Retrospective clinical study of 1472-unit monolithic zirconia restorations with feather-edge margins realized with digital workflow.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical performance of monolithic zirconia restorations with feather-edge margins fabricated by digital impressions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All participants that present monolithic zirconia restorations with feather-edge margins realized with digital workflow were evaluated during scheduled periodontal maintenance between February and September 2022 according to predetermined inclusion criteria. Clinical performance was assessed using the modified USPHS and periodontal parameters. Overall survival was calculated for monolithic zirconia restorations. Technical and biologic complications were reported. Descriptive statistical analysis and life-table analyses were performed for all data. RESULTS: A total of 1472 monolithic zirconia FDPs (1279 on abutments and 193 on pontics) placed in 1189 patients (982 males and 490 females) from February 2017 to September 2020 were analyzed. The mean follow-up was 44 months (range 36-61 months), and the overall survival rate was 98.5%. There were 931 single crowns, 96 were 3-unit FDPs, 33 were 4-unit FDPs, 11 were 5-unit FDPs, and 6-unit FDPs. Three single crowns had irreparable cracks, and 6 single crowns and one 4-unit FDP were fractured. One 3-unit FDP failed due to tooth fracture and 5 single crowns failed due to endodontic failure. The loss of retention was noted in 25 monolithic zirconia FDPs and hypersensitivity in 44 single crowns. Biologic complications were uncommon. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results and its limitations, the monolithic zirconia FPDs and digital impressions represent a favorable prosthetic treatment similar to that reported with other margin designs CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Monolithic zirconia restorations on vertical-margin abutments fabricated using a digital workflow demonstrate excellent clinical performance. The digital clinical workflow without the use of a cast means a reduction in costs, steps, and operating time.

Influence of early colorectal cancer component on the positive margins after endoscopic resection: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic treatment methods for early colorectal cancer (ECRC) mainly depend on the size and morphology. It is unclear whether different endoscopic resection methods could achieve curative resection for ECRC confined in the mucosa. The study was designed to compare the rate of positive vertical margin (VM) of ECRC with advanced adenomas (AAs) including adenoma > 1 cm, villous adenoma, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia/dysplasia stratified by different endoscopic resection methods. METHODS: Rate of positive VM for 489 ECRCs including Intramucosal (pTis) and superficial submucosal invasion (pT1) carcinomas were compared with those of 753 AAs stratified by different endoscopic resection methods using Chi-squared test. Multivariate logistic model was performed to investigate the risk factors of positive VM for different endoscopic resection methods. RESULTS: The pTis ECRC exhibited a similar rate of positive VM as that of AAs for en bloc hot snare polypectomy (HSP, 0% Vs. 0.85%, P = 0.617), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR, 0.81% vs. 0.25%, P = 0.375) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD, 1.82% Vs. 1.02%, P = 0.659). The pTis carcinoma was not found to be a risk factor for positive VM by en bloc EMR (P = 0.349) or ESD (P = 0.368). The en bloc resection achieved for pT1a carcinomas exhibited similar to positive VM achieved through ESD (2.06% Vs. 1.02%, P = 1.000) for AAs. Nonetheless, EMR resulted in higher risk of positive VM (5.41% Vs. 0.25%, P < 0.001) for pT1a carcinomas as compared to AAs. The pT1a invasion was identified as a risk factor for positive VM in polyps with en bloc EMR (odds ratio = 23.90, P = 0.005) but not ESD (OR = 2.96, P = 0.396). CONCLUSION: Collectively, the pTis carcinoma was not found to be a risk factor for positive VM resected by en bloc HSP, EMR or ESD. Additionally, ESD may be preferred over EMR for pT1a carcinomas with lower rate of positive VM.

Risk factors for vertical incomplete resection in endoscopic submucosal dissection of deep invasive submucosal colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: It has been recently reported that deep invasive submucosal (T1b) colorectal cancer (CRC) without other pathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis has a low rate of lymph node metastasis, increasing the possibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the future. However, ESD for T1b CRC is technically difficult, and some lesions cannot be resected en bloc. This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with vertical incomplete ESD in T1b CRC. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 140 pathological T1b CRC lesions that underwent initial ESD at our institution between January 2011 and October 2020, and categorized them into positive vertical margin (PVM) and negative vertical margin (NVM) groups. The risk factors for PVM were examined using univariate and multivariate analyses, and a subgroup analysis for T1b CRC with an obvious depressed surface was performed. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed obvious depression (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.47-22.5) and severe fibrosis (HR: 11.4; 95% CI: 3.95-33.0) as significant risk factors for PVM. Length of depressed surface ≥12 mm (HR: 6.19; 95% CI: 1.56 -24.6) was identified as an independent predictor of PVM for T1b CRC with an obvious depression. CONCLUSION: Pathological T1b CRC cases with an obvious depression and severe fibrosis are at a high risk of vertical incomplete ESD.

Novel endoscopic ultrasonography classification for assured vertical resection margin (≥500 µm) in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The risk of local recurrence might be low in pT1 colorectal carcinoma with a tumor vertical margin (VM) ≥500 µm. We investigated the relationship between endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) findings and VM in cases with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) categorized as Type 2B according to the Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) classification. METHODS: We analyzed 179 JNET Type 2B colorectal tumors resected by ESD at Hiroshima University Hospital from January 2010 to May 2021. The distance from the tumor invasive front to the muscle layer on EUS was defined as the tumor-free distance (EUS-TFD) and classified as Type I (EUS-TFD ≥1 mm) and II (<1 mm). We investigated the relationship between EUS-TFD and VM and analyzed the predictive factors for VM ≥500 µm. RESULTS: EUS-TFD Type I was diagnosed in 133 (74.3%) lesions: VM ≥500 µm (114, 85.7%); VM <500 µm (19, 14.3%); and VM positive (VM1) (0, 0%). Type II was diagnosed in 46 (25.7%) lesions: VM ≥500 µm (14, 30.5%); VM <500 µm (22, 47.8%); and VM1 (10, 21.7%). In the EUS-TFD Type I cases, 84.5% and 87.8% were protruded and superficial types; whereas for Type II cases, these were 38.9% and 25%, respectively. EUS-TFD classification (Type I), scope operability (good), submucosal invasion depth (<2000 µm), histology at the deepest invasive portion (favorable), and degree of fibrosis (F0/F1) were significant predictors of VM ≥500 µm. CONCLUSIONS: In JNET Type 2B lesions, EUS-TFD classification is a novel diagnostic indicator to predict VM ≥500 µm in ESD preoperatively.

Vertical tumor margin of endoscopic resection for T1 colorectal carcinoma affects the prognosis of patients undergoing additional surgery.

BACKGROUND: Vertical tumor margin-negative T1 colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is an absolute curative condition following complete endoscopic resection (ER). However, the influence on prognosis in relation to vertical tumor margin is unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the influence of the distance from vertical tumor margin to resected specimen edge (vertical margin distance) of ER for T1b (submucosal invasion depth > 1000 µm) CRC on the prognosis of patients undergoing additional surgery after ER. METHODS: In total, 215 consecutive patients with T1b CRC who underwent additional surgery after ER at Hiroshima University Hospital between February 1992 and June 2019 were enrolled. We assessed 191 patients without lymph node metastases at the additional surgery. The specimens resected by ER were classified into three groups based on the vertical margin distance: patients with a vertical margin distance of ≥ 500 µm (Group A); patients with a vertical margin distance of < 500 µm (Group B); and patients with a positive vertical tumor margin (Group C). Subsequently, we evaluated the prognosis of the patients in relation to the clinicopathological characteristics among the three groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics among the three groups. Group A had a significantly higher recurrence-free 5-year survival rate than Groups B and C (100%, 84.5%, and 81.8%, respectively). Similarly, Group A had a significantly higher disease-specific 5-year survival rate than Group C (100% vs. 95.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Complete en bloc resection with sufficient submucosal layer from the invasive front (vertical margin distance > 500 µm) by ER for T1 CRC reduces the risk of metastatic recurrence after additional surgery.

Traction Devices May Not Affect the Vertical Margin Distance in the Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Introduction The usefulness of traction devices (TDs) in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has not been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of using a TD on the vertical margin (VM) distance in the ESD of rectal NETs. Methods In this single-center, retrospective study, we included patients with rectal NETs who were treated with ESD during 2013-2023. They were divided into TD and non-TD groups. One pathologist remeasured the VM distance (primary outcome) and the depth of submucosal invasion (SM depth). Secondary outcomes were margins, resection time, delayed bleeding, and perforation. First, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) to assess the usefulness of TD for VM distance. Then, we used multiple regression analysis to identify factors affecting the VM distance. Results The TD and non-TD groups comprised 24 and 117 lesions, respectively. Patients in the TD group were significantly younger than those in the non-TD group (P = 0.003). In the TD and non-TD groups, the VM distance was 150 µm and 100 µm, respectively (P = 0.70). Only resection time significantly differed between groups, shorter in the TD group (P = 0.005). Twenty-two cases in each group were matched after PSM, yielding no significant differences in VM distance. The use of a TD was not an independent predictor of VM distance (P = 0.65), but age (P < 0.001) and SM depth (P = 0.003) were. Conclusion Using a TD does not seem to affect the VM distance in ESD for rectal NETs.

Recurrence rate of intramucosal gastric cancer with positive vertical margin due to lesion damage during endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: In principle, additional surgery is performed after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer if the vertical margin is positive, regardless of lesion damage. The recurrence rate of vertical margin-positive lesions due to lesion damage after endoscopic submucosal dissection is unknown, and unnecessary surgeries may be performed. In this study, we investigated whether there was a difference in the recurrence rate between vertical margin-positive lesions due to lesion damage and vertical margin-negative lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 1,294 intramucosal gastric cancer lesions that were resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection between January 2008 and December 2016, without additional surgery. The lesions were divided into the Damage and No damage groups based on vertical margin status. The Damage group had only one non-curative indication: a positive vertical margin due to lesion damage. The No damage group had no non curative indications. We compared the recurrence rate between the Damage and No damage groups. RESULTS: The recurrence rates of the Damage and No damage groups were 0% (0/23; 95% confidence interval: 0-14.8%) and 0% (0/1,271; 95% confidence interval: 0-0.003%), respectively, with no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: In intramucosal gastric cancer, the recurrence rate of vertical margin-positive lesions due to lesion damage was 0%, which did not differ from that of vertical margin-negative lesions with curative resection. Follow-up, instead of additional surgery, may be an option for patients with non-curative resection when the only non-curative indication is a positive vertical margin due to lesion damage.

Revising the definition of vertical margin involvement following endoscopic polypectomy may reduce unnecessary surgery in patients with malignant colorectal polyps.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopically resected malignant colorectal polyps (MCPs) present a dilemma regarding whether the risk of residual disease justifies a major bowel resection. Overtreatment is common, and the vast majority of patients who undergo resection have no residual tumor. The aim of this study was to investigate whether revising the definition of vertical margin involvement following MCP polypectomy could reduce unnecessary surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a cohort study of consecutive patients with MCPs treated at a tertiary hospital between 2004 and 2018. Data on demographics, index colonoscopy, polyp pathology, and any subsequent surgical resection were analyzed. Polypectomy resection margins were reviewed and measured to the nearest decimal place. The ability of existing guidelines (requiring a margin clearance of ≥ 1 mm) to predict residual disease was compared to a revised version requiring a margin clearance of ≥ 0.1 mm. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients with an MCP were included. Of these 129 patients, 77 (60%) underwent surgical resection, of which 62 (81%) had no residual tumor. Existing guidelines, requiring a margin clearance of ≥ 1 mm, classified 28 patients as being at "low risk" for residual disease. Of these, four underwent surgery, but none had residual tumor (P = 0.031). Revised guidelines, requiring a margin clearance of ≥ 0.1 mm, classified 44 patients as "low risk." Of these, in the 13 that had surgery, no residual tumor was found (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Revising the definition of vertical margin involvement leads to more patients being correctly classified as being at low risk of residual disease. This has the potential to reduce unnecessary surgery in patients with MCPs.

Optimal extent of lymph node dissection in patients with gastric cancer who underwent non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection with a positive vertical margin.

BACKGROUND: The optimal extent of lymph node dissection in patients receiving non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and diagnosed with a positive vertical margin is unclear. This study attempted to identify optimal candidates for D2 lymph node dissection among these patients. METHODS: This study included patients who underwent gastrectomy for primary gastric cancer following non-curative ESD with a positive vertical margin between January 2002 and December 2018. We classified the patients according to the positive vertical margin pattern into an obvious exposure group and a non-obvious exposure group. We developed a score model for predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) using factors selected by multivariate analyses and beta regression coefficients, and the incidence of LNM was evaluated. RESULTS: This study included 110 patients. LNM was detected in 17 patients (15%). We developed a predictive scoring system as follows: tumor size >30 mm (0, No; 1, Yes) + undifferentiated type tumor in the invasive front (0, No; 2, Yes) + depth of submucosal invasion > 1500 µm (0, No; 1, Yes) + obvious tumor exposure at the vertical margin (0, No; 1, Yes). In patients with 5 points, the incidence rates of all and group 2 LNM were as high as 60% and 40%, respectively. Conversely, in patients with fewer than 5 points, the incidence rates of all and group 2 LNM were just 11% and 5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with 5 points according to our score model for predicting LNM, gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection is recommended.

[Analysis on risk factors of positive vertical resection margin after endoscopic treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors].

Objective: To analyze the risk factors of positive vertical resection margin of the postoperative specimens after endoscopic treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Methods: A case-control study was performed. Clinical data of patients with rectal NET (G1) undergoing endoscopic treatment between January 2015 and June 2018 at the Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital were retrospectively collected. Inclusion criteria: cases underwent endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), whose mucosal specimens were pathologically confirmed as NET, and NET was confined to the rectum by nuclide imaging examination before endoscopic treatment. Those with incomplete clinical data or follow-up data were excluded. Resected specimen was fixed and sliced every 2 mm, and when tumor cells were found to infiltrate the vertical cutting edge, the positive vertical margin was defined. Associations of gender, age, resection method, tumor diameter, lesion morphology (nodular lesions, biopsy or post-treatment scar-like changes), mitotic figure, Ki-67 index, etc. and positive vertical margin were analyzed. Univariate analysis was performed using binary logistic analysis and multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression model. Results: A total of 133 patients with rectal NET were enrolled, including 93 males and 40 females, with an average age of (50.0±10.7) years. Sixty-four patients received EMR treatment and 3 patients (4.7%) had positive vertical margins. While 69 patients received ESD treatment and 13 (18.8%) had positive vertical margins. After endoscopic treatment, 16 cases (12.0%) were vertical positive margin, including 11 males and 5 females with an average age of (52.4±10.4) years. The lesion diameter was (9.0±4.7) mm. Univariate analysis showed that lesion diameter ≥10 mm (χ(2)=5.575, P=0.018) and scar-like changes (χ(2)=3.894, P=0.048) were significantly associated with positive vertical margin. Multivariate analysis showed that the lesion diameter ≥10 mm (OR=10.136, 95%CI: 2.114 to 48.591, P=0.004) was an independent risk factor for positive vertical margin of the specimen after endoscopic treatment of rectal NET. Conclusion: The diameter of rectal NET ≥10 mm indicates a high risk for positive vertical margin after endoscopic treatment.

Treatment Results of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection with a Ligation Device for Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Objective The vertical margin of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) removed by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is often tumor-positive. We examine the treatment results of endoscopic mucosal resection with a ligation device (EMR-L) for the removal of duodenal NETs located in the submucosal layer without metastasis. EMR-L can be performed with less technical skill, and the ligation device reduces the rate of positive vertical margin. Methods Ten consecutive patients with 10 duodenal NETs resected by EMR-L were enrolled. All of the lesions were located in the submucosal layer, were assessed to be free of metastasis, and were confirmed to be NETs pathologically by an endoscopic biopsy. The endoscopic results, pathological results, and prognosis were all examined. Results The en bloc resection rate and endoscopic complete resection rate were both 100%. Complete resection was achieved pathologically in 7 lesions (70.0%). The vertical margins were negative in all cases. Lymphatic vessel invasion was observed in three patients, all of whom underwent additional surgery with lymph node dissection (one of them also exhibited blood vessel invasion and a positive horizontal margin). No evidence of residual tumors or lymph node metastasis was observed in any of the patients. No recurrence was observed in any of the 10 patients (mean follow-up period: 18.6 months). One patient (10.0%) experienced intraoperative bleeding. Perforation occurred in 1 patient (10.0%), but the condition was managed well by conservative therapy. Conclusion EMR-L was an acceptable method for endoscopically resecting submucosal duodenal NETs, and the NETs resected by EMR-L were tumor-negative in the vertical margins.

Registro e controle de publicações seriadas pelo sistema de arquivamento com margem vertical visível (visirecord): experiência da catalogação retrospectiva da coleção do Instituto Adolfo Lutz / Registration and control of serials publications through the Visible Vertical Margin Filling System (Visirecord): an experience of retrospective cataloging of the Instituto Adolfo Lutz collection

Foi feita uma recatalogação das publicações seriadas na Biblioteca do Instituto Adolfo Lutz. O sistema adotado foi o de arquivamento com margem vertical visível (Visirecord) por ser de manuseio essencialmente prático e com características próprias para informações rápidas e precisas quanto à coleção de publicações seriadas. A catalogação da coleção foi retrospectiva e o tombamento dos volumes e das coleções foi feito durante este trabalho, pois a Biblioteca não tombava as suas publicações seriadas. Foi adotado o tombo em 2 livros separados - para coleção e volumes - por se tratar de patrimônio da Instituição. O trabalho, cuja duração foi de 2 anos, já aprovou completamente a aplicação do sistema vertical como catalogação auxiliar do bibliotecário. Suas finalidades principais refletem na aquisição, correspondência referente às publicações e ao acervo propriamente dito (AU).