A safe and simple exposure and Pringle maneuver in laparoscopic anatomical liver resection of segment 7.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic access to liver segment 7 (S7) is difficult for deep surgical situations and bleeding control. Herein, our proposed laparoscopic technique for S7 lesions using a self-designed tube method is introduced. METHODS: Clinical data of patients who underwent laparoscopic anatomical liver resection of S7 (LALR-S7) with the help of our self-designed tube to improve the exposure of S7 and bleeding control in the Second Affiliated Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) from April 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate feasibility and safety. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age was 51.3 ± 10.3 years; mean operation time, 194.5 ± 22.7 min; median blood loss, 160.0 ml (150.0-205.0 ml); and median length of hospital stay, 8.0 days (7.0-9.0 days). There was no case conversion to open surgery. Postoperative pathology revealed all cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Free surgical margins were achieved in all patients. No major postoperative complications were observed. Patients with postoperative complications recovered after conservative treatment. During outpatient follow-up examination, no other abnormality was presented. All patients survived without tumor recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary clinical effect of our method was safe, reproducible and effective for LALR-S7. Further research is needed due to some limitations of this study.

Totally laparoscopic anatomic S7 segmentectomy using in situ split along the right intersectoral and intersegmental planes.

BACKGROUND: The traditional open or laparoscopic segmentectomy of liver segment 7 (S7) requires exposing and controlling the root of the right hepatic vein(RHV)after full mobilization and lifting up of the right liver before liver transection. This approach violates the "no-touch" principle for malignant tumors, and makes laparoscopic resection technically challenging. So reports on isolated totally laparoscopic anatomic S7 segmentectomy have rarely been reported. This study describes our experience in laparoscopic anatomic S7 segmentectomy using in situ split along the right intersectoral and intersegmental planes of the liver. To our knowledge, this is the first description of this novel approach. METHODS: From September 2017 to May 2019, patients who underwent laparoscopic anatomic S7 segmentectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma at the HPB Surgery Department, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital entered into this retrospective study. This in situ split approach was designed using main vessels as the plane markers of right intersectoral and intersegmental planes, along which liver transection was carried out. There was no need to mobilize the right liver and control the root of RHV. RESULTS: There were 9 women and 15 men. The average diameter of the tumors on preoperative CT/MR was 3.4 cm (range 2-6 cm). All the procedures were successfully carried out laparoscopically. There was no perioperative death. The average operative time was 216.5 min (range 180-310 min). The average blood loss was 320 ml (range 120-620 ml). Pathological study showed all the operations to be R0 resections. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic anatomic S7 segmentectomy using the in situ split approach resulted in R0 liver resection in all our patients with primary liver cancer. The operation was technically feasible and it provided a better view and increased maneuverability in the cramped operative space compared with the traditional open/laparoscopic approach. The approach also better complies with the "no-touch" principle for malignant tumors. Its long-term oncological outcomes require further studies.

Laparoscopic right posterior anatomic liver resections with Glissonean pedicle-first and venous craniocaudal approach.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic segment 7 segmentectomy and segment 6-7 bisegmentectomy are challenging resections because of the posterior position and the lack of landmarks. The anatomy of the right posterior Glissonean pedicle and the caudal view of laparoscopy make such resections suitable for the Glissonean pedicle-first approach. METHODS: The study population included all consecutive patients treated with laparoscopic liver resection from August 2019 to February 2020. The approach is based on the ultrasonographic identification of the right posterior or segmental pedicle from the dorsal side of the liver after complete mobilization. The pedicle of interest is isolated through mini-hepatotomy and clamped. The segment anatomy is defined by ischemia. The transection starts from the ventral side, close to the right hepatic vein that is exposed and followed craniocaudally. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent anatomical laparoscopic resection of right posterolateral segments. There were 7 colorectal liver metastases, 2 hepatocellular carcinoma, and 1 biliary cysto-adenoma. Five patients underwent Sg7 resection, one patient underwent a Sg7 subsegmentectomy, and 4 underwent Sg6-7 bisegmentectomy. The Glissonean pedicle-first approach was feasible in eight patients. The craniocaudal approach to the RHV was feasible in six patients, not indicated in three cases and was abandoned in one patient for technical difficulty. There was no operative morbidity or mortality. Median post-operative hospital stay was 5 days. CONCLUSIONS: The Glissonean pedicle-first approach is safe and effective for laparoscopic anatomic resections of the right posterior sector. The craniocaudal approach to right hepatic vein from the ventral side is a convenient procedure to follow the segmental anatomy deep in the parenchyma.

Total laparoscopic management of lesions involving liver segment 7.

BACKGROUND: Until recently, laparoscopic resection of tumors involving segment 7 (s7) of the liver was seen as a relative contraindication. We analyzed our experiences with laparoscopic resection of tumors in s7. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospective database on operative and postoperative characteristics and surgical outcomes of patients in whom the intention was to remove tumors located in s7 of the liver laparoscopically. We defined two groups: those with laparoscopic metastasectomy of s7 (s7 group) and those undergoing laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (RPS group). RESULTS: Of 400 patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection, 20 patients (5 %) underwent total laparoscopic resections of tumors in s7 (7 metastasectomy of s7 and 13 RPS). The type of resection was decided on the basis of tumor size and location. Median age was 70 years (range 46-82), and the indication for surgery was mainly CRLM (n = 13, 65 %) and HCC (n = 4, 20 %). There was 1 (5 %) conversion. Mean operative times were 252 min (±69) for s7 and 271 min (±102) for RPS. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 400 mL (±493) for s7 and 625 mL (±363) for RPS. A Pringle maneuver was used in 86 % of patients in s7 group and 75 % of patients in RPS group. Mean total hospital stay was 4.6 days (±2.5) in s7 and 6.9 days (±7.8) for RPS. The overall R0 resection rate was 95 % (s7 100 %, RPS 92 %). CONCLUSION: Although resection of lesions in s7 is technically demanding, a laparoscopic approach can be performed safely and effectively in experienced hands.

Laparoscopic Liver Resection of Segments 7 and 8: from the Initial Restrictions to the Current Indications.

Since the beginning of laparoscopic liver surgery, resection of the posterosuperior segments has been considered one of the most challenging procedure due to its difficult access. The main drawbacks of the laparoscopic approach to dome lesions are poor visualization, the difficulty of instrumentation and the greater complexity in the control of bleeding. In the evolution of minimally invasive techniques from hybrid techniques to the current purely laparoscopic approaches, the different authors have established gradually the currents indications and surgical techniques to operate these segments with a similar feasibility and safety than open approach. The standardization in the patient position, the use of intercostal trocars, the learning curve in laparoscopic liver surgery, the management of the hepatic blood flow and the refinement of the technique in the extrahepatic and intrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approaches, has allowed to leave behind the initial contraindications about the laparoscopic approach in these segments. In the present review of the literature, the accumulated experience of the different groups in minimally invasive liver surgery together with the technological advances in the different laparoscopic devices have facilitated the resection of tumors in segments 7 and 8 with similar and even better results than open surgery.

Laparoscopic anatomic resection of segment 7 of the liver using the intrahepatic Glissonean approach from the dorsal side (with video).

Laparoscopic anatomic resection of S7 is challenging. Ome and colleagues described an intrahepatic approach to the S7 Glissonean pedicles from the dorsal side without dissection around the hepatic hilum, allowing safe exposure of the right hepatic vein in the same view. This approach is safe and offers advantages for later hepatectomy.

Laparoscopic anatomical S7 segmentectomy by the intrahepatic glissonian approach.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic anatomical liver resection for posterosuperior lesions is challenging [1,2] A technique of anatomical liver resection with intrahepatic Glissonian approach in open surgery has been published [3]. However, few articles report this technique via the laparoscopic approach [4]. We report a case of laparoscopic anatomical S7 segmentectomy using the Glissonian pedicle approach. VIDEO: A 76-year-old male was admitted for an incidentally detected hepatic mass in segment 7 (S7). Abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed a 5.5 cm solitary tumor. First, the major Glissonian pedicle of the right posterior section was dissected, followed by hepatic parenchymal dissection peripherally until the branches of the Glissonian pedicles of segment 6 and 7 were reached. The S7 Glissonian pedicle was temporarily clamped to confirm demarcation. Dissection was then performed until the right hepatic vein (RHV) was exposed. Further dissection was then continued along the RHV, up to its root. RESULTS: Operative time was 330 minutes. The estimated intraoperative blood loss was 300 mL without a requirement for intraoperative transfusion. On postoperative day 4, the abdominal CT was performed, which revealed no abnormal findings. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 5 without any complications. Pathologic findings demonstrated a 5.2 × 3.8 × 3.1 cm hepatocellular carcinoma (pT1b) with a 2.8-cm tumor-free resection margin. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic anatomical S7 segmentectomy via the intrahepatic Glissonian approach is a technically demanding procedure and should be adopted for selected patients. However, this technique is feasible with careful dissection and control of the intrahepatic Glissonian pedicle.

A Sling Technique for Laparoscopic Resection of Segment Seven of the Liver.

INTRODUCTION: As the incidence of liver cancer continues to increase in the setting of cirrhosis, parenchyma-sparing liver resection is increasingly necessary. A technique is described that involves using a sling made from 1-inch-wide packing gauze to retract and rotate the liver to divide the right triangular and coronary ligaments and mobilize segment 7. The right lobe is rotated anteriorly and counterclockwise, allowing access and parenchymal transection of segment 7 under ultrasonographic guidance. CASE PRESENTATION: Seven patients with tumors in segment 7 underwent resection with the technique described above: 4 had Child's A cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 1 had metastatic colon cancer, 1 had an adenoma, and 1 had a symptomatic hemangioma. Tumor size ranged between 2.5 and 7.7 cm. Blood loss during resection was between 150 and 500 mL. No patients required transfusion as a result of surgery. With the exception of 1 patient with Clostridium difficile colitis, the average hospital stay was 3.8 days. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Parenchyma-sparing laparoscopic resection of segment 7 is feasible and can be safely performed using a sling for intracorporal hepatic retraction, manipulation, and positioning. Given the risk of HCC recurrence, laparoscopic liver resection may also be better suited for subsequent salvage liver transplant because of less perihepatic adhesions.

Intermittent Pringle Versus Continuous Half-Pringle Maneuver for Laparoscopic Liver Resections of Tumors in Segment 7.

Segment 7 is considered an unfavorable portion for laparoscopic hepatectomy because of technical difficulties in exposure and controlling bleeding. We compared intermittent Pringle with continuous half-Pringle maneuver in laparoscopic liver resections of tumors in segment 7. A retrospective analysis was conducted in a total of 36 consecutive patients with tumors in segment 7 undergoing laparoscopic liver resections between July 2011 and February 2016 (16 in the Pringle group versus 20 in the half-Pringle group). The two groups were well matched in baseline characteristics. The operative time (274.5 ± 34.3 versus 237.6 ± 41.8 min), overall declamping time (28.4 ± 8.6 versus 2.3 ± 2.5 min), and ischemic duration (69.7 ± 16.5 versus 52.7 ± 13.2 min) were significantly longer in the Pringle group (P < 0.05). The amount of intraoperative blood loss (612.5 ± 222.3 versus 417.4 ± 163.8 mL) and transfusion (335.2 ± 58.7 versus 224.8 ± 76.2 mL) was significantly greater in the Pringle group (P < 0.05). The Pringle group was associated with significantly lower postoperative albumin and higher C-reactive protein levels on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7 (P < 0.05). Laparoscopic hepatectomy for tumors in segment 7 can be performed safely and effectively with successful exposure of surgical field and proper hepatic blood flow occlusion. Continuous half-Pringle maneuver offers the advantages of less operative time and blood loss, less injury, and better recovery.

Segment 7 Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Is It Possible to Resect When Metastatic Lesions Border Suprahepatic Veins?

INTRODUCTION: After nearly 25 years of experience, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is now recognized as being feasible and safe.1 However, laparoscopic resections of the posterosuperior segments are more technically demanding. They are associated with higher conversions rates, more intraoperative bleeding, and increased operating time.2 Appropriate training is required to approach these resections safely.3 This video demonstrates the technical maneuvers to laparoscopically approach a segment 7 tumor in contact with the right supra hepatic vein. METHOD: The pertinent aspect to perform a segment 7 metastasis resection using minimally invasive techniques is shown. The main steps of this operation include (1) complete release of the right liver from the coronary and triangular ligament, (2) dissection of the retrohepatic vena cava and transection of the hepatocaval ligament, (3) the use of intercostal trocars for direct vision of the inferior vena cava and the right suprahepatic vein,4,5 (4) the use of intraoperative ultrasound to evaluate the position and limits of vascular structures compared to the lesion, (5) careful transection of the hepatic parenchyma, and (6) dissection of the right hepatic vein to separate it from the lesion. RESULTS: The surgery was performed in a 68-year-old male patient. The patient developed synchronous metastases to the liver from a sigmoid colon tumor. Two lesions were identified; a 15 mm subcapsular lesion located in segment 5 and a 45 mm lesion located in segment 7 in contact with the right hepatic vein and inferior vena cava confluence. Previously, laparoscopic sigmoidectomy was performed without complications (TNM classification of the specimen: T3N0, with 31 resected lymph nodes, KRAS gene mutated). Following chemotherapy with FOLFOX + bevacizumab, a good response to the liver lesion was noted on imaging. Subsequently, a laparoscopic resection of the metastases in segment 7 and 5 was performed. The surgery lasted 210 min, intraoperative blood loss was 200 cm3, no Pringle maneuver was required, and the postoperative period was uneventful with the patient being discharged on postoperative day number four. Pathology of the liver specimens confirmed metastases from colon adenocarcinoma with free surgical margins. DISCUSSION: Some important points achieving easier and safer approach of the posterior segments of the liver by laparoscopic route should be discussed. First, the patient's semi-lateral position showed in the video allows placing the ports and the optic in a more comfortable position since the lateral portion of the abdominal and thoracic wall becomes anterior. Another important point is the complete liberation of the hepatorenal, falciform, triangular, and right coronary ligaments in order to fully mobilize the liver and convert a segment that is posterior in the anatomical position to an anterior segment for the surgeon. And finally, the use of intercostal trocars that allows a direct and perpendicular view of the right hepatic vein and vena cava represents the most important point. Interestingly, these specific trocars should be inserted through the pleural cavity, during a forced expiration or apnea to avoid lung injury. In this context, the trocar balloon helps the surgeon to avoid displacement or that pneumoperitoneum enters the pleural cavity. At the end of the procedure, we strongly recommend to stitch laparoscopically these diaphragmatic openings after removing the trocars in order to avoid migration of abdominal fluid or bowel incarceration into the pleural cavity during the postoperative period and also to avoid future diaphragmatic hernia. In the present case, the parenchymal transection was performed with Thunderbeat (Olympus®, Japan), a device integrating both ultrasound dissection and advanced bipolar energy. We use this device because it saves time by sealing vessels up to 7 mm in diameter avoiding the need to use clips in the majority of intrahepatic veins and portal branches. However, currently, several techniques and devices are equivalent for parenchymal transection in laparoscopic liver resection and should be left to the surgeon's preference, as in open liver procedures. CONCLUSION: Using laparoscopy to remove lesions in the posterior segments of the liver is safe and feasible. Vision from transthoracic port has the added benefit of making the dissection of right hepatic vein and inferior vena cava safer. Mastery of the anatomy is paramount before attempting this approach with minimally invasive techniques. Surgeons who attempt this operation should have expertise with both laparoscopy and liver surgery.

Infectious salmon anaemia virus nuclear export protein is encoded by a spliced gene product of genomic segment 7.

Infectious salmon anaemia virus (ISAV) is an orthomyxovirus causing anaemia and circulatory disease with high mortality in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Orthomyxoviruses are unusual as RNA viruses as they replicate in the nucleus and some viral transcripts undergo splicing. The nuclear replication necessitates a tightly controlled nuclear import and export of viral proteins. From ISAV genomic segment 7 two known mRNAs are transcribed; one collinear with the genomic segment, coding for the non-structural protein, and one spliced transcript, S7ORF2, coding for a protein with unknown function. Here we report initial functional analysis of the S7ORF2 protein. The results indicate that S7ORF2 protein gradually accumulates in the host cell during virus replication cycle, locates predominantly in the cytoplasm and is a part of purified virus particles. Trapping of S7ORF2 in the nucleus was obtained by treatment with leptomycin B, an inhibitor of CRM1-mediated nuclear export, indicating that S7ORF2 use CRM1 for the nuclear exit. Immunofluorescent staining of cells over-expressing both S7ORF2 and matrix protein (M) showed co-localization in the nucleus. However, S7ORF2 protein was found to interact with both the viral nucleoprotein (NP) and M proteins in ISAV infected cells as well as in purified viral particles. These results indicate that the S7ORF2 could be called the ISAV nuclear export protein, ISAV/NEP.