is a variant of ARVC. Beside left ventricular systolic dysfunction and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, carriers of these mutations may present with episodes of chest pain associated with elevated cardiac enzymes and cardiac imaging findings indistinguishable from other forms of acute myocarditis including viral myocarditis. Currently, there are no guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of this entity.

Left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: an association with desmoglein-2 gene mutation-a case report.

BACKGROUND: Desmosomes are specialized intercellular adhesive junctions of cardiac and epithelial cells that provide intercellular mechanical coupling through glycoproteins, one of which is desmoglein (DSG). DSG-2 mutations are frequently associated with biventricular arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM). We report a case of left-dominant ACM in a patient who initially was misclassified as dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). CASE SUMMARY: A 28-year-old-woman was found to have a moderately reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function and frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). Targeted genetic testing revealed a heterozygous likely pathogenic variant associated with ACM in exon 15 of the DSG-2 gene (c.3059_3062del; p.Glu1020Alafs*18). Subsequent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging showed epicardial and mid-myocardial fatty infiltration involving multiple LV wall segments, multiple areas of mid-myocardial fibrosis/scar, regional dyskinesis involving both ventricles, and an overall reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. The patient's right ventricular (RV) cavity size and overall RV systolic function were normal. Based on the patient's frequent PVCs, family history, fibrofatty myocardial replacement in multiple LV segments, and dyskinetic motion of multiple ventricular wall segments (predominantly affecting the LV), the patient was diagnosed with left-dominant ACM. DISCUSSION: Identifying a likely pathogenic mutation associated with ACM in a patient with ventricular arrhythmias and a family history of sudden cardiac death increased the possibility of ACM. Subsequent CMR imaging confirmed the diagnosis of left-dominant ACM by demonstrating regional biventricular dyskinesia and a characteristic pattern of fibrofatty myocardial replacement. Our case highlights the importance of targeted genetic testing and advanced cardiac imaging in distinguishing left-dominant ACM from DCM.

Left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with a nonsense mutation in DSP.

A 74-year-old man had abnormal left ventricular (LV) function according to a perioperative test at a local hospital and was transferred to our institution for further evaluation and treatment. His electrocardiogram demonstrated the presence of premature ventricular contraction with a QRS complex of the right bundle branch block type and superior axis. His echocardiography showed systolic dysfunction of the LV (LV ejection fraction, 44.6%). Cardiac computed tomography imaging revealed banded and patchy densities observed frequently from the middle to epicardial layer of the LV wall. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed fat signals on fat-selective images and late gadolinium enhancement in the mid-wall to subepicardial layers in the LV myocardium. Endomyocardial biopsy revealed the histological presence of fibrofatty replacement. A genetic analysis revealed a nonsense mutation in the desmoplakin gene. Thus, he was diagnosed with left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. To prevent fatal ventricular arrhythmias, an implantable cardioverter defibrillator was successfully implanted.

Importance of cardiac magnetic resonance findings in the diagnosis of left dominant arrythmogenic cardiomyopathy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Left dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (LDAC) has recently been recognized as falling on the spectrum of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. It is characterized by fibroadipose replacement of the left ventricle. The aim of this study was to describe the most frequent forms of clinical presentation of LDAC, imaging findings, and events at follow-up, highlighting the importance of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: Prospective registry of patients with findings compatible with LDAC. CMR image analysis and clinical follow-up was performed. The primary endpoint was the appearance of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during follow-up, defined as sudden cardiac death, sustained ventricular arrhythmias, and heart transplant. RESULTS: We included 74 consecutive patients (mean age, 48.6 years; 50 men [67.6%]). The most frequent CMR indications were chest pain with normal coronary angiography, ventricular arrhythmias, and suspicion of cardiomyopathies. The main CMR findings were midwall and/or subepicardial pattern of late gadolinium enhancement (91.9%), fatty epicardial infiltration (83.8%), and left ventricle segmental contractility abnormalities (47.9%). At a mean follow-up of 3.74 years, 24 patients (32.4%) had a MACE (sudden cardiac death 8.1%, sustained ventricular arrhythmias 21.6%, and heart transplant 4.1%). Independent predictors for the appearance for MACE were a CMR study showing severe late gadolinium enhancement, male sex, and practicing sports. CONCLUSIONS: CMR is a key tool for diagnosing LDAC. Characteristic findings are subepicardial fatty infiltration and midwall-subepicardial late gadolinium enhancement. The prognosis of this population is poor with a high incidence of sudden cardiac death and ventricular arrhythmias.

Unique Association of Rare Cardiovascular Disease in an Athlete With Ventricular Arrhythmias.

Ventricular arrhythmias are a leading cause of non-elegibility to competitive sport. The failure to detect a significant organic substrate in the initial stage of screening does not preclude the identification of structural pathologies in the follow-up by using advanced imaging techniques. Here we report the case of a senior athlete judged not elegible because an arrhythmia with the morphology consistent with the origin of the left ventricle, in which subsequent execution of a cardiac MR and a thoracic CT scan has allowed the identification of an unique association between an area of myocardial damage, probable site of origine of the arrhythma, and a rare aortic malformation.