Epidemiology of healthcare-associated endometritis after surgical abortion in Ukraine: results a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To determine the current prevalence of healthcare-associated endometritis after surgical abortion and antimicrobial resistance of responsible pathogens in Ukraine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective, multicentre cohort study was based on surveillance data of healthcare-associated endometritis after legal induced surgical abortion. Women who underwent induced surgical abortion at gynecological departments of 16 regional hospitals between 2020 and 2022 are included in the study. Definitions of endometritis were adapted from the CDC/NHSN. Antibiotic susceptibility was done by the disc diffusion test as recommended by EUCAST. RESULTS: Results: Among 18,328 women who underwent surgical abortion, 5,023 (27.4%) endometritis were observed. Of all post-abortion endometritis cases, 95.3% were detected after hospital discharge. The prevalence of endometritis in different types surgical abortion was: after vacuum aspiration at < 14 weeks, 23.8%, and after dilatation and evacuation at ≥ 14 weeks, 32%. The most responsible pathogens of post-abortion endometritis are Escherichia coli (24.1%), Enterococcus spp. (14.3%), Enterobacter spp. (12,8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8.3%), Proteus mirabilis (6.6%), Serratia marcescens (6.2%), Staphylococcus aureus (5.9%), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (5.7%). A significant proportion these pathogens developed resistance to several antimicrobials, varying widely depending on the bacterial species, antimicrobial group. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Results this study suggest a high prevalence of endometritis after surgical abortion in Ukraine. A significant proportion of women were affected by endometritis caused by bacteria developed resistance to several antimicrobials. Optimizing the antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce the burden of endometritis after surgical abortion, but prevention is the key element.

First and Second-Trimester Surgical Abortion Providers and Services in 2019: Results From the Canadian Abortion Provider Survey.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to explore the workforce and clinical care of first and second-trimester surgical abortion (FTSA, STSA) providers following the publication of the updated Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) surgical abortion guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a national, cross-sectional, online, self-administered survey of physicians who provided abortion care in 2019. This anonymized survey collected participant demographics, types of abortion services, and characteristics of FTSA and STSA clinical care. Through healthcare organizations using a modified Dillman technique, we recruited from July to December 2020. Descriptive statistics were generated by R Statistical Software. RESULTS: We present the data of 222 surgical abortion provider respondents, of whom 219 provided FTSA, 109 STSA, and 106 both. Respondents practiced in every Canadian province and territory. Most were obstetrician-gynaecologists (56.8%) and family physicians (36.0%). The majority of FTSA and STSA respondents were located in urban settings, 64.8% and 79.8%, respectively, and more than 80% practiced in hospitals. More than 1 in 4 respondents reported <5 years' experience with surgical abortion care and 93.2% followed SOGC guidelines. Noted guideline deviations included that prophylactic antibiotic use was not universal, and more than half of respondents used sharp curettage in addition to suction. Fewer than 5% of STSA respondents used mifepristone for cervical preparation. CONCLUSION: The surgical abortion workforce is multidisciplinary and rejuvenating. Education, training, and practice support, including SOGC guideline implementation, are required to optimize care and to ensure equitable FTSA and STSA access in both rural and urban regions. GESTATIONAL AGE NOTATION: weeks, weeks' gestation, gestational age (GA), e.g., 116 weeks.

Bottom-up advocacy strategies to abortion access during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned towards reproductive justice in Brazil.

In Brazil, abortion is only allowed in cases of rape, serious risk to a woman's life or fetal anecephaly. Legal abortion services cover less than 4% of the Brazilian territory and only 1,800 procedures are performed, in average, per year. During the COVID-19 pandemic, almost half of the already few Brazilian abortion clinics shut down and women had to travel even longer distances, reaching abortion services at later gestational ages. In this paper, we describe three bottom-up advocacy strategies that emerged from difficulties deepened during the COVID-19 pandemic at a single abortion service in Brazil, amidst anti-gender policies from the federal government. Telemedicine abortion, outpatient surgical abortion and the provision of abortion after 20 weeks' gestation are important strategies that may reduce inequalities that impact the most vulnerable populations, such as black and indigenous women, children, adolescents and women experiencing domestic violence.

Abortion experiences and preferences of transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people who were assigned female or intersex at birth experience pregnancy and have abortions. Scarce data have been published on individual abortion experiences or preferences of this understudied population. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to fill existing evidence gaps on the abortion experiences and preferences of transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people in the United States to inform policies and practices to improve access to and quality of abortion care for this population. STUDY DESIGN: In 2019, we recruited transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people who were assigned female or intersex at birth at the age of ≥18 years from across the United States to participate in an online survey about sexual and reproductive health recruited through The Population Research in Identities and Disparities for Equality Study and online postings. We descriptively analyzed closed- and open-ended survey responses related to pregnancy history, abortion experiences, preferences for abortion method, recommendations to improve abortion care for transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people, and respondent sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Most of the 1694 respondents were <30 years of age. Respondents represented multiple gender identities and sexual orientations and resided across all 4 United States Census Regions. Overall, 210 respondents (12%) had ever been pregnant; these 210 reported 433 total pregnancies, of which 92 (21%) ended in abortion. For respondents' most recent abortion, 41 (61%) were surgical, 23 (34%) were medication, and 3 (5%) were another method (primarily herbal). Most recent abortions took place at ≤9 weeks' gestation (n=41, 61%). If they were to need an abortion today, respondents preferred medication abortion over surgical abortion in a 3:1 ratio (n=703 vs n=217), but 514 respondents (30%) did not know which method they would prefer. The reasons for medication abortion preference among the 703 respondents included a belief that it is the least invasive method (n=553, 79%) and the most private method (n=388, 55%). To improve accessibility and quality of abortion care for transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive patients, respondents most frequently recommended that abortion clinics adopt gender-neutral or gender-affirming intake forms, that providers use gender-neutral language, and that greater privacy be incorporated into the clinic. CONCLUSION: These data contribute substantially to the evidence base on individual experiences of and preferences for abortion care for transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people. Findings can be used to adapt abortion care to better include and affirm the experiences of this underserved population.

Definition and Multiple Factors of Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion.

Recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) is usually defined as three or more spontaneous abortions prior to 20-28 weeks gestation. RSA affects approximately 2-5% of all women of childbearing age, and it brings tremendous psychological and psychiatric trauma to the women and also results in economic burden. The causes could be female age, anatomical and chromosomal abnormalities, genetic, endocrinological, placental anomalies, infection, smoking and alcohol consumption, psychological factor, exposure to environmental factors such as heavy metal, environment pollution, and radiation.

Identifying the risk factors and incidence of Asherman Syndrome in women with post-abortion uterine curettage.

AIM: To evaluate the risk factors and incidence of Asherman Syndrome in women with post-abortion uterine evacuation and curettage. METHODS: A total of 2546 patients who had surgical abortion (uterine evacuation and curettage) before the 20th gestational week with indications of missed abortion, anembryonic pregnancy, incomplete abortion, and elective curettage in a tertiary antenatal care center were recruited. The patients were called and surveyed for their symptoms; including infertility, oligo-amenorrhea and recurrent pregnancy loss, preterm birth and intrauterine growth retardation and abnormal placentation as criteria of Asherman Syndrome. Diagnostic (office) hysteroscopy was performed for 177 who had one of those complaints. RESULTS: The incidence of Asherman Syndrome was 1.6% (n = 43/2546). History of ≥3 abortions was the main factor that increased the risk of Asherman Syndrome for by 4.6 times. Use of vacuum aspiration or sharp curettage, premedication for cervical priming, and having a pregnancy >10th gestational weeks were not risk factors for Asherman Syndrome. CONCLUSION: When the diagnosis was based on presence of symptoms who underwent uterine instrumentation, the incidence of Asherman Syndrome was found to be 1.6%. Repeated abortions were the main risk factor for Asherman Syndrome and avoiding from repeated uterine instrumentations may have a role in prevention.

HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATED INFECTION AFTER LEGAL INDUCED ABORTIONS IN UKRAINE: RESULTS A MULTICENTER STUDY.

OBJECTIVE: The aim: To determine trend of legal induced surgical abortion and to assess the frequency of infection complications after termination of pregnancy in Ukraine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective multicentre cohort study was based on surveillance data of healthcare-associated infection (HAI) after legal induced surgical abortion in women's from January 2017 to 2019 in Ukraine. Definitions of HAI after induced abortion were used from the CDC/ NHSN. RESULTS: Results: The number of surgical abortions in Ukraine increased by 32.8%. A total of 25.9% HAIs were identified after surgical abortion. Of these HAIs, 25.9 were Endometritis, 21.8% Bacterial Vaginitis, 14.3% Parametritis, 13.1% Cervicitis, 9.9% Adnexa utery, 7.8% Salpingitis, 6.3% Chorioamnionitis, and 0.9% other reproductive tract infections. E.coli were most commonly reported, accounting for 25.9% of all organisms, followed by Enterococcus spp. (16.2%), Staphylococcus aureus (15.5%), P. aeruginosa (10.9%), and Enterobacter spp. (10.1%). Antimicrobial resistance in the isolates associated with HAIs showed, among the gram-positive bacteria, that 19.1% and 3.6% of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolates were b-lactam (oxacillin) - and glycopeptide-resistant, respectively. Meticillin resistance was reported in 23.2% of S aureus isolates. Vancomycin resistance was reported in 3.7% of isolated enterococci. Among the gram-negative bacteria, third-generation cephalosporins resistance was found in 33.1% of Klebsiella spp and in 24.1% of E.coli isolates. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The results of this study revealed high rates of HAIs after surgical abortion and most causing pathogens were associated with resistant to antibiotic strains. This knowledge is essential to develop targeted strategies to surveillance and reduce the incidence of post-abortion infections.

Bleeding assessment in haemophilia carriers-High rates of bleeding after surgical abortion and intrauterine device placement: A multicentre study in China.

INTRODUCTION: An increased bleeding tendency has been shown in female haemophilia carriers compared to healthy females. Bleeding assessment tools (BATs) have mainly been performed in western cultures. It is unclear how they perform in populations with different healthcare, health/wellness concepts and awareness, as well as family planning practices. AIM: To (a) describe and compare the bleeding symptoms in carriers with healthy females, particularly for bleeding after surgical abortion and intrauterine device (IUD) placement which are performed frequently for family planning in China; (b) quantify scores of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Bleeding Assessment Tool (ISTH-BAT) and Chinese-BAT (C-BAT) developed to include surgical abortion and IUD placement as separate categories in Chinese haemophilia carriers; (c) correlate bleeding scores (BS) with factor levels. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, cross-sectional study on obligate haemophilia carriers and healthy controls using ISTH-BAT and C-BAT. RESULTS: We enrolled 125 haemophilia carriers and 106 controls. Carriers, compared to controls, had significantly higher median BS (3 vs 1 by both ISTH-BAT and C-BAT) and lower factor level (63.5 vs 101.8 IU/dL). Bleeding after surgical abortion and IUD placement was significantly associated with carrier status. Bleeding scores from neither ISTH-BAT nor C-BAT showed significant correlation with factor levels. CONCLUSION: Haemophilia carriers in China experienced abnormal bleeding. Unique to the Chinese carriers is significant bleeding after surgical abortion (3rd highest incidence of bleeding symptom) and IUD placement (4th highest). However, both ISTH-BAT and C-BAT exhibited no correlation between BS and factor levels in this population and neither could identify carriers with low factor level (of <50 IU/dL).

Gabapentin as an adjunct to paracervical block for perioperative pain management for first-trimester uterine aspiration: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Pain management approaches during uterine aspiration vary, which include local anesthetic, oral analgesics, moderate sedation, deep sedation, or a combination of approaches. For local anesthetic approaches specifically, we continue to have suboptimal pain control. Gabapentin as an adjunct to pain management has proven to be beneficial in gynecologic surgery. We sought to evaluate the impact of gabapentin on perioperative pain during surgical management of first-trimester abortion or early pregnancy loss with uterine aspiration under local anesthesia. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that adding gabapentin to local anesthesia will reduce perioperative and postoperative pain associated with uterine aspiration. Secondary outcomes included tolerability of gabapentin and postoperative pain, nausea, vomiting, and anxiety. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial of gabapentin 600 mg given 1 to 2 hours preoperatively among subjects receiving a first-trimester uterine aspiration under paracervical block in an outpatient ambulatory surgery center. There were 111 subjects randomized. The primary outcome was pain at time of uterine aspiration as measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes included pain at other perioperative time points. To assess changes in pain measures, an intention to treat mixed effects model was fit with treatment groups (gabapentin vs control) as a between-subjects factor and time point as a within-subjects factor plus their interaction term. Because of a non-normal distribution of pain scores, the area under the curve was calculated for secondary outcomes with comparison of groups utilizing Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Among the 111 randomized, most subjects were Black or African American (69.4%), mean age was 26 years (±5.5), and mean gestational age was 61.3 days (standard deviation, 14.10). Mean pain scores at time of uterine aspiration were 66.77 (gabapentin) vs 71.06 (placebo), with a mean difference of -3.38 (P=.51). There were no significant changes in pain score preoperatively or intraoperatively. Subjects who received gabapentin had significantly lower levels of pain at 10 minutes after surgery (mean difference [standard error (SE)]=-13.0 [-5.0]; P=.01) and 30 minutes after surgery (mean difference [SE]=-10.8 [-5.1]; P=.03) compared with subjects who received placebo. Median nausea scores and incidence of emesis pre- and postoperatively did not differ between groups. Similarly, anxiety scores did not differ between groups, before or after the procedure. At 10 and 30 minutes after the procedure, most participants reported no side effects or mild side effects, and this did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Preoperative gabapentin did not reduce pain during uterine aspiration. However, it did reduce postoperative pain, which may prove to be a desired attribute of its use, particularly in cases where postoperative pain may be a greater challenge.

Initiation of abortion before there is definitive ultrasound evidence of intrauterine pregnancy: A systematic review with meta-analyses.

INTRODUCTION: Women are increasingly presenting for abortion at very early gestation. However, providers may be reluctant to conduct abortion at this stage as they may be concerned that they cannot exclude an ectopic pregnancy or that they may terminate a non-viable pregnancy, or may be concerned that both medical and surgical methods may be less effective at this stage of gestation. This provider concern may result in delays in the abortion as additional investigations may be required until an intrauterine pregnancy can be confirmed. Additional unnecessary visits may be distressing for women and waste health service resources. The objective of this systematic review was to determine whether it is safe and effective to initiate abortion before there is ultrasound evidence of an intrauterine pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched Embase Classic, Embase; Ovid MEDLINE® Epub Ahead-of-Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE® Daily, Ovid MEDLINE®; and Cochrane Library on 25 October 2019. Eligible studies were randomized and non-randomized comparative studies, published in English from 1985, comparing initiation of abortion before there is definitive evidence of an intrauterine pregnancy with initiation afterwards. We assessed risk-of-bias using the Newcastle-Ottowa scale. All outcomes were analyzed as risk ratios (RR) and meta-analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: Two non-randomized studies (n = 3785) showed no differences in "missed ectopic pregnancy" (RR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.03-2.12), "ongoing pregnancy" (RR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.34-3.34), or "complete abortion without surgical intervention" (RR = 1, 95% CI 0.98-1.02) between initiation of medical abortion before or after ultrasound evidence of an intrauterine pregnancy. A third non-randomized study (n = 1530) showed no differences between initiation of surgical abortion before or after ultrasound evidence of an intrauterine pregnancy in "missed ectopic pregnancy" (no events), "ongoing pregnancy" (RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.03-11.59) or "complete abortion without repeat surgical intervention" (RR = 1, 95% CI 0.99-1.01). The quality of evidence was very low. CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of abortion before there is definitive ultrasound evidence of an intrauterine pregnancy in women without signs or symptoms of an ectopic pregnancy should be considered.

Risk factors for surgical intervention of early medical abortion.

BACKGROUND: By being noninvasive, medical termination of pregnancy has increased worldwide access to abortion and improved safety of unsafe abortion. However, secondary surgical intervention is the most frequent complication to medical abortion. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify and quantify risk factors for surgical intervention in women undergoing medically induced termination of pregnancy before 9 completed weeks of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a nationwide cohort study, including all pregnancies terminated before 63 gestational days in women aged 15-49 years during the period 2005-2015. Induction regimen was 200 mg mifepristone followed 24-48 hours later by 0.8 mg vaginal misoprostol. All included pregnancies were followed up for 8 weeks from mifepristone administration. Data were retrieved from national health registers. Multiple logistic regression provided adjusted odds ratios of surgical intervention with 95% confidence intervals. The discriminative ability of the risk factors in identifying surgical intervention was assessed by cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Of 86,437 early medical abortions, 5320 (6.2%) underwent a surgical intervention within 8 weeks after induction. The proportion of surgical interventions increased from 3.5% in the 5th to 6th gestational week to 10.3% in week 9, odds ratio, 3.2 (95% confidence interval, 2.9-3.6). Compared with women aged 15-19 years, the risk of surgical intervention increased with increasing maternal age until the age of 30-34 years, odds ratio, 1.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.5-1.9), where after the risk decreased to an odds ratio for age group 40-49 of 1.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.4). Compared with nulliparous women, a history of only vaginal deliveries with spontaneous delivery of placenta implied an odds ratio of 1.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.2), women with a history of at least 1 cesarean delivery, an odds ratio of 1.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.3-1.6), and women having experienced a manual removal of placenta after a vaginal birth, an odds ratio of 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.7-2.4). Previous medically induced abortion decreased the risk of surgical intervention, odds ratio 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.91), whereas previous early (before 56 days of gestation) surgically induced abortion implied a 53% (95% confidence interval, 1.4-1.7) increased risk of surgical intervention. Previous surgical abortion after 55 days of gestation increased the risk by 17% (95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.3). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the model including all quantified risk factors was 63% (95% confidence interval, 62-64%). CONCLUSION: Gestational age, maternal age, previous deliveries, and history of medically and surgically induced abortions all had a significant influence on the risk of surgical intervention of early medical abortion. However, inclusion of all quantified risk factors still left most interventions unpredictable.

Patients' Motivation for Surgical Versus Medical Abortion.

OBJECTIVE: Induced abortion is the second most common reproductive health procedure in Canada. Among all Canadian women, 31% will have at least one induced abortion in their life. Unfortunately, abortion services are disparate throughout the country. With the recent introduction of mifepristone in Canada, it is hoped that access to abortion will be improved. However, it is recognized that some women who are eligible for medical abortion with mifepristone will still choose surgical abortion. The purpose of this study was to understand the patient's motivation to choose surgical abortion instead of medical abortion. METHODS: A survey was given to a sample of women coming to the Women's Clinic at Kingston General Hospital in Kingston, Ontario, for surgical abortion who qualified for medical abortion at the time their appointment was made. The study was approved by the Queen's University Health Sciences and Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board before data collection (#6022783) (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2). RESULTS: This study was conducted between February 13, 2018 and June 1, 2018. In agreement with previous studies, the most common perceived advantages of surgical abortion were that it is faster and requires fewer visits. Therefore, one of the greatest perceived obstacles to medical abortion is the need for follow-up. CONCLUSION: Being able to offer two highly effective options for induced abortion will hopefully improve equitable access to abortion. To increase women's acceptance of medical abortion as a feasible option, we need to consider making some changes to the follow-up plan in our clinic.

Surgical termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: what role can an independent abortion service provider play?

Most hospitals in Great Britain only offer a medical termination of pregnancy for a fetal anomaly (TOPFA) in the second trimester. We describe the safety and acceptability of a surgical TOPFA service delivered by an independent-sector abortion provider. Non-identifiable data for women undergoing TOPFA at British Pregnancy Advisory Service from 1 January 2015 to 31 March 2016 was extracted from existing databases. Anonymous feedback was obtained using a questionnaire. Women (n = 389) were treated along a specialised care pathway within routine abortion lists. The anomalies were chromosomal (64.0%), structural (30.8%), suspected chromosomal and/or structural or unknown (5.1%). The termination method was vacuum aspiration (41.9%) or dilation and evacuation (58.1%). No complications were reported. Feedback (173 women, 122 partners) indicated care was sensitive (99.6%), supportive (100.0%), knowledgeable (99.2%), and helpful (100.0%). Most (92.1%) reported the right amount of partner involvement. All of the respondents were likely/very likely to recommend the service. A cross-sector approach safely and satisfactorily increases the choice of TOPFA methods. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? A surgical abortion in the first and second trimesters has been demonstrated to be safe and acceptable, if not preferable, to a medical induction for most women, including those seeking a termination of pregnancy for a foetal anomaly (TOPFA). However, most hospitals in Britain only offer a medical TOPFA in the second trimester, often due to a lack of skills to provide a surgical alternative. The lack of choice of method has a negative impact on women's experiences of TOPFA care. Independent sector abortion clinics provide the majority of surgical abortions in the second trimester in Britain, and are therefore a potential site of surgical TOPFA care. What do the results of this study add? Women and NHS service providers can be reassured that when a dedicated care pathway for TOPFA is employed in the context of routine abortion provision in the independent sector, the choice of termination method can be safely and satisfactorily increased. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The main implication is the raising of awareness among NHS providers of the availability and acceptability of this model of TOFPA service delivery, so it can become an option for more women who do not want to have a medical induction. We hope that the demonstration of some women's preferences for surgical TOPFA and the safety of this option will lead to development of this service within routine abortion lists within hospital settings. Further research could include determining the reasons why women and their partners may ultimately not choose to pursue a surgical TOPFA within the independent sector abortion service and an in-depth exploration of women's experiences of being treated within this setting.

Risk of complication during surgical abortion in obese women.

BACKGROUND: Surgical abortion is a generally safe procedure. Obesity is a known risk factor for complications in other surgical procedures, but insufficient information exists to determine the effects of increasing body mass index on the risk of surgical abortions. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether obesity is a risk factor for major complications in surgical abortions. METHODS: A quality control database from a single outpatient center was analyzed to determine rates of major complications during surgical abortions in relation to obesity class. Complications included hemorrhage, need for repeat evacuation, uterine perforation, cervical laceration, medication reaction, unexpected surgery, or unplanned admission to the hospital. Chi-squared and analysis of variance were used for analysis. RESULTS: We included 2468 procedures: 1475 procedures (59.8%) in the first trimester and 993 procedures (40.2%) in the second trimester. The overall complications rate was 2.2%. Second-trimester procedures were more likely than those in the first trimester to have complications (3.1% vs 1.6%; P=.009). Overall, 39.6% of the women were obese, and 9.6% of them met criteria for class 3 obesity (body mass index, >40 kg/m2). Women who underwent second-trimester abortions with class 3 obesity had a rate of complication of 8.7%, which was significantly more than normal weight women (odds ratio, 5.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.93-8.07; P<.001). COMMENT: Surgical abortions are overall safe procedures, but class 3 obesity increases the rate of complication in second-trimester procedures.

Pain management of surgical abortion using transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation: An orthogonal prospective study.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the optimal combination of parameters for the management of pain during surgical abortion using transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation (TEAS). METHODS: This study recruited patients scheduled for surgical abortion between October 2014 and August 2015. The treatment protocol was created using three levels for each factor (stimulating time, acupoints, age, and parity). The primary outcomes were intraoperative visual analog scale (VAS), postoperative VAS, cervical relaxation degree and intraoperative blood loss. The secondary outcomes were the vital signs. RESULTS: Stimulation time was associated with intraoperative VAS scores (P < 0.001), acupoints were associated with postoperative VAS scores (P = 0.037), and age was associated with postoperative VAS scores (P < 0.043). Parity (P = 0.025) was associated with heart rate. A comprehensive analysis of the parameters revealed the best levels for each (stimulation time: from 15 min before operation to immediate postoperative; acupoints: SP 6 and LR 3; patient age 25.1-30.0 years; and parity: G≥2 P0 A≥1 ). Seven patients did not complete follow-up. The remaining 135 subjects did not show continuous vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, fever or any other adverse effect. CONCLUSION: During surgical abortion, TEAS stimulation from 15 min before operation to immediate postoperative, SP 6 and LR 3, age 25.1-30.0 years and G≥2 P0 A≥1 were associated with the best analgesic effect.

Preoperative effects of mifepristone for dilation and evacuation after 19 weeks of gestation: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mifepristone as an adjunct to, or replacement for, osmotic dilators for cervical preparation in surgical abortion after 19 weeks of gestation. DESIGN: Site-stratified, double-blinded randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Two tertiary care teaching hospitals. POPULATION: Women undergoing dilation and evacuation at 19-236/7 weeks of gestation from November 2013 through November 2015. METHODS: Participants were randomised to receive (1) mifepristone alone (n = 27), (2) osmotic dilators with mifepristone (n = 27) or (3) osmotic dilators with placebo (n = 21) with all receiving pre-procedure misoprostol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative time, preoperative cervical dilation and complications. RESULTS: We enrolled 75 participants; mean gestation 21 weeks. Pre-procedure cervical dilation was ≥3 cm in 4, 52, and 57% of participants in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.005). Mifepristone with misoprostol for cervical preparation resulted in longer procedure times compared with osmotic dilators, with median total procedure times of (1) 18.5 (8-52), (2) 12 (7-25), and (3) 13 (6-26) minutes (P ≤ 0.005). Excluding time required for manual dilation, procedure times were similar: median times from dilation complete to evacuation complete were (1) 10.5 (4-23), (2) 8.5 (5-24), and (3) 10 (4-20) minutes (P = 0.10). Complications occurred in seven cases, six with trainees and one with an attending physician (P = 0.03), with difference by study group not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Elimination of osmotic dilators has the potential to decrease burden and opportunity cost of cervical preparation. The longer procedure time, related to manual dilation, is offset by decreasing dilator-related preoperative time and discomfort. Provider experience may impact risk when eliminating dilators. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Mifepristone and misoprostol for cervical preparation prior to D&E has potential to reduce barriers to care.

Different routes of misoprostol for cervical priming in first trimester surgical abortions: a randomized blind trial.

PURPOSE: To compare effectiveness and patient satisfaction of different routes of misoprostol for short-term (same day) cervical priming in first trimester surgical abortions. METHODS: In a blind randomized trial, patients undergoing surgical abortion at a gestational age of 6 + 0-14 + 6 were administered oral, vaginal, or sub-lingual 400 mcg misoprostol, 1.5 to 4 h prior to procedure. Surgeons blinded to patient allocation evaluated cervical priming. The primary outcome was initial cervical dilatation. Secondary outcomes were cervical consistency, ease of dilation, patient discomfort, and side effects. RESULTS: From July 2015 through May 2016, 120 patients were randomized as follows: 40 to oral, 40 to vaginal, and 40 to sublingual misoprostol administration. No differences were noted in patient age, gestational age, curettage indication (termination/delayed miscarriage), past vaginal delivery, and administration to procedure interval. Initial cervical dilatation was similar between the groups, as were cervical consistency and ease of dilation. Patients noted the greatest discomfort and side effects with sublingual administration. The followings were found to be independently associated with cervical dilatation in a linear regression analysis: sublingual administration, gestational age, missed abortion, and previous vaginal delivery. Side effects and administration to procedure interval were found non-significant. CONCLUSION: The same day cervical priming for first trimester surgical abortion is similarly achieved with all routes of misoprostol administration. In cases of termination of pregnancy with no prior vaginal delivery, sublingual administration may be considered, but entails a higher rate of side effects and patient discomfort.

"In patient" medical abortion versus surgical abortion: patient's satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patients' satisfaction with medical and surgical abortion, implementing the Italian guidelines on medical abortion entailing an "in patient" procedure. METHODS: A total of 1832 pregnant chose between surgical (vacuum aspiration) or medical abortion (mifepristone p.o. followed after 3 days by sublingual misoprostol) and expressed their expected satisfaction on a visual analog scale (VAS). A total of 885 women chose surgical and 947 medical abortion. The primary end-point was satisfaction VAS score 20 days after the procedure. Secondary end-points were: difference between pre- and post-abortion VAS score; difference in satisfaction VAS scores according to parity and previous abortion; incidence of side effects. RESULTS: VAS score was high in each group but significantly higher for the 1-day surgical than for the 3-day medical abortion procedure (7.9 ± 1.0 versus 7.2 ± 1.2; p < 0.0001). In the surgical group the VAS score increased after the treatment (6.9 ± 1.6 versus 7.9 ± 1.0, p < 0.0001), while it decreased in the medical group (7.5 ± 1.0 versus 7.2 ± 1.2; p < 0.0001). Multiparous women reported higher satisfaction with medical abortion; women with a previous abortion preferred surgical abortion. CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures are considered satisfactory by the patients. Performing medical abortion as a 3-day "in patient" procedure, decreased women's satisfaction scores from their baseline expectations.

Comparison of lidocaine spray and paracervical block application for pain relief during first-trimester surgical abortion: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Surgical abortion is one of the most frequently performed gynaecological procedures and its associated pain has always been a problem in gynaecology. Here we studied the analgesic efficacy of lidocaine spray and paracervical block (PCB) in patients undergoing first-trimester surgical abortion. A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study was conducted on 108 women requesting pregnancy termination. The subjects were randomly assigned into four groups: Group 1 (PCB plus lidocaine spray) (n=27), Group 2 (PCB) (n=27), Group 3 (lidocaine spray) (n=27) and Group 4 (placebo) (n=27). Intra-procedural and post-procedural pain scores were measured with a standard visual analogue scale (VAS). The median VAS scores during procedure in placebo, lidocaine spray, PCB plus lidocaine spray and PCB groups were 8 (7-9), 5 (4-8), 4 (3-4) and 5 (3-5), respectively. The most effective method of pain relief during first-trimester abortion can be achieved through a combined use of PCB plus lidocaine spray. Therefore, lidocaine spray is a non-invasive complementary anaesthetic method versus traditional PCB for first-trimester surgical abortion.

Induced Abortions and the Risk of Preeclampsia Among Nulliparous Women.

Induced abortion (IA) has been associated with a lower risk of preeclampsia among nulliparous women, but it remains unclear whether this association differs by method (either surgical or medical) or timing of IA. We performed a nested case-control study of 12,650 preeclampsia cases and 50,600 matched control deliveries identified in the Medical Birth Register of Finland from 1996 to 2010. Data on number, method, and timing of IAs were obtained through a linkage with the Registry of Induced Abortions. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Overall, prior IA was associated with a lower risk of preeclampsia, with odds ratios of 0.9 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9, 1.0) for 1 prior IA and 0.7 (95% CI: 0.5, 1.0) for 3 or more IAs. Differences in the associations between IA and preeclampsia by timing and method of IA were small, with odds ratios of 0.8 (95% CI: 0.6, 1.1) for late (≥12 gestation weeks) surgical abortion and 0.9 (95% CI: 0.7, 1.2) for late medical abortion. There was no association between IA in combination with a history of spontaneous abortion and risk of preeclampsia. In conclusion, prior IA only was associated with a slight reduction in the risk of preeclampsia.