The multidimensional value of natriuretic peptides in heart failure, integrating laboratory and clinical aspects.

Natriuretic peptides (NP) play an essential role in heart failure (HF) regulation, and their measurement has improved diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. Clinical symptoms and objective measurements, such as NP levels, should be included in the HF definition to render it more reliable and consistent among observers, hospitals, and healthcare systems. BNP and NT-proBNP are reasonable surrogates for cardiac disease, and their measurement is critical to early diagnosis and risk stratification of HF patients. NPs should be measured in all patients presenting with dyspnea or other symptoms suggestive of HF to facilitate early diagnosis and risk stratification. Both BNP and NT-proBNP are currently used for guided HF management and display comparable diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. Standardized cutoffs for each NP assay are essential for data comparison. The value of NP testing is recognized at various levels, including patient empowerment and education, analytical and operational issues, clinical HF management, and cost-effectiveness.

Neuroendocrine response to diclofenac in healthy subjects: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: The precise effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the neuroendocrine hydro-electrolytic regulation are not precisely understood. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate, in healthy subjects, the neuroendocrine response of the antidiuretic system to intravenous diclofenac infusion. METHODS: For this single-blinded, cross-over study, we recruited 12 healthy subjects (50% women). Test sessions were divided into three observation times (pre-test; test; 48 h post-test), which were repeated equally on two different occasions, with the administration of diclofenac (75 mg in saline solution 0.9% 100 cc) on 1 day, or placebo (saline solution 0.9% 100 cc) on another day. The night before the test the subjects were asked to collect a salivary cortisol and cortisone sample, which was repeated on the night of the procedure session. Serial urine and blood samples were collected on the test day (for osmolality, electrolytes, ACTH, cortisol, copeptin, MR-proADM, MR-proANP; the last three represent more stable and analytically reliable molecules than their respective active peptides). Moreover, the subjects were evaluated with the bioimpedance vector analysis (BIVA) before and after the test. Forty-eight hours after the end of the procedure urine sodium, urine potassium, urine osmolality, serum sodium and copeptin were revaluated together with BIVA. RESULTS: No significant changes in circulating hormone levels were observed; anyway, 48 h after diclofenac, BIVA showed a significant water retention (p < 0.00001), especially in extracellular fluid (ECF) (16.47 ± 1.65 vs 15.67 ± 1.84, p < 0.001). Salivary cortisol and cortisone tended to increase only the night after placebo administration (p = 0.054 cortisol; p = 0.021 cortisone). CONCLUSION: Diclofenac resulted in an increased ECF at 48 h, but this phenomenon seems to be associated with a greater renal sensibility to the action of vasopressin rather than with an increase in its secretion. Moreover, a partial inhibitory effect on cortisol secretion can be hypothesized.

The Prognostic Value of Cardiac Biomarkers in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction during and after Hospitalization.

Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) carries a strong risk of death and the development of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). A number of biomarkers have been proposed for risk stratification among patients with MI. The aim of this study was to determine whether elevated galectin-3 and midregional-pro atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) levels can be used as predictors of MACE in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: Plasma levels of galectin-3 and MR-proANP were collected from 96 patients following their first AMI hospitalised in our clinic over the course of a year. Samples were taken on admission, and on the first and fifth day of hospitalization. During hospitalization, all patients were followed up for the occurrence of early major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as sudden cardiac arrest, new onset atrial fibrillation and need to use pressor amines. All patients were also followed up twelve months after AMI for the occurrence of late MACE defined as cardiac death, reinfarction and need for unscheduled PCI. Results: Patients who experienced early MACE had significantly higher galectin-3 and MR-proANP levels assessed on admission (p = 0.007, p = 0.003). ROC curve analysis found also galectin-3 concentration assessed on admission to be a strong predictor of late MACE (AUC = 0.75, p = 0.0061). MRproANP does not appear to have any value in predicting late MACE. Conclusions: A high concentration of galectin-3 and MR-proANP observed on admission in patients with acute myocardial infarction has significant prognostic value: it may identify patients at high risk of early adverse cardiac events after AMI. In contrast to MR-proANP, a high concentration of galectin-3 observed on admission may also identify patients at high risk of late MACE.

MR-proANP measured at admission is associated with incident atrial fibrillation in STEMI patients.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Increased blood levels of mid regional pro atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) have been associated with a greater risk of incident AF. However, knowledge of the value of MR-proANP in predicting incident AF after STEMI is sparse. To assess whether MR-proANP measured at admission is associated with development of incident AF in patients with STEMI. 673 STEMI patients with no history of AF treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) were prospectively enrolled from September 2006 to December 2008. Blood samples were drawn before the procedure. MR-proANP was measured by an automated processing assay. End point was incident AF. Median follow-up time was 5.5 years (interquartile-range 4.7-6.0), during which 63 patients developed AF. In a multivariable Cox regression model adjusted for relevant clinical and biochemical variables, MR-proANP was significantly associated with the development of AF (HR 1.18 per 100 pmol, 95% CI 1.11-1.28, p < 0.001). In a subgroup of patients who underwent echocardiography (N = 360), MR-proANP remained significantly associated with the development of AF (HR 1.39 per 100 pmol, 95% CI 1.13-1.71, p = 0.002) after adjusting for clinical and biochemical variables and left ventricular ejection fraction. When stratifying patients according to tertiles of MR-proANP, patients in the upper tertile displayed an 11 times greater risk of developing AF during follow-up as compared to patients in the lower tertile (HR 11.1, 95% CI 4.4-28.2, p < 0.001). Plasma MR-proANP measured at admission is an independent predictor of incident AF after STEMI.

Atrial fibrillation is frequent but does not affect risk stratification in pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Although prior studies indicate a high prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE), the exact prevalence and prognostic impact are unknown. METHODS: We aimed to investigate the prevalence, risk factors and prognostic impact of AF on risk stratification, in-hospital adverse outcomes and mortality in 528 consecutive PE patients enrolled in a single-centre registry between 09/2008 and 09/2017. RESULTS: Overall, 52 patients (9.8%) had known AF and 57 (10.8%) presented with AF on admission; of those, 34 (59.6%) were newly diagnosed with AF. Compared to patients with no AF, overt hyperthyroidism was associated with newly diagnosed AF (OR 7.89 [2.99-20.86]), whilst cardiovascular risk comorbidities were more frequently observed in patients with known AF. Patients with AF on admission had more comorbidities, presented more frequently with tachycardia and elevated cardiac biomarkers and were hence stratified to higher risk classes. However, AF on admission had no impact on in-hospital adverse outcome (8.3%) and in-hospital mortality (4.5%). In multivariate logistic regression analyses corrected for AF on admission, NT-proBNP and troponin elevation as well as higher risk classes in risk assessment models remained independent predictors of an in-hospital adverse outcome. CONCLUSION: Atrial fibrillation is a frequent finding in PE, affecting more than 10% of patients. However, AF was not associated with a higher risk of in-hospital adverse outcomes and did not affect the prognostic performance of risk assessment strategies. Thus, our data support the use of risk stratification tools for patients with acute PE irrespective of the heart rhythm on admission.

MR-proANP and incident cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes with and without heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) is a useful biomarker in outpatients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) to diagnose heart failure (HF). Elevated B-type natriuretic peptides are included in the definition of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) but little is known about the prognostic value of including A-type natriuretic peptides (MR-proANP) in the evaluation of patients with T2D. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the risk of incident cardiovascular (CV) events in outpatients with T2D (n = 806, mean ± standard deviation age 64 ± 10 years, 65% male, median [interquartile range] duration of diabetes 12 [6-17] years, 17.5% with symptomatic HFpEF) according to MR-proANP levels and stratified according to HF-status including further stratification according to a prespecified cut-off level of MR-proANP. RESULTS: A total of 126 CV events occurred (median follow-up 4.8 [4.1-5.3] years). An elevated MR-proANP, with a cut-off of 60 pmol/l or as a continuous variable, was associated with incident CV events (p < 0.001). Compared to patients without HF, patients with HFpEF and high MR-proANP (≥ 60 pmol/l; median 124 [89-202] pmol/l) and patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) had a higher risk of CV events (multivariable model; hazard ratio (HR) 2.56 [95% CI 1.64-4.00] and 3.32 [1.64-6.74], respectively). Conversely, patients with HFpEF and low MR-proANP (< 60 pmol/l; median 46 [32-56] pmol/l) did not have an increased risk (HR 2.18 [0.78-6.14]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with T2D and HFpEF with high MR-proANP levels had an increased risk for CV events compared to patients with HFpEF without elevated MR-proANP and compared to patients without HF, supporting the use of MR-proANP in the definition of HFpEF from a prognostic point-of-view.

Associations of cardiac stress biomarkers with incident type 2 diabetes and changes in glucose metabolism: KORA F4/FF4 study.

BACKGROUND: High N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide levels have been associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). However, less is known about other cardiac stress biomarkers in this context. Here we evaluated the association of mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), C-terminal pro-arginine vasopressin (copeptin), C-terminal pro-endothelin-1 (CT-proET-1) and mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) with incident T2D and changes in glucose metabolism. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study using data from the population-based KORA F4/FF4 study. 1773 participants (52.3% women) with MR-proANP measurements and 960 (52.7% women) with copeptin, CT-proET-1 and MR-proADM measurements were included. We examined associations of circulating plasma levels of MR-proANP, copeptin, CT-proET-1 and MR-proADM with incident T2D, the combined endpoint of incident prediabetes/T2D and with fasting and 2 h-glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, HOMA-B and HbA1c at follow-up. Logistic and linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, waist circumference, height, hypertension, total/HDL cholesterol ratio, triglycerides, smoking, physical activity and parental history of diabetes were used to compute effect estimates. RESULTS: During a median follow-up time of 6.4 years (25th and 75th percentiles: 6.0 and 6.6, respectively), 119 out of the 1773 participants and 72 out of the 960 participants developed T2D. MR-proANP was inversely associated with incident T2D (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.75 [0.58; 0.96] per 1-SD increase of log MR-proANP). Copeptin was positively associated with incident prediabetes/T2D (1.29 [1.02; 1.63] per 1-SD increase of log copeptin). Elevated levels of CT-proET-1 were associated with increased HOMA-B at follow-up, while elevated MR-proADM levels were associated with increased fasting insulin, HOMA-IR and HOMA-B at follow-up. These associations were independent of previously described diabetes risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: High plasma concentrations of MR-proANP contributed to a lower risk of incident T2D, whereas high plasma concentrations of copeptin were associated with an increased risk of incident prediabetes/T2D. Furthermore, high plasma concentrations of CT-proET-1 and MR-proADM were associated with increased insulin resistance. Our study provides evidence that biomarkers implicated in cardiac stress are associated with incident T2D and changes in glucose metabolism.

Biomarker dynamics in cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study on MR-proADM, MR-proANP, hs-CRP and sP-selectin plasma levels in the perioperative period.

Background: For many biomarkers in cardiac surgery, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the normal dynamics of plasma levels during the perioperative course. The aim of this study was to investigate the perioperative dynamics of MR-proADM, MR-proANP, hs-CRP and sP-selectin in cardiac surgery.Method: A prospective observational pilot study with 20 patients scheduled for open cardiac surgery procedures with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Plasma samples were taken for each patient and biomarker during the pre-, per- and postoperative period until Day 6 postoperatively.Results: MR-proADM increased significantly from 0.62 [IQR; 0.54-0.93] nmol/L preoperatively to 1.20 [1.04-1.80] nmol/L postoperative Day 1. MR-proANP increased significantly from 125 [77-152] pmol/L preoperatively to 198 [168-307] pmol/L on weaning from CPB. hs-CRP increased significantly from 2.5 mg/L [0.4-12] preoperatively to peak at 208 mg/L [186-239] postoperative Day 3. The preoperative level of sP-selectin at 23.0 [21.3-26.3] ng/mL initially fell at weaning from CPB, followed by a significant peak of 25.5 [22.7-27.7] ng/mL 8 h postoperatively.Conclusions: The findings in this study may help to understand the physiology of the biomarkers analysed and their response to cardiac surgical trauma including CPB. Furthermore, these findings will guide us in further research on the clinical usefulness of these biomarkers.

Diagnostic utility of MR-proANP and NT-proBNP in elderly outpatients with a high risk of heart failure: the Copenhagen heart failure risk study.

Background: Amino-terminal-pro-B-type-natriuretic-peptide (NT-proBNP) is a diagnostic biomarker for heart failure (HF), but plasma concentrations are influenced by numerous factors. Mid-regional-pro-atrial-natriuretic-peptide (MR-proANP) have comparable diagnostic value in acute HF. However, data are lacking in the non-acute setting. This study sought to assess the diagnostic utility of MR-proANP in outpatients with a high risk of HF.Methods: This prospective study included 399 outpatients. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 60 years, ≥1 risk factor for HF (diabetes, chronic kidney disease, vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension), without known or suspected HF. Unrecognized HF was diagnosed based on clinical signs, patient-reported symptoms and echocardiography. Plasma concentrations of MR-proANP and NT-proBNP were analysed.Results: In total, 65 patients were diagnosed with HF or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (N = 12 LVEF ≤ 40%, N = 7 LVEF > 40% to ≤50%, N = 46 LVEF > 50%). Both MR-proANP (odds-ratio: 1.77; 95% CI:1.16-2.72; p = 0.009) and NT-proBNP (odds-ratio: 1.49; 95% CI:1.22-1.82; p < 0.001) were associated with HF. Area under receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUC) for the diagnosis of HF or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction was higher for MR-proANP (AUC = 0.886; p < 0.001) and NT-proBNP (AUC = 0.910; p < 0.001) compared to patient-reported symptoms of HF (AUC = 0.830), but NT-proBNP added more diagnostic information compared to MR-proANP (p = 0.022).Conclusions: Both NT-proBNP and MR-proANP are useful biomarkers in the diagnosis of HF or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a non-acute setting. However, NT-proBNP added more diagnostic information compared to MR-proANP.

MR-proANP level predicts new onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: MR-pro ANP is a novel peptide with multiple biological functions, especially within the cardiovascular system. It plays an important role in physiological and pathological processes in the human body and its level may be clinically relevant in new onset atrial fibrillation. The aim of this study was to determine whether elevated MR-proANP level is a predictor of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included 96 patients with their first diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction hospitalized in the Department of Interventional Cardiology within one year. The plasma levels of MR-proANP were determined on admission, and on the first and fifth day of hospitalisation by BRAHMS MRproANP KRYPTOR. New onset AF was diagnosed in 9.4% of patients during hospitalisation; the level of MR proANP was also found to be significantly higher in this group of patients compared to those without arrhythmia (p = 0.017). ROC curve analysis indicates that the concentration of MR-proANP is a good predictor of AF diagnosed during the hospitalisation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AUC = 0.738, p = 0.0011). CONCLUSIONS: MR-proANP might be a good predictor of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Elevated MR-proANP plasma concentrations are associated with sepsis and predict mortality in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mid-regional pro atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) is an established biomarker for heart failure, based on its key role in regulating homeostasis of water balance and blood pressure. The aim of the study was to determine the value of MR-proANP as a clinical biomarker in critical illness and/or sepsis. Upon admission to the medical intensive care unit (ICU), we investigated MR-proANP plasma concentrations in 217 critically ill patients (144 with sepsis, 73 without sepsis). Results were compared with 65 healthy controls. RESULTS: MR-proANP plasma levels were significantly elevated in critically ill patients, when compared to healthy controls. Notably, MR-proANP levels were significantly higher in ICU patients with sepsis. MR-proANP levels were not associated with metabolic comorbidities like diabetes or obesity. In critically ill patients, MR-proANP plasma concentrations correlated with inflammatory cytokines, markers of organ dysfunction and several adipocytokines, such as resistin, retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) and adiponectin. Importantly, high MR-proANP plasma levels were associated with mortality, as MR-proANP levels above 227.0 pmol/l indicated a particularly increased mortality risk in ICU patients. The association between MR-proANP and mortality was independent of single organ failure and inflammation markers. CONCLUSION: Our study emphasizes the role of circulating MR-proANP as a biomarker in critically ill patients, in which high MR-proANP indicates organ dysfunction, sepsis and mortality risk. The association between high MR-proANP and inflammatory as well as adipose tissue-derived endocrine mediators warrants further pathophysiological investigations.

Prognostic and diagnostic significance of mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute heart failure: data from the ACE 2 Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic and prognostic value of mid-regional pro-ANP (MR-proANP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with acute dyspnea. METHODS: MR-proANP and NT-proBNP were measured with commercial immunoassays at hospital admission (n = 313), on day 2 (n = 234), and before discharge (n = 91) and compared for diagnosing acute heart failure (HF; n = 143) and to predict mortality among patients with acute HF and acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD; n = 84) separately. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient between MR-proANP and NT-proBNP was 0.89 (p < 0.001) and the receiver-operating area under the curve (AUC) was 0.85 (95% CI 0.81-0.89) for MR-proANP and 0.86 (0.82-0.90) for NT-proBNP to diagnose acute HF. During a median follow-up of 816 days, mortality rates were 46% in acute HF patients and 42% in AECOPD patients. After adjustment for other risk variables by multivariate Cox regression analysis, MR-proANP and NT-proBNP concentrations were associated with mortality in patients with acute HF, but only MR-proANP were associated with mortality among patients with AECOPD: hazard ratio (lnMR-proANP) 1.98 (95% CI 1.17-3.34). CONCLUSION: MR-proANP and NT-proBNP concentrations provide similar diagnostic and prognostic information in patients with acute HF. In contrast to NT-proBNP, MR-proANP measurements also provided independent prognostic information in AECOPD patients.

Serial Assessment of Natriuretic Peptides in Patients Undergoing Interventional Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage.

BACKGROUND: Closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) to prevent cardioembolic events is an alternative therapy to oral anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The LAA is an important source of natriuretic peptides and its exclusion from the circulation may alter the blood level of these hormones, thereby influencing their diagnostic value and clinical effects. METHODS: We aimed to prospectively assess potential changes in mid-regional pro A-type natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels 6 weeks and 6 months after interventional LAA closure using the WATCHMAN device. RESULTS: In 29 consecutive patients with successful LAA closure baseline MR-proANP level was 274±208pmol/l and decreased by -24.5±68 (p=0.07) and -15.0±44pmol/l (p=0.10) after 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively. The drop in the MR-proANP level after 6 weeks and 6 months was significant in patients with elevated (≥214pmol/l) baseline MR-proANP level (n=15: -54.3±78.0, p<0.01 and -31.8±45.4pmol/l, p=0.03, respectively) and those with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF<45%, n=7: -87.4±97.3, p=0.02 and -60.3±42.6pmol/l, p=0.01, respectively). Baseline NT-proBNP level (median 1054pg/ml; IQR 621-1977pg/ml), sodium, potassium, mean systolic or diastolic blood pressure did not change significantly in the mentioned patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: After LAA closure, MR-proANP level decreased significantly in patients with elevated baseline MR-proANP level or reduced LVEF, whereas NT-proBNP level remained unchanged, thereby altering the correlation coefficient between the two biomarkers. Our findings should be considered when using these biomarkers for diagnostic or prognostic evaluation in patients with interventional LAA closure.

Mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide to predict clinical course in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) induces reverse cardiac remodelling in heart failure (HF), but many patients receiving CRT remain non-responders. This study assessed the role of amino-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), mid-regional-pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), and mid-regional-pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) at the time of device implantation to predict favourable clinical course (CRT response and/or risk of MACE) in HF patients receiving CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 137 HF patients were prospectively included. Blood was drawn from the coronary sinus (CS) at CRT implantation, and from a peripheral vein (PV) simultaneously and after 6 months. Clinical CRT response at 6 months and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 2 years were assessed. Baseline PV-levels of MR-proANP (202 vs. 318 pmol/L, P = 0.009) and MR-proADM (843 vs. 1112 pmol/L, P = 0.02) were lower in CRT responders compared with non-responders. At 6 months, CRT responders showed a decrease in MR-proANP levels, compared with an increase in non-responders (-32 vs. +7 pmol/L, P = 0.02). During the same period, NT-proBNP decreased by a similar way in responders and non-responders, while MR-proADM was unchanged in both groups. High baseline MR-proANP, either in PV (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.71, P = 0.002) or CS (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.70, P = 0.005) was associated with reduced likelihood of CRT response. Furthermore, PV and CS levels of NT-proBNP, MR-proANP, and MR-proADM were all associated with increased risk of 2-year MACE (all P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Mid-regional-pro-atrial natriuretic peptide may assist prediction of clinical course in HF patients undergoing CRT implantation. Low circulating MR-proANP at the time of device implantation is associated with CRT response and more favourable outcome.

The natriuretic peptide MR-proANP predicts all-cause mortality and adverse outcome in community patients: a 10-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: The precursor peptide of atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) has a physiological role in fluid homeostasis and is associated with mortality and adverse clinical outcomes in heart failure patients. Little is known about the prognostic potential of this peptide for long-term mortality prediction in community-dwelling patients. We evaluated associations of MR-proANP levels with 10-year all-cause mortality in patients visiting their general practitioner for a respiratory tract infection. METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis including 359 patients (78.5%) of the original trial, we calculated cox regression models and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to assess associations of MR-proANP blood levels with mortality and adverse outcome including death, pulmonary embolism, and major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 10.0 years, 9.8% of included patients died. Median admission MR-proANP levels were significantly elevated in non-survivors compared to survivors (80.5 pmol/L, IQR 58.6-126.0; vs. 45.6 pmol/L, IQR 34.2-68.3; p<0.001) and associated with 10-year all-cause mortality (age-adjusted HR 2.0 [95% CI 1.3-3.1, p=0.002]; AUC 0.79). Results were similar for day 7 blood levels and also for the prediction of other adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Increased MR-proANP levels were associated with 10-year all-cause mortality and adverse clinical outcome in a sample of community-dwelling patients. If diagnosis-specific cut-offs are confirmed in future studies, this marker may help to direct preventive measures in primary care.

Modern peptide biomarkers and echocardiography in cardiac healthy haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: In this prospective study, we aimed to assess the haemodynamic changes before and after haemodialysis (HD) in cardiac healthy subjects on chronic HD by imaging methods and endocrine markers of fluid balance. METHODS: Mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), vasopressin (AVP) and copeptin (CT-proAVP), metanephrines and normetanephrines, renin and aldosterone, standard transthoracic echocardiography and diameter of vena cava inferior (VCID) were performed in 20 patients with end stage renal disease (CKD5D) before and after HD and were stratified in residual excretion (RE, less or more 0.5 l) and ultrafiltration rate (UF, less or more 2 l). RESULTS: Copeptin was significantly higher in patients before HD. Copeptin was inversely correlated with haemodialysis treatment adequacy (KT/v), RE and UF, but was not significantly influenced by age, gender and body mass index (BMI). MR-proANP was significantly reduced by haemodialysis by 27% and was inversely correlated with KT/v, but there was a significant influence by UF, RE, age, gender and BMI. NT-proBNP was significantly higher in patients before HD and was not influenced by RE and UF. Renin, aldosterone, metanephrines and normetanephrines did not demonstrate significant differences. Echocardiographic parameters and VCID were significantly correlated with RE, UF and copeptin. CONCLUSION: Modern biomarkers will provide cardiovascular risk assessment, but elimination (UF), RE and other factors may influence the serum concentrations, e.g. in patients with renal impairment. The interpretation will be limited by altered reference ranges, and will be restricted to individual courses combined with clinical and echocardiographic data.

MR-proANP, MR-proADM, and PCT in Patients Presenting with Acute Dyspnea in a Medical Emergency Unit.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of the role of novel biomarkers in the management of cardiac and pulmonary conditions has received particular attention in recent years. A further particular perspective is the use of biomarker panels in the evaluation of patients presenting with acute dyspnea. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated three biomarkers (MR-proANP, PCT, and MR-proADM) in consecutive patients presenting with acute dyspnea in a medical emergency unit during a 4-week period. Patients received a final diagnosis. Biomarkers were tested for their potential to predict diagnoses and survival. No intervention was done. RESULTS: Overall, n = 172 patients were included. Of these, 32.6 % had acute heart failure, 16.9 % pneumonia, and 5.8 % died. MR-proANP was the highest in patients with acute heart failure and lung embolism. Dyspnea scores and levels of MR-pro-ANP correlated positively. MR-proANP achieved an AUC of 0.83 for the diagnosis of acute heart failure. Using a cut-off of 120 pmol/l, sensitivity was 91.1 % and specificity 50 %. PPV was 46.8 % and NPV 92.1 %. In patients with MR-proANP >300 pmol/l, PPV raised to 67.3 %. MR-proADM had an AUC of 0.84 for the prediction of death. PPV was 16 % and NPV 98.4 %. The AUC of PCT was 0.74 for the diagnosis of pneumonia. Using a cut-off of 0.25 ng/ml, PCT had a sensitivity of 44.8 % and a specificity of 85.3 %. PPV was 38.2 and NPV 88.4 %. Using a lower cut-off of <0.1 ng/ml, NPV reached 92.9 %. CONCLUSIONS: A panel of three biomarkers (MR-proANP, PCT, and MR-proADM) in patients presenting to the emergency unit with acute dyspnea provides information about the probability of acute heart failure, nonsurvival, and pneumonia. These biomarkers achieve low to moderate positive predictive values (PPV) and high negative predictive values (NPV).

Maternal serum copeptin, MR-proANP and procalcitonin levels at 11-13 weeks gestation in the prediction of preeclampsia.

PURPOSE: We investigated the potential value of maternal serum copeptin, midregional proatrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) and Procalcitonin (PCT) levels at 11-13 weeks' gestation in the prediction of preeclampsia (PE) in a case-control study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Maternal serum concentration of copeptin, MR-proANP and PCT were measured at 11-13 weeks' gestation in cases of PE (n = 35) and controls (n = 100). The PE group was divided into early-onset PE (EO-PE) and late-onset PE (LO-PE). From the regression model, the value in each case and control was expressed as a multiple of the expected median (MoM). The Mann-Whitney test was used to determine the significance of differences in the median MoM in each outcome group from that in the controls. RESULTS: In the PE group, compared to controls, maternal serum concentrations of copeptin, MR-proANP and PCT were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The maternal serum copeptin, MR-proANP and PCT levels are higher in EO-PE and LO-PE patients, but the difference is not significant. Thus, their levels in first trimester are not proven to be effective markers to screen for PE.

Biomarkers and diagnostics in heart failure.

Heart failure (HF) biomarkers have dramatically impacted the way HF patients are evaluated and managed. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) are the gold standard biomarkers in determining the diagnosis and prognosis of HF, and studies on natriuretic peptide-guided HF management look promising. An array of additional biomarkers has emerged, each reflecting different pathophysiological processes in the development and progression of HF: myocardial insult, inflammation and remodeling. Novel biomarkers, such as mid-regional pro atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), mid-regional pro adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), highly sensitive troponins, soluble ST2 (sST2), growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15 and Galectin-3, show potential in determining prognosis beyond the established natriuretic peptides, but their role in the clinical care of the patient is still partially defined and more studies are needed. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Heart failure pathogenesis and emerging diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.

Combination of cardiac color Doppler ultrasound, serum MR-ProANP and NT-ProBNP forecasted hypertensive LVH and LFH.

To analyze the value of the combined test of the cardiac color Doppler ultrasound, the serum middle receptor pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-ProANP) and the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP) in forecasting the hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and left heart failure (LHF). All patients were subjected to cardiac color Doppler ultrasound examination to obtain left atrium volume index (LAVI), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), early-diastolic peak flow velocity (E), early-diastolic mean flow velocity (e'), early-diastolic peak flow velocity/early-diastolic mean flow velocity (E/e') and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Biomarkers were performed to obtain serum MR-ProANP and NT-ProBNP concentrations, and statistical analysis was performed. The LVEF was obviously lower than that in the control group (P<0.01). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) values of LVEF, E/e', serum MR-ProANP and NT-ProBNP alone were in the range of 0.7-0.8. The AUC, sensitivity and specificity of LVEF and E/e' combined with MR-ProANP and NT-ProBNP to diagnose hypertensive LVH and LHF were 0.892, 89.14% and 78.21%, which were higher than those of single diagnosis. In the heart failure group, LVEF was negatively correlated with serum MR-ProANP and NT-ProBNP concentrations (P<0.05), and E/e' was positively correlated with serum MR-ProANP and NT-ProBNP concentrations (P<0.05). Pump function and ventricular remodeling in patients with hypertensive LVH and LHF are closely related to serum MR-ProANP and NT-ProBNP levels. Combination of the two testing can improve the prediction and diagnostic efficacy of LHF.