The Effects of Statins, Ezetimibe, PCSK9-Inhibitors, Inclisiran, and Icosapent Ethyl on Platelet Function.

This review aims to examine the complex interaction between dyslipidemia, platelet function, and related drug treatments. In particular, the manuscript provides an overview of the effects of major hypolipidemic drugs on platelet function. Indeed, growing evidence supports the view that statins, ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors, inclisiran, and icosapent ethyl also act as antithrombotics. It is known that platelets play a key role not only in the acute phase of coronary syndromes but also in the early phase of atherosclerotic plaque formation. The goal of cholesterol-lowering therapy is to reduce cardiovascular events. The direct effects of cholesterol-lowering drugs are widely described in the literature. Lowering LDL-c (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) by 1 mmol/L results in a 22-23% reduction in cardiovascular risk. Numerous studies have examined the direct antithrombotic effects of these drugs on platelets, endothelium, monocytes, and smooth muscle cells, and thus, potentially independent of blood LDL-cholesterol reduction. We reviewed in vitro and in vivo studies evaluating the complex interaction between hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, platelet function, and related drug treatments. First, we discussed the role of statins in modulating platelet activation. Discontinuation of statin therapy was associated with increased cardiovascular events with increased ox-LDL, P-selectin, and platelet aggregation. The effect of PCSK9-I (inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, PCSK9 involved in the degradation of LDL receptors in the liver) was associated with a statistically significant reduction in platelet reactivity, calculated in P2Y12 reaction units (PRU), in the first 14 days and no difference at 30 days compared to placebo. Finally, in patients with hypertriglyceridemia, the REDUCE-IT study showed that icosapent ethyl (an ethyl ester of eicosapentaenoic acid that reduces triglyceride synthesis and improves triglyceride clearance) resulted in a 25% reduction in ischemic events and cardiovascular death. However, to date, there is not yet clear clinical evidence that the direct antithrombotic effects of the drugs may have a beneficial impact on outcomes independently from the reduction in LDL-C or triglycerides.

The effect of smoking on residual platelet reactivity to clopidogrel: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cigarette smoking is an important cardiovascular risk factor, causing morbidity and mortality. There are many original studies on the impact of smoking, but its influence on platelet ADP-P2Y12 receptor inhibitors lack consistency. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of already existing data/studies to further explore this issue. PubMed, Web of science, EMBASE, Clinical Trials, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2018. Studies investigating the residual platelet reactivity categorized by smoking status and patients treated with platelet ADP-P2Y12 receptor inhibitors qualified the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value measured by VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, compared with different smoking status in ADP-P2Y12 receptor inhibitors treatment groups. Secondary outcome was post-treatment with 5 µmol/L ADP-inhibition of platelet aggregation (ADP-IPA) measured by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA). Of the 4954 citations retrieved, 12 studies involving 16 296 patients with acute coronary syndrome and/or stent deployment using platelet ADP-P2Y12 receptor inhibitors were included for meta-analysis. Pooled analysis revealed that PRU values of current smokers were 25.70 lower than nonsmokers (95% CI -38.81 to -12.60, p = 0.0001), getting better effects of antiplatelet treatment. In the smoking extent subgroup analysis, patients smoking >10 cigarettes/day shown about 46.49 lower of PRU values than patients smoking <10 cigarettes/day (p < 0.00001). Racial subgroup analyses found that smokers had increased platelet inhibition in the Caucasian population. Further, pooled analysis of ADP-IPA values for 1658 patients from five studies showed a significantly lower residual platelet reactivity in current smokers compared to that in nonsmokers (MD = -4.19; 95% CI -6.55 to -1.83; p = 0.0005). This systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that smokers have increased platelet inhibition and lower aggregation in response to clopidogrel than nonsmokers. These residual platelet reactivity observations may help to explain differential clinical outcomes in smokers vs. nonsmokers in large scale clinical trials.

A brief review on resistance to P2Y12 receptor antagonism in coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Platelet inhibition is important for patients with coronary artery disease. When dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is required, a P2Y12-antagonist is usually recommended in addition to standard aspirin therapy. The most used P2Y12-antagonists are clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor. Despite DAPT, some patients experience adverse cardiovascular events, and insufficient platelet inhibition has been suggested as a possible cause. In the present review we have performed a literature search on prevalence, mechanisms and clinical implications of resistance to P2Y12 inhibitors. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for relevant papers and 11 meta-analyses were included. P2Y12 resistance is measured by stimulating platelets with ADP ex vivo and the most used assays are vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), Multiplate, VerifyNow (VN) and light transmission aggregometry (LTA). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The frequency of high platelet reactivity (HPR) during clopidogrel therapy is predicted to be 30%. Genetic polymorphisms and drug-drug interactions are discussed to explain a significant part of this inter-individual variation. HPR during prasugrel and ticagrelor treatment is estimated to be 3-15% and 0-3%, respectively. This lower frequency is explained by less complicated and more efficient generation of the active metabolite compared to clopidogrel. Meta-analyses do show a positive effect of adjusting standard clopidogrel treatment based on platelet function testing. Despite this, personalized therapy is not recommended because no large-scale RCT have shown any clinical benefit. For patients on prasugrel and ticagrelor, platelet function testing is not recommended due to low occurrence of HPR.

Genotyping and phenotyping CYP3A4\CYP3A5: no association with antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel.

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of polymorphism of CYP3A subfamily isoenzymes (allelic variants of CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3) on the efficacy clopidogrel in patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Platelet activity was determined on a VerifyNow P2Y12 test system in 81 patients with ACS aged 37-91 who had PCI. The activity of CYP3A4/5 was expressed as the ratio of the concentrations of cortisol and 6ß-hydroxycortisol was performed by using high performance liquid chromatography. Genotyping was performed by using real-time polymerase real-time chain reaction. The frequencies for the CYP3A5 gene, rs 776746, were identified as follows: 77 (95.1%)-CC, 4 (4.9%)-CT; the allele frequencies by loci for the CYP3A4, rs rs35599367, were as follows: 78 (96.3%)-GG, 3 (3.7%)-AG. There was no statistically significant genotype-dependent difference between the presence of a minor T and G alleles and the presence of clopidogrel resistance (OR 3.53; 95% CI 0.46-26.94; p = 0.233 and p = 0.443, respectively). The average level of the metabolic relationship (6ß-hydroxycortisol/cortisol) between the clopidogrel-resistant group and the normal platelet reactivity group was not statistically significantly different: 3.3 ± 2.8 versus 3.2 ± 3.2; p = 0.947. So, the activity of CYP3A4/5 was not related to platelet aggregation rates in this model. Genotyping and phenotyping CYP3A4\CYP3A5 does not predict the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel. More extensive research is required to establish their clinical relevance.

Individual long-term variation of platelet reactivity in patients with dual antiplatelet therapy after myocardial infarction.

There is a large inter-individual variation in response to clopidogrel treatment, and previous studies have indicated higher risk of thrombotic events in those with high residual platelet reactivity (HPR). Less is known about individual variation over time. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to investigate intra-individual variation in platelet reactivity. Platelet aggregation in whole blood was assessed in 77 patients, at 3 days, 8 days and 6 months after admission for acute myocardial infarction and loading dose of clopidogrel. All patients were treated with aspirin and clopidogrel through 6-month follow-up. We found a significant increase in median ADP-stimulated aggregation from third to eighth day (195 vs. 250 AU*min, p-value = 0.001) but not from day 8 to 6 months (250 vs. 223 AU*min, p-value = 0.666). There was no significant change in the overall rate of HPR (15.6% vs 20.8%, p-value 0.503) or low platelet reactivity (LPR) (37.7% vs 33.8%, p-value = 0.609) from day 8 to 6-month follow-up. In contrast, more than one in four changed HPR status, 15.6% from non-HPR to HPR and 10.4% HPR to non-HPR. A shift in LPR status appeared even more frequent, occurring in about one of three patients. In spite of similar median aggregation and rate of HPR during 6-month follow-up, about one in four of the patients changed HPR status and one in three changed LPR status. This may be important information for a concept of risk stratification based on a single aggregation value early after an acute coronary syndromes.

vWF/ADAMTS13 is associated with on-aspirin residual platelet reactivity and clinical outcome in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms behind residual platelet reactivity (RPR) despite aspirin treatment are not established. It has been shown that coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with high on-aspirin RPR have elevated levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF). ADAMTS13 is a metalloprotease cleaving ultra large vWF multimers into less active fragments.Our aim was to investigate whether ADAMTS13 and vWF/ADAMTS13 ratio were associated with high RPR, and further with clinical endpoints after 2 years. METHODS: Stable aspirin-treated CAD patients (n = 999) from the ASCET trial. RPR was assessed by PFA-100. ADAMTS13 antigen and activity were analysed using chromogenic assays. Endpoints were a composite of acute myocardial infarction, stroke and death. RESULTS: The number of patients with high RPR was 258 (25.8%). Their serum thromboxane B2 (TxB2) levels were low, indicating inhibition of COX-1. They had significantly lower levels of ADAMTS13 antigen compared to patients with low RPR (517 vs 544 ng/mL, p = 0.001) and significantly lower ADAMTS13 activity (0.99 vs 1.04 IU/mL, p = 0.020). The differences were more pronounced when relating RPR to ratios of vWF/ADAMTS13 antigen and vWF/ADAMTS13 activity (p < 0.001, both). We found an inverse correlation between vWF and ADAMTS13 antigen (r = -0.14, p < 0.001) and ADAMTS13 activity (r = -0.11, p < 0.001). No correlations between TxB2 and ADAMTS13 antigen or activity, were observed, implying that ADAMTS13 is not involved in TxB2 production. Patients who experienced endpoints (n = 73) had higher vWF level (113 vs 105%, p = 0.032) and vWF/ADAMTS13 antigen ratio (0.23 vs 0.20, p = 0.012) compared to patients without. When dichotomizing vWF/ADAMTS13 antigen at median level we observed that patients above median had higher risk for suffering endpoints, with an adjusted OR of 1.86 (95% CI 1.45, 2.82). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that ADAMTS13 is of importance for RPR, and that it in combination with vWF also is associated with clinical endpoints in stable CAD patients on aspirin. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00222261. Registered 13.09.2005. Retrospectively registered.

Monitoring ASA and P2Y12-specific platelet inhibition--comparison of conventional (single) and multiple electrode aggregometry.

OBJECTIVE: Several platelet function test systems exist for the evaluation of the platelet inhibitory effect in patients on P2Y12 inhibitors and/or acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) therapy. Studies comparing different available assays found only a poor correlation. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the correlation and agreement between single electrode (SEA) and multiple electrode (MEA) aggregometry. METHODS AND RESULTS: In whole blood arachidonic acid (AA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation was measured simultaneously using SEA (Chrono-Log) and MEA (Multiplate). We analyzed a total of 226 measurements taken from 58 patients on single ASA therapy or dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA and a thienopyridine. A cut-off value for clopidogrel/prasugrel high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) of > 47 units (U) was chosen for MEA testing using hirudin and > 5 Ohm for SEA with citrate anticoagulated blood samples. The respective cut-off values for ASA HPR were > 30 U for the MEA assay and > 1 Ohm for SEA testing. There was a good correlation of the prevalence of thienopyridine-HPR in both whole blood assays (Spearman rank correlation coefficient r = 0.698) and a good inter-rate accordance (Cohen's Kappa statistic κ = 0.648). For AA-induced aggregation, the correlation of the results obtained was significant (r = 0.536; p < 0.001) and detecting ASA-HPR revealed a moderate (κ = 0.482) correlation between both impedance aggregometry assays. CONCLUSION: Platelet function testing using SEA and MEA provided both good accordance and correlation and therefore study results obtained by these two assays similarly enabled the detection of HPR of thienopyridine (and ASA) therapy.

Clopidogrel-Related High Residual Platelet Reactivity Associated with Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

INTRODUCTION: There are few studies on the relationship between the occurrence of clopidogrel-related high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at admission in patients with ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible relationship between the two. METHODS: Patients who were hospitalized and diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke were recruited from July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018, at Shanghai TCM-Integrated Hospital. Renal function was measured within 24 h of enrollment and eGFR was calculated. Patients were tested for platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow system after 7 days of antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel 75 mg/d alone, and patients with P2Y12 reaction unit values ≥230 were diagnosed with HRPR. The association between HRPR and eGFR was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 274 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 91 (33.21%) had HRPR. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that an increased risk of HRPR was independently associated with female sex and reduced eGFR (female sex: OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.26-3.99, p = 0.006; mild chronic kidney disease [CKD]: OR = 2.95, 95% CI: 1.47-5.93, p = 0.002; moderate CKD: OR = 3.07, 95% CI: 1.08-8.75, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Decreased eGFR is an independent risk factor for the occurrence of HRPR in patients with ischemic stroke.

Impact of renal function on residual platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common comorbidity in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and may potentially influence platelet function. HYPOTHESIS: We explored the influence of renal function on platelet reactivity to investigate whether high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) is associated with cardiovascular events. METHODS: ACS patients treated with aspirin and clopidogrel were prospectively enrolled. Patients were categorized into two groups on the basis of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): non-CKD (eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) and CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ). Platelet function was measured by thromboelastography ≥5 days after maintenance dual antiplatelet therapy. Major adverse clinical events (MACEs) were collected at 1 year after discharge. RESULTS: There were 282 non-CKD patients and 212 CKD patients. A significant difference in median MAADP value was observed between the two groups (15.0 mm vs. 31.3 mm, p < .001). HRPR was more prevalent in the CKD group than the non-CKD group (27.4% vs 9.6%, p < .001). At 1-year follow-up, the incidence of MACEs was significantly higher for those with both CKD and HRPR compared with those with either CKD or HRPR (37.9% vs. 18.5%, p < .001). The relationship between HRPR and MACEs was consistent across CKD strata without evidence of interaction. Adding platelet reactivity to eGFR improved the model with area under the curve increasing from 0.703 to 0.734. CONCLUSION: In patients with ACS, the risk of HRPR increased with declining eGFR. Both CKD and HRPR were associated with MACEs at 1-year follow-up.

Comparison of Light Transmission Aggregometry With Impedance Aggregometry in Patients on Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors.

Since data on the agreement between light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in patients on the more potent P2Y12 inhibitors are missing so far, we investigated if the evaluation of the responsiveness to therapy by LTA can be replaced by MEA in 160 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and prasugrel or ticagrelor (n = 80 each). Cut-off values for high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) or arachidonic acid (AA) were defined according to previous studies showing an association of HRPR with the occurrence of adverse ischemic outcomes. ADP- inducible platelet aggregation was 33% and 37% (P = 0.07) by LTA and 19 AU and 20 AU (P = 0.38) by MEA in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients, respectively. AA- inducible platelet aggregation was 2% and 3% by LTA and 15 AU and 16 AU by MEA, (all P ≥ 0.3) in patients on prasugrel and ticagrelor, respectively. By LTA, HRPR ADP and HRPR AA were seen in 5%/5% and in 4%/ 13% of patients receiving prasugrel- and ticagrelor, respectively. By MEA, HRPR ADP and HRPR AA were seen in 3%/ 25% and 0%/24% of prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients, respectively. ADP-inducible platelet reactivity by MEA correlated significantly with LTA ADP in prasugrel-treated patients (r = 0.4, P < 0.001), but not in those receiving ticagrelor (r = 0.09, P = 0.45). AA-inducible platelet aggregation by LTA and MEA did not correlate in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients. Sensitivity/specificity of HRPR by MEA to detect HRPR by LTA were 25%/99% for MEA ADP and 100%/79% for MEA AA in prasugrel-treated patients, and 0%/100% for MEA ADP and 70%/83% for MEA AA in ticagrelor-treated patients. In conclusion, on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity by LTA and MEA shows a significant correlation in prasugrel- but not ticagrelor-treated patients. However, in both groups LTA and MEA revealed heterogeneous results regarding the classification of patients as responders or non-responders to P2Y12 inhibition.

Direct factor IXa inhibition with the RNA-aptamer pegnivacogin reduces platelet reactivity in vitro and residual platelet aggregation in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Residual platelet reactivity is a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Thrombin is a major platelet activator and upon initiation of the coagulation cascade, it is subsequently produced downstream of factor IXa, which itself is known to be increased in ACS. Pegnivacogin is a novel RNA-aptamer based factor IXa inhibitor featuring a reversal agent, anivamersen. We hypothesized that pegnivacogin could reduce platelet reactivity. METHODS: Whole blood samples from healthy volunteers were incubated in vitro in the presence and absence of pegnivacogin and platelet reactivity was analysed. In addition, platelet aggregometry was performed in blood samples from ACS patients in the RADAR trial featuring the intravenous administration of pegnivacogin as well as reversal by anivamersen. RESULTS: In vitro, pegnivacogin significantly reduced adenosine diphosphate-induced CD62P-expression (100% vs. 89.79±4.04%, p=0.027, n=9) and PAC-1 binding (100% vs. 83.02±4.08%, p=0.010, n=11). Platelet aggregation was reduced (97.71±5.30% vs. 66.53±9.92%, p=0.013, n=10) as evaluated by light transmission aggregometry. In the presence of the RNA-aptamer reversal agent anivamersen, neither CD62P-expression nor platelet aggregation was attenuated. In patients with ACS treated with aspirin and clopidogrel, residual platelet aggregation was significantly reduced 20 min after intravenous bolus of 1 mg/kg pegnivacogin (100% versus 43.21±8.23%, p=0.020). CONCLUSION: Inhibition of factor IXa by pegnivacogin decreases platelet activation and aggregation in vitro. This effect was negated by anivamersen. In ACS patients, platelet aggregation was significantly reduced after intravenous pegnivacogin. An aptamer-based anticoagulant inhibiting factor IXa therefore might be a promising antithrombotic strategy in ACS patients.

Low Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Are Linked to Impaired Clopidogrel-Mediated Platelet Inhibition.

Low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels are an independent predictor of ischemic events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This may in part be due to decreased clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition in patients with low HDL-C. We investigated the association of HDL-C with on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) in 314 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin undergoing angioplasty and stenting. Platelet P-selectin expression was assessed by flow cytometry, and platelet aggregation was determined by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and the Impact-R. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were inversely associated with P-selectin expression and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (both P ≤ .01). Moreover, we found a positive correlation of HDL-C with surface coverage by the Impact-R ( P = .003). Patients with low HDL-C (≤35 mg/dL) exhibited a significantly higher P-selectin expression in response to ADP and higher platelet aggregation by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and the Impact-R than patients with normal HDL-C (>35 mg/dL; all P < .05). High on-treatment residual platelet reactivity by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay occurred significantly more frequently in patients with low HDL-C levels than in those with normal HDL-C (47.4% vs 30.1%, P = .01). In conclusion, low HDL-C is linked to impaired clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition after angioplasty and stenting.

Disaggregation Following Agonist-Induced Platelet Activation in Patients on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

Disaggregation as the difference between maximal and final platelet aggregation by light transmission aggregometry indicates the stability of platelet aggregates. We evaluated the extent of disaggregation after platelet stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (ADP), arachidonic acid (AA), collagen, epinephrine, and thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP)-6 in 323 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with daily aspirin and clopidogrel (group 1), prasugrel (group 2), or ticagrelor (group 3) therapy. All patients in group 1 underwent elective angioplasty and stenting, whereas all patients included in groups 2 and 3 suffered from acute coronary syndromes (STEMI or NSTEMI) and underwent urgent PCI. Significant differences between maximal and final platelet aggregation were observed with all agonists throughout the groups (all p<0.001). Disaggregation was highest using AA (clopidogrel 36.5%; prasugrel/ticagrelor 100%) and ADP (clopidogrel 21.7%; prasugrel/ticagrelor 100%). In contrast, low disaggregation was observed after platelet stimulation with collagen and TRAP-6 in clopidogrel-treated patients, and after platelet stimulation with collagen and epinephrine in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients. In conclusion, pathways of platelet activation that are not inhibited by standard antiplatelet therapy allow persisting platelet aggregation and may at least in part be responsible for adverse ischemic events.

Parathyroid Hormone Levels and High-Residual Platelet Reactivity in Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Acetylsalicylic Acid and Clopidogrel or Ticagrelor.

BACKGROUND: High-residual-on-treatment platelet reactivity still represents a challenging issue, potentially vanishing the benefits of dual antiplatelet treatment in patients with coronary artery disease. However, very few is known on the determinants of suboptimal response to antiplatelet agents. Recent interests have emerged on the potential prothrombotic effect of parathyroid hormone (PTH). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the impact of parathyroid hormone (PTH) on platelet reactivity in patients receiving DAPT after an acute coronary syndrome or PCI. METHODS: Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30- to 90-days postdischarge. By whole blood impedance aggregometry, HRPR was considered for ASPI test >862 AU*min (for ASA) and ADP test values ≥417 AU*min (for ADP antagonists). RESULTS: We included 362 patients on DAPT, 125 (34.5%) receiving clopidogrel, and 237 (65.5%) on ticagrelor. Patients were divided according to PTH quartiles values (<45.8; 45.8-60.3; 60.4-88; ≥88.1 pg/mL). Higher PTH was associated with older age (P = 0.001); renal failure (P < 0.001), higher HDL cholesterol (P = 0.006) and creatinine (P < 0.001) and lower 25-OH cholecalciferol (P < 0.001). Suboptimal response to ASA was infrequent (2.8%), and not influenced by the levels of PTH (P = 0.57). ADP-mediated platelet aggregation was significantly increased in patients with higher PTH (P = 0.03), with an absolute increase in the prevalence of HRPR to ADP antagonists for higher PTH (24.7% vs. 40%, P = 0.007 for 4th vs. 1-3rd quartiles, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 2.04[1.14-3.64], P = 0.02). By the use of the ROC curve, we identified PTH levels above 96.7 pg/mL as the best predictor of HRPR with ADP antagonists (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 2.52[1.31-4.87], P = 0.006). Higher rate of HRPR was confirmed for PTH >96.7 pg/mL among the subgroup of patients on clopidogrel (51.5 vs. 85.7%, P = 0.001; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 12.5[2.6-60.9], P = 0.002), but not among ticagrelor-treated patients (11.3 vs. 16.7%, P = 0.31; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.55[0.56-4.6], P = 0.42). CONCLUSION: In patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for coronary artery disease, higher PTH levels are associated with an increased ADP-mediated platelet reactivity and suboptimal response to clopidogrel, especially for values above 96.7 pg/mL, while not influencing the effectiveness of ASA and ticagrelor.

Changes in platelet function independent of pharmacotherapy following coronary intervention in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.

BACKGROUND: High on treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) is common in patients receiving clopidogrel following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS); it's also associated with increased morbidity and mortality. More potent and predictable antiplatelet drugs have addressed this issue at the expense of increased bleeding. Identification of HTPR and the targeted use of more potent antiplatelet drugs has, so far, broadly failed. We investigate this approach in terms of the timing of platelet function testing and how this can impact on the ability of these bedside tests to predict HTPR around the time of coronary intervention. METHODS: High risk ACS patients treated with 5 days of clopidogrel had platelet function assessed using the multiple electrode aggregometry system (MEA) pre, post and 24 h following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Simultaneous detailed analysis of platelet status was undertaken with quantification of platelet bound and soluble p-selectin and mass spectrometry quantification of the eicosanoid 12-HETE. RESULTS: As assessed by MEA 40.5% of patients had HTPR pre-PCI; mean aggregation units (AU) in response to ADP were 499.1 ± 46.3 pre-PCI, 407.6 ± 37.7 post-PCI and 269.1 ± 24.6 AU 24 h post-PCI (pre to post PCI p > 0.05, pre to 24 h post-PCI p = 0.0002). This highly significant drop in platelet reactivity was contrasted with on-going expression of platelet bound p-selectin, increased soluble p-selectin and rising 12-HETE concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: This study outlines significant changes in ex-vivo platelet aggregation that occur within 24 h of PCI in high risk NSTEMI patients using bedside PFT. Whilst there were no changes in antiplatelet therapy during the study period its clear that timing is crucial when assessing high on treatment residual platelet activity.

Selection of P2Y12 antagonist, treatment initiation, and predictors of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in a "Real World" registry.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to compare characteristics related to selection of a P2Y12 antagonist, investigate initiation of therapy with new-generation drugs, and identify predictors of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with stent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 589 patients in the LAPCOR (Laboratory AntiPlatelet efficacy and Clinical Outcome Registry; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02264912) registry was analyzed. P2Y12 receptor antagonist efficacy was measured by VASP phosphorylation 24 ± 4 hours after a loading dose of clopidogrel (600 mg, N=407), prasugrel (60 mg, N=106), or ticagrelor (180 mg, N=76) and expressed by platelet reactivity index (PRI). HTPR was defined as PRI ≥50%. Patients treated with prasugrel were significantly younger and had significantly higher hemoglobin levels than those who received clopidogrel or ticagrelor, while chronic kidney disease was significantly more prevalent in the ticagrelor group. Almost all invasively managed patients given new-generation drugs received a loading dose after coronary angiography. Mean residual PRI and HTPR were significantly higher after clopidogrel (44.2 ± 23.1% and 42.2%, respectively) vs. prasugrel (17.7 ± 18.0% and 9.4%, respectively) or ticagrelor (18.8 ± 17.0% and 7.9%, respectively; all p<0.001). Among multiple variables tested, HTPR in patients treated with the new agents significantly related only to platelet count (p=0.014) and mean platelet volume (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Safety is the most important aspect under consideration in choosing new agents for an individual patient. Other than platelet count and mean platelet volume, factors known as predictors of higher platelet reactivity, did not influence the efficacy of new-generation P2Y12 receptor antagonists.

Mean platelet volume and high-residual platelet reactivity in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

OBJECTIVE: High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) is associated with a two- to ninefold increased risk of recurrent ischemic events among patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for coronary artery disease. However, its determinants are still poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of mean platelet volume (MPV) on platelet reactivity in patients receiving DAPT after an acute coronary syndrome or PCI. METHODS: Patients treated with DAPT (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA] and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30 - 90 days post-discharge. By whole blood impedance aggregometry, HRPR was considered for ASPI test > 862 aggregation units (AU)*min (for ASA) and ADP test values ≥ 417 AU*min (for ADP-antagonists). RESULTS: Our population is represented by a total of 487 patients on DAPT, divided according to MPV tertiles (< 10.4 fl; 10.4 - 11.29 fl; ≥ 11.3 fl). Larger-sized platelets were associated with use of statins (p < 0.001) and beta-blockers (p = 0.03), higher hemoglobin levels (p = 0.002) and lower platelets count (p < 0.001). Higher platelet reactivity was observed at ASPI test in patients with higher MPV (r = 0.12, p = 0.008), but not for ADP-mediated aggregation (r = -0.007, p = 0.88). However, a low prevalence of HRPR was observed with ASA, with no impact of MPV tertiles (1.2 vs 1.1 vs 1.6%, p = 0.70, adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.05 [0.51 - 1.77], p = 0.87). MPV did not influence the prevalence of HRPR for ADP-antagonists (25.9 vs 1 vs 26.5%, p = 0.89; adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.1 [0.84 - 1.45], p = 0.50) with similar results among the 259 patients receiving clopidogrel (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.15 [0.82 - 1.62], p = 0.43) and the 228 patients on ticagrelor (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.46 [0.84 - 2.55], p = 0.18). CONCLUSION: In patients receiving DAPT, MPV does not affect the response to major antiplatelet therapies. In fact, MPV elevation does not influence the risk of HRPR with clopidogrel, ticagrelor or ASA.

Association of immature platelets with adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Immature platelets are less responsive to the effects of antiplatelet drugs and contain messenger ribonucleic acid that is translationally active. They can be measured easily using an automated hematoanalyzer and reported as part of the complete blood count. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of elevated immature platelet count (IPC) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: In this prospective cohort study in patients with CAD, patients underwent IPC measurement and were then followed up for the composite endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, or hospitalization for angina. For the purposes of analysis, patients were stratified into tertiles of IPC. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were followed up for a median of 31 months. Stratification to the high IPC tertile was associated with higher rates of MACE compared with the intermediate and low tertiles (60% vs. 24% vs. 16%, respectively; p < 0.001). Time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed that an IPC level ≥7,632 platelets/µl was 70.7% sensitive and 82.1% specific for MACE. After adjustment for age, admission diagnosis, index revascularization, heart failure, smoking, hematocrit, and baseline platelet count, patients with an IPC level ≥7,632 platelets/µl were more likely to experience a MACE (hazard ratio: 4.65; 95% confidence interval: 1.78 to 12.16; p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: IPC is a novel biomarker for MACE risk stratification in patients with CAD. Future studies should focus on the utilization of this marker for individualized antiplatelet therapy.

Association between silent embolic cerebral infarction and continuous increase of P2Y12 reaction units after neurovascular stenting.

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular procedures are one of the important treatment options for steno-occlusive arteries in ischemic stroke patients. However, embolic complications after such procedures are always a concern. The authors investigated the association between serial change of residual platelet reactivity and silent embolic cerebral infarction (SECI) after endovascular treatment. METHODS: Ischemic stroke patients undergoing stenting of intra- or extracranial arteries were recruited prospectively. Residual platelet reactivity, represented by aspirin reaction units (ARUs) and P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs), was measured serially (6 hours before, immediately after, and 24 hours after the procedure). A loading dosage of aspirin (500 mg) and/or clopidogrel (300 mg) was given 24 hours before the procedure to patients naïve to antiplatelet agents, whereas the usual dosage (aspirin 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg) was continued for patients who had previously been taking these agents for more than a week. Diffusion-weighted MRI was performed before and 24 hours after the procedure to detect new SECIs. Clinical characteristics, baseline ARU and PRU values, and the change in ARU and PRU values after stenting were compared between patients with and without SECIs. RESULTS: Among 69 consecutive patients who underwent neurovascular stent insertion, 41 patients (59.4%) had poststenting SECIs. The lesion was located only at the vascular territory of the stented vessel in 21 patients (51.2%), outside the stented vessel territory in 8 patients (19.5%), and both inside and outside in 12 patients (29.3%). The occurrence of SECIs was not associated with the baseline ARU or PRU value, but was associated with PRU increase after stenting (36 ± 73 vs -12 ± 59, p = 0.007), deployment of a longer stent (31.1 ± 16.5 mm vs 21.8 ± 9.9 mm, p = 0.01), and stent insertion in extracranial arteries (78.1% vs 45.2%, p = 0.008). Stent length (OR 1.066, p = 0.01) and PRU change (OR 1.009, p = 0.04) were independently associated with the occurrence of SECI. CONCLUSIONS: Residual platelet reactivity after dual antiplatelet treatment measured before stenting did not predict poststenting SECI. However, the longer stent and the serial increase of PRU values after stenting were related to SECI. Continuous increase of platelet activation after endovascular procedure may be important in poststent cerebral infarction.

High On-Aspirin Platelet Reactivity and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Results From ASCET (Aspirin Nonresponsiveness and Clopidogrel Endpoint Trial).

BACKGROUND: Patients with stable coronary artery disease on single-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin are still at risk for atherothrombotic events, and high on-aspirin residual platelet reactivity (RPR) has been suggested as a risk factor. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this randomized trial, the association between platelet function determined by the PFA100 platelet function analyzer system (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Germany) and clinical outcome in 1001 patients, all on single-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (160 mg/d) was studied. Patients were randomized to continue with aspirin 160 mg/d or change to clopidogrel 75 mg/d. A composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and unstable angina was used. At 2-year follow-up, 106 primary end points were registered. The prevalence of high RPR was 25.9%. High on-aspirin RPR did not significantly influence the primary end point in the aspirin group (13.3% versus 9.9%, P=0.31). However, in post hoc analysis, patients with von Willebrand factor levels or platelet count below median values and high on-aspirin RPR had a statistically significant higher end point rate than that of patients with low RPR (20% versus 7.5%, P=0.014, and 18.2% versus 10.8%, P=0.039, respectively). The composite end point rate in patients with high on-aspirin RPR treated with clopidogrel was not different from that of patients treated with aspirin (7.6% versus 13.3%, P=0.16). CONCLUSIONS: In stable, aspirin-treated patients with coronary artery disease, high on-aspirin RPR did not relate to clinical outcome and did not identify a group responsive to clopidogrel. Post hoc subgroup analysis raised the possibility that high on-aspirin RPR might be predictive in patients with low von Willebrand factor or platelet count, but these findings will require confirmation in future studies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT00222261. (J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e000703 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.000703.).