RESUMO
It is challenging for a surgeon to determine the appropriate vascular access for hemodialysis patients whose cephalic vein is usually inaccessible. The purpose of the study is to compare the complications and patency rates between transposed arteriovenous fistulas (tAVF) and arteriovenous graft (AVG) for the hemodialysis patients. Studies were recruited from PubMed, Cochrane library, EMBASE, the web of science databases, and reviewing reference lists of related studies from the inception dates to September 2, 2021. Statistical analyses were conducted using the statistical tool Review Manager version5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK). I2 > 50% was defined as a high degree of heterogeneity, and then a random-effects model was used. Otherwise, the fixed-effects model was used. Odds ratio with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used. Thirty-three trials (26 retrospective studies, four randomized controlled trials, two prospective trials, and one controlled-comparative study) with 6430 enrolled participants were identified in our analysis. The results showed that tAVF was accompanied with lower thrombosis rate (103/1184 (8.69%) vs 257/1367 (18.80%); I2 = 45%; 95% CI, 0.34 (0.26, 0.45)) and infection rate (43/2031 (2.12%) vs 180/2147 (8.38%); I2 = 0%; 95% CI, 0.20 (0.14, 0.30)) than arteriovenous graft. The significantly better primary patency rates, secondary patency rates, and primary assisted patency rates during follow-up were found in tAVF. However, the failure rate and the prevalence of hematoma were significantly lower in AVG group. No evidence showed the rate of overall mortality, steal syndrome, and aneurysm reduced in tAVF. Our results showed that tAVF is a promising vascular access technique for hemodialysis patients whose cephalic vein is inaccessible. Our data showed that tAVF has less thrombosis, infection risk, and better patency rates when compared with AVG. However, more attentions need to be paid to transposed arteriovenous fistulas maturation and hematoma.