Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.534
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 210(6): 730-736, 2024 Sep 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38984938

RESUMO

Delivering antibiotics directly to the respiratory tract through inhalation to address lung infections has garnered clinical and scientific interest for decades, given the potential favorable pharmacokinetic profile of this administration route. Among critically ill patients, the burden of healthcare-associated pulmonary infections particularly drove continued interest in delivering inhaled antibiotics to intubated patients. We present a concise overview of the existing rationale and evidence and provide guidance for implementing inhaled antibiotics among ventilated critically ill patients, emphasizing insights from recent literature.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Respiração Artificial , Humanos , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Administração por Inalação , Estado Terminal/terapia , Aerossóis , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 79(4): 1010-1017, 2024 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39106450

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are important complications early (<30 days) after lung transplantation (LT). However, current incidence, associated factors, and outcomes are not well reported. METHODS: LT recipients transplanted at our institution (July 2019-January 2020 and October 2021-November 2022) were prospectively included. We assessed incidence and presentation of pneumonia and evaluated the impact of associated factors using regression models. We also evaluated molecular relatedness of respiratory pathogens collected peri-transplant and at pneumonia occurrence using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). RESULTS: In the first 30 days post-LT, 25/270 (9.3%) recipients were diagnosed with pneumonia (68% [17/25] VAP; 32% [8/25] HAP). Median time to pneumonia was 11 days (IQR, 7-13); 49% (132/270) of donor and 16% (44/270) of recipient respiratory peri-transplant cultures were positive. However, pathogens associated with pneumonia were not genetically related to either donor or recipient cultures at transplant, as determined by PFGE. Diagnosed pulmonary hypertension (HR, 4.42; 95% CI, 1.62-12.08) and immunosuppression use (HR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.30-6.56) were pre-transplant factors associated with pneumonia. Pneumonia occurrence was associated with longer hospital stay (HR, 5.44; 95% CI, 2.22-13.37) and VAP with longer ICU stay (HR, 4.31; 95% CI, 1.73-10.75) within the first 30 days post-transplantation; 30- and 90-day mortality were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Prospectively assessed early pneumonia incidence occurred in ∼10% of LT. Populations at increased risk for pneumonia occurrence include LT with pre-transplant pulmonary hypertension and pre-transplant immunosuppression. Pneumonia was associated with increased healthcare use, highlighting the need for further improvements by preferentially targeting higher-risk patients.


Assuntos
Transplante de Pulmão , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Humanos , Transplante de Pulmão/efeitos adversos , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/microbiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Incidência , Adulto , Fatores de Risco , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde/microbiologia , Idoso , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia
3.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; : e0020524, 2024 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687014

RESUMO

Ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) is among the most intractable of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. New antimicrobial agents are critically needed for the treatment of VABP. However, current conventionally used animal model systems are inadequate to meet this challenge. We, therefore, developed rabbit models of VABP caused by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Persistently neutropenic New Zealand White rabbits were used throughout the study. The early-phase intubated model (0-24 h) received mechanical ventilation, while the late-phase intubated model (72-96 h) was ambulatory. The following outcome parameters were studied: survival, residual tissue bacterial burden (CFU/g), residual BAL bacterial burden (CFU/mL), lung weights, pulmonary lesion score, histology, O2 saturation, radiographic imaging, and histology. Each anesthetized rabbit received a predetermined endotracheal bacterial inoculum, and ventilators were set to FiO2 = 40% and PEEP = 8 mmHg. Within the first 12 h post-inoculation, mean bacterial burdens in lung tissue and BAL fluid, respectively, were established at approximately 107 CFU/g and 106 CFU/mL, persisted through 24 h in the early-phase model and increased in the late-phase model to approximately 108 CFU/g and 107 CFU/mL. Mean max SpO2 was ≥98 mmHg, and mean nadir SpO2 was ≥68 mmHg. Serial thoracic radiographs demonstrated progressive multilobar pneumonic infiltrates. Lung histology revealed progressive focal bronchopneumonia, coagulative necrosis, intra-alveolar hemorrhage, alveolar epithelial cell necrosis, and bacterial microcolonies. The new rabbit model of VABP produced by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa recapitulates the pathophysiological, microbiological, diagnostic imaging, and histological patterns of human disease by which to assess critically needed new antimicrobial agents against this lethal infection.

4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 62(1): e0113323, 2024 01 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38112451

RESUMO

Empiric antibiotics may affect bacterial pathogen recovery using conventional culture methods (CCMs), while PCR-based diagnostics are likely less affected. Herein, we conducted an in vitro study of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) inoculated with bacteria and clinically relevant antibiotic concentrations to compare the recovery between the BioFire FILMARRAY Pneumonia Panel (Pn Panel) and CCMs. Remnant clinical BAL specimens were inoculated to ~105 cfu/mL using 12 clinical isolates. Isolates consisted of one wild-type (WT) and one or more resistant strains of: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Staphylococcus aureus. Piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, meropenem, levofloxacin, or vancomycin was added to achieve pulmonary epithelial lining fluid peak and trough concentrations. Post-exposure cfu/mL was quantified by CCMs and simultaneously tested by the PN Panel for identification and semi-quantitative genetic copies/mL. CCM results were categorized as significant growth (SG) (≥1 × 104), no significant growth (NSG) (≥1 × 103, <1 × 104), or no growth (NG) (<1 × 103). The PN Panel accurately identified all isolates, resistance genes, and reported ≥106 genetic copies/mL regardless of antibiotic exposure. The CCM also identified all S. aureus strains exposed to vancomycin. For WT Gram-negative isolates exposed to antibiotics, SG, NSG, and NG were observed in 7/52 (13%), 18/52 (35%), and 27/52 (52%) of CCM experiments, respectively. For resistant Gram-negatives isolates, SG, NSG, and NG were observed in 62/88 (70%), 17/88 (19%), and 9/88 (10%), respectively. These in vitro data demonstrate that the PN Panel is able to identify Gram-negative pathogens in the presence of clinically significant antibiotic concentrations when CCM may not.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Pneumonia , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Vancomicina/farmacologia , Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar , Staphylococcus aureus , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Bactérias , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana
5.
BMC Microbiol ; 24(1): 59, 2024 Feb 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38368365

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Colistin and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (Col-CRKP) represent a significant and constantly growing threat to global public health. We report here an outbreak of Col-CRKP infections during the fifth wave of COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The outbreak occurred in an intensive care unit with 22 beds at a teaching university hospital, Isfahan, Iran. We collected eight Col-CRKP strains from seven patients and characterized these strains for their antimicrobial susceptibility, determination of hypermucoviscous phenotype, capsular serotyping, molecular detection of virulence and resistance genes. Clonal relatedness of the isolates was performed using MLST. RESULTS: The COVID-19 patients were aged 24-75 years with at least 50% pulmonary involvement and were admitted to the intensive care unit. They all had superinfection caused by Col-CRKP, and poor responses to antibiotic treatment and died. With the exception of one isolate that belonged to the ST11, all seven representative Col-CRKP strains belonged to the ST16. Of these eight isolates, one ST16 isolate carried the iucA and ybtS genes was identified as serotype K20 hypervirulent Col-CRKP. The blaSHV and blaNDM-1 genes were the most prevalent resistance genes, followed by blaOXA-48 and blaCTX-M-15 and blaTEM genes. Mobilized colistin-resistance genes were not detected in the isolates. CONCLUSIONS: The continual emergence of ST16 Col-CRKP strains is a major threat to public health worldwide due to multidrug-resistant and highly transmissible characteristics. It seems that the potential dissemination of these clones highlights the importance of appropriate monitoring and strict infection control measures to prevent the spread of resistant bacteria in hospitals.


Assuntos
Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos , Interleucinas , Infecções por Klebsiella , Humanos , Colistina/farmacologia , Irã (Geográfico)/epidemiologia , beta-Lactamases/genética , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Tipagem de Sequências Multilocus , Pandemias , Infecções por Klebsiella/epidemiologia , Infecções por Klebsiella/microbiologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Surtos de Doenças , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/genética , Hospitais Universitários
6.
Pulm Pharmacol Ther ; 86: 102315, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39009240

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled antibiotics for adults with pneumonia by meta-analysis. METHODS: Literature retrieval was completed through five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus) by the deadline of May 31, 2024. The process of study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. The quality of observational studies and randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were evaluated by Newcastle Ottawa scale and Jadad scale, respectively. The primary outcomes included mortality, clinical cure, and microbiological cure. Secondary outcomes were recurrence and renal impairment. RESULTS: There were 30 studies were analyzed, including 12 RCT studies and 18 observational studies. Inhaled antibiotics did not significantly reduce mortality in RCT studies (odds ratio (OR) = 1.06, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.80-1.41). Inhaled antibiotics were associated with higher rates of clinical cure (OR = 1.47 95%CI: 0.82-2.66 in RCT studies and OR = 2.09, 95%CI: 1.36-3.21 in observational studies) and microbiological cure (OR = 7.00 in RCT studies and OR = 2.20 in observational studies). Subgroup analysis showed patients received inhaled antibiotics combined with intravenous administration and inhaled amikacin had better improvements of mortality, clinical cure and microbiological cure. Inhaled antibiotics were not associated with recurrence. The pooled OR of renal impairment were 0.65 (95%CI: 0.27-1.13; I-squared = 43.5 %, P = 0.124) and 0.63(95%CI: 0.26-1.11; I-squared = 69.0 %, P = 0.110) in RCT studies and observational studies, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled antibiotics decreased risk of renal impairment and achieved significant improvements of clinical and microbiological cure in patients with pneumoniae.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Humanos , Administração por Inalação , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Pneumonia/complicações , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
J Surg Res ; 300: 448-457, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38870652

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is associated with increased mortality, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and longer intensive care unit stays. The rate of VAP (VAPs per 1000 ventilator days) within a hospital is an important quality metric. Despite adoption of preventative strategies, rates of VAP in injured patients remain high in trauma centers. Here, we report variation in risk-adjusted VAP rates within a statewide quality collaborative. METHODS: Using Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program data from 35 American College of Surgeons-verified Level I and Level II trauma centers between November 1, 2020 and January 31, 2023, a patient-level Poisson model was created to evaluate the risk-adjusted rate of VAP across institutions given the number of ventilator days, adjusting for injury severity, physiologic parameters, and comorbid conditions. Patient-level model results were summed to create center-level estimates. We performed observed-to-expected adjustments to calculate each center's risk-adjusted VAP days and flagged outliers as hospitals whose confidence intervals lay above or below the overall mean. RESULTS: We identified 538 VAP occurrences among a total of 33,038 ventilator days within the collaborative, with an overall mean of 16.3 VAPs per 1000 ventilator days. We found wide variation in risk-adjusted rates of VAP, ranging from 0 (0-8.9) to 33.0 (14.4-65.1) VAPs per 1000 d. Several hospitals were identified as high or low outliers. CONCLUSIONS: There exists significant variation in the rate of VAP among trauma centers. Investigation of practices and factors influencing the differences between low and high outlier institutions may yield information to reduce variation and improve outcomes.


Assuntos
Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Melhoria de Qualidade , Centros de Traumatologia , Humanos , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/etiologia , Michigan/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Risco Ajustado/métodos , Idoso , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos
8.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 24(1): 109, 2024 May 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704520

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many intensive care units (ICUs) halted research to focus on COVID-19-specific studies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the conduct of an international randomized trial of stress ulcer prophylaxis (Re-Evaluating the Inhibition of Stress Erosions in the ICU [REVISE]) during the pandemic, addressing enrolment patterns, center engagement, informed consent processes, data collection, a COVID-specific substudy, patient transfers, and data monitoring. METHODS: REVISE is a randomized trial among mechanically ventilated patients, comparing pantoprazole 40 mg IV to placebo on the primary efficacy outcome of clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding and the primary safety outcome of 90-day mortality. We documented protocol implementation status from March 11th 2020-August 30th 2022. RESULTS: The Steering Committee did not change the scientific protocol. From the first enrolment on July 9th 2019 to March 10th 2020 (8 months preceding the pandemic), 267 patients were enrolled in 18 centers. From March 11th 2020-August 30th 2022 (30 months thereafter), 41 new centers joined; 59 were participating by August 30th 2022 which enrolled 2961 patients. During a total of 1235 enrolment-months in the pandemic phase, enrolment paused for 106 (8.6%) months in aggregate (median 3 months, interquartile range 2;6). Protocol implementation involved a shift from the a priori consent model pre-pandemic (188, 58.8%) to the consent to continue model (1615, 54.1%, p < 0.01). In one new center, an opt-out model was approved. The informed consent rate increased slightly (80.7% to 85.0%, p = 0.05). Telephone consent encounters increased (16.6% to 68.2%, p < 0.001). Surge capacity necessitated intra-institutional transfers; receiving centers continued protocol implementation whenever possible. We developed a nested COVID-19 substudy. The Methods Centers continued central statistical monitoring of trial metrics. Site monitoring was initially remote, then in-person when restrictions lifted. CONCLUSION: Protocol implementation adaptations during the pandemic included a shift in the consent model, a sustained high consent rate, and launch of a COVID-19 substudy. Recruitment increased as new centers joined, patient transfers were optimized, and monitoring methods were adapted.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pantoprazol/uso terapêutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Protocolos Clínicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevenção & controle , Antiulcerosos/uso terapêutico , Antiulcerosos/administração & dosagem
9.
Infection ; 2024 Aug 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39115698

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This executive summary of a German national guideline aims to provide the most relevant evidence-based recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. METHODS: The guideline made use of a systematic assessment and decision process using evidence to decision framework (GRADE). Recommendations were consented by an interdisciplinary panel. Evidence analysis and interpretation was supported by the German innovation fund providing extensive literature searches and (meta-) analyses by an independent methodologist. For this executive summary, selected key recommendations are presented including the quality of evidence and rationale for the level of recommendation. RESULTS: The original guideline contains 26 recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with nosocomial pneumonia, thirteen of which are based on systematic review and/or meta-analysis, while the other 13 represent consensus expert opinion. For this key summary, we present 11 most relevant for everyday clinical practice key recommendations with evidence overview and rationale, of which two are expert consensus and 9 evidence-based (4 strong, 5 weak and 2 open recommendations). For the management of nosocomial pneumonia patients should be divided in those with and without risk factors for multidrug-resistant pathogens and/or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bacterial multiplex-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) should not be used routinely. Bronchoscopic diagnosis is not considered superior to´non-bronchoscopic sampling in terms of main outcomes. Only patients with septic shock and the presence of an additional risk factor for multidrug-resistant pathogens (MDRP) should receive empiric combination therapy. In clinically stabilized patients, antibiotic therapy should be de-escalated and focused. In critically ill patients, prolonged application of suitable beta-lactam antibiotics should be preferred. Therapy duration is suggested for 7-8 days. Procalcitonin (PCT) based algorithm might be used to shorten the duration of antibiotic treatment. Patients on the intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). Diagnostics for Aspergillus should be performed with an antigen test from bronchial lavage fluid. CONCLUSION: The current guideline focuses on German epidemiology and standards of care. It should be a guide for the current treatment and management of nosocomial pneumonia in Germany.

10.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 855, 2024 Aug 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39179984

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior antibiotic exposure has been identified as a risk factor for VAP occurrence, making it a growing concern among clinical practitioners. But there is a lack of systematic research on the types of antibiotics and the duration of exposure that influence VAP occurrence in children at current. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 278 children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) and underwent invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) between January 2020 and December 2022. Of these, 171 patients with MV duration ≥ 48 h were included in the study, with 61 of them developing VAP (VAP group) and the remaining 110 as the non-VAP group. We analyzed the relationship between early antibiotic exposure and VAP occurrence. RESULTS: The incidence of VAP was 21.94% (61/278). The VAP group had significantly longer length of hospital stay (32.00 vs. 20.00 days, p<0.001), PICU stay(25.00 vs. 10.00 days, p<0.001), and duration of mechanical ventilation(16.00 vs. 6.00 days, p<0.001) compared to the non-VAP group. The mortality in the VAP group was significantly higher than that in the non-VAP group (36.07% vs. 21.82%, p = 0.044). The VAP group had a significantly higher rate of carbapenem exposure (65.57% vs. 41.82%, p = 0.003) and duration of usage (9.00 vs. 5.00 days, p = 0.004) than the non-VAP group. Vancomycin and/or linezolid exposure rates (57.38% vs. 40.00%, p = 0.029) and duration (8 vs. 4.5 days, p = 0.010) in the VAP group were significantly higher than that in the non-VAP group, either. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the use of carbapenem (≥ 7 days) (OR = 5.156, 95% CI: 1.881-14.137, p = 0.001), repeated intubation (OR = 3.575, 95% CI: 1.449-8.823, p = 0.006), and tracheostomy (OR = 5.767, 95% CI:1.686-19.729, p = 0.005) as the independent risk factors for the occurrence of VAP, while early intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was a protective factor against VAP (OR = 0.426, 95% CI: 0.185-0.98, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Prior carbapenem exposure (more than 7 days) was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of VAP. For critically ill children, reducing carbapenem use and duration as much as possible should be considered.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Carbapenêmicos , Estado Terminal , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Respiração Artificial , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Incidência , Pré-Escolar , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Criança , Fatores de Risco , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 73, 2024 Jan 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38200426

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: At some point in their lives, many people will require major heart surgery (MHS). Patients are generally older adults with various risk factors for infection. However, the incidence of infection after MHS is poorly known, as reported infection data are frequently biased due to different factors like the surgical procedure, postoperative timing, and infectious syndromes or etiologic agents, among others. In addition, most patient data are retrospectively obtained. PURPOSE AND METHODS: Data were prospectively collected regarding the incidence of all nosocomial infections produced from the time of surgery to hospital discharge in a cohort of 800 adults consecutively undergoing a MHS procedure. RESULTS: During postoperative hospitalization, 124 of the 800 participants developed one or more infections (15.5%): during their ICU stay in 68 patients (54.8%), during their stay on the general ward post ICU in 50 (40.3%), and during their stay in both wards in 6 (4.8%). The most common infections were pneumonia (related or not to mechanical ventilation), surgical site and bloodstream. As etiological agents, 193 pathogens were isolated: mostly Gram-negative bacilli (54.4%), followed by Gram-positive bacteria (30%), viruses (4.6%) and fungi (1.5%). In our cohort, all-cause mortality was recorded in 33 participants (4.1%) and 9 infection-related deaths (1.1%) were produced. Among subjects who developed infections, overall mortality was 13.7% and in those who did not, this was only 2.3%. CONCLUSION: Infection following MHS remains frequent and severe. Our data suggest that hospital-acquired infection studies should consider episodes of infection in all populations during their entire hospital stay and not only those related to specific clinical syndromes or acquired while the patient is in intensive care.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Infecção Hospitalar , Humanos , Idoso , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Coração , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Hospitais
12.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 131, 2024 04 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38641851

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV 2) and requiring mechanical ventilation suffer from a high incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), mainly related to Enterobacterales. Data regarding extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) VAP are scarce. We aimed to investigate risk factors and outcomes of ESBL-E related VAP among critically ill coronavirus infectious disease-19 (COVID-19) patients who developed Enterobacterales related VAP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed an ancillary analysis of a multicenter prospective international cohort study (COVID-ICU) that included 4929 COVID-19 critically ill patients. For the present analysis, only patients with complete data regarding resistance status of the first episode of Enterobacterales related VAP (ESBL-E and/or carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, CRE) and outcome were included. RESULTS: We included 591 patients with Enterobacterales related VAP. The main causative species were Enterobacter sp (n = 224), E. coli (n = 111) and K. pneumoniae (n = 104). One hundred and fifteen patients (19%), developed a first ESBL-E related VAP, mostly related to Enterobacter sp (n = 40), K. pneumoniae (n = 36), and E. coli (n = 31). Eight patients (1%) developed CRE related VAP. In a multivariable analysis, African origin (North Africa or Sub-Saharan Africa) (OR 1.7 [1.07-2.71], p = 0.02), time between intubation and VAP (OR 1.06 [1.02-1.09], p = 0.002), PaO2/FiO2 ratio on the day of VAP (OR 0.997 [0.994-0.999], p = 0.04) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole exposure (OR 3.77 [1.15-12.4], p = 0.03) were associated with ESBL-E related VAP. Weaning from mechanical ventilation and mortality did not significantly differ between ESBL-E and non ESBL-E VAP. CONCLUSION: ESBL-related VAP in COVID-19 critically-ill patients was not infrequent. Several risk factors were identified, among which some are modifiable and deserve further investigation. There was no impact of resistance of the first Enterobacterales related episode of VAP on outcome.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Humanos , Escherichia coli , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Estado Terminal , beta-Lactamases , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Fatores de Risco , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Prognóstico
13.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 49, 2024 02 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38373973

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nebulisation of antibiotics is a promising treatment for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by multidrug-resistant organisms. Ensuring effective antibiotic concentrations at the site of infection in the interstitial space fluid is crucial for clinical outcomes. Current assessment methods, such as epithelial lining fluid and tissue homogenates, have limitations in providing longitudinal pharmacokinetic data. MAIN BODY: Lung microdialysis, an invasive research technique predominantly used in animals, involves inserting probes into lung parenchyma to measure antibiotic concentrations in interstitial space fluid. Lung microdialysis offers unique advantages, such as continuous sampling, regional assessment of antibiotic lung concentrations and avoidance of bronchial contamination. However, it also has inherent limitations including the cost of probes and assay development, the need for probe calibration and limited applicability to certain antibiotics. As a research tool in VAP, lung microdialysis necessitates specialist techniques and resource-intensive experimental designs involving large animals undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation. However, its potential impact on advancing our understanding of nebulised antibiotics for VAP is substantial. The technique may enable the investigation of various factors influencing antibiotic lung pharmacokinetics, including drug types, delivery devices, ventilator settings, interfaces and disease conditions. Combining in vivo pharmacokinetics with in vitro pharmacodynamic simulations can become feasible, providing insights to inform nebulised antibiotic dose optimisation regimens. Specifically, it may aid in understanding and optimising the nebulisation of polymyxins, effective against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, lung microdialysis holds promise in exploring novel nebulisation therapies, including repurposed antibiotic formulations, bacteriophages and immunomodulators. The technique's potential to monitor dynamic biochemical changes in pneumonia, such as cytokines, metabolites and inflammation/infection markers, opens avenues for developing theranostic tools tailored to critically ill patients with VAP. CONCLUSION: In summary, lung microdialysis can be a potential transformative tool, offering real-time insights into nebulised antibiotic pharmacokinetics. Its potential to inform optimal dosing regimen development based on precise target site concentrations and contribute to development of theranostic tools positions it as key player in advancing treatment strategies for VAP caused by multidrug-resistant organisms. The establishment of international research networks, exemplified by LUMINA (lung microdialysis applied to nebulised antibiotics), signifies a proactive step towards addressing complexities and promoting multicentre experimental studies in the future.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Animais , Humanos , Microdiálise , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/microbiologia , Pulmão/metabolismo , Respiração Artificial
14.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 54, 2024 02 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38374103

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Both critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support exhibit a high incidence of healthcare-associated infections (HAI). However, data on incidence, microbiology, resistance patterns, and the impact of HAI on outcomes in patients receiving ECMO for severe COVID-19 remain limited. We aimed to report HAI incidence and microbiology in patients receiving ECMO for severe COVID-19 and to evaluate the impact of ECMO-associated infections (ECMO-AI) on in-hospital mortality. METHODS: For this study, we analyzed data from 701 patients included in the ECMOSARS registry which included COVID-19 patients supported by ECMO in France. RESULTS: Among 602 analyzed patients for whom HAI and hospital mortality data were available, 214 (36%) had ECMO-AI, resulting in an incidence rate of 27 ECMO-AI per 1000 ECMO days at risk. Of these, 154 patients had bloodstream infection (BSI) and 117 patients had ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The responsible microorganisms were Enterobacteriaceae (34% for BSI and 48% for VAP), Enterococcus species (25% and 6%, respectively) and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (13% and 20%, respectively). Fungal infections were also observed (10% for BSI and 3% for VAP), as were multidrug-resistant organisms (21% and 15%, respectively). Using a Cox multistate model, ECMO-AI were not found associated with hospital death (HR = 1.00 95% CI [0.79-1.26], p = 0.986). CONCLUSIONS: In a nationwide cohort of COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO support, we observed a high incidence of ECMO-AI. ECMO-AI were not found associated with hospital death. Trial registration number NCT04397588 (May 21, 2020).


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecção Hospitalar , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Sepse , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/complicações , Estudos de Coortes , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/etiologia , Sepse/complicações , Atenção à Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos
15.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 40, 2024 02 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38317262

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) due to wild-type AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (wtAE) is frequent in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Despite a low level of evidence, definitive antimicrobial therapy (AMT) with third generation cephalosporins (3GCs) or piperacillin is discouraged. METHODS: Observational prospective study including consecutive wtAE VAP patients in 20 French ICUs. The primary objective was to assess the association of the choice of definitive AMT, i.e. piperacillin ± tazobactam (PTZ), 3GCs or other molecule (4GCs, carbapenems, quinolones, cotrimoxazole; control group), with treatment success at day-7. Recurrence of infection was collected as a secondary outcome, and analyzed accounting for the competing risk of death. RESULTS: From February 2021 to June 2022, 274 patients were included. Enterobacter cloacae was the most prevalent specie (31%). Seventy-eight patients (28%) had PTZ as definitive AMT while 44 (16%) had 3GCs and 152 (56%) were classified in the control group. Day-7 success rate was similar between the 3 groups (74% vs. 73% vs. 68% respectively, p = 0.814). Recurrence probability at day-28 was 31% (95% CI 21-42), 40% (95% CI 26-55) and 21% (95% CI 15-28) for PTZ, 3GCs and control groups (p = 0.020). In multivariable analysis, choice of definitive AMT was not associated with clinical success, but definitive AMT with 3GCs was associated with recurrence at day-28 [csHR(95%CI) 10.9 (1.92-61.91)]. CONCLUSION: Choice of definitive antimicrobial therapy was not associated with treatment success at day 7. However, recurrence of pneumonia at day-28 was higher in patients treated with third generation cephalosporins with no differences in mortality or mechanical ventilation duration.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/tratamento farmacológico , Estado Terminal/terapia , Piperacilina/uso terapêutico , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam/uso terapêutico , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva
16.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 309, 2024 Sep 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39289732

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate whether endotracheal tubes (ETTs) with a metal coating reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) compared to uncoated ETTs. METHODS: An extensive literature review was conducted to find studies that compared metal-coated ETT with uncoated ETT across four databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The search parameters were set from the inception of each database until June 2024. The primary outcome measures were the rates of VAP and hospital mortality. Two independent researchers carried out the literature selection, data extraction, and quality evaluation. Data analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4.1. Furthermore, a Deeks funnel plot was used to evaluate potential publication bias in the studies included. RESULTS: Following the screening process, five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing a total of 2157 patients were identified. In terms of the primary outcome, the VAP incidence was found to be lower in the group utilizing metal-coated ETT compared to those with uncoated ETT, demonstrating a statistically significant difference [RR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.54-0.95), P = 0.02]. No notable difference in mortality rates was observed between the two groups [RR = 1.05, 95% CI (0.86-1.27), P = 0.65]. Concerning secondary outcomes, two studies were evaluated to compare the mechanical ventilation duration (RR = 0.60, 95% CI (- 0.52, 1.72), P = 0.29, I2 = 97%) and intensive care unit (ICU) stay for both patient groups (RR = 0.47, 95% CI (- 1.02, 1.95), P = 0.54, I2 = 50%). Due to the marked heterogeneity, a comparison of mechanical ventilation length between the two patient groups was not feasible. However, both studies suggested no significant difference in ventilation duration between patients using metal-coated ETT and those with uncoated ETT. CONCLUSIONS: Metal-coated ETT show a lower occurrence of VAP compared to the uncoated ETT. Nevertheless, they do not considerably decrease the length of mechanical ventilation, the duration of ICU admission, nor do they reduce hospital mortality rates. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , identifier CRD42024560618.


Assuntos
Intubação Intratraqueal , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Humanos , Intubação Intratraqueal/instrumentação , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos , Intubação Intratraqueal/efeitos adversos , Metais , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle
17.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 214, 2024 Jul 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956655

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a prevalent and grave hospital-acquired infection that affects mechanically ventilated patients. Diverse diagnostic criteria can significantly affect VAP research by complicating the identification and management of the condition, which may also impact clinical management. OBJECTIVES: We conducted this review to assess the diagnostic criteria and the definitions of the term "ventilator-associated" used in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of VAP management. SEARCH METHODS: Based on the protocol (PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019147411), we conducted a systematic search on MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL for RCTs, published or registered between 2010 and 2024. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included completed and ongoing RCTs that assessed pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions in adults with VAP. DATA COLLECTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were collected using a tested extraction sheet, as endorsed by the Cochrane Collaboration. After cross-checking, data were summarised in a narrative and tabular form. RESULTS: In total, 7,173 records were identified through the literature search. Following the exclusion of records that did not meet the eligibility criteria, 119 studies were included. Diagnostic criteria were provided in 51.2% of studies, and the term "ventilator-associated" was defined in 52.1% of studies. The most frequently included diagnostic criteria were pulmonary infiltrates (96.7%), fever (86.9%), hypothermia (49.1%), sputum (70.5%), and hypoxia (32.8%). The different criteria were used in 38 combinations across studies. The term "ventilator-associated" was defined in nine different ways. CONCLUSIONS: When provided, diagnostic criteria and definitions of VAP in RCTs display notable variability. Continuous efforts to harmonise VAP diagnostic criteria in future clinical trials are crucial to improve quality of care, enable accurate epidemiological assessments, and guide effective antimicrobial stewardship.


Assuntos
Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Humanos , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/diagnóstico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Respiração Artificial/métodos
18.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 10, 2024 01 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38172969

RESUMO

KEY MESSAGES: In this study including 391 critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia due to Gram-negative pathogens, combination therapy was not associated with a reduced hazard of death at Day 28 or a greater likelihood of clinical cure at Day 14. No over-risk of AKI was observed in patients receiving combination therapy. BACKGROUND: The benefits and harms of combination antimicrobial therapy remain controversial in critically ill patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), ventilated HAP (vHAP) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) involving Gram-negative bacteria. METHODS: We included all patients in the prospective multicenter OutcomeRea database with a first HAP, vHAP or VAP due to a single Gram-negative bacterium and treated with initial adequate single-drug or combination therapy. The primary endpoint was Day-28 all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were clinical cure rate at Day 14 and a composite outcome of death or treatment-emergent acute kidney injury (AKI) at Day 7. The average effects of combination therapy on the study endpoints were investigated through inverse probability of treatment-weighted regression and multivariable regression models. Subgroups analyses were performed according to the resistance phenotype of the causative pathogens (multidrug-resistant or not), the pivotal (carbapenems or others) and companion (aminoglycosides/polymyxins or others) drug classes, the duration of combination therapy (< 3 or ≥ 3 days), the SOFA score value at pneumonia onset (< 7 or ≥ 7 points), and in patients with pneumonia due to non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria, pneumonia-related bloodstream infection, or septic shock. RESULTS: Among the 391 included patients, 151 (38.6%) received single-drug therapy and 240 (61.4%) received combination therapy. VAP (overall, 67.3%), vHAP (16.4%) and HAP (16.4%) were equally distributed in the two groups. All-cause mortality rates at Day 28 (overall, 31.2%), clinical cure rate at Day 14 (43.7%) and the rate of death or AKI at Day 7 (41.2%) did not significantly differ between the groups. In inverse probability of treatment-weighted analyses, combination therapy was not independently associated with the likelihood of all-cause death at Day 28 (adjusted odd ratio [aOR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.77; P = 0.56), clinical cure at Day 14 (aOR, 0.79; 95% CI 0.53-1.20; P = 0.27) or death or AKI at Day 7 (aOR, 1.07; 95% CI 0.71-1.63; P = 0.73). Multivariable regression models and subgroup analyses provided similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Initial combination therapy exerts no independent impact on Day-28 mortality, clinical cure rate at Day 14, and the hazard of death or AKI at Day 7 in critically ill patients with mono-bacterial HAP, vHAP or VAP due to Gram-negative bacteria.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Anti-Infecciosos , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Humanos , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/microbiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estado Terminal/terapia , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Injúria Renal Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Injúria Renal Aguda/complicações , Hospitais
19.
J Intensive Care Med ; : 8850666241264774, 2024 Jul 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39051603

RESUMO

Background: The methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) accounts for 20% to 40% of all hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) cases with mortality rates up to 55%. Prompt and accurate diagnosis is essential, especially in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Nasal MRSA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) diagnostic utility evidence is conflicting in the literature for HAP due to a low number of HAP patients included in prior studies or due to the lack of high-yield gold standard cultures defined for comparisons. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a 65-bed medical ICU, and encompassing all adult patients admitted from January 2015 to March 2023 for HAP. Respiratory cultures included were those obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage or endotracheal suction within 7 days of nasal MRSA PCR testing. Results: The study included 412 patients; 56.8% were males and 65% were Whites. The mean age was 60.5 years. Most patients (82.5%) underwent MRSA-PCR before intubation, and the average time between MRSA-PCR and lower respiratory cultures was 2.15 days. The diagnostic performance of nasal MRSA PCR in diagnosing HAP in the ICU yielded a sensitivity (Sen) of 47.83%, specificity (Sp) of 92.29%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 26.83%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.77%. For nonventilator HAP (nv-HAP) cases sensitivity was at 50%, specificity 92.83%, PPV 28.57%, and NPV at 97.00%. In ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP-HAP), the corresponding values were 42.86%, 90.91%, 23.08%, and 96.15%, respectively. Conclusion: The nasal MRSA PCR shows a high NPV and low false negative rate, suggesting it is a reliable tool for ruling out MRSA HAP in ICU patients. Care should be taken into account for disease prevalence and clinical context, as these factors may influence test performance. Further validation through prospective large-sample studies utilizing high-yield lower respiratory tract cultures is necessary to confirm our findings.

20.
J Intensive Care Med ; : 8850666241290468, 2024 Oct 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39444321

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common and serious nosocomial infection affecting critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. This study investigated the prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms in VAP, the VAP rate, and the outcomes associated with MDR-VAP. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study, conducted in 2022, included adult ICU cases from April 2021 to March 2022, receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h. Patient data were analyzed for demographics, comorbidities, empirical antibiotic use, and outcomes. MDR organisms were identified in respiratory cultures. RESULTS: Among 447 patients, 133 developed VAP, with 96 cases being MDR-VAP. The mean age of the overall VAP population was 52 years, 70% of which were males. The incidence of VAP was 30.0% (95% CI: 25.7%-34.5%), while that of MDR-VAP was 21.6% (95% CI: 17.9%-25.8%). The most prevalent MDR organisms were Acinetobacter species (50%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (46.9%). Empirical antibiotics were administered in 96% of VAP cases. The overall VAP rate was 38.03/1000 ventilator days. No single antimicrobial agent seemed to offer an empirical cover, as the susceptibility rate for most tested antimicrobials was less than 85%. Patients with MDR-VAP had a low survival rate (64.6%) and were less likely to be extubated at 13.5% compared to non-MDR-VAP (survival rate of 62.2%). COVID-19 patients had a high incidence of MDR VAP, especially with Acinetobacter. Overall, VAP mortality was 57.1%. The median ventilator days were 16 for VAP and only four for non-VAP. CONCLUSION: Gram-negative organisms, particularly Klebsiella and Acinetobacter, were the main MDR VAP culprits. MDR-VAP exhibited higher morbidity and mortality. A study focused on developing resistance by microorganisms is warranted for further understanding.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA