Darolutamide does not interfere with OATP-mediated uptake of docetaxel.

The addition of darolutamide, an androgen receptor signalling inhibitor, to therapy with docetaxel has recently been approved as a strategy to treat metastatic prostate cancer. OATP1B3 is an SLC transporter that is highly expressed in prostate cancer and is responsible for the accumulation of substrates, including docetaxel, into tumours. Given that darolutamide inhibits OATP1B3 in vitro, we sought to characterise the impact of darolutamide on docetaxel pharmacokinetics. We investigated the influence of darolutamide on OATP1B3 transport using in vitro and in vivo models. We assessed the impact of darolutamide on the tumour accumulation of docetaxel in a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model and on an OATP1B biomarker in patients. Darolutamide inhibited OATP1B3 in vitro at concentrations higher than the reported Cmax. Consistent with these findings, in vivo studies revealed that darolutamide does not influence the pharmacokinetics of Oatp1b substrates, including docetaxel. Docetaxel accumulation in PDX tumours was not decreased in the presence of darolutamide. Metastatic prostate cancer patients had similar levels of OATP1B biomarkers, regardless of treatment with darolutamide. Consistent with a low potential to inhibit OATP1B3-mediated transport in vitro, darolutamide does not significantly impede the transport of Oatp1b substrates in vivo or in patients. Our findings support combined treatment with docetaxel and darolutamide, as no OATP1B3 transporter based drug-drug interaction was identified.

Berbamine targets cancer stem cells and reverses cabazitaxel resistance via inhibiting IGF2BP1 and p-STAT3 in prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a small subpopulation of tumor cells with the capability of self-renewal and drug resistance, leading to tumor progression and disease relapse. Our study aimed to investigate the antitumor effect of berbamine, extracted from berberis amurensis, on prostate CSCs. METHODS: Sphere formation was used to collect prostate CSCs. The viability, proliferation, invasion, migration, and apoptosis assays were used to evaluate the antitumor effect of berbamine on prostate CSCs. Prostate CSC markers were analyzed by flow cytometry and qRT-PCR. Small RNA sequencing analysis was conducted to analyse miRNAs. Exosomes were extracted using the ExoQuick-TC kit and verified by testing exosomal markers using western blot. RESULTS: Berbamine targets prostate CSCs. Additionally, berbamine enhanced the antitumor effect of cabazitaxel, a second-line chemotherapeutic drug for advanced prostate cancer, and re-sensitized Cabazitaxel-resistant PCa cells (CabaR-DU145) to cabazitaxel by inhibiting ABCG2, CXCR4, IGF2BP1, and p-STAT3. Berbamine enhanced the expression of let-7 miRNA family and miR-26b and influenced the downstream targets IGF2BP1 and p-STAT3, respectively. Silencing CXCR4 and ABCG2 downregulated the expression of IGF2BP1 and p-STAT3, respectively. Importantly, berbamine enhanced also levels of exosomal let-7 family and miR-26b, suggesting that berbamine possibly influences the expression of let-7 family and miR-26b through exosome delivery. Exosomes derived from berbamine-treated CabaR-DU145 cells re-sensitized the cells to cabazitaxel. CONCLUSION: Berbamine enhanced the toxic activity of cabazitaxel and reversed cabazitaxel resistance potentially through CXCR4/exosomal let-7/IGF2BP1 and ABCG2/exosomal miR-26b/p-STAT3 axes.

Interplay of Ritonavir-Boosted Oral Cabazitaxel with the Organic Anion-Transporting Polypeptide (OATP) Uptake Transporters and Carboxylesterase 1 in Mice.

Intravenously administered chemotherapeutic cabazitaxel is used for palliative treatment of prostate cancer. An oral formulation would be more patient-friendly and reduce the need for hospitalization. We therefore study determinants of the oral pharmacokinetics of cabazitaxel in a ritonavir-boosted setting, which reduces the CYP3A-mediated first-pass metabolism of cabazitaxel. We here assessed the role of organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs) in the disposition of orally boosted cabazitaxel and its active metabolites, using the Oatp1a/b-knockout and the OATP1B1/1B3-transgenic mice. These transporters may substantially affect plasma clearance and hepatic and intestinal drug disposition. The pharmacokinetics of cabazitaxel and DM2 were not significantly affected by Oatp1a/b and OATP1B1/1B3 activity. In contrast, the plasma AUC0-120 min of DM1 in Oatp1a/b-/- was 1.9-fold (p < 0.05) higher than that in wild-type mice, and that of docetaxel was 2.4-fold (p < 0.05) higher. We further observed impaired hepatic uptake and intestinal disposition for DM1 and docetaxel in the Oatp-ablated strains. None of these parameters showed rescue by the OATP1B1 or -1B3 transporters in the humanized mouse strains, suggesting a minimal role of OATP1B1/1B3. Ritonavir itself was also a potent substrate for mOatp1a/b, showing a 2.9-fold (p < 0.0001) increased plasma AUC0-120 min and 3.5-fold (p < 0.0001) decreased liver-to-plasma ratio in Oatp1a/b-/- compared to those in wild-type mice. Furthermore, we observed the tight binding of cabazitaxel and its active metabolites, including docetaxel, to plasma carboxylesterase (Ces1c) in mice, which may complicate the interpretation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic mouse studies. Collectively, these results will help to further optimize (pre)clinical research into the safety and efficacy of orally applied cabazitaxel.

Baseline characteristics may impact treatment duration of cabazitaxel in patients with mCRPC: a subanalysis of data from a post-marketing surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: Cabazitaxel has demonstrated improvements in overall survival among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the pivotal comparison clinical trials TROPIC, PROSELICA and CARD. However, these trials include mCRPC patients with similar characteristics, and there are limited data on how baseline characteristics affect treatment discontinuation in the patient population. METHODS: To assess individual factors that may impact the discontinuation rate of cabazitaxel treatment, we conducted a post hoc analysis of data from a nationwide all-case, post-marketing surveillance of cabazitaxel in Japan. Patients were grouped according to the number of cabazitaxel treatment cycles received (1-2 and ≥3 cycles). Predictive factors were identified through multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Across 660 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, 70.2% received ≥3 cycles of cabazitaxel treatment. Those receiving 1-2 cycles of cabazitaxel had a greater proportion of patients with poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, presence of lung and liver metastases, higher prostate-specific antigen level and prior radiation therapy at baseline. Regardless of the number of cabazitaxel cycles received, the primary reason for discontinuation was progression of disease rather than adverse events. Compared with those receiving 1-2 cycles, a lower proportion of patients receiving 3-10 and ≥11 cycles of cabazitaxel treatment experienced adverse events. Multivariate analysis showed a significant association between early discontinuation and presence of liver lesions, poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status and higher prostate-specific antigen level at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Post-marketing surveillance data suggest physicians should individualize cabazitaxel treatment based on certain patient characteristics at baseline.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis of G-CSF during chemotherapy for prostate cancer, Japanese clinical guideline for appropriate use of G-CSF: clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (DTX) is commonly used as a primary chemotherapy, and cabazitaxel (CBZ) has shown efficacy in patients who are DTX resistant. Primary prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy is currently used with CBZ treatment in routine clinical care in Japan. METHODS: In this study, we performed a systematic review following the Minds guidelines to investigate the effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF during chemotherapy for prostate cancer and to construct G-CSF guidelines for primary prophylaxis use during chemotherapy. A comprehensive literature search of various electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi) was performed on January 10, 2020, to identify studies published between January 1990 and December 31, 2019 that investigate the impact of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF during CBZ administration on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Ultimately, nine articles were included in the qualitative systematic review. Primary G-CSF prophylaxis during CBZ administration for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer was difficult to assess in terms of correlation with overall survival, mortality from infection, and patients' quality of life. These difficulties were owing to the lack of randomized controlled trials comparing patients with and without primary prophylaxis of G-CSF during CBZ administration. However, some retrospective studies have suggested that it may reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSION: G-CSF may be beneficial as primary prophylaxis during CBZ administration for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer, and we made a "weak recommendation to perform" with an annotation of the relevant regimen.

Transcriptomic analysis of plasma exosomes provides molecular information of response to cabazitaxel treatment in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer type and the second most common cancer-related cause of death in men. Cabazitaxel, a next-generation taxane, shows favorable toxicity profile and is effective in docetaxel-resistant tumors. Despite initial responses, in most cases, prostate cancer patients acquire resistance to cabazitaxel. There is a need to identify molecular markers that can monitor and predict treatment response. METHODS: We performed transcriptional exosome profiling (Human Transcriptome Array-HTA 2.0) from the plasma of 19 patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer at baseline and in patients after one cycle of cabazitaxel (C1). The patients were stratified in two groups (responders and nonresponders) according to their clinical response to cabazitaxel. Gene set enrichment analysis and ingenuity pathway analysis platforms were used for gene and pathway analysis. RESULTS: We detected molecular differences in the exosomes from two groups of patients (nonresponders vs. responders) at baseline in pathways related to prostate cancer, oncogenic signaling, cytoskeleton, and immune system. In nonresponders, we found enrichment of cytoskeleton related gene (Stathmin-1 and ITSN1) that have been associated with resistance to cabazitaxel. Monitoring of exosomal transcripts after the first cycle of treatment revealed changes in pathways associated with response to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential transcriptional profiling of plasma-derived exosomes reveals differential expression of genes that may reflect resistance to cabazitaxel treatment and therapy response.

KIF14 mediates cabazitaxel-docetaxel cross-resistance in advanced prostate cancer by promoting AKT phosphorylation.

Docetaxel is a first-line chemotherapy drug for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC); yet, some CRPC patients develop docetaxel drug resistance. Cabazitaxel is approved in the post-docetaxel treatment setting. However, recent studies suggested cross-resistance between the development of drug resistance and current treatments. In this study, we used docetaxel-resistant cell lines DU145/DTX50 and PC-3/DTX30 to measure the responses to cabazitaxel. Our findings demonstrated that docetaxel resistance could lead to cross-resistance to cabazitaxel. After docetaxel-resistant cells were treated with cabazitaxel, transcriptome analysis was performed, and the results were analyzed in combination with survival analysis and correlation analysis with Gleason score to screen the cross-resistance genes. The continuously increased expression of kinesin family member 14 (KIF14) was identified as the main cause of cross-resistance to cabazitaxel in docetaxel-resistant cells. Silencing the expression of KIF14 could restore the sensitivity of resistant PCa cells to docetaxel and cabazitaxel, attenuate proliferation and promote apoptosis of the resistant PCa cells. Notably, the depressed expression of KIF14 inhibited the phosphorylation of Akt located downstream. In summary, KIF14 mediates the cross-resistance between docetaxel and cabazitaxel, and targeting KIF14 could be an effective measurement for reversing docetaxel or cabazitaxel chemotherapy failure or enhancing the anti-tumor effects of docetaxel or cabazitaxel.

Real-world effectiveness of third-line cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: CARD-like analysis of data from a post-marketing surveillance in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The CARD trial was conducted in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who had received docetaxel and experienced disease progression within 1 year on an androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy (ARAT). Subsequent treatment with cabazitaxel had improved clinical outcomes compared with an alternative ARAT. This study aims to confirm the effectiveness of cabazitaxel in real-world patients in Japan and compare their characteristics with those of patients from the CARD trial. METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of a nationwide post-marketing surveillance registering all patients who were prescribed cabazitaxel in Japan between September 2014 and June 2015. Included patients had received docetaxel and ≤ 1 year of an ARAT (abiraterone or enzalutamide) prior to receiving cabazitaxel or an alternative ARAT, as their third-line therapy. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the time to treatment failure (TTF) of the third-line therapy. Patients were matched (1:1) from the cabazitaxel and second ARAT arms based on propensity score (PS). RESULTS: Of the 535 patients analysed, 247 received cabazitaxel and 288 the alternative ARAT as their third-line therapy, of which, 91.3% (n = 263/288) received abiraterone and 8.7% (n = 25/288) received enzalutamide as their second third-line ARAT. Patients in the cabazitaxel and second ARAT arms had TNM classification of M1 or MX in 73.3% and 68.1%, Gleason score of 8-10 in 78.5% and 79.2% and mean (standard deviation) serum PSA levels of 483 (1370) and 594 (1241) ng/mL, respectively. Initial cabazitaxel dose was ≤ 20 mg/m2 in 61.9% (n = 153/247) of the patients in the cabazitaxel arm. The median TTF (95% confidence interval [CI]) of the third-line therapy was 109 (94-128) days for cabazitaxel and 58 (57-66) days for the second ARAT, with a hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.339 (0.279-0.413) favouring cabazitaxel. Similar results were obtained after PS-matching, with a hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.323 (95% CI 0.258-0.402) favouring cabazitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the CARD trial, cabazitaxel demonstrated superior effectiveness over a second alternative ARAT in a real-world patient population in Japan, despite the population having more advanced disease status and a lower dose of cabazitaxel being more frequently administered, than in the CARD trial.

Enhancement of the Oral Availability of Cabazitaxel Using the Cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) Inhibitor Ritonavir in Mice.

There is currently great interest in developing oral taxanes due to their lower costs and greater patient friendliness. We here wanted to test whether oral ritonavir, a cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inhibitor, could boost the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of orally administered cabazitaxel (10 mg/kg) in male wild-type, Cyp3a-/-, and Cyp3aXAV (transgenic overexpression of human CYP3A4 in liver and intestine) mice. Ritonavir was initially administered at a dose of 25 mg/kg, but lower dosages of 10 and 1 mg/kg were also studied to assess the remaining amount of boosting, aiming to minimize possible side effects. Compared to the respective vehicle groups, plasma exposure of cabazitaxel (AUC0-24h) was enhanced 2.9-, 10.9-, and 13.9-fold in wild-type mice and 1.4-, 10.1-, and 34.3-fold in Cyp3aXAV mice by treatment with 1, 10, and 25 mg/kg ritonavir, respectively. Upon treatment with 1, 10, and 25 mg/kg of ritonavir, the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was increased by 1.4-, 2.3-, and 2.8-fold in wild-type mice, while it increased by 1.7-, 4.2-, and 8.0-fold in Cyp3aXAV mice, respectively. AUC0-24h and Cmax remained unchanged in Cyp3a-/-. Biotransformation of cabazitaxel to its active metabolites still took place when coadministered with ritonavir, but this process was delayed due to the Cyp3a/CYP3A4 inhibition. These data indicate that CYP3A is the primary limiting factor in the plasma exposure to cabazitaxel and that cabazitaxel oral bioavailability could be dramatically enhanced by coadministration of an effective CYP3A inhibitor such as ritonavir. These findings could be a starting point for the setup of a clinical study, which would be needed to verify the boosting of cabazitaxel by ritonavir in humans.

Intraperitoneal administration of cabazitaxel-loaded nanoparticles in peritoneal metastasis models.

Colorectal and ovarian cancers frequently develop peritoneal metastases with few treatment options. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has shown promising therapeutic effects, but is limited by rapid drug clearance and systemic toxicity. We therefore encapsulated the cabazitaxel taxane in poly(alkyl cyanoacrylate) (PACA) nanoparticles (NPs), designed to improve intraperitoneal delivery. Toxicity of free and encapsulated cabazitaxel was investigated in rats by monitoring clinical signs, organ weight and blood hematological and biochemical parameters. Pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and treatment response were evaluated in mice. Biodistribution was investigated by measuring both cabazitaxel and the 2-ethylbutanol NP degradation product. Drug encapsulation was shown to increase intraperitoneal drug retention, leading to prolonged intraperitoneal drug residence time and higher drug concentrations in peritoneal tumors. As a result, encapsulation of cabazitaxel improved the treatment response in two in vivo models bearing intraperitoneal tumors. Together, these observations indicate a strong therapeutic potential of NP-based cabazitaxel encapsulation as a novel treatment for peritoneal metastases.

The efficacy of sequential therapy with docetaxel and cabazitaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer: A retrospective multi-institutional study in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the efficacy of docetaxel (DOC) and cabazitaxel (CBZ) and examined the factors associated with the prognosis of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) receiving DOC-CBZ sequential treatment in Japanese real-world data. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data for 146 patients who received DOC followed by CBZ. The correlations of prostate specific antigen (PSA) decrease rate and time to progression between DOC and CBZ treatment were examined. Combined progression-free survival (PFS) of DOC-CBZ and overall survival (OS) from the initiation of DOC and the diagnosis of CRPC were evaluated and compared between patients with high and low PSA levels at the start of DOC and CBZ treatment. RESULTS: No correlations of PSA decrease rate and time to progression were observed between DOC and CBZ. The patients for whom DOC was started in higher PSA levels had significantly shorter combined PFS (p = 0.003) and OS from the initiation of DOC (p = 0.002). In patients who started DOC at high PSA levels, those who switched to CBZ at low PSA levels had longer OS than those who switched at high PSA levels (p = 0.048). The OS from CRPC of patients who started DOC at low PSA levels was significantly longer than those that started at high PSA levels (p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: For patients for whom DOC was not effective, sequential CBZ might have change to be effective. The PSA levels at the start of DOC and CBZ might be a potential prognostic biomarker.

Efficacy of cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A single-center study in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: Cabazitaxel is a next-generation taxane that can prolong overall survival after docetaxel treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, the efficacy of cabazitaxel varies among these patients. The clinical indicators of the prognosis after cabazitaxel treatment were analyzed. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who received cabazitaxel between February 2015 and June 2021 was performed. All patients had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prognostic factors for prostate-specific antigen progression-free and overall survival were analyzed by Cox proportional-hazards analysis and the log-rank test. RESULTS: The study comprised 57 patients who received cabazitaxel (median 4 cycles, range 1-27) at a starting dose of 15-25 mg/m2 . The median age and follow-up duration were 70 years and 9.2 months. The median prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.6 and 10.5 months, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that previous androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy before cabazitaxel treatment was the only significant risk factor (hazard ratio 2.784, p = 0.022) for prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival. Multivariate analysis for overall survival revealed that poor performance status (≥1) (hazard ratio 2.107, p = 0.039), low hemoglobin (hazard ratio 0.142, p = 0.010), and high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (hazard ratio 9.150, p = 0.032) at baseline were significantly associated with a poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Previous androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy was the only risk factor for biochemical progression. Poor performance status, anemia, and high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio were risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with cabazitaxel. These risk factors seem useful for identifying patients with survival benefit from cabazitaxel treatment.

ROS-Responsive Nanocomplex of aPD-L1 and Cabazitaxel Improves Intratumor Delivery and Potentiates Radiation-Mediated Antitumor Immunity.

Despite the promising benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in clinical cancer treatments, the therapeutic efficacy is largely restricted by low antitumor immunity and limited intratumor delivery in solid tumors. Herein, we designed a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-responsive albumin nanocomplex of antiprogrammed cell death receptor ligand 1 (aPD-L1) and cabazitaxel (RAN-PC), which exhibited prominent tumor accumulation and intratumor permeation in 4T1 tumors. Compared with the negative control, the RAN-PC + radiation treatment (RAN-PC+X) produced a 3.61- and 5.10-fold enhancement in CD3+CD8+ T cells and the interferon (IFN)-γ-expressing subtype, respectively, and notably reduced versatile immunosuppressive cells. Moreover, RAN-PC+X treatment resulted in notable retardation of tumor growth, with a 78.97% inhibition in a 4T1 breast tumor model and a 90.30% suppression in a CT-26 colon tumor model. Therefore, the ROS-responsive albumin nanocomplex offers an encouraging platform for ICIs with prominent intratumor delivery capacity for cancer immunotherapy.

STEAP1 Knockdown Decreases the Sensitivity of Prostate Cancer Cells to Paclitaxel, Docetaxel and Cabazitaxel.

The Six Transmembrane Epithelial Antigen of the Prostate 1 (STEAP1) protein has been indicated as an overexpressed oncoprotein in prostate cancer (PCa), associated with tumor progression and aggressiveness. Taxane-based antineoplastic drugs such as paclitaxel, docetaxel, or cabazitaxel, have been investigated in PCa treatment, namely for the development of combined therapies with the improvement of therapeutic effectiveness. This study aimed to evaluate the expression of STEAP1 in response to taxane-based drugs and assess whether the sensitivity of PCa cells to treatment with paclitaxel, docetaxel, or cabazitaxel may change when the STEAP1 gene is silenced. Thus, wild-type and STEAP1 knockdown LNCaP and C4-2B cells were exposed to paclitaxel, docetaxel or cabazitaxel, and STEAP1 expression, cell viability, and survival pathways were evaluated. The results obtained showed that STEAP1 knockdown or taxane-based drugs treatment significantly reduced the viability and survival of PCa cells. Relatively to the expression of proliferation markers and apoptosis regulators, LNCaP cells showed a reduced proliferation, whereas apoptosis was increased. However, the effect of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or cabazitaxel treatment was reversed when combined with STEAP1 knockdown. Besides, these chemotherapeutic drugs may stimulate the cell growth of PCa cells knocked down for STEAP1. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that STEAP1 expression levels might influence the response of PCa cells to chemotherapeutics drugs, indicating that the use of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or cabazitaxel may lead to harmful effects in PCa cells with decreased expression of STEAP1.

Influence of response to prior docetaxel on sensitivity to cabazitaxel in prostate cancer patients with PTEN alterations.

The purpose of this study was to investigate factors predicting the sensitivity to cabazitaxel therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted from chromosome 10 (PTEN) alterations. This single-institution, retrospective study included 12 mCRPC patients with PTEN alterations who had received cabazitaxel therapy. Five patients (41%) responded to cabazitaxel therapy with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level decline of ≥30% from baseline, and all of them had responded to prior docetaxel therapy with a PSA decline of ≥30%. None of the patients with a poor response to prior docetaxel therapy responded well to cabazitaxel therapy. Of the seven patients who did not respond to cabazitaxel and whose PSA declined from baseline was <30%, five (71%) were also refractory to prior docetaxel therapy. The PSA responses to docetaxel and cabazitaxel were significantly correlated (p = 0.027). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that progression-free survival (PFS) for cabazitaxel was significantly shorter for prior docetaxel nonresponders (3.3 versus 9.1 months, p = 0.028). Multivariate analysis revealed that a poor response to prior docetaxel (PSA decline < 30%) (hazard ratio [HR] = 6.382, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.172-34.750, p = 0.032) and baseline PSA of ≥20 ng/ml (HR = 33.584, 95% CI 2.332-483.671, p = 0.010) were independent prognostic factors for PFS with cabazitaxel therapy. These results demonstrate cross-resistance between docetaxel and cabazitaxel. The response to prior docetaxel therapy can influence the sensitivity to cabazitaxel therapy in mCRPC patients with PTEN alterations.

Circulating tumor cell gene expression and plasma AR gene copy number as biomarkers for castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with cabazitaxel.

BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel improves overall survival (OS) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients progressing after docetaxel. In this prospective study, we evaluated the prognostic role of CTC gene expression on cabazitaxel-treated patients and its association with plasma androgen receptor (AR) copy number (CN). METHODS: Patients receiving cabazitaxel 20 or 25 mg/sqm for mCRPC were enrolled. Digital PCR was performed to assess plasma AR CN status. CTC enrichment was assessed using the AdnaTest EMT-2/StemCell kit. CTC expression analyses were performed for 17 genes. Data are expressed as hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were fully evaluable. CTC expression of AR-V7 (HR=2.52, 1.24-5.12, p=0.011), AKR1C3 (HR=2.01, 1.06-3.81, p=0.031), AR (HR=2.70, 1.46-5.01, p=0.002), EPCAM (HR=3.75, 2.10-6.71, p< 0.0001), PSMA (HR=2.09, 1.19-3.66, p=0.01), MDK (HR=3.35, 1.83-6.13, p< 0.0001), and HPRT1 (HR=2.46, 1.44-4.18, p=0.0009) was significantly associated with OS. ALDH1 (OR=5.50, 0.97-31.22, p=0.05), AR (OR=8.71, 2.32-32.25, p=0.001), EPCAM (OR=7.26, 1.47-35.73, p=0.015), PSMA (OR=3.86, 1.10-13.50, p=0.035), MDK (OR=6.84, 1.87-24.98, p=0.004), and HPRT1 (OR=7.41, 1.82-30.19, p=0.005) expression was associated with early PD. AR CN status was significantly correlated with AR-V7 (p=0.05), EPCAM (p=0.02), and MDK (p=0.002) expression. In multivariable model, EPCAM and HPRT1 CTC expression, plasma AR CN gain, ECOG PS=2, and liver metastases and PSA were independently associated with poorer OS. In patients treated with cabazitaxel 20 mg/sqm, median OS was shorter in AR-V7 positive than negative patients (6.6 versus 14 months, HR=3.46, 1.47-8.17], p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline CTC biomarkers may be prognosticators for cabazitaxel-treated mCRPC patients. Cabazitaxel at lower (20 mg/sqm) dose was associated with poorer outcomes in AR-V7 positive patients compared to AR-V7 negative patients in a post hoc subgroup analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03381326 . Retrospectively registered on 18 December 2017.

Comprehensive analysis of the associations between clinical factors and outcomes by machine learning, using post marketing surveillance data of cabazitaxel in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate relationships between clinical outcomes and explanatory variables by network clustering analysis using data from a post marketing surveillance (PMS) study of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients. METHODS: The PMS was a prospective, multicenter, observational study of patients with metastatic, docetaxel-refractory CRPC treated with cabazitaxel in Japan after its launch in 2014. Graphical Markov (GM) model-based simulations and network clustering in 'R' package were conducted to identify correlations between clinical factors and outcomes. Factors shown to be associated with overall survival (OS) in the machine learning analysis were confirmed according to the clinical outcomes observed in the PMS. RESULTS: Among the 660 patients analyzed, median patient age was 70.0 years, and median OS and time-to-treatment failure (TTF) were 319 and 116 days, respectively. In GM-based simulations, factors associated with OS were liver metastases, performance status (PS), TTF, and neutropenia (threshold 0.05), and liver metastases, PS, and TTF (threshold 0.01). Factors associated with TTF were OS and relative dose intensity (threshold 0.05), and OS (threshold 0.01). In network clustering in 'R' package, factors associated with OS were number of treatment cycles, discontinuation due to disease progression, and TTF (threshold 0.05), and liver and lung metastases, PS, discontinuation due to adverse events, and febrile neutropenia (threshold 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analysis of patient subgroups demonstrated that visceral metastases and poor PS at baseline were associated with worse OS, while neutropenia or febrile neutropenia and higher number of cabazitaxel cycles were associated with better OS. CONCLUSIONS: Neutropenia may be a predictive factor for treatment efficacy in terms of survival. Poor PS and distant metastases to the liver and lungs were shown to be associated with worse outcomes, while factors related to treatment duration were shown to positively correlate with better OS.

Safety and survival of docetaxel and cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate real-world haematological toxicity, overall survival (OS) and the treatment characteristics of docetaxel and cabazitaxel chemotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective claims data study followed patients with mCRPC receiving cabazitaxel or docetaxel from their first chemotherapy infusion. Haematological toxicities were measured using treatment codes and inpatient diagnoses. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to identify OS predictors. RESULTS: Data from 539 patients administered docetaxel and 240 administered cabazitaxel were analysed. Regarding adverse events, within 8 months of treatment initiation, some kind of treatment for haematological toxicity was documented in 31% of patients given docetaxel and in 61% of patients given cabazitaxel. In the same period, hospitalization associated with haematological toxicity was documented in 11% of the patients in the docetaxel cohort and in 15% of the patients in the cabazitaxel cohort. In the docetaxel cohort, 9.9% of patients required reverse isolation and 13% were diagnosed with sepsis during hospitalization. In the cabazitaxel cohort, the cumulative incidence was 7.9% and 15%, respectively. The median OS was reached at 21.9 months in the docetaxel cohort and, because of a later line of therapy, at 11.3 months in the cabazitaxel cohort. A multivariate Cox regression revealed that indicators of locally advanced and metastatic disease, severe comorbidities, and prior hormonal/cytotoxic therapies were independent predictors of early death. CONCLUSION: Cabazitaxel patients face an increased risk of haematological toxicities during treatment. Together with their short survival time, this calls for a strict indication when using cabazitaxel in patients with mCRPC.

Immunotherapeutic role of cabazitaxel treatment in the activation of TLR3 signalling in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in vitro.

BACKGROUND: The activation of toll like receptors (TLR) potentially affect the inflammatory tumor microenvironment and thus is associated with tumor growth or inhibition. Cabazitaxel (CAB) has been effectively used for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, the immune regulatory role of CAB in the tumor microenvironment is not clear. In this context, we for the first time assessed the immunotherapeutic role of CAB in the TLR3 signalling following activation of Poly I:C in mCRPC cells. METHODS AND RESULTS: The cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of CAB with the induction of Poly I:C were determined by WST-1, Annexin V, acridine orange, RT-PCR analysis, ELISA assay and immunofluorescence staining in DU-145 mCRPC and HUVEC control cells. Our findings showed that CAB treatment with Poly I:C significantly suppressed the proliferation of DU-145 cells through the induction of apoptosis and caspase activation. Additionally, higher concentration of CAB mediated the activation of TLR3 via increased cytoplasmic and nuclear expression of TLR3, TICAM-1 and IRF-3 in mCRPC cells. CONCLUSIONS: Co-treatment of CAB and Poly I:C was more effective in mCRPC cells with less toxicity in control cells. However, further investigations are required to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of TLRs signalling upon CAB treatment at the molecular level to further validate the immunotherapeutic efficacy of CAB in mCRPC.

The synergistic anticancer effect of salinomycin combined with cabazitaxel in CD44+ prostate cancer cells by downregulating wnt, NF-κB and AKT signaling.

BACKGROUND: Tumor-initiating or cancer stem cells (CSCs) reduce the effectiveness of conventional therapy. Thus, it is crucial to eliminate CSCs while killing bulky cancer cells using a combination of conventional chemotherapy and anti-CSC drugs. Salinomycin is a selective inhibitor against CSCs and shows promise in combination applications. The aim of the study was to examine the efficacy of co-administered cabazitaxel and salinomycin on the survival of prostate cancer cells and CSCs. METHODS AND RESULTS: CD44 + stem cells were isolated from human PC3 prostate cancer cells by using magnetic activated cell sorting. The cells were concomitantly exposed to salinomycin and cabazitaxel, and the cell survival was determined by MTT test. Apoptosis was assessed by image-based cytometer, and cell migration was evaluated by wound healing assay. The expression of target mRNA and protein were assessed by RT-qPCR and Western blot, respectively. Combination index (CI) analysis showed that simultaneous administration of salinomycin and cabazitaxel was able to exert strong synergistic effect on CD44 + subpopulation (CI = 0.33), but no synergism was observed in PC3 cells. The combination of the two agents significantly increased Bax, cytochrome c, caspase-3 and - 8 mRNA expression in CD44 + CSCs, causing apoptosis. The applied therapy strategy strongly inhibited the phosphorylation of Akt, protein expression of Akt1, NF-κB and Wnt. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our data suggest that combining salinomycin with cabazitaxel shows promise as a prostate cancer treatment approach that can target CSCs.