Frequency and characteristics of severe relapse in giant cell arteritis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency and characteristics of severe relapse in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) in a real-life setting. METHODS: In a monocentric database of 530 patients, we retrospectively analysed patients who experienced at least one relapse and distinguished severe from nonsevere relapses. Severe relapse was defined by the occurrence of an ischaemic event (ophthalmologic, neurologic, digestive, limb ischaemia), the occurrence of an aortic complication (i.e. new or worsening of aortic dilation, aortic dissection), or new or worsening of vascular stenosis. RESULTS: From the cohort of 530 patients, 242 (45.7%) patients experienced relapse at least once, including 13 (2.5% of the cohort) who experienced severe relapse. Among the 464 recorded relapses, 14 (3% of all relapses) were severe. Severe relapse corresponded to the following vascular events: a peripheral limb ischaemia in 6 patients, a visual event in 3 patients (including 2 acute anterior ischaemic anterior neuropathies), an aortic complication in 3 patients, a mesenteric ischaemia in one patient and an ischaemic stroke in one patient.When compared with the 229 patients who experienced nonsevere relapses, severe relapse patients were younger at diagnosis (p= 0.02), more frequently showed limb claudication at baseline (p< 0.0001) and fewer GCA-related cranial signs (p< 0.0001). At diagnosis, more large-vessel vasculitis on imaging (82% vs 36%, p= 0.002) were observed in patients with severe relapse. The death rate did not differ between patients with severe and nonsevere relapses. CONCLUSION: In a real-life setting, relapse affects nearly half of GCA patients, but severe relapse is rare.

Natural history of the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement: risk factor analysis for late aortic complications after aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to clarify the natural history of the ascending aorta and to identify risk factors for late ascending aortic events after first isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: A total of 287 patients undergoing AVR were enrolled. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the diameter of the ascending aorta at the time of AVR, as determined by computed tomography: Group A (n = 233) was defined as an ascending aortic diameter <40 mm, and Group B (n = 54) was defined as an ascending aortic diameter ≥40 mm. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 7.6 years. The baseline diameter of the ascending aorta was 31.4 ± 4.8 mm in Group A and 44.7 ± 4.2 mm in Group B. These values increased to 35.9 ± 7.4 mm in Group A and 50.1 ± 7.3 mm in Group B during the follow-up period (P < 0.001). Ten patients had acute type A aortic dissection (Group A: 1 patient vs. Group B: 9 patients; P < 0.001), and three patients had enlargement of the ascending aorta to ≥55 mm in diameter (Group A: 1 patient vs. Group B: 2 patients). Multivariate analysis revealed that the baseline ascending aortic diameter was the only significant risk factor for developing late ascending aortic events (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: AVR alone may not prevent further enlargement of the ascending aorta. An ascending aorta ≥40 mm in diameter at the time of AVR increased the risk of late ascending aortic events.

Comparison of aortic media changes in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis versus bicuspid valve insufficiency and proximal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate aortic media changes in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) and simultaneous replacement of the proximal aorta for BAV stenosis vs BAV insufficiency. METHODS: Review of our institutional BAV database identified a subgroup of 79 consecutive BAV patients (mean age 52.3 ± 13 years, 81% men) with BAV stenosis or insufficiency and concomitant proximal aortic dilatation of ≥50 mm who underwent AVR and simultaneous replacement of proximal aorta from 1995 through 2005. All cases of BAV disease and concomitant ascending aortic dilatation of 40-50 mm underwent isolated AVR and therefore were excluded from this analysis. Proximal aortic media elastic fibre loss (EFL) was assessed (graded 0 to 3+) and compared between patients with BAV stenosis (Group I, n = 44) vs BAV insufficiency (Group II, n = 35). Follow-up (690 patient-years) was 100% complete and 9.1 ± 4.6 years long. RESULTS: Mean aortic media EFL was 1.3 ± 0.7 in Group I vs 2.5 ± 0.8 in Group II (P = 0.03). Moderate/severe EFL (i.e. defined as grade 2+/3+) was found in 13 patients (29%) in Group I vs 28 patients (80%) in Group II (P < 0.001). Logistic regression identified BAV insufficiency as the strongest predictor of moderate/severe EFL (OR 9.3; 95% CI 3.2-29.8, P < 0.001). Valve-related event-free survival was 64 ± 8% in Group I vs 93% ± 5% in Group II at 10 years postoperatively (P = 0.05). A total of 4 patients (5%, 3 from Group I and 1 from Group II) underwent redo aortic root surgery for prosthetic valve endocarditis during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BAV insufficiency and a proximal aorta of ≥50 mm have a significantly higher rate of moderate/severe EFL as compared to their counterparts with BAV stenosis.