The Role of Ileostomy in the Prevention and Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage after Elective Rectal Cancer Surgery - A Retrospective Analysis of Specific Risk Factors, Outcomes, and Complications.

Background: The objective of this paper is to highlight the role and place of ileostomy from the perspective of the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL). Materials and method: This was a retrospective study of 74 (46.54%) low and ultra-low anterior resections from 159 cases of rectal cancer operated on in a seven-year interval (2015 - 2021). The cases were divided into two groups: Group A with protective ileostomy (47 cases = 63.51%) and Group B without protective ileostomy (27 cases = 35.49%). Results: The type of anastomosis was low colorectal for 15 cases and ileorectal for two cases, both in Group A, with either mechanical or manual sutures. Continuous loop ileostomy was the only fecal diversion procedure used for protection. The ileostomy-specific complications recorded in Group A were peristomal skin lesions (8 cases), early peristomal hernia (2 cases), and severe dehydration with acute renal-insufficency (7 cases). The closure of the ileostomy was performed in 42 cases (89.36%), with the time between the primary operation and the closure being 4.28 months on average, with limits between 12 days and 10 months. AL treatment was conservative in 13 (76.47%) cases and surgical in four cases, with the types of operations performed at reintervention being take-down of the anastomosis + left terminal colostomy + ileostomy closure in three cases (2 in Group A and 1 in Group B) and terminal ileostomy in one case in Group A. Conclusions: To reduce its specific complications, ileostomy should be performed in well-selected patients. Those with risk factors for leakage include males, the elderly, and those having important comorbidities, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, low tumors below 5 cm from the anal verge, or complete circumferential stenosis and peritumoral inflammatory infiltrate.

Management of Anastomotic Leakage after Low Anterior Rectal Resections with Total Mesorectal Excision - A Retrospective Study.

Background: This study sought to investigate the diagnostic procedures, treatment modalities, and consequences of anastomotic leakage (AL) in low anterior resection rectal cancer patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 186 patients consecutively admitted and treated in the 1st Department of Surgery in Craiova, between January 2018 and June 2022, all of whom had undergone surgical interventions for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Among this cohort, 106 patients who had undergone scheduled low and ultralow anterior rectal resections with total mesorectal excision were selected for further analysis. Twenty-four patients were diagnosed with postoperative AL and underwent diverse management strategies based on the severity of their condition. Results: The study revealed an incidence of 22.6% for postoperative AL, with all of them being classified as grade B and C, according to the 2010 International Study Group of Rectal Cancer Classification, which were associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Notably, patients exhibited various comorbidities, including obesity, arterial hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and kidney failure. The management approach depended on the severity of the clinical presentation and the availability of treatment options. Early diagnosis and conservative management constituted the initial therapeutic strategy for grade B AL, with surgical reintervention or transanal vacuum therapy being used in grade C AL. Conclusions: The incidence and mortality associated with AF following low anterior resections were notably elevated. Grade B AL were successfully managed through conservative treatment, whereas grade C AL required either surgical reintervention for drainage or diversion procedures, or transanal vacuum therapy.

Safety of Anastomoses in Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer.

Introduction: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumor of the digestive system, the incidence of this cruel disease has been increasing at a constant rate. Materials and methods: 236 patients diagnosed with right colon cancer were retrospectively reviewed. For all patients included in this study, right hemicolectomy or extended right hemicolectomy with ileo-colonic anastomosis was performed. Patients were divided in two groups, as follows: study group including patients which developed anastomotic leakage, and control group including patients without anastomotic leak. There were compared clinical, surgical, postoperative and anastomotic leakage (AL) related data within the two groups.The study investigates possible risk and protective factors for developing anastomotic leakage, furthermore the relationship between anastomotic leakage and mortality was analyzed. Results: risk factors for AL as advanced age, tumors of the right 1/3 of transvers colon, emergencysurgery, mechanical suture, S-E anastomosis, late start of bowel motility were identified during the current research. S-S anastomotic technique were identified as protective factor in the development of fistula. Conclusion: According to the results of the present research, in right colon tumors S-S anastomotic technique should be used, being linked with the lowest chances of anastomotic leakage.

Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation Level in Rectal Cancer Surgery beyond Conventions: A Review.

Within the intricate field of rectal cancer surgery, the contentious debate over the optimal level of ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) persists as an ongoing discussion, influencing surgical approaches and patient outcomes. This narrative review incorporates historical perspectives, technical considerations, and functional as well as oncological outcomes, addressing key questions related to anastomotic leakage risks, genitourinary function, and oncological concerns, providing a more critical understanding of the well-known inconclusive evidence. Beyond the dichotomy of high versus low tie, it navigates the complexities of colorectal cancer surgery with a fresh perspective, posing a transformative question: "Is low tie ligation truly reproducible?" Considering a multidimensional approach that enhances patient outcomes by integrating the surgeon, patient, technique, and technology, instead of a rigid and categorical statement, we argued that a balanced response to this challenging question may require compromise.